Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights as a Basis for Standing
This Note proposes a novel solution to standing problems faced by environmental plaintiffs seeking to enforce, or to compel agencies to enforce, environmental regulation. It argues that environmental plaintiffs should be able to obtain standing to bring an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) review a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Yale journal on regulation 2012-01, Vol.29 (1), p.201-243 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 243 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 201 |
| container_title | Yale journal on regulation |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Evans, Danieli |
| description | This Note proposes a novel solution to standing problems faced by environmental plaintiffs seeking to enforce, or to compel agencies to enforce, environmental regulation. It argues that environmental plaintiffs should be able to obtain standing to bring an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) review action or a citizen suit based on ownership of private tradable environmental resource rights, created by increasingly popular environmental privatization These rights should operate as a basis for standing even for who would otherwise be unable to meet standing requirements of individual injury, causation, and redressability. Relying on tradable rights to environmental resources as a basis for standing in APA review actions or citizen suits would maximize the benefits of citizen participation while averting the concerns associated with broad grants of standing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022117167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607376151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p937-8a3504a8c666d65b2b721556b7f15572fe56d70208011e9882565c1457336d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj01LAzEURYMoOFb_Q3DlZiAfk7yMOy1VCwWldl8yM5kxZZrUJFPw35uiK1fCgwuXcx-cM1QwDrIUNRPnqCBQ0bKuBFyiqxh3hNAKAAoU5961wSSD34I96pxLl0wwMWHr8NoM06iTD1944XofWrM3Lt3jTdCdbkaT26MN3p1aPWY8-ilDeG2HjxSxzocfdbQR5zF-T9p11g3X6KLXYzQ3vzlDm6fFZv5Srl6fl_OHVXmoOZRKc0EqrVopZSdFwxpgVAjZQJ8DWG-E7IAwogilplaKCSlamhU5l53o-Azd_bw9BP85ZaPt3sbWjKN2xk9xSwljlAKV8A-UKFURKk7o7R90l51d9tjWDIQCpSj_Bma0clA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927587881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights as a Basis for Standing</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Evans, Danieli</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Danieli</creatorcontrib><description>This Note proposes a novel solution to standing problems faced by environmental plaintiffs seeking to enforce, or to compel agencies to enforce, environmental regulation. It argues that environmental plaintiffs should be able to obtain standing to bring an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) review action or a citizen suit based on ownership of private tradable environmental resource rights, created by increasingly popular environmental privatization These rights should operate as a basis for standing even for who would otherwise be unable to meet standing requirements of individual injury, causation, and redressability. Relying on tradable rights to environmental resources as a basis for standing in APA review actions or citizen suits would maximize the benefits of citizen participation while averting the concerns associated with broad grants of standing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-5925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Haven: Yale Journal on Regulation</publisher><subject>20th century ; Administrative Procedure Act-US ; Causality ; Citizen participation ; Citizens ; Concrete ; Enforcement ; Environmental protection ; Environmental regulations ; Failure ; grants ; Injuries ; Legislation ; Privatization ; Property rights ; Public interest ; Regulated industries ; Regulation ; Reviews ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Yale journal on regulation, 2012-01, Vol.29 (1), p.201-243</ispartof><rights>Copyright Yale University School of Law Winter 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Danieli</creatorcontrib><title>Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights as a Basis for Standing</title><title>Yale journal on regulation</title><description>This Note proposes a novel solution to standing problems faced by environmental plaintiffs seeking to enforce, or to compel agencies to enforce, environmental regulation. It argues that environmental plaintiffs should be able to obtain standing to bring an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) review action or a citizen suit based on ownership of private tradable environmental resource rights, created by increasingly popular environmental privatization These rights should operate as a basis for standing even for who would otherwise be unable to meet standing requirements of individual injury, causation, and redressability. Relying on tradable rights to environmental resources as a basis for standing in APA review actions or citizen suits would maximize the benefits of citizen participation while averting the concerns associated with broad grants of standing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Administrative Procedure Act-US</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>grants</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Regulated industries</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0741-9457</issn><issn>2376-5925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj01LAzEURYMoOFb_Q3DlZiAfk7yMOy1VCwWldl8yM5kxZZrUJFPw35uiK1fCgwuXcx-cM1QwDrIUNRPnqCBQ0bKuBFyiqxh3hNAKAAoU5961wSSD34I96pxLl0wwMWHr8NoM06iTD1944XofWrM3Lt3jTdCdbkaT26MN3p1aPWY8-ilDeG2HjxSxzocfdbQR5zF-T9p11g3X6KLXYzQ3vzlDm6fFZv5Srl6fl_OHVXmoOZRKc0EqrVopZSdFwxpgVAjZQJ8DWG-E7IAwogilplaKCSlamhU5l53o-Azd_bw9BP85ZaPt3sbWjKN2xk9xSwljlAKV8A-UKFURKk7o7R90l51d9tjWDIQCpSj_Bma0clA</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Evans, Danieli</creator><general>Yale Journal on Regulation</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights as a Basis for Standing</title><author>Evans, Danieli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p937-8a3504a8c666d65b2b721556b7f15572fe56d70208011e9882565c1457336d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Administrative Procedure Act-US</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>grants</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Regulated industries</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Danieli</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Yale journal on regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Danieli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights as a Basis for Standing</atitle><jtitle>Yale journal on regulation</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>201-243</pages><issn>0741-9457</issn><eissn>2376-5925</eissn><abstract>This Note proposes a novel solution to standing problems faced by environmental plaintiffs seeking to enforce, or to compel agencies to enforce, environmental regulation. It argues that environmental plaintiffs should be able to obtain standing to bring an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) review action or a citizen suit based on ownership of private tradable environmental resource rights, created by increasingly popular environmental privatization These rights should operate as a basis for standing even for who would otherwise be unable to meet standing requirements of individual injury, causation, and redressability. Relying on tradable rights to environmental resources as a basis for standing in APA review actions or citizen suits would maximize the benefits of citizen participation while averting the concerns associated with broad grants of standing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New Haven</cop><pub>Yale Journal on Regulation</pub><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0741-9457 |
| ispartof | Yale journal on regulation, 2012-01, Vol.29 (1), p.201-243 |
| issn | 0741-9457 2376-5925 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022117167 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | 20th century Administrative Procedure Act-US Causality Citizen participation Citizens Concrete Enforcement Environmental protection Environmental regulations Failure grants Injuries Legislation Privatization Property rights Public interest Regulated industries Regulation Reviews Studies U.S.A Violations |
| title | Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights as a Basis for Standing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concrete%20Private%20Interest%20in%20Regulatory%20Enforcement:%20Tradable%20Environmental%20Resource%20Rights%20as%20a%20Basis%20for%20Standing&rft.jtitle=Yale%20journal%20on%20regulation&rft.au=Evans,%20Danieli&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=201-243&rft.issn=0741-9457&rft.eissn=2376-5925&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2607376151%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927587881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |