Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from poultry to antifungal drugs - a comparative study of the disk diffusion, broth microdilution (M 38-A) and Etest® methods
The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from birds to available antifungal drugs using different in vitro assays - classical disk diffusion, Etest® and broth microdilution NCCLS/CLSI M 38-A. The study material consisted of about 2.000 swabs and sa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polish journal of veterinary sciences 2012-01, Vol.15 (1), p.125-133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 133 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Polish journal of veterinary sciences |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Tokarzewski, S. Ziółkowska, G. Nowakiewicz, A. |
description | The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from birds to available antifungal drugs using different in vitro assays - classical disk diffusion, Etest® and broth microdilution NCCLS/CLSI M 38-A. The study material consisted of about 2.000 swabs and samples from different species of birds. A. niger (n=10) was accounted for 6.81% of the total pool of strains isolated. Determinations were made for 13 antifungal drugs using the disk diffusion method. The A. niger exhibited high susceptibility to enilconazole, terbinafine, voriconazole, tioconazole and ketoconazole, low susceptibility to clotrimazole, miconazole and nystatin, and resistance to amphotericin B, itraconazole, pimaricin, fluconazole and 5-fluorocytosine. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for 9 antifungal drugs using the micromethod of duplicate serial dilutions in a liquid medium. A. niger strains were most susceptible to enilconazole and voriconazole. MIC ranged from 0.0625 to 0.5 μg/ml for enilconazole, with MIC90-0.5 μg/ml and MIC50-0.125 μg/ml. The corresponding values for voriconazole were 0.25-1 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B and terbinafine ranged from 0.5 to 4 μg/ml, while the values for the remaining drugs were highly varied. MIC was measured by the gradient diffusion method using Etest® for 5 antifungal drugs: amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole. By far the highest susceptibility was obtained in the case of voriconazole, with MIC ranging from 0.0625 to 1 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B ranged from 0.25 to 4 μg/ml, for itraconazole and ketoconazole ranging from 0.5 to 16 μg/ml. Methods available for this purpose are not always applicable in field conditions. The present results indicate that the Etest® technique, due to its high percentage of agreement with the M 38-A microdilution method, should find application in medical and veterinary practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/v10181-011-0123-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1021256954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2631164761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-27773c9e926874a0f46a64ce7f60a02cd422572a4673fe3eb0ad6bfe89dcc653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEokPhAdggi1WRCPgS28kKjUq5aFohxEhdWp7Yzrh14uBLYV6KF2DHk-HRlCIhsfBF1n--8_v8VfUUwVe44e3rGwRRi2qI9guTmt-rFphAWGNK-f1qgSikNeKcHFWPYryCkHWkZQ-rI4w5bAnji-rnlxx7PSe7sc6mHUg6JjsNwBuwjLMOg3UuRzDZQQcQU5B2isBG72TSCpjgRzD77FIopR7IKVmTp0E6oEIeIqiBBL0fZxlksje6ELLa7eFpq4Gy8bpsxuRo_fQSbIJPWzDaPnhlXU7lEZxcANLWyxcFrcDZ3t2vH2DUaetVfFw9MNJF_eT2PK7W787Wpx_q80_vP54uz-u-YTTVmJcJ9J3uMGt5I6FpmGRNr7lhUELcqwZjyrFsGCdGE72BUrGN0W2n-p5RclydHLBz8F9zcSBGW2bmnJy0z1EgiBGmrKNNkT7_R3rlc5iKOdF1BHHcdaiI0EFU_hlj0EbMwY4y7ApJ7HMVh1xFyVXscxW81Dy7BefNqNVdxZ8gi-DNQfBNuqSD0kPIu3L5a-C_cERR8V8I9YFgY9Lf7zrIcC0Kn1Pxed0I9HZ1yVcXK3FJfgMfW8S5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993172991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from poultry to antifungal drugs - a comparative study of the disk diffusion, broth microdilution (M 38-A) and Etest® methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tokarzewski, S. ; Ziółkowska, G. ; Nowakiewicz, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tokarzewski, S. ; Ziółkowska, G. ; Nowakiewicz, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from birds to available antifungal drugs using different in vitro assays - classical disk diffusion, Etest® and broth microdilution NCCLS/CLSI M 38-A. The study material consisted of about 2.000 swabs and samples from different species of birds. A. niger (n=10) was accounted for 6.81% of the total pool of strains isolated. Determinations were made for 13 antifungal drugs using the disk diffusion method. The A. niger exhibited high susceptibility to enilconazole, terbinafine, voriconazole, tioconazole and ketoconazole, low susceptibility to clotrimazole, miconazole and nystatin, and resistance to amphotericin B, itraconazole, pimaricin, fluconazole and 5-fluorocytosine. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for 9 antifungal drugs using the micromethod of duplicate serial dilutions in a liquid medium. A. niger strains were most susceptible to enilconazole and voriconazole. MIC ranged from 0.0625 to 0.5 μg/ml for enilconazole, with MIC90-0.5 μg/ml and MIC50-0.125 μg/ml. The corresponding values for voriconazole were 0.25-1 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B and terbinafine ranged from 0.5 to 4 μg/ml, while the values for the remaining drugs were highly varied. MIC was measured by the gradient diffusion method using Etest® for 5 antifungal drugs: amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole. By far the highest susceptibility was obtained in the case of voriconazole, with MIC ranging from 0.0625 to 1 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B ranged from 0.25 to 4 μg/ml, for itraconazole and ketoconazole ranging from 0.5 to 16 μg/ml. Methods available for this purpose are not always applicable in field conditions. The present results indicate that the Etest® technique, due to its high percentage of agreement with the M 38-A microdilution method, should find application in medical and veterinary practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1505-1773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2300-2557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/v10181-011-0123-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22708367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Versita</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antifungal Agents - pharmacology ; Aspergillus niger - drug effects ; Bacteriological Techniques - veterinary ; broth microdilution (M 38-A) method ; disk diffusion method ; Drug Resistance, Fungal ; Etest ; poultry ; Poultry - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Polish journal of veterinary sciences, 2012-01, Vol.15 (1), p.125-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Veterinary Sciences 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-27773c9e926874a0f46a64ce7f60a02cd422572a4673fe3eb0ad6bfe89dcc653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-27773c9e926874a0f46a64ce7f60a02cd422572a4673fe3eb0ad6bfe89dcc653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tokarzewski, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziółkowska, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowakiewicz, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from poultry to antifungal drugs - a comparative study of the disk diffusion, broth microdilution (M 38-A) and Etest® methods</title><title>Polish journal of veterinary sciences</title><addtitle>Pol J Vet Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from birds to available antifungal drugs using different in vitro assays - classical disk diffusion, Etest® and broth microdilution NCCLS/CLSI M 38-A. The study material consisted of about 2.000 swabs and samples from different species of birds. A. niger (n=10) was accounted for 6.81% of the total pool of strains isolated. Determinations were made for 13 antifungal drugs using the disk diffusion method. The A. niger exhibited high susceptibility to enilconazole, terbinafine, voriconazole, tioconazole and ketoconazole, low susceptibility to clotrimazole, miconazole and nystatin, and resistance to amphotericin B, itraconazole, pimaricin, fluconazole and 5-fluorocytosine. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for 9 antifungal drugs using the micromethod of duplicate serial dilutions in a liquid medium. A. niger strains were most susceptible to enilconazole and voriconazole. MIC ranged from 0.0625 to 0.5 μg/ml for enilconazole, with MIC90-0.5 μg/ml and MIC50-0.125 μg/ml. The corresponding values for voriconazole were 0.25-1 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B and terbinafine ranged from 0.5 to 4 μg/ml, while the values for the remaining drugs were highly varied. MIC was measured by the gradient diffusion method using Etest® for 5 antifungal drugs: amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole. By far the highest susceptibility was obtained in the case of voriconazole, with MIC ranging from 0.0625 to 1 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B ranged from 0.25 to 4 μg/ml, for itraconazole and ketoconazole ranging from 0.5 to 16 μg/ml. Methods available for this purpose are not always applicable in field conditions. The present results indicate that the Etest® technique, due to its high percentage of agreement with the M 38-A microdilution method, should find application in medical and veterinary practice.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Aspergillus niger - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - veterinary</subject><subject>broth microdilution (M 38-A) method</subject><subject>disk diffusion method</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Fungal</subject><subject>Etest</subject><subject>poultry</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><issn>1505-1773</issn><issn>2300-2557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEokPhAdggi1WRCPgS28kKjUq5aFohxEhdWp7Yzrh14uBLYV6KF2DHk-HRlCIhsfBF1n--8_v8VfUUwVe44e3rGwRRi2qI9guTmt-rFphAWGNK-f1qgSikNeKcHFWPYryCkHWkZQ-rI4w5bAnji-rnlxx7PSe7sc6mHUg6JjsNwBuwjLMOg3UuRzDZQQcQU5B2isBG72TSCpjgRzD77FIopR7IKVmTp0E6oEIeIqiBBL0fZxlksje6ELLa7eFpq4Gy8bpsxuRo_fQSbIJPWzDaPnhlXU7lEZxcANLWyxcFrcDZ3t2vH2DUaetVfFw9MNJF_eT2PK7W787Wpx_q80_vP54uz-u-YTTVmJcJ9J3uMGt5I6FpmGRNr7lhUELcqwZjyrFsGCdGE72BUrGN0W2n-p5RclydHLBz8F9zcSBGW2bmnJy0z1EgiBGmrKNNkT7_R3rlc5iKOdF1BHHcdaiI0EFU_hlj0EbMwY4y7ApJ7HMVh1xFyVXscxW81Dy7BefNqNVdxZ8gi-DNQfBNuqSD0kPIu3L5a-C_cERR8V8I9YFgY9Lf7zrIcC0Kn1Pxed0I9HZ1yVcXK3FJfgMfW8S5</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Tokarzewski, S.</creator><creator>Ziółkowska, G.</creator><creator>Nowakiewicz, A.</creator><general>Versita</general><general>Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Veterinary Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from poultry to antifungal drugs - a comparative study of the disk diffusion, broth microdilution (M 38-A) and Etest® methods</title><author>Tokarzewski, S. ; Ziółkowska, G. ; Nowakiewicz, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-27773c9e926874a0f46a64ce7f60a02cd422572a4673fe3eb0ad6bfe89dcc653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Aspergillus niger - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - veterinary</topic><topic>broth microdilution (M 38-A) method</topic><topic>disk diffusion method</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Fungal</topic><topic>Etest</topic><topic>poultry</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tokarzewski, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziółkowska, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowakiewicz, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Polish journal of veterinary sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tokarzewski, S.</au><au>Ziółkowska, G.</au><au>Nowakiewicz, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from poultry to antifungal drugs - a comparative study of the disk diffusion, broth microdilution (M 38-A) and Etest® methods</atitle><jtitle>Polish journal of veterinary sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Pol J Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>125-133</pages><issn>1505-1773</issn><eissn>2300-2557</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from birds to available antifungal drugs using different in vitro assays - classical disk diffusion, Etest® and broth microdilution NCCLS/CLSI M 38-A. The study material consisted of about 2.000 swabs and samples from different species of birds. A. niger (n=10) was accounted for 6.81% of the total pool of strains isolated. Determinations were made for 13 antifungal drugs using the disk diffusion method. The A. niger exhibited high susceptibility to enilconazole, terbinafine, voriconazole, tioconazole and ketoconazole, low susceptibility to clotrimazole, miconazole and nystatin, and resistance to amphotericin B, itraconazole, pimaricin, fluconazole and 5-fluorocytosine. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for 9 antifungal drugs using the micromethod of duplicate serial dilutions in a liquid medium. A. niger strains were most susceptible to enilconazole and voriconazole. MIC ranged from 0.0625 to 0.5 μg/ml for enilconazole, with MIC90-0.5 μg/ml and MIC50-0.125 μg/ml. The corresponding values for voriconazole were 0.25-1 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B and terbinafine ranged from 0.5 to 4 μg/ml, while the values for the remaining drugs were highly varied. MIC was measured by the gradient diffusion method using Etest® for 5 antifungal drugs: amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole. By far the highest susceptibility was obtained in the case of voriconazole, with MIC ranging from 0.0625 to 1 μg/ml. MIC for amphotericin B ranged from 0.25 to 4 μg/ml, for itraconazole and ketoconazole ranging from 0.5 to 16 μg/ml. Methods available for this purpose are not always applicable in field conditions. The present results indicate that the Etest® technique, due to its high percentage of agreement with the M 38-A microdilution method, should find application in medical and veterinary practice.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Versita</pub><pmid>22708367</pmid><doi>10.2478/v10181-011-0123-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1505-1773 |
ispartof | Polish journal of veterinary sciences, 2012-01, Vol.15 (1), p.125-133 |
issn | 1505-1773 2300-2557 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1021256954 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Antifungal Agents - pharmacology Aspergillus niger - drug effects Bacteriological Techniques - veterinary broth microdilution (M 38-A) method disk diffusion method Drug Resistance, Fungal Etest poultry Poultry - microbiology |
title | Susceptibility testing of Aspergillus niger strains isolated from poultry to antifungal drugs - a comparative study of the disk diffusion, broth microdilution (M 38-A) and Etest® methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20testing%20of%20Aspergillus%20niger%20strains%20isolated%20from%20poultry%20to%20antifungal%20drugs%20-%20a%20comparative%20study%20of%20the%20disk%20diffusion,%20broth%20microdilution%20(M%2038-A)%20and%20Etest%C2%AE%20methods&rft.jtitle=Polish%20journal%20of%20veterinary%20sciences&rft.au=Tokarzewski,%20S.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=125-133&rft.issn=1505-1773&rft.eissn=2300-2557&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/v10181-011-0123-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2631164761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993172991&rft_id=info:pmid/22708367&rfr_iscdi=true |