Cost function analysis for solid waste management: a developing country experience
The need for improved cost planning methods for solid waste management (SWM) is particularly strong in emerging economies where problems are severe, expectations for improvements are high, but finances are constrained. Estimating cost functions is suggested as an improved cost planning method. The r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management & research 2012-05, Vol.30 (5), p.485-491 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 491 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 485 |
container_title | Waste management & research |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Parthan, Shantha R Milke, Mark W Wilson, David C Cocks, John H |
description | The need for improved cost planning methods for solid waste management (SWM) is particularly strong in emerging economies where problems are severe, expectations for improvements are high, but finances are constrained. Estimating cost functions is suggested as an improved cost planning method. The research uses 1999 data from 298 Indian municipalities, covering over 140 million people. Stepwise multiple regression involving eight predictor variables was conducted on costs to detect any statistically significant correlations. The average costs on either a per tonne or per capita basis are most influenced by the total number of staff employed per capita or per tonne. The results are believed to be due to labour costs being such a high fraction of total costs in developing countries. Due to high variability in labour intensity between municipalities the data showed no clear correlation between per tonne or per capita costs and population, indicating no economy-of-scale. The data used here are subject to significant conjecture over their quality and age; however, the unique nature of the study should help future researchers investigating costs in emerging economies |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0734242X11425565 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020858274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0734242X11425565</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1020858274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-373f673e555e9db5419b59648b69bfe755b5aabcdf9e8453fd8a3cd0d52f48983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOj72riTgxk01zyZxJ4MvEARRcFfS9kYqbTMmrTr_3owzigiCq7s43z2Xew5C-5QcU6rUCVFcMMEeKRVMylyuoQklJs94npt1NFnI2ULfQtsxPhNChBZkE20xRjTlykzQ3dTHAbuxr4bG99j2tp3HJmLnA46-bWr8ZuMAuEvKE3TQD6fY4hpeofWzpn_ClR_7IcwxvM8gNNBXsIs2nG0j7K3mDnq4OL-fXmU3t5fX07ObrOJGDxlX3OWKg5QSTF1KQU0pTS50mZvSgZKylNaWVe0MaCG5q7XlVU1qyZzQRvMddLT0nQX_MkIciq6JFbSt7cGPsaAkfSk1U-IfKJVK5kaThB7-Qp_9GFIsn5RhXFPFEkWWVBV8jAFcMQtNZ8M8QcWimuJ3NWnlYGU8lh3U3wtfXSQgWwIxJf3z6h-GHyrrlYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019238172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost function analysis for solid waste management: a developing country experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Parthan, Shantha R ; Milke, Mark W ; Wilson, David C ; Cocks, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Parthan, Shantha R ; Milke, Mark W ; Wilson, David C ; Cocks, John H</creatorcontrib><description>The need for improved cost planning methods for solid waste management (SWM) is particularly strong in emerging economies where problems are severe, expectations for improvements are high, but finances are constrained. Estimating cost functions is suggested as an improved cost planning method. The research uses 1999 data from 298 Indian municipalities, covering over 140 million people. Stepwise multiple regression involving eight predictor variables was conducted on costs to detect any statistically significant correlations. The average costs on either a per tonne or per capita basis are most influenced by the total number of staff employed per capita or per tonne. The results are believed to be due to labour costs being such a high fraction of total costs in developing countries. Due to high variability in labour intensity between municipalities the data showed no clear correlation between per tonne or per capita costs and population, indicating no economy-of-scale. The data used here are subject to significant conjecture over their quality and age; however, the unique nature of the study should help future researchers investigating costs in emerging economies</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-242X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-3669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0734242X11425565</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22081379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cost structure ; Costs ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Developing Countries ; Emerging markets ; India ; LDCs ; Municipal solid waste ; Per capita ; Regression Analysis ; Studies ; Waste disposal ; Waste Management</subject><ispartof>Waste management & research, 2012-05, Vol.30 (5), p.485-491</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. May 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-373f673e555e9db5419b59648b69bfe755b5aabcdf9e8453fd8a3cd0d52f48983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-373f673e555e9db5419b59648b69bfe755b5aabcdf9e8453fd8a3cd0d52f48983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0734242X11425565$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0734242X11425565$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parthan, Shantha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milke, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocks, John H</creatorcontrib><title>Cost function analysis for solid waste management: a developing country experience</title><title>Waste management & research</title><addtitle>Waste Manag Res</addtitle><description>The need for improved cost planning methods for solid waste management (SWM) is particularly strong in emerging economies where problems are severe, expectations for improvements are high, but finances are constrained. Estimating cost functions is suggested as an improved cost planning method. The research uses 1999 data from 298 Indian municipalities, covering over 140 million people. Stepwise multiple regression involving eight predictor variables was conducted on costs to detect any statistically significant correlations. The average costs on either a per tonne or per capita basis are most influenced by the total number of staff employed per capita or per tonne. The results are believed to be due to labour costs being such a high fraction of total costs in developing countries. Due to high variability in labour intensity between municipalities the data showed no clear correlation between per tonne or per capita costs and population, indicating no economy-of-scale. The data used here are subject to significant conjecture over their quality and age; however, the unique nature of the study should help future researchers investigating costs in emerging economies</description><subject>Cost structure</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Municipal solid waste</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste Management</subject><issn>0734-242X</issn><issn>1096-3669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOj72riTgxk01zyZxJ4MvEARRcFfS9kYqbTMmrTr_3owzigiCq7s43z2Xew5C-5QcU6rUCVFcMMEeKRVMylyuoQklJs94npt1NFnI2ULfQtsxPhNChBZkE20xRjTlykzQ3dTHAbuxr4bG99j2tp3HJmLnA46-bWr8ZuMAuEvKE3TQD6fY4hpeofWzpn_ClR_7IcwxvM8gNNBXsIs2nG0j7K3mDnq4OL-fXmU3t5fX07ObrOJGDxlX3OWKg5QSTF1KQU0pTS50mZvSgZKylNaWVe0MaCG5q7XlVU1qyZzQRvMddLT0nQX_MkIciq6JFbSt7cGPsaAkfSk1U-IfKJVK5kaThB7-Qp_9GFIsn5RhXFPFEkWWVBV8jAFcMQtNZ8M8QcWimuJ3NWnlYGU8lh3U3wtfXSQgWwIxJf3z6h-GHyrrlYU</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Parthan, Shantha R</creator><creator>Milke, Mark W</creator><creator>Wilson, David C</creator><creator>Cocks, John H</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Cost function analysis for solid waste management: a developing country experience</title><author>Parthan, Shantha R ; Milke, Mark W ; Wilson, David C ; Cocks, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-373f673e555e9db5419b59648b69bfe755b5aabcdf9e8453fd8a3cd0d52f48983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cost structure</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Municipal solid waste</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parthan, Shantha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milke, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocks, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management & research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parthan, Shantha R</au><au>Milke, Mark W</au><au>Wilson, David C</au><au>Cocks, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost function analysis for solid waste management: a developing country experience</atitle><jtitle>Waste management & research</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag Res</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>485-491</pages><issn>0734-242X</issn><eissn>1096-3669</eissn><abstract>The need for improved cost planning methods for solid waste management (SWM) is particularly strong in emerging economies where problems are severe, expectations for improvements are high, but finances are constrained. Estimating cost functions is suggested as an improved cost planning method. The research uses 1999 data from 298 Indian municipalities, covering over 140 million people. Stepwise multiple regression involving eight predictor variables was conducted on costs to detect any statistically significant correlations. The average costs on either a per tonne or per capita basis are most influenced by the total number of staff employed per capita or per tonne. The results are believed to be due to labour costs being such a high fraction of total costs in developing countries. Due to high variability in labour intensity between municipalities the data showed no clear correlation between per tonne or per capita costs and population, indicating no economy-of-scale. The data used here are subject to significant conjecture over their quality and age; however, the unique nature of the study should help future researchers investigating costs in emerging economies</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22081379</pmid><doi>10.1177/0734242X11425565</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-242X |
ispartof | Waste management & research, 2012-05, Vol.30 (5), p.485-491 |
issn | 0734-242X 1096-3669 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020858274 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Cost structure Costs Costs and Cost Analysis Developing Countries Emerging markets India LDCs Municipal solid waste Per capita Regression Analysis Studies Waste disposal Waste Management |
title | Cost function analysis for solid waste management: a developing country experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20function%20analysis%20for%20solid%20waste%20management:%20a%20developing%20country%20experience&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20&%20research&rft.au=Parthan,%20Shantha%20R&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=485-491&rft.issn=0734-242X&rft.eissn=1096-3669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0734242X11425565&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020858274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019238172&rft_id=info:pmid/22081379&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0734242X11425565&rfr_iscdi=true |