Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric environment (1994) 2012-07, Vol.54, p.511-518 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 511 |
container_title | Atmospheric environment (1994) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Cleveland, M.J. Ziemba, L.D. Griffin, R.J. Dibb, J.E. Anderson, C.H. Lefer, B. Rappenglück, B. |
description | Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established.
► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020856786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231012002099</els_id><sourcerecordid>1020856786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2KFDEURgtRcBx9Ba2N4Kbam6SqUtkpzfgDAy501uF2ctOmqUraJDXQPr1pema2QiAJnO_my2matww2DNj48bDBssRM4X7DgfEN1CX7Z80Vm6To-NT3z-tZDLzjgsHL5lXOBwAQUsmrpmx_Y0JTKPm_WHwMbXTtmnYYWqQUc5zbNfuwf7otmHObj2RKiguVdGox2PaYYqnZsJqZMFVoH6h40ybKMWAw9BjJJh5Pr5sXDudMbx726-buy82v7bfu9sfX79vPt50RSpVuNw1oCK0bDA7GAZtwZwRTI1cO7YhKjAqkFY5bBcoNTFkzGct6GEwvrBLXzYfL3Frvz0q56MVnQ_OMgeKaNQMO0zDKaazoeEFN7ZgTOX1MfsF0qpA-a9YH_ahZnzVrqEv2Nfj-4Q3MBmeX6m99fkrzEZgcJavcuwvnMGrcp8rc_ayDBgCmpl6c2366EFSV3HtKOhtP1Z31qbrTNvr_lfkHgiqkNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020856786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cleveland, M.J. ; Ziemba, L.D. ; Griffin, R.J. ; Dibb, J.E. ; Anderson, C.H. ; Lefer, B. ; Rappenglück, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M.J. ; Ziemba, L.D. ; Griffin, R.J. ; Dibb, J.E. ; Anderson, C.H. ; Lefer, B. ; Rappenglück, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established.
► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosol mass spectrometer ; Aerosols ; air quality ; Aircraft components ; Applied sciences ; atmospheric chemistry ; Atmospheric pollution ; biomass ; burning ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fingerprints ; Houston ; Mass spectrometers ; mass spectrometry ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ; Organic aerosol ; Organic materials ; Oxidation ; particulates ; Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution ; Pollution ; Quadrupoles ; Spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2012-07, Vol.54, p.511-518</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26017671$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziemba, L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappenglück, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established.
► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.</description><subject>Aerosol mass spectrometer</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Aircraft components</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>burning</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fingerprints</subject><subject>Houston</subject><subject>Mass spectrometers</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</subject><subject>Organic aerosol</subject><subject>Organic materials</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>particulates</subject><subject>Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Quadrupoles</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM2KFDEURgtRcBx9Ba2N4Kbam6SqUtkpzfgDAy501uF2ctOmqUraJDXQPr1pema2QiAJnO_my2matww2DNj48bDBssRM4X7DgfEN1CX7Z80Vm6To-NT3z-tZDLzjgsHL5lXOBwAQUsmrpmx_Y0JTKPm_WHwMbXTtmnYYWqQUc5zbNfuwf7otmHObj2RKiguVdGox2PaYYqnZsJqZMFVoH6h40ybKMWAw9BjJJh5Pr5sXDudMbx726-buy82v7bfu9sfX79vPt50RSpVuNw1oCK0bDA7GAZtwZwRTI1cO7YhKjAqkFY5bBcoNTFkzGct6GEwvrBLXzYfL3Frvz0q56MVnQ_OMgeKaNQMO0zDKaazoeEFN7ZgTOX1MfsF0qpA-a9YH_ahZnzVrqEv2Nfj-4Q3MBmeX6m99fkrzEZgcJavcuwvnMGrcp8rc_ayDBgCmpl6c2366EFSV3HtKOhtP1Z31qbrTNvr_lfkHgiqkNg</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Cleveland, M.J.</creator><creator>Ziemba, L.D.</creator><creator>Griffin, R.J.</creator><creator>Dibb, J.E.</creator><creator>Anderson, C.H.</creator><creator>Lefer, B.</creator><creator>Rappenglück, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</title><author>Cleveland, M.J. ; Ziemba, L.D. ; Griffin, R.J. ; Dibb, J.E. ; Anderson, C.H. ; Lefer, B. ; Rappenglück, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aerosol mass spectrometer</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Aircraft components</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>burning</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fingerprints</topic><topic>Houston</topic><topic>Mass spectrometers</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</topic><topic>Organic aerosol</topic><topic>Organic materials</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>particulates</topic><topic>Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Quadrupoles</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziemba, L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappenglück, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cleveland, M.J.</au><au>Ziemba, L.D.</au><au>Griffin, R.J.</au><au>Dibb, J.E.</au><au>Anderson, C.H.</au><au>Lefer, B.</au><au>Rappenglück, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>54</volume><spage>511</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>511-518</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established.
► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-2310 |
ispartof | Atmospheric environment (1994), 2012-07, Vol.54, p.511-518 |
issn | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020856786 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aerosol mass spectrometer Aerosols air quality Aircraft components Applied sciences atmospheric chemistry Atmospheric pollution biomass burning Exact sciences and technology Fingerprints Houston Mass spectrometers mass spectrometry Nuclear magnetic resonance Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Organic aerosol Organic materials Oxidation particulates Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution Pollution Quadrupoles Spectroscopy |
title | Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20urban%20aerosol%20using%20aerosol%20mass%20spectrometry%20and%20proton%20nuclear%20magnetic%20resonance%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Cleveland,%20M.J.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=54&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=511-518&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020856786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020856786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231012002099&rfr_iscdi=true |