Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2012-07, Vol.54, p.511-518
Hauptverfasser: Cleveland, M.J., Ziemba, L.D., Griffin, R.J., Dibb, J.E., Anderson, C.H., Lefer, B., Rappenglück, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue
container_start_page 511
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 54
creator Cleveland, M.J.
Ziemba, L.D.
Griffin, R.J.
Dibb, J.E.
Anderson, C.H.
Lefer, B.
Rappenglück, B.
description Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established. ► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020856786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231012002099</els_id><sourcerecordid>1020856786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2KFDEURgtRcBx9Ba2N4Kbam6SqUtkpzfgDAy501uF2ctOmqUraJDXQPr1pema2QiAJnO_my2matww2DNj48bDBssRM4X7DgfEN1CX7Z80Vm6To-NT3z-tZDLzjgsHL5lXOBwAQUsmrpmx_Y0JTKPm_WHwMbXTtmnYYWqQUc5zbNfuwf7otmHObj2RKiguVdGox2PaYYqnZsJqZMFVoH6h40ybKMWAw9BjJJh5Pr5sXDudMbx726-buy82v7bfu9sfX79vPt50RSpVuNw1oCK0bDA7GAZtwZwRTI1cO7YhKjAqkFY5bBcoNTFkzGct6GEwvrBLXzYfL3Frvz0q56MVnQ_OMgeKaNQMO0zDKaazoeEFN7ZgTOX1MfsF0qpA-a9YH_ahZnzVrqEv2Nfj-4Q3MBmeX6m99fkrzEZgcJavcuwvnMGrcp8rc_ayDBgCmpl6c2366EFSV3HtKOhtP1Z31qbrTNvr_lfkHgiqkNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020856786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cleveland, M.J. ; Ziemba, L.D. ; Griffin, R.J. ; Dibb, J.E. ; Anderson, C.H. ; Lefer, B. ; Rappenglück, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M.J. ; Ziemba, L.D. ; Griffin, R.J. ; Dibb, J.E. ; Anderson, C.H. ; Lefer, B. ; Rappenglück, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established. ► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosol mass spectrometer ; Aerosols ; air quality ; Aircraft components ; Applied sciences ; atmospheric chemistry ; Atmospheric pollution ; biomass ; burning ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fingerprints ; Houston ; Mass spectrometers ; mass spectrometry ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ; Organic aerosol ; Organic materials ; Oxidation ; particulates ; Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution ; Pollution ; Quadrupoles ; Spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2012-07, Vol.54, p.511-518</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26017671$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziemba, L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappenglück, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established. ► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.</description><subject>Aerosol mass spectrometer</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Aircraft components</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>burning</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fingerprints</subject><subject>Houston</subject><subject>Mass spectrometers</subject><subject>mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</subject><subject>Organic aerosol</subject><subject>Organic materials</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>particulates</subject><subject>Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Quadrupoles</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM2KFDEURgtRcBx9Ba2N4Kbam6SqUtkpzfgDAy501uF2ctOmqUraJDXQPr1pema2QiAJnO_my2matww2DNj48bDBssRM4X7DgfEN1CX7Z80Vm6To-NT3z-tZDLzjgsHL5lXOBwAQUsmrpmx_Y0JTKPm_WHwMbXTtmnYYWqQUc5zbNfuwf7otmHObj2RKiguVdGox2PaYYqnZsJqZMFVoH6h40ybKMWAw9BjJJh5Pr5sXDudMbx726-buy82v7bfu9sfX79vPt50RSpVuNw1oCK0bDA7GAZtwZwRTI1cO7YhKjAqkFY5bBcoNTFkzGct6GEwvrBLXzYfL3Frvz0q56MVnQ_OMgeKaNQMO0zDKaazoeEFN7ZgTOX1MfsF0qpA-a9YH_ahZnzVrqEv2Nfj-4Q3MBmeX6m99fkrzEZgcJavcuwvnMGrcp8rc_ayDBgCmpl6c2366EFSV3HtKOhtP1Z31qbrTNvr_lfkHgiqkNg</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Cleveland, M.J.</creator><creator>Ziemba, L.D.</creator><creator>Griffin, R.J.</creator><creator>Dibb, J.E.</creator><creator>Anderson, C.H.</creator><creator>Lefer, B.</creator><creator>Rappenglück, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</title><author>Cleveland, M.J. ; Ziemba, L.D. ; Griffin, R.J. ; Dibb, J.E. ; Anderson, C.H. ; Lefer, B. ; Rappenglück, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b85aceadf5ca5cf018abc319629fad6a936907d3f2d909f519dc8cd1405c43d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aerosol mass spectrometer</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Aircraft components</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>burning</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fingerprints</topic><topic>Houston</topic><topic>Mass spectrometers</topic><topic>mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</topic><topic>Organic aerosol</topic><topic>Organic materials</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>particulates</topic><topic>Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Quadrupoles</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziemba, L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefer, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappenglück, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cleveland, M.J.</au><au>Ziemba, L.D.</au><au>Griffin, R.J.</au><au>Dibb, J.E.</au><au>Anderson, C.H.</au><au>Lefer, B.</au><au>Rappenglück, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>54</volume><spage>511</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>511-518</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Particulate matter was measured during August and September of 2006 in Houston as part of the Texas Air Quality Study II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project. Aerosol size and composition were determined using an Aerodyne quadrupole aerosol mass spectrometer. Aerosol was dominated by sulfate (4.1 ± 2.6 μg m−3) and organic material (5.5 ± 4.0 μg m−3), with contributions of organic material from both primary (∼32%) and secondary (∼68%) sources. Secondary organic aerosol appears to be formed locally. In addition, 29 aerosol filter samples were analyzed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy to determine relative concentrations of organic functional groups. Houston aerosols are less oxidized than those observed elsewhere, with smaller relative contributions of carbon-oxygen double bonds. These particles do not fit 1H NMR source apportionment fingerprints for identification of secondary, marine, and biomass burning organic aerosol, suggesting that a new fingerprint for highly urbanized and industrially influenced locations be established. ► SOA constitutes approximately 2/3 of organic aerosol loadings in Houston. ► Data indicate a water insoluble fraction of oxidized organic aerosol. ► Aerosol WSOC is less oxidized and does not fit previously identified 1H NMR source fingerprints.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 2012-07, Vol.54, p.511-518
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020856786
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aerosol mass spectrometer
Aerosols
air quality
Aircraft components
Applied sciences
atmospheric chemistry
Atmospheric pollution
biomass
burning
Exact sciences and technology
Fingerprints
Houston
Mass spectrometers
mass spectrometry
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Organic aerosol
Organic materials
Oxidation
particulates
Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution
Pollution
Quadrupoles
Spectroscopy
title Characterization of urban aerosol using aerosol mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20urban%20aerosol%20using%20aerosol%20mass%20spectrometry%20and%20proton%20nuclear%20magnetic%20resonance%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Cleveland,%20M.J.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=54&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=511-518&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020856786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020856786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231012002099&rfr_iscdi=true