Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum

This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated slud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Desalination and water treatment 2012-03, Vol.41 (1-3), p.265-278
Hauptverfasser: Gil, J.A., Dorgeloh, E., van Lier, J.B., van der Graaf, J.H.J.M., Prats, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 278
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 265
container_title Desalination and water treatment
container_volume 41
creator Gil, J.A.
Dorgeloh, E.
van Lier, J.B.
van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.
Prats, D.
description This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19443994.2012.664740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624199614</els_id><sourcerecordid>1020839916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgBdRsNT-Aw8BEbxsTbLZTdaDoMVHoWLxcQ5xdoIp292a7Bb896a0ingwlxky3zz4kuSY0TGjip6zUoisLMWYU8bHRSGkoHvJYPOdZqUq9n_lh8kohAWNLxcyF3yQzJ8747u0X5HWkgoBm86b2gWsyMP1UyDzWCXT6QXp3pH0ATeYqSrXuTUGYgJxTcxNHWMLfd0vj5IDa-qAo10cJq-3Ny-T-3T2eDedXM1SiOd2qTR5XjDOpa24tTbLuTRGGJljJoVUaBRXsUoRgAIA8grerKCWMaBMSJoNk7Pt3JVvP3oMnV66AFjXpsG2D5pRTlX0woqInvxBF23vm3idZmUmqCiUKCMlthT4NgSPVq-8Wxr_GUfpjWn9bVpvTOut6dh2uhtuApjaetOACz-9PFeM55mK3OWWwyhl7dDrAA4bwMp5hE5Xrft_0Rfxc47h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1934046849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gil, J.A. ; Dorgeloh, E. ; van Lier, J.B. ; van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. ; Prats, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil, J.A. ; Dorgeloh, E. ; van Lier, J.B. ; van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. ; Prats, D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.664740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>L'Aquila: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Activated carbon ; Activated sludge ; Additives ; Applied sciences ; Biomass ; Bioreactors ; Cakes ; Chlorides ; Coagulants ; Coagulation ; Decentralised MBR ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filterability ; Inoculum ; Membranes ; Particle size ; Particle size distribution ; pH effects ; Pollution ; Removal ; Size distribution ; Sludge ; start-up ; Waste water ; Wastewater ; Water treatment and pollution ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2012-03, Vol.41 (1-3), p.265-278</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Desalination Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25812538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorgeloh, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prats, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Cakes</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Coagulants</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Decentralised MBR</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filterability</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>start-up</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgBdRsNT-Aw8BEbxsTbLZTdaDoMVHoWLxcQ5xdoIp292a7Bb896a0ingwlxky3zz4kuSY0TGjip6zUoisLMWYU8bHRSGkoHvJYPOdZqUq9n_lh8kohAWNLxcyF3yQzJ8747u0X5HWkgoBm86b2gWsyMP1UyDzWCXT6QXp3pH0ATeYqSrXuTUGYgJxTcxNHWMLfd0vj5IDa-qAo10cJq-3Ny-T-3T2eDedXM1SiOd2qTR5XjDOpa24tTbLuTRGGJljJoVUaBRXsUoRgAIA8grerKCWMaBMSJoNk7Pt3JVvP3oMnV66AFjXpsG2D5pRTlX0woqInvxBF23vm3idZmUmqCiUKCMlthT4NgSPVq-8Wxr_GUfpjWn9bVpvTOut6dh2uhtuApjaetOACz-9PFeM55mK3OWWwyhl7dDrAA4bwMp5hE5Xrft_0Rfxc47h</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Gil, J.A.</creator><creator>Dorgeloh, E.</creator><creator>van Lier, J.B.</creator><creator>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</creator><creator>Prats, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Desalination Publications</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</title><author>Gil, J.A. ; Dorgeloh, E. ; van Lier, J.B. ; van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. ; Prats, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Cakes</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Coagulants</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Decentralised MBR</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filterability</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>start-up</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorgeloh, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prats, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil, J.A.</au><au>Dorgeloh, E.</au><au>van Lier, J.B.</au><au>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</au><au>Prats, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>265-278</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.</abstract><cop>L'Aquila</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/19443994.2012.664740</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-3986
ispartof Desalination and water treatment, 2012-03, Vol.41 (1-3), p.265-278
issn 1944-3986
1944-3994
1944-3986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839916
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acidity
Activated carbon
Activated sludge
Additives
Applied sciences
Biomass
Bioreactors
Cakes
Chlorides
Coagulants
Coagulation
Decentralised MBR
Exact sciences and technology
Filterability
Inoculum
Membranes
Particle size
Particle size distribution
pH effects
Pollution
Removal
Size distribution
Sludge
start-up
Waste water
Wastewater
Water treatment and pollution
Water treatment plants
title Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T13%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Start-up%20of%20decentralised%20MBRs%20Part%20II:%20the%20use%20of%20additives%20as%20initial%20inoculum&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Gil,%20J.A.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=265-278&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19443994.2012.664740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020839916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1934046849&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1944398624199614&rfr_iscdi=true