Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum
This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated slud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Desalination and water treatment 2012-03, Vol.41 (1-3), p.265-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 278 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Desalination and water treatment |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Gil, J.A. Dorgeloh, E. van Lier, J.B. van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. Prats, D. |
description | This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19443994.2012.664740 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624199614</els_id><sourcerecordid>1020839916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgBdRsNT-Aw8BEbxsTbLZTdaDoMVHoWLxcQ5xdoIp292a7Bb896a0ingwlxky3zz4kuSY0TGjip6zUoisLMWYU8bHRSGkoHvJYPOdZqUq9n_lh8kohAWNLxcyF3yQzJ8747u0X5HWkgoBm86b2gWsyMP1UyDzWCXT6QXp3pH0ATeYqSrXuTUGYgJxTcxNHWMLfd0vj5IDa-qAo10cJq-3Ny-T-3T2eDedXM1SiOd2qTR5XjDOpa24tTbLuTRGGJljJoVUaBRXsUoRgAIA8grerKCWMaBMSJoNk7Pt3JVvP3oMnV66AFjXpsG2D5pRTlX0woqInvxBF23vm3idZmUmqCiUKCMlthT4NgSPVq-8Wxr_GUfpjWn9bVpvTOut6dh2uhtuApjaetOACz-9PFeM55mK3OWWwyhl7dDrAA4bwMp5hE5Xrft_0Rfxc47h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1934046849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gil, J.A. ; Dorgeloh, E. ; van Lier, J.B. ; van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. ; Prats, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil, J.A. ; Dorgeloh, E. ; van Lier, J.B. ; van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. ; Prats, D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.664740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>L'Aquila: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Activated carbon ; Activated sludge ; Additives ; Applied sciences ; Biomass ; Bioreactors ; Cakes ; Chlorides ; Coagulants ; Coagulation ; Decentralised MBR ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filterability ; Inoculum ; Membranes ; Particle size ; Particle size distribution ; pH effects ; Pollution ; Removal ; Size distribution ; Sludge ; start-up ; Waste water ; Wastewater ; Water treatment and pollution ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2012-03, Vol.41 (1-3), p.265-278</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Desalination Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25812538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorgeloh, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prats, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Cakes</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Coagulants</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Decentralised MBR</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filterability</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>start-up</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgBdRsNT-Aw8BEbxsTbLZTdaDoMVHoWLxcQ5xdoIp292a7Bb896a0ingwlxky3zz4kuSY0TGjip6zUoisLMWYU8bHRSGkoHvJYPOdZqUq9n_lh8kohAWNLxcyF3yQzJ8747u0X5HWkgoBm86b2gWsyMP1UyDzWCXT6QXp3pH0ATeYqSrXuTUGYgJxTcxNHWMLfd0vj5IDa-qAo10cJq-3Ny-T-3T2eDedXM1SiOd2qTR5XjDOpa24tTbLuTRGGJljJoVUaBRXsUoRgAIA8grerKCWMaBMSJoNk7Pt3JVvP3oMnV66AFjXpsG2D5pRTlX0woqInvxBF23vm3idZmUmqCiUKCMlthT4NgSPVq-8Wxr_GUfpjWn9bVpvTOut6dh2uhtuApjaetOACz-9PFeM55mK3OWWwyhl7dDrAA4bwMp5hE5Xrft_0Rfxc47h</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Gil, J.A.</creator><creator>Dorgeloh, E.</creator><creator>van Lier, J.B.</creator><creator>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</creator><creator>Prats, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Desalination Publications</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</title><author>Gil, J.A. ; Dorgeloh, E. ; van Lier, J.B. ; van der Graaf, J.H.J.M. ; Prats, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7a5561227fd2fff3527aa4a75e37478ea8282270ecc0ccce2dcbf40f11c014703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Cakes</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Coagulants</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Decentralised MBR</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filterability</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>start-up</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorgeloh, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prats, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil, J.A.</au><au>Dorgeloh, E.</au><au>van Lier, J.B.</au><au>van der Graaf, J.H.J.M.</au><au>Prats, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>265-278</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>This paper corresponds to the second part of a study aiming to establish the best conditions to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactors. The first part focused on the impact of different operational parameters on the start-up, whereas this second part aims to find a substitute for activated sludge to serve as initial inoculum. Both low powdered activated carbon addition and Alumin 7 (alkaline coagulant) demonstrated a low performance in terms of filterability and operation. In turn, ferrous chloride (FeCl2), due to its ability to coagulate soluble and colloidal matter, was able to create a cake layer composed of large coagulated particles acting as a prefilter. Additionally, the combination of wastewater plus FeCl2 allowing sufficient contact time before the filtration starts has demonstrated to be the best way to start-up decentralised membrane bioreactor using this additive. Eventhough some drawbacks are associated with its high acidity, i.e. low pH, high conductivity and low NH4+–N removal, the excellent filterabilities observed and the possibility to create a cake layer from “zero-biomass” convert this additive as a possible substitute for activated sludge. This is supported by particle size distribution measurements suggesting that the negative effects of fine particles are outweighed by the possibility of creating a cake layer that impedes pore blocking.</abstract><cop>L'Aquila</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/19443994.2012.664740</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1944-3986 |
ispartof | Desalination and water treatment, 2012-03, Vol.41 (1-3), p.265-278 |
issn | 1944-3986 1944-3994 1944-3986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839916 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acidity Activated carbon Activated sludge Additives Applied sciences Biomass Bioreactors Cakes Chlorides Coagulants Coagulation Decentralised MBR Exact sciences and technology Filterability Inoculum Membranes Particle size Particle size distribution pH effects Pollution Removal Size distribution Sludge start-up Waste water Wastewater Water treatment and pollution Water treatment plants |
title | Start-up of decentralised MBRs Part II: the use of additives as initial inoculum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T13%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Start-up%20of%20decentralised%20MBRs%20Part%20II:%20the%20use%20of%20additives%20as%20initial%20inoculum&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Gil,%20J.A.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=265-278&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19443994.2012.664740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020839916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1934046849&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1944398624199614&rfr_iscdi=true |