IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL
Purpose Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of anesthesia 2012-06, Vol.26 (3), p.351-356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | Journal of anesthesia |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Eker, H. Evren Çok, Oya Yalçin Ergenoğlu, Pınar Ariboğan, Anış Arslan, Gülnaz |
description | Purpose
Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL.
Methods
Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded.
Results
Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg;
p
= 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min;
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020833663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356580970</galeid><sourcerecordid>A356580970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-K1TAUxoMoznX0AdxIwc1sOp4k_ZMuh2HUgQsuHHQZ0uSkZGyTmrQLd76Db-iTTEpHQbhIIAk5v-_wnXyEvKZwSQHadwmgrqAEykrKeV1WT8iBVlyUgtfdU3KAjvJSNI04Iy9SugeAhlL-nJwxxquurZoDkbdfillFpXFRUxgLtBb1UgRfzDHMwYbx989f37ai81jo4NM6zYvLdZcRhcapJTqdr4tDv6Ri9QbjEJwfipvPX48vyTOrxoSvHs9zcvf-5u76Y3n89OH2-upY6hrYUprOCm26qje86bIF0_csb6aFjgvgtue0rduGVb02YvPYas4AdR7UCtbzc3Kxt82uv6-YFjm5pHEclcewJkmBgeC8aXhG3-7ooEaUztuw5PE3XF7xuqkFdC1kqjxBDegxqjF4tC4__8NfnuDzMjg5fVJAd4GOIaWIVs7RTSr-yF7llq7c05U5XbmlK6usefM45dpPaP4q_sSZAbYDKZf8gFHehzX6_PH_6foAhDawgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020833663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Eker, H. Evren ; Çok, Oya Yalçin ; Ergenoğlu, Pınar ; Ariboğan, Anış ; Arslan, Gülnaz</creator><creatorcontrib>Eker, H. Evren ; Çok, Oya Yalçin ; Ergenoğlu, Pınar ; Ariboğan, Anış ; Arslan, Gülnaz</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL.
Methods
Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded.
Results
Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg;
p
= 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min;
p
< 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol–ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0913-8668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22349746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Acetaminophen ; Acetaminophen - administration & dosage ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage ; Anesthesiology ; Anesthetics - administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Critical Care Medicine ; Double-Blind Method ; Emergency Medicine ; Heart beat ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intensive ; Ketamine - administration & dosage ; Lithotripsy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Pediatrics ; Phenols ; Propofol ; Propofol - administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of anesthesia, 2012-06, Vol.26 (3), p.351-356</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22349746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eker, H. Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çok, Oya Yalçin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariboğan, Anış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Gülnaz</creatorcontrib><title>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</title><title>Journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><description>Purpose
Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL.
Methods
Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded.
Results
Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg;
p
= 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min;
p
< 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol–ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.</description><subject>Acetaminophen</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Anesthetics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Heart beat</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Ketamine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Propofol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0913-8668</issn><issn>1438-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-K1TAUxoMoznX0AdxIwc1sOp4k_ZMuh2HUgQsuHHQZ0uSkZGyTmrQLd76Db-iTTEpHQbhIIAk5v-_wnXyEvKZwSQHadwmgrqAEykrKeV1WT8iBVlyUgtfdU3KAjvJSNI04Iy9SugeAhlL-nJwxxquurZoDkbdfillFpXFRUxgLtBb1UgRfzDHMwYbx989f37ai81jo4NM6zYvLdZcRhcapJTqdr4tDv6Ri9QbjEJwfipvPX48vyTOrxoSvHs9zcvf-5u76Y3n89OH2-upY6hrYUprOCm26qje86bIF0_csb6aFjgvgtue0rduGVb02YvPYas4AdR7UCtbzc3Kxt82uv6-YFjm5pHEclcewJkmBgeC8aXhG3-7ooEaUztuw5PE3XF7xuqkFdC1kqjxBDegxqjF4tC4__8NfnuDzMjg5fVJAd4GOIaWIVs7RTSr-yF7llq7c05U5XbmlK6usefM45dpPaP4q_sSZAbYDKZf8gFHehzX6_PH_6foAhDawgQ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Eker, H. Evren</creator><creator>Çok, Oya Yalçin</creator><creator>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</creator><creator>Ariboğan, Anış</creator><creator>Arslan, Gülnaz</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</title><author>Eker, H. Evren ; Çok, Oya Yalçin ; Ergenoğlu, Pınar ; Ariboğan, Anış ; Arslan, Gülnaz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Anesthetics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Heart beat</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Ketamine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Propofol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eker, H. Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çok, Oya Yalçin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariboğan, Anış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Gülnaz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eker, H. Evren</au><au>Çok, Oya Yalçin</au><au>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</au><au>Ariboğan, Anış</au><au>Arslan, Gülnaz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>J Anesth</stitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>351-356</pages><issn>0913-8668</issn><eissn>1438-8359</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL.
Methods
Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded.
Results
Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg;
p
= 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min;
p
< 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol–ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>22349746</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0913-8668 |
ispartof | Journal of anesthesia, 2012-06, Vol.26 (3), p.351-356 |
issn | 0913-8668 1438-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020833663 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Acetaminophen Acetaminophen - administration & dosage Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage Anesthesiology Anesthetics - administration & dosage Child Child, Preschool Critical Care Medicine Double-Blind Method Emergency Medicine Heart beat Humans Infant Injections, Intravenous Intensive Ketamine - administration & dosage Lithotripsy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Pain Medicine Pediatrics Phenols Propofol Propofol - administration & dosage Prospective Studies |
title | IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A01%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IV%20paracetamol%20effect%20on%20propofol%E2%80%93ketamine%20consumption%20in%20paediatric%20patients%20undergoing%20ESWL&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=Eker,%20H.%20Evren&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=351-356&rft.issn=0913-8668&rft.eissn=1438-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA356580970%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020833663&rft_id=info:pmid/22349746&rft_galeid=A356580970&rfr_iscdi=true |