IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL

Purpose Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 2012-06, Vol.26 (3), p.351-356
Hauptverfasser: Eker, H. Evren, Çok, Oya Yalçin, Ergenoğlu, Pınar, Ariboğan, Anış, Arslan, Gülnaz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 351
container_title Journal of anesthesia
container_volume 26
creator Eker, H. Evren
Çok, Oya Yalçin
Ergenoğlu, Pınar
Ariboğan, Anış
Arslan, Gülnaz
description Purpose Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Methods Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded. Results Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg; p  = 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min; p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020833663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356580970</galeid><sourcerecordid>A356580970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-K1TAUxoMoznX0AdxIwc1sOp4k_ZMuh2HUgQsuHHQZ0uSkZGyTmrQLd76Db-iTTEpHQbhIIAk5v-_wnXyEvKZwSQHadwmgrqAEykrKeV1WT8iBVlyUgtfdU3KAjvJSNI04Iy9SugeAhlL-nJwxxquurZoDkbdfillFpXFRUxgLtBb1UgRfzDHMwYbx989f37ai81jo4NM6zYvLdZcRhcapJTqdr4tDv6Ri9QbjEJwfipvPX48vyTOrxoSvHs9zcvf-5u76Y3n89OH2-upY6hrYUprOCm26qje86bIF0_csb6aFjgvgtue0rduGVb02YvPYas4AdR7UCtbzc3Kxt82uv6-YFjm5pHEclcewJkmBgeC8aXhG3-7ooEaUztuw5PE3XF7xuqkFdC1kqjxBDegxqjF4tC4__8NfnuDzMjg5fVJAd4GOIaWIVs7RTSr-yF7llq7c05U5XbmlK6usefM45dpPaP4q_sSZAbYDKZf8gFHehzX6_PH_6foAhDawgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020833663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Eker, H. Evren ; Çok, Oya Yalçin ; Ergenoğlu, Pınar ; Ariboğan, Anış ; Arslan, Gülnaz</creator><creatorcontrib>Eker, H. Evren ; Çok, Oya Yalçin ; Ergenoğlu, Pınar ; Ariboğan, Anış ; Arslan, Gülnaz</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Methods Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded. Results Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg; p  = 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min; p  &lt; 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol–ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0913-8668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22349746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Acetaminophen ; Acetaminophen - administration & dosage ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage ; Anesthesiology ; Anesthetics - administration & dosage ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Critical Care Medicine ; Double-Blind Method ; Emergency Medicine ; Heart beat ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intensive ; Ketamine - administration & dosage ; Lithotripsy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Pediatrics ; Phenols ; Propofol ; Propofol - administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of anesthesia, 2012-06, Vol.26 (3), p.351-356</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22349746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eker, H. Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çok, Oya Yalçin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariboğan, Anış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Gülnaz</creatorcontrib><title>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</title><title>Journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><description>Purpose Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Methods Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded. Results Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg; p  = 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min; p  &lt; 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol–ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.</description><subject>Acetaminophen</subject><subject>Acetaminophen - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Anesthetics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Heart beat</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Ketamine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0913-8668</issn><issn>1438-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-K1TAUxoMoznX0AdxIwc1sOp4k_ZMuh2HUgQsuHHQZ0uSkZGyTmrQLd76Db-iTTEpHQbhIIAk5v-_wnXyEvKZwSQHadwmgrqAEykrKeV1WT8iBVlyUgtfdU3KAjvJSNI04Iy9SugeAhlL-nJwxxquurZoDkbdfillFpXFRUxgLtBb1UgRfzDHMwYbx989f37ai81jo4NM6zYvLdZcRhcapJTqdr4tDv6Ri9QbjEJwfipvPX48vyTOrxoSvHs9zcvf-5u76Y3n89OH2-upY6hrYUprOCm26qje86bIF0_csb6aFjgvgtue0rduGVb02YvPYas4AdR7UCtbzc3Kxt82uv6-YFjm5pHEclcewJkmBgeC8aXhG3-7ooEaUztuw5PE3XF7xuqkFdC1kqjxBDegxqjF4tC4__8NfnuDzMjg5fVJAd4GOIaWIVs7RTSr-yF7llq7c05U5XbmlK6usefM45dpPaP4q_sSZAbYDKZf8gFHehzX6_PH_6foAhDawgQ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Eker, H. Evren</creator><creator>Çok, Oya Yalçin</creator><creator>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</creator><creator>Ariboğan, Anış</creator><creator>Arslan, Gülnaz</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</title><author>Eker, H. Evren ; Çok, Oya Yalçin ; Ergenoğlu, Pınar ; Ariboğan, Anış ; Arslan, Gülnaz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d9f8cd94bd369ffedbb2edbd7093803fb31757624bcd8effe7c320ec835f82b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen</topic><topic>Acetaminophen - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Anesthetics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Heart beat</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Ketamine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eker, H. Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çok, Oya Yalçin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariboğan, Anış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Gülnaz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eker, H. Evren</au><au>Çok, Oya Yalçin</au><au>Ergenoğlu, Pınar</au><au>Ariboğan, Anış</au><au>Arslan, Gülnaz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>J Anesth</stitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>351-356</pages><issn>0913-8668</issn><eissn>1438-8359</eissn><abstract>Purpose Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol–ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol–ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Methods Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1–2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol–ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 μg/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol–ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol–ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded. Results Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol–ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 ± 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 ± 20.1 mg; p  = 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 ± 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 ± 11.4 min; p  &lt; 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol–ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>22349746</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0913-8668
ispartof Journal of anesthesia, 2012-06, Vol.26 (3), p.351-356
issn 0913-8668
1438-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020833663
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage
Anesthesiology
Anesthetics - administration & dosage
Child
Child, Preschool
Critical Care Medicine
Double-Blind Method
Emergency Medicine
Heart beat
Humans
Infant
Injections, Intravenous
Intensive
Ketamine - administration & dosage
Lithotripsy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Pediatrics
Phenols
Propofol
Propofol - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
title IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A01%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IV%20paracetamol%20effect%20on%20propofol%E2%80%93ketamine%20consumption%20in%20paediatric%20patients%20undergoing%20ESWL&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=Eker,%20H.%20Evren&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=351-356&rft.issn=0913-8668&rft.eissn=1438-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA356580970%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020833663&rft_id=info:pmid/22349746&rft_galeid=A356580970&rfr_iscdi=true