Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians: clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques
Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Internal medicine journal 2012-06, Vol.42 (6), p.627-633 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 633 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 627 |
container_title | Internal medicine journal |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Dabscheck, E. J. Steinfort, D. P. Irving, L. B. Hew, M. |
description | Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has been no systematic analysis regarding the availability and uptake of this new technology among thoracic physicians.
Methods: Physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand were emailed a survey seeking their current approach to three scenarios requiring mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Respondents were also asked for their preferred investigation for each scenario if any current constraints were removed. Relevant demographic information was sought.
Results: We received 164 responses from 512 Australasian physicians (34%). Without constraints, EBUS‐TBNA was the preferred investigation for all three clinical scenarios, but only 33% of respondents had access to EBUS‐TBNA. Constraints included lack of availability and lack of expertise. Reduced EBUS‐TBNA access was associated with a number of clinician factors.
Conclusions: Australasian thoracic physicians prefer EBUS‐TBNA for the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, but access to EBUS‐TBNA services is limited. We recommend targeted measures to improve access to EBUS‐TBNA use and optimise mediastinal staging of NSCLC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02683.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020827983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1020827983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-7282bbb232f7f2a5a9763fe95c39a582a23fe68e853069d3d80f617583048e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctu1DAUtRCIlpZfQF6ySfAjiR0kFlUF00Ifm0pdWnccp-PBsQc7aWf-pR-L0ymzxhvfx3nYOghhSkqaz5d1SauqLuq2rUpGKC0JayQvt2_Q8WHx9qWuCtISfoQ-pLQmhAreVu_REWNUyopWx-j52nQW0mg9OJxGeLD-AYce--CLNIBzhTbOYTflsQavTcQwhNycTWmM4CBZ8HhchQjaarxZ7ZLVeZS-Yu2stzrLbvJutNpg8B3Wwc9E68eEg8dDxsw2O2z9YxZ7NHg0euXtn8mkU_SuB5fMx9f7BN39-H53flFc3S4uz8-uCl0RwQvBJFsul4yzXvQMamhFw3vT1pq3UEsGLHeNNLLmpGk73knSN1TUkpNKGsZP0Oe97CaG2XZUg03zt8GbMCVFCSOSiVbyDJV7qI4hpWh6tYn5_XGXQWqORq3VnICaE1BzNOolGrXN1E-vLtNyMN2B-C-LDPi2BzxZZ3b_Lawur3_OVeYXe75No9ke-BB_q0ZwUav7m4US8kb-WtxLdcH_AqiMr0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020827983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians: clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Dabscheck, E. J. ; Steinfort, D. P. ; Irving, L. B. ; Hew, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dabscheck, E. J. ; Steinfort, D. P. ; Irving, L. B. ; Hew, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has been no systematic analysis regarding the availability and uptake of this new technology among thoracic physicians.
Methods: Physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand were emailed a survey seeking their current approach to three scenarios requiring mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Respondents were also asked for their preferred investigation for each scenario if any current constraints were removed. Relevant demographic information was sought.
Results: We received 164 responses from 512 Australasian physicians (34%). Without constraints, EBUS‐TBNA was the preferred investigation for all three clinical scenarios, but only 33% of respondents had access to EBUS‐TBNA. Constraints included lack of availability and lack of expertise. Reduced EBUS‐TBNA access was associated with a number of clinician factors.
Conclusions: Australasian thoracic physicians prefer EBUS‐TBNA for the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, but access to EBUS‐TBNA services is limited. We recommend targeted measures to improve access to EBUS‐TBNA use and optimise mediastinal staging of NSCLC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1444-0903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-5994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02683.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22188414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>access to health services ; Australasia ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) ; Endosonography ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; mediastinal staging ; Mediastinoscopy ; Mediastinum - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; non-small-cell lung carcinoma ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Thoracic Surgery ; Thoracoscopy</subject><ispartof>Internal medicine journal, 2012-06, Vol.42 (6), p.627-633</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal © 2011 Royal Australasian College of Physicians</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal © 2011 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-7282bbb232f7f2a5a9763fe95c39a582a23fe68e853069d3d80f617583048e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-7282bbb232f7f2a5a9763fe95c39a582a23fe68e853069d3d80f617583048e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1445-5994.2011.02683.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1445-5994.2011.02683.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22188414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dabscheck, E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinfort, D. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, L. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hew, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians: clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques</title><title>Internal medicine journal</title><addtitle>Intern Med J</addtitle><description>Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has been no systematic analysis regarding the availability and uptake of this new technology among thoracic physicians.
Methods: Physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand were emailed a survey seeking their current approach to three scenarios requiring mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Respondents were also asked for their preferred investigation for each scenario if any current constraints were removed. Relevant demographic information was sought.
Results: We received 164 responses from 512 Australasian physicians (34%). Without constraints, EBUS‐TBNA was the preferred investigation for all three clinical scenarios, but only 33% of respondents had access to EBUS‐TBNA. Constraints included lack of availability and lack of expertise. Reduced EBUS‐TBNA access was associated with a number of clinician factors.
Conclusions: Australasian thoracic physicians prefer EBUS‐TBNA for the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, but access to EBUS‐TBNA services is limited. We recommend targeted measures to improve access to EBUS‐TBNA use and optimise mediastinal staging of NSCLC.</description><subject>access to health services</subject><subject>Australasia</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>mediastinal staging</subject><subject>Mediastinoscopy</subject><subject>Mediastinum - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>non-small-cell lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracoscopy</subject><issn>1444-0903</issn><issn>1445-5994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUctu1DAUtRCIlpZfQF6ySfAjiR0kFlUF00Ifm0pdWnccp-PBsQc7aWf-pR-L0ymzxhvfx3nYOghhSkqaz5d1SauqLuq2rUpGKC0JayQvt2_Q8WHx9qWuCtISfoQ-pLQmhAreVu_REWNUyopWx-j52nQW0mg9OJxGeLD-AYce--CLNIBzhTbOYTflsQavTcQwhNycTWmM4CBZ8HhchQjaarxZ7ZLVeZS-Yu2stzrLbvJutNpg8B3Wwc9E68eEg8dDxsw2O2z9YxZ7NHg0euXtn8mkU_SuB5fMx9f7BN39-H53flFc3S4uz8-uCl0RwQvBJFsul4yzXvQMamhFw3vT1pq3UEsGLHeNNLLmpGk73knSN1TUkpNKGsZP0Oe97CaG2XZUg03zt8GbMCVFCSOSiVbyDJV7qI4hpWh6tYn5_XGXQWqORq3VnICaE1BzNOolGrXN1E-vLtNyMN2B-C-LDPi2BzxZZ3b_Lawur3_OVeYXe75No9ke-BB_q0ZwUav7m4US8kb-WtxLdcH_AqiMr0I</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Dabscheck, E. J.</creator><creator>Steinfort, D. P.</creator><creator>Irving, L. B.</creator><creator>Hew, M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians: clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques</title><author>Dabscheck, E. J. ; Steinfort, D. P. ; Irving, L. B. ; Hew, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-7282bbb232f7f2a5a9763fe95c39a582a23fe68e853069d3d80f617583048e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>access to health services</topic><topic>Australasia</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>mediastinal staging</topic><topic>Mediastinoscopy</topic><topic>Mediastinum - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>non-small-cell lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracoscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dabscheck, E. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinfort, D. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, L. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hew, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Internal medicine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dabscheck, E. J.</au><au>Steinfort, D. P.</au><au>Irving, L. B.</au><au>Hew, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians: clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques</atitle><jtitle>Internal medicine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Intern Med J</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>627</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>627-633</pages><issn>1444-0903</issn><eissn>1445-5994</eissn><abstract>Background/Aim: We determined current practice among Australasian thoracic physicians in the mediastinal staging of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the availability of endobronchial ultrasound‐transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and constraints to its use, as there has been no systematic analysis regarding the availability and uptake of this new technology among thoracic physicians.
Methods: Physician members of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand were emailed a survey seeking their current approach to three scenarios requiring mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Respondents were also asked for their preferred investigation for each scenario if any current constraints were removed. Relevant demographic information was sought.
Results: We received 164 responses from 512 Australasian physicians (34%). Without constraints, EBUS‐TBNA was the preferred investigation for all three clinical scenarios, but only 33% of respondents had access to EBUS‐TBNA. Constraints included lack of availability and lack of expertise. Reduced EBUS‐TBNA access was associated with a number of clinician factors.
Conclusions: Australasian thoracic physicians prefer EBUS‐TBNA for the mediastinal staging of NSCLC, but access to EBUS‐TBNA services is limited. We recommend targeted measures to improve access to EBUS‐TBNA use and optimise mediastinal staging of NSCLC.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>22188414</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02683.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1444-0903 |
ispartof | Internal medicine journal, 2012-06, Vol.42 (6), p.627-633 |
issn | 1444-0903 1445-5994 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020827983 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | access to health services Australasia Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Endosonography Health Care Surveys Humans Lung Neoplasms - pathology mediastinal staging Mediastinoscopy Mediastinum - pathology Neoplasm Staging - methods non-small-cell lung carcinoma Practice Patterns, Physicians Thoracic Surgery Thoracoscopy |
title | Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer among Australasian thoracic physicians: clinical practice and constraints on minimally invasive techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mediastinal%20staging%20of%20non-small-cell%20lung%20cancer%20among%20Australasian%20thoracic%20physicians:%20clinical%20practice%20and%20constraints%20on%20minimally%20invasive%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Internal%20medicine%20journal&rft.au=Dabscheck,%20E.%20J.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=627&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=627-633&rft.issn=1444-0903&rft.eissn=1445-5994&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02683.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020827983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020827983&rft_id=info:pmid/22188414&rfr_iscdi=true |