Evaluation of a Peridomestic Mosquito Trap for Integration into an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Push-Pull Control Strategy
We determined the feasibility of using the BG-Sentinel™ mosquito trap (BGS) as the pull component in a push-pull strategy to reduce indoor biting by Aedes aegypti. This included evaluating varying numbers of traps (1–4) and mosquito release numbers (10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) on recapture r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vector ecology 2012-06, Vol.37 (1), p.8-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Journal of vector ecology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Salazar, Ferdinand V Achee, Nicole L Grieco, John P Prabaripai, Atchariya Eisen, Lars Shah, Pankhil Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap |
description | We determined the feasibility of using the BG-Sentinel™ mosquito trap (BGS) as the pull component in a push-pull strategy to reduce indoor biting by Aedes aegypti. This included evaluating varying numbers of traps (1–4) and mosquito release numbers (10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) on recapture rates under screen house conditions. Based on these variations in trap and mosquito numbers, release intervals were rotated through a completely randomized design with environmental factors (temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity) and monitored throughout each experiment. Data from four sampling time points (05:30, 09:30, 13:30, and 17:30) indicate a recapture range among treatments of 66–98%. Furthermore, 2–3 traps were as effective in recapturing mosquitoes as 4 traps for all mosquito release numbers. Time trends indicate Day 1 (the day the mosquitoes were released) as the “impact period” for recapture with peak numbers of marked mosquitoes collected at 09:30 or 4 h post-release. Information from this study will be used to guide the configuration of the BGS trap component of a push-pull vector control strategy currently in the proof-of-concept stage of development in Thailand and Peru. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00195.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020189549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1020189549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5015-85b7c5829365ac6fcfddcf5843f4ae69385ecef128c78cae7a191cb1bd8bb0d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEon_gK4AlLuWQYCdx4iBxqMICRUWs1Jar5TjjxatsnNoJ7d746ExI6YHT-uKR5veePfOiiDCaMDzvtgmrchGXLMuTlLI0oZRVPLl_Eh0_Np5iTQWLWcnoUXQSwpbSTOSieB4dpSnPBc_S4-j36pfqJjVa1xNniCJr8LZ1Owij1eSbC7eTHR259mogxnly0Y-w8Qtve-yonpxDC4Eo2OyH0ZKzj3YYwav3pJ46q22r4C1ZT-FnvJ66jtSuH73ryNWILih5ET0zqgvw8uE-jW4-ra7rL_Hl988X9fll3HDKeCx4U2ou0ioruNKF0aZtteEiz0yuoKgywUGDYanQpdAKSsUqphvWtKJpaJtnp9HZ4jt4dzvheHJng4auUz24KUhGcZGi4nl1AMrKClfMU0Tf_Idu3eR7HGSmBOc8ZQVSYqG0dyF4MHLwdqf8HiE5Byq3cs5NzrnJOVD5N1B5j9JXDw9MzQ7aR-G_BBH4sAB3toP9wcby649VjRXqXy96o5xUG2-DvLlCskCQi4oxJIqFaKxzPRz-9z8hFMib</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018555216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Peridomestic Mosquito Trap for Integration into an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Push-Pull Control Strategy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Salazar, Ferdinand V ; Achee, Nicole L ; Grieco, John P ; Prabaripai, Atchariya ; Eisen, Lars ; Shah, Pankhil ; Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</creator><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Ferdinand V ; Achee, Nicole L ; Grieco, John P ; Prabaripai, Atchariya ; Eisen, Lars ; Shah, Pankhil ; Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</creatorcontrib><description>We determined the feasibility of using the BG-Sentinel™ mosquito trap (BGS) as the pull component in a push-pull strategy to reduce indoor biting by Aedes aegypti. This included evaluating varying numbers of traps (1–4) and mosquito release numbers (10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) on recapture rates under screen house conditions. Based on these variations in trap and mosquito numbers, release intervals were rotated through a completely randomized design with environmental factors (temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity) and monitored throughout each experiment. Data from four sampling time points (05:30, 09:30, 13:30, and 17:30) indicate a recapture range among treatments of 66–98%. Furthermore, 2–3 traps were as effective in recapturing mosquitoes as 4 traps for all mosquito release numbers. Time trends indicate Day 1 (the day the mosquitoes were released) as the “impact period” for recapture with peak numbers of marked mosquitoes collected at 09:30 or 4 h post-release. Information from this study will be used to guide the configuration of the BGS trap component of a push-pull vector control strategy currently in the proof-of-concept stage of development in Thailand and Peru.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1710</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-7134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00195.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22548532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Society for Vector Ecology</publisher><subject>Aedes ; Aedes aegypti ; Animals ; BG-Sentinel™ trap ; Culicidae ; Diptera ; Light ; Mosquito Control - instrumentation ; push-pull strategy ; screen house ; Temperature ; Thailand</subject><ispartof>Journal of vector ecology, 2012-06, Vol.37 (1), p.8-19</ispartof><rights>2012 The Society for Vector Ecology</rights><rights>2012 The Society for Vector Ecology.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Vector Ecology Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5015-85b7c5829365ac6fcfddcf5843f4ae69385ecef128c78cae7a191cb1bd8bb0d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5015-85b7c5829365ac6fcfddcf5843f4ae69385ecef128c78cae7a191cb1bd8bb0d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22548532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Ferdinand V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achee, Nicole L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabaripai, Atchariya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisen, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Pankhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Peridomestic Mosquito Trap for Integration into an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Push-Pull Control Strategy</title><title>Journal of vector ecology</title><addtitle>J Vector Ecol</addtitle><description>We determined the feasibility of using the BG-Sentinel™ mosquito trap (BGS) as the pull component in a push-pull strategy to reduce indoor biting by Aedes aegypti. This included evaluating varying numbers of traps (1–4) and mosquito release numbers (10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) on recapture rates under screen house conditions. Based on these variations in trap and mosquito numbers, release intervals were rotated through a completely randomized design with environmental factors (temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity) and monitored throughout each experiment. Data from four sampling time points (05:30, 09:30, 13:30, and 17:30) indicate a recapture range among treatments of 66–98%. Furthermore, 2–3 traps were as effective in recapturing mosquitoes as 4 traps for all mosquito release numbers. Time trends indicate Day 1 (the day the mosquitoes were released) as the “impact period” for recapture with peak numbers of marked mosquitoes collected at 09:30 or 4 h post-release. Information from this study will be used to guide the configuration of the BGS trap component of a push-pull vector control strategy currently in the proof-of-concept stage of development in Thailand and Peru.</description><subject>Aedes</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BG-Sentinel™ trap</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Mosquito Control - instrumentation</subject><subject>push-pull strategy</subject><subject>screen house</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><issn>1081-1710</issn><issn>1948-7134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEon_gK4AlLuWQYCdx4iBxqMICRUWs1Jar5TjjxatsnNoJ7d746ExI6YHT-uKR5veePfOiiDCaMDzvtgmrchGXLMuTlLI0oZRVPLl_Eh0_Np5iTQWLWcnoUXQSwpbSTOSieB4dpSnPBc_S4-j36pfqJjVa1xNniCJr8LZ1Owij1eSbC7eTHR259mogxnly0Y-w8Qtve-yonpxDC4Eo2OyH0ZKzj3YYwav3pJ46q22r4C1ZT-FnvJ66jtSuH73ryNWILih5ET0zqgvw8uE-jW4-ra7rL_Hl988X9fll3HDKeCx4U2ou0ioruNKF0aZtteEiz0yuoKgywUGDYanQpdAKSsUqphvWtKJpaJtnp9HZ4jt4dzvheHJng4auUz24KUhGcZGi4nl1AMrKClfMU0Tf_Idu3eR7HGSmBOc8ZQVSYqG0dyF4MHLwdqf8HiE5Byq3cs5NzrnJOVD5N1B5j9JXDw9MzQ7aR-G_BBH4sAB3toP9wcby649VjRXqXy96o5xUG2-DvLlCskCQi4oxJIqFaKxzPRz-9z8hFMib</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Salazar, Ferdinand V</creator><creator>Achee, Nicole L</creator><creator>Grieco, John P</creator><creator>Prabaripai, Atchariya</creator><creator>Eisen, Lars</creator><creator>Shah, Pankhil</creator><creator>Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</creator><general>Society for Vector Ecology</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Peridomestic Mosquito Trap for Integration into an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Push-Pull Control Strategy</title><author>Salazar, Ferdinand V ; Achee, Nicole L ; Grieco, John P ; Prabaripai, Atchariya ; Eisen, Lars ; Shah, Pankhil ; Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5015-85b7c5829365ac6fcfddcf5843f4ae69385ecef128c78cae7a191cb1bd8bb0d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aedes</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BG-Sentinel™ trap</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Mosquito Control - instrumentation</topic><topic>push-pull strategy</topic><topic>screen house</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salazar, Ferdinand V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achee, Nicole L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prabaripai, Atchariya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisen, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Pankhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vector ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salazar, Ferdinand V</au><au>Achee, Nicole L</au><au>Grieco, John P</au><au>Prabaripai, Atchariya</au><au>Eisen, Lars</au><au>Shah, Pankhil</au><au>Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Peridomestic Mosquito Trap for Integration into an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Push-Pull Control Strategy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vector ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Vector Ecol</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>8-19</pages><issn>1081-1710</issn><eissn>1948-7134</eissn><abstract>We determined the feasibility of using the BG-Sentinel™ mosquito trap (BGS) as the pull component in a push-pull strategy to reduce indoor biting by Aedes aegypti. This included evaluating varying numbers of traps (1–4) and mosquito release numbers (10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) on recapture rates under screen house conditions. Based on these variations in trap and mosquito numbers, release intervals were rotated through a completely randomized design with environmental factors (temperature, relative humidity, and light intensity) and monitored throughout each experiment. Data from four sampling time points (05:30, 09:30, 13:30, and 17:30) indicate a recapture range among treatments of 66–98%. Furthermore, 2–3 traps were as effective in recapturing mosquitoes as 4 traps for all mosquito release numbers. Time trends indicate Day 1 (the day the mosquitoes were released) as the “impact period” for recapture with peak numbers of marked mosquitoes collected at 09:30 or 4 h post-release. Information from this study will be used to guide the configuration of the BGS trap component of a push-pull vector control strategy currently in the proof-of-concept stage of development in Thailand and Peru.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Society for Vector Ecology</pub><pmid>22548532</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00195.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1081-1710 |
ispartof | Journal of vector ecology, 2012-06, Vol.37 (1), p.8-19 |
issn | 1081-1710 1948-7134 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020189549 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aedes Aedes aegypti Animals BG-Sentinel™ trap Culicidae Diptera Light Mosquito Control - instrumentation push-pull strategy screen house Temperature Thailand |
title | Evaluation of a Peridomestic Mosquito Trap for Integration into an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Push-Pull Control Strategy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T13%3A03%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Peridomestic%20Mosquito%20Trap%20for%20Integration%20into%20an%20Aedes%20aegypti%20(Diptera:%20Culicidae)%20Push-Pull%20Control%20Strategy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vector%20ecology&rft.au=Salazar,%20Ferdinand%20V&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=8-19&rft.issn=1081-1710&rft.eissn=1948-7134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00195.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020189549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018555216&rft_id=info:pmid/22548532&rfr_iscdi=true |