Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation

The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unles...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of legal studies 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.209-238
1. Verfasser: Adler, Barry E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 238
container_issue 1
container_start_page 209
container_title The Journal of legal studies
container_volume 41
creator Adler, Barry E.
description The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/665705
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019876854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/665705</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/665705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAgCs6pn2EwES_VN2n-9ahDpzDwMr2GNE1ca9fUpD3s29vRgSfR03v58Ty8D0KXGG4xSH7HORPAjtAEs1QkLOX8GE0AqEgIS-EUncVYAQCmREzQfKm3NllvrA-2K83sQTefoW87s5u967rXXembc3TidB3txeFO0dvT43rxnKxely-L-1ViKCZdkkvGcmOzzDhaiBRbkWvNwFInuMWZI5gBAcqYkft6VzCQTEiSWSLzojDpFN2MuW3wX72NndqW0di61o31fVSYcI6p5BT-poAzKbhkdKDXIzXBxxisU20otzrsBqT2g6lxsJ_M3mxKoz98G2yMqvJ9aIa3D0y1hRvo1T_owOYjq2Lnw2-937cBgHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019876854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><creator>Adler, Barry E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adler, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><description>The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/665705</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLGSAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Auctions ; Bank collateral ; Bankruptcy ; Bankruptcy Code ; Bankruptcy procedures ; Collateral ; Cramdown ; Debt management ; Debtors ; Decisions ; Game theory ; Judicial process ; Liquidation value ; Liquidity ; Secured creditors ; Trade ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Valuation ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Journal of legal studies, 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.209-238</ispartof><rights>2012 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086%2F665705$$EPDF$$P50$$Guchicagopress$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086%2F665705$$EHTML$$P50$$Guchicagopress$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,33754,53997,54001</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adler, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><title>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</title><title>The Journal of legal studies</title><description>The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.</description><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bank collateral</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Bankruptcy Code</subject><subject>Bankruptcy procedures</subject><subject>Collateral</subject><subject>Cramdown</subject><subject>Debt management</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Liquidation value</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Secured creditors</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0047-2530</issn><issn>1537-5366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAgCs6pn2EwES_VN2n-9ahDpzDwMr2GNE1ca9fUpD3s29vRgSfR03v58Ty8D0KXGG4xSH7HORPAjtAEs1QkLOX8GE0AqEgIS-EUncVYAQCmREzQfKm3NllvrA-2K83sQTefoW87s5u967rXXembc3TidB3txeFO0dvT43rxnKxely-L-1ViKCZdkkvGcmOzzDhaiBRbkWvNwFInuMWZI5gBAcqYkft6VzCQTEiSWSLzojDpFN2MuW3wX72NndqW0di61o31fVSYcI6p5BT-poAzKbhkdKDXIzXBxxisU20otzrsBqT2g6lxsJ_M3mxKoz98G2yMqvJ9aIa3D0y1hRvo1T_owOYjq2Lnw2-937cBgHQ</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Adler, Barry E.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</title><author>Adler, Barry E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bank collateral</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Bankruptcy Code</topic><topic>Bankruptcy procedures</topic><topic>Collateral</topic><topic>Cramdown</topic><topic>Debt management</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Liquidation value</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Secured creditors</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adler, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adler, Barry E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of legal studies</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>209-238</pages><issn>0047-2530</issn><eissn>1537-5366</eissn><coden>JLGSAO</coden><abstract>The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/665705</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2530
ispartof The Journal of legal studies, 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.209-238
issn 0047-2530
1537-5366
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019876854
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)
subjects Auctions
Bank collateral
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy Code
Bankruptcy procedures
Collateral
Cramdown
Debt management
Debtors
Decisions
Game theory
Judicial process
Liquidation value
Liquidity
Secured creditors
Trade
U.S.A
United States of America
Valuation
Values
title Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A18%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Game-Theoretic%20Bankruptcy%20Valuation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Adler,%20Barry%20E.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=209-238&rft.issn=0047-2530&rft.eissn=1537-5366&rft.coden=JLGSAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/665705&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/665705%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019876854&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/665705&rfr_iscdi=true