Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation
The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unles...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of legal studies 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.209-238 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 238 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | The Journal of legal studies |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Adler, Barry E. |
description | The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/665705 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019876854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/665705</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/665705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAgCs6pn2EwES_VN2n-9ahDpzDwMr2GNE1ca9fUpD3s29vRgSfR03v58Ty8D0KXGG4xSH7HORPAjtAEs1QkLOX8GE0AqEgIS-EUncVYAQCmREzQfKm3NllvrA-2K83sQTefoW87s5u967rXXembc3TidB3txeFO0dvT43rxnKxely-L-1ViKCZdkkvGcmOzzDhaiBRbkWvNwFInuMWZI5gBAcqYkft6VzCQTEiSWSLzojDpFN2MuW3wX72NndqW0di61o31fVSYcI6p5BT-poAzKbhkdKDXIzXBxxisU20otzrsBqT2g6lxsJ_M3mxKoz98G2yMqvJ9aIa3D0y1hRvo1T_owOYjq2Lnw2-937cBgHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019876854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><creator>Adler, Barry E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adler, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><description>The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/665705</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLGSAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Auctions ; Bank collateral ; Bankruptcy ; Bankruptcy Code ; Bankruptcy procedures ; Collateral ; Cramdown ; Debt management ; Debtors ; Decisions ; Game theory ; Judicial process ; Liquidation value ; Liquidity ; Secured creditors ; Trade ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Valuation ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Journal of legal studies, 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.209-238</ispartof><rights>2012 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086%2F665705$$EPDF$$P50$$Guchicagopress$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086%2F665705$$EHTML$$P50$$Guchicagopress$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,33754,53997,54001</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adler, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><title>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</title><title>The Journal of legal studies</title><description>The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.</description><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bank collateral</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Bankruptcy Code</subject><subject>Bankruptcy procedures</subject><subject>Collateral</subject><subject>Cramdown</subject><subject>Debt management</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Liquidation value</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Secured creditors</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0047-2530</issn><issn>1537-5366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAgCs6pn2EwES_VN2n-9ahDpzDwMr2GNE1ca9fUpD3s29vRgSfR03v58Ty8D0KXGG4xSH7HORPAjtAEs1QkLOX8GE0AqEgIS-EUncVYAQCmREzQfKm3NllvrA-2K83sQTefoW87s5u967rXXembc3TidB3txeFO0dvT43rxnKxely-L-1ViKCZdkkvGcmOzzDhaiBRbkWvNwFInuMWZI5gBAcqYkft6VzCQTEiSWSLzojDpFN2MuW3wX72NndqW0di61o31fVSYcI6p5BT-poAzKbhkdKDXIzXBxxisU20otzrsBqT2g6lxsJ_M3mxKoz98G2yMqvJ9aIa3D0y1hRvo1T_owOYjq2Lnw2-937cBgHQ</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Adler, Barry E.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</title><author>Adler, Barry E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b855bce99cf4d731e7baa50e4f76e19f215020455c80001fd50857829e28bddc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bank collateral</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Bankruptcy Code</topic><topic>Bankruptcy procedures</topic><topic>Collateral</topic><topic>Cramdown</topic><topic>Debt management</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Liquidation value</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Secured creditors</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adler, Barry E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adler, Barry E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of legal studies</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>209-238</pages><issn>0047-2530</issn><eissn>1537-5366</eissn><coden>JLGSAO</coden><abstract>The rules of bankruptcy reorganization in the United States permit a debtor to retain a secured claim’s collateral in exchange for judicially approved compensation even over the objection of the secured creditor. An alternative would grant a secured creditor the right to recover its collateral unless satisfied with the compensation, a right often implicit in modern bankruptcy practice despite the formal rules. Either debtor or secured creditor domination of the bankruptcy process may yield inefficient continuation decisions, violations of absolute priority, and high transactions cost. As a remedy to these pitfalls, a mechanism that would mediate between debtor and creditor control and could harness the parties’ information about collateral value is proposed here: junior interests would, on behalf of the debtor, propose a reorganization plan that could include a take-it-or-leave-it offer for collateral with assured liquidation of the collateral being the consequence if the secured creditor rejected the plan.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/665705</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2530 |
ispartof | The Journal of legal studies, 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.209-238 |
issn | 0047-2530 1537-5366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019876854 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run) |
subjects | Auctions Bank collateral Bankruptcy Bankruptcy Code Bankruptcy procedures Collateral Cramdown Debt management Debtors Decisions Game theory Judicial process Liquidation value Liquidity Secured creditors Trade U.S.A United States of America Valuation Values |
title | Game-Theoretic Bankruptcy Valuation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A18%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Game-Theoretic%20Bankruptcy%20Valuation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Adler,%20Barry%20E.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=209-238&rft.issn=0047-2530&rft.eissn=1537-5366&rft.coden=JLGSAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/665705&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/665705%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019876854&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/665705&rfr_iscdi=true |