Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Novel Cooling and Power Gas Turbine Engine

A life cycle cost analysis was performed to compare life cycle costs of a novel gas turbine engine to those of a conventional microturbine with similar power capacity. This engine, called the high-pressure regenerative turbine engine (HPRTE), operates on a pressurized semiclosed cycle and is integra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of energy resources technology 2010-12, Vol.132 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Malhotra, Vaibhav, Lear, W. E, Khan, J. R, Sherif, S. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of energy resources technology
container_volume 132
creator Malhotra, Vaibhav
Lear, W. E
Khan, J. R
Sherif, S. A
description A life cycle cost analysis was performed to compare life cycle costs of a novel gas turbine engine to those of a conventional microturbine with similar power capacity. This engine, called the high-pressure regenerative turbine engine (HPRTE), operates on a pressurized semiclosed cycle and is integrated with a vapor absorption refrigeration system. The HPRTE uses heat from its exhaust gases to power the absorption refrigeration unit, which cools the high-pressure compressor inlet of the HPRTE to below ambient temperatures and also produces some external refrigeration. The life cycle cost analysis procedure is based on principles laid out in the Federal Energy Management Program. The influence of different design and economic parameters on the life cycle costs of both technologies is analyzed. The results of this analysis are expressed in terms of the cost ratios of the two technologies. The pressurized nature of the HPRTE leads to compact components resulting in significant savings in equipment cost versus those of a microturbine. Revenue obtained from external refrigeration offsets some of the fuel costs for the HPRTE, thus proving to be a major contributor in cost savings for the HPRTE. For the base case of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) inlet temperature of 1373 K and an exit temperature of 1073 K, the HPRTE showed life cycle cost savings of 7% over a microturbine with a similar power capacity.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4003075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019652122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1019652122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a353t-8f112d4aed5e79450d6dff48f40a85a5d89024c9aff48163265e9e1f62b2e6973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1PAjEQxRujiYgePHvpxUQPi51-bfdICIIJUQ94bspuS5aULbashv_eEoiXecnMb95kHkL3QEYAIF5gxAlhpBQXaACCqkJVFb9EAwKVKEjJ1DW6SWlDCIDidIDmi9ZZPDnUPteQ9njcGX9IbcLBYYPfw4_1eRB8262x6Rr8GX5txDOT8LKPq7azeNqts9yiK2d8sndnHaKv1-lyMi8WH7O3yXhRGCbYvlAOgDbc2EbYsuKCNLJxjivHiVHCiEZVhPK6MscmSEalsJUFJ-mKWlmVbIieTr67GL57m_Z626baem86G_qkIX8qBQVKM_p8QusYUorW6V1styYeMqSPaWnQ57Qy-3i2Nak23kXT1W36X6BMcQ7l8fzDiTNpa_Um9DHnlTSXnEjC_gBqHG-F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019652122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Novel Cooling and Power Gas Turbine Engine</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Malhotra, Vaibhav ; Lear, W. E ; Khan, J. R ; Sherif, S. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Vaibhav ; Lear, W. E ; Khan, J. R ; Sherif, S. A</creatorcontrib><description>A life cycle cost analysis was performed to compare life cycle costs of a novel gas turbine engine to those of a conventional microturbine with similar power capacity. This engine, called the high-pressure regenerative turbine engine (HPRTE), operates on a pressurized semiclosed cycle and is integrated with a vapor absorption refrigeration system. The HPRTE uses heat from its exhaust gases to power the absorption refrigeration unit, which cools the high-pressure compressor inlet of the HPRTE to below ambient temperatures and also produces some external refrigeration. The life cycle cost analysis procedure is based on principles laid out in the Federal Energy Management Program. The influence of different design and economic parameters on the life cycle costs of both technologies is analyzed. The results of this analysis are expressed in terms of the cost ratios of the two technologies. The pressurized nature of the HPRTE leads to compact components resulting in significant savings in equipment cost versus those of a microturbine. Revenue obtained from external refrigeration offsets some of the fuel costs for the HPRTE, thus proving to be a major contributor in cost savings for the HPRTE. For the base case of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) inlet temperature of 1373 K and an exit temperature of 1073 K, the HPRTE showed life cycle cost savings of 7% over a microturbine with a similar power capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-0738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4003075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JERTD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Cooling ; Cost analysis ; Cost engineering ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy management ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Engines and turbines ; Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gas turbine engines ; General, economic and professional studies ; Heat Energy Generation/Storage/Transfer ; Life cycle costs ; Refrigeration ; Regenerative</subject><ispartof>Journal of energy resources technology, 2010-12, Vol.132 (4)</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a353t-8f112d4aed5e79450d6dff48f40a85a5d89024c9aff48163265e9e1f62b2e6973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a353t-8f112d4aed5e79450d6dff48f40a85a5d89024c9aff48163265e9e1f62b2e6973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38520</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23844177$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lear, W. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherif, S. A</creatorcontrib><title>Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Novel Cooling and Power Gas Turbine Engine</title><title>Journal of energy resources technology</title><addtitle>J. Energy Resour. Technol</addtitle><description>A life cycle cost analysis was performed to compare life cycle costs of a novel gas turbine engine to those of a conventional microturbine with similar power capacity. This engine, called the high-pressure regenerative turbine engine (HPRTE), operates on a pressurized semiclosed cycle and is integrated with a vapor absorption refrigeration system. The HPRTE uses heat from its exhaust gases to power the absorption refrigeration unit, which cools the high-pressure compressor inlet of the HPRTE to below ambient temperatures and also produces some external refrigeration. The life cycle cost analysis procedure is based on principles laid out in the Federal Energy Management Program. The influence of different design and economic parameters on the life cycle costs of both technologies is analyzed. The results of this analysis are expressed in terms of the cost ratios of the two technologies. The pressurized nature of the HPRTE leads to compact components resulting in significant savings in equipment cost versus those of a microturbine. Revenue obtained from external refrigeration offsets some of the fuel costs for the HPRTE, thus proving to be a major contributor in cost savings for the HPRTE. For the base case of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) inlet temperature of 1373 K and an exit temperature of 1073 K, the HPRTE showed life cycle cost savings of 7% over a microturbine with a similar power capacity.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Engines and turbines</subject><subject>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gas turbine engines</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Heat Energy Generation/Storage/Transfer</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Refrigeration</subject><subject>Regenerative</subject><issn>0195-0738</issn><issn>1528-8994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1PAjEQxRujiYgePHvpxUQPi51-bfdICIIJUQ94bspuS5aULbashv_eEoiXecnMb95kHkL3QEYAIF5gxAlhpBQXaACCqkJVFb9EAwKVKEjJ1DW6SWlDCIDidIDmi9ZZPDnUPteQ9njcGX9IbcLBYYPfw4_1eRB8262x6Rr8GX5txDOT8LKPq7azeNqts9yiK2d8sndnHaKv1-lyMi8WH7O3yXhRGCbYvlAOgDbc2EbYsuKCNLJxjivHiVHCiEZVhPK6MscmSEalsJUFJ-mKWlmVbIieTr67GL57m_Z626baem86G_qkIX8qBQVKM_p8QusYUorW6V1styYeMqSPaWnQ57Qy-3i2Nak23kXT1W36X6BMcQ7l8fzDiTNpa_Um9DHnlTSXnEjC_gBqHG-F</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Malhotra, Vaibhav</creator><creator>Lear, W. E</creator><creator>Khan, J. R</creator><creator>Sherif, S. A</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Novel Cooling and Power Gas Turbine Engine</title><author>Malhotra, Vaibhav ; Lear, W. E ; Khan, J. R ; Sherif, S. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a353t-8f112d4aed5e79450d6dff48f40a85a5d89024c9aff48163265e9e1f62b2e6973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Engines and turbines</topic><topic>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gas turbine engines</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Heat Energy Generation/Storage/Transfer</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Refrigeration</topic><topic>Regenerative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lear, W. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherif, S. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of energy resources technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malhotra, Vaibhav</au><au>Lear, W. E</au><au>Khan, J. R</au><au>Sherif, S. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Novel Cooling and Power Gas Turbine Engine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of energy resources technology</jtitle><stitle>J. Energy Resour. Technol</stitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>0195-0738</issn><eissn>1528-8994</eissn><coden>JERTD2</coden><abstract>A life cycle cost analysis was performed to compare life cycle costs of a novel gas turbine engine to those of a conventional microturbine with similar power capacity. This engine, called the high-pressure regenerative turbine engine (HPRTE), operates on a pressurized semiclosed cycle and is integrated with a vapor absorption refrigeration system. The HPRTE uses heat from its exhaust gases to power the absorption refrigeration unit, which cools the high-pressure compressor inlet of the HPRTE to below ambient temperatures and also produces some external refrigeration. The life cycle cost analysis procedure is based on principles laid out in the Federal Energy Management Program. The influence of different design and economic parameters on the life cycle costs of both technologies is analyzed. The results of this analysis are expressed in terms of the cost ratios of the two technologies. The pressurized nature of the HPRTE leads to compact components resulting in significant savings in equipment cost versus those of a microturbine. Revenue obtained from external refrigeration offsets some of the fuel costs for the HPRTE, thus proving to be a major contributor in cost savings for the HPRTE. For the base case of a high-pressure turbine (HPT) inlet temperature of 1373 K and an exit temperature of 1073 K, the HPRTE showed life cycle cost savings of 7% over a microturbine with a similar power capacity.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4003075</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-0738
ispartof Journal of energy resources technology, 2010-12, Vol.132 (4)
issn 0195-0738
1528-8994
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019652122
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
subjects Applied sciences
Cooling
Cost analysis
Cost engineering
Economic data
Electric energy
Energy
Energy economics
Energy management
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Engines and turbines
Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc
Exact sciences and technology
Gas turbine engines
General, economic and professional studies
Heat Energy Generation/Storage/Transfer
Life cycle costs
Refrigeration
Regenerative
title Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Novel Cooling and Power Gas Turbine Engine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20Cycle%20Cost%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Novel%20Cooling%20and%20Power%20Gas%20Turbine%20Engine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20energy%20resources%20technology&rft.au=Malhotra,%20Vaibhav&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=0195-0738&rft.eissn=1528-8994&rft.coden=JERTD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4003075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1019652122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019652122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true