Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts
An important decision problem during the layout phase of a cross dock is related to the arrangement of inbound and outbound operations within a terminal. Either one side of the terminal is exclusively dedicated to inbound and the other to outbound destinations (vis-à-vis policy) or inbound and outbo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Operations management research 2011-12, Vol.4 (3-4), p.150-163 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 163 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3-4 |
| container_start_page | 150 |
| container_title | Operations management research |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Stephan, Konrad Boysen, Nils |
| description | An important decision problem during the layout phase of a cross dock is related to the arrangement of inbound and outbound operations within a terminal. Either one side of the terminal is exclusively dedicated to inbound and the other to outbound destinations (vis-à-vis policy) or inbound and outbound destinations can facultatively be assigned all around the terminal (mix policy). The latter policy promises more flexibility, when finally assigning dock doors to truck destinations during operational planning, but comes for the price of ambiguous material flows and potential congestions inside the terminal. Both policies are compared with regard to their impact on operational planning, where deterministic, stochastic and unknown inbound loads are differentiated. Our results show the mix policy being superior in most cases except for unknown inbound loads. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019625910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A715499342</galeid><sourcerecordid>A715499342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-206d36a3999bf4d991db2d490070d0bb0e9bb387dad45dac7d9ab13bd8b5a8913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEEqXwAKyw2k03Hnxi52J2o6oXpEpsuCwtO3ZGLkk89clU7dvwLrxYzxBURAWyZFv29_8-x39RvAWxAiGa9wilqCUXAFyIquHyWXEAWtZcN0o-f9zL6mXxCvFaiFooqA6Kb18j8p8_-G1EdosrNsa74JlP3XeaUmYWMW6mMUzzB7ZmXRq3NkdME0s987HvQ6Yr1uWEuKgGe592M74uXvR2wPDm93pYfDk_-3x6ya8-XXw8XV_xrgI5cyray9pKrbXrldcavCu90tSS8MI5EbRzsm289arytmu8tg6k862rbKtBHhYni-82p5tdwNmMEbswDHYKaYcGBOi6rDQIQo-eoNdplyeqztB75FWDIuh4gTZ2CCZOfZqz7faeZt1ApbSWqiRq9Q-Khg9j7NIU-kjnfwlgEfz6qRx6s81xtPmeCjT7AM0SoKEAzT5AI0nzbtEEcoz4qKhbJdtWKE1EuRBId9Mm5D8d_d_2AR6wpj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900913614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Stephan, Konrad ; Boysen, Nils</creator><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Konrad ; Boysen, Nils</creatorcontrib><description>An important decision problem during the layout phase of a cross dock is related to the arrangement of inbound and outbound operations within a terminal. Either one side of the terminal is exclusively dedicated to inbound and the other to outbound destinations (vis-à-vis policy) or inbound and outbound destinations can facultatively be assigned all around the terminal (mix policy). The latter policy promises more flexibility, when finally assigning dock doors to truck destinations during operational planning, but comes for the price of ambiguous material flows and potential congestions inside the terminal. Both policies are compared with regard to their impact on operational planning, where deterministic, stochastic and unknown inbound loads are differentiated. Our results show the mix policy being superior in most cases except for unknown inbound loads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-9735</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-9743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Congestion ; Distribution costs ; Docks ; Doors ; Engineering Economics ; Fabrikplanung ; Flexibility ; Güterverkehr ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Layouts ; Logistics ; Logistikdienstleister ; Management ; Marketing ; Operations Management ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Organization ; Policies ; Scheduling ; Simulation ; Stochasticity ; Strategic planning ; Terminals ; Trucks</subject><ispartof>Operations management research, 2011-12, Vol.4 (3-4), p.150-163</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-206d36a3999bf4d991db2d490070d0bb0e9bb387dad45dac7d9ab13bd8b5a8913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-206d36a3999bf4d991db2d490070d0bb0e9bb387dad45dac7d9ab13bd8b5a8913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Konrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysen, Nils</creatorcontrib><title>Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts</title><title>Operations management research</title><addtitle>Oper Manag Res</addtitle><description>An important decision problem during the layout phase of a cross dock is related to the arrangement of inbound and outbound operations within a terminal. Either one side of the terminal is exclusively dedicated to inbound and the other to outbound destinations (vis-à-vis policy) or inbound and outbound destinations can facultatively be assigned all around the terminal (mix policy). The latter policy promises more flexibility, when finally assigning dock doors to truck destinations during operational planning, but comes for the price of ambiguous material flows and potential congestions inside the terminal. Both policies are compared with regard to their impact on operational planning, where deterministic, stochastic and unknown inbound loads are differentiated. Our results show the mix policy being superior in most cases except for unknown inbound loads.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Congestion</subject><subject>Distribution costs</subject><subject>Docks</subject><subject>Doors</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Fabrikplanung</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Güterverkehr</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Layouts</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Logistikdienstleister</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Operations Management</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Terminals</subject><subject>Trucks</subject><issn>1936-9735</issn><issn>1936-9743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEEqXwAKyw2k03Hnxi52J2o6oXpEpsuCwtO3ZGLkk89clU7dvwLrxYzxBURAWyZFv29_8-x39RvAWxAiGa9wilqCUXAFyIquHyWXEAWtZcN0o-f9zL6mXxCvFaiFooqA6Kb18j8p8_-G1EdosrNsa74JlP3XeaUmYWMW6mMUzzB7ZmXRq3NkdME0s987HvQ6Yr1uWEuKgGe592M74uXvR2wPDm93pYfDk_-3x6ya8-XXw8XV_xrgI5cyray9pKrbXrldcavCu90tSS8MI5EbRzsm289arytmu8tg6k862rbKtBHhYni-82p5tdwNmMEbswDHYKaYcGBOi6rDQIQo-eoNdplyeqztB75FWDIuh4gTZ2CCZOfZqz7faeZt1ApbSWqiRq9Q-Khg9j7NIU-kjnfwlgEfz6qRx6s81xtPmeCjT7AM0SoKEAzT5AI0nzbtEEcoz4qKhbJdtWKE1EuRBId9Mm5D8d_d_2AR6wpj8</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Stephan, Konrad</creator><creator>Boysen, Nils</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts</title><author>Stephan, Konrad ; Boysen, Nils</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-206d36a3999bf4d991db2d490070d0bb0e9bb387dad45dac7d9ab13bd8b5a8913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Congestion</topic><topic>Distribution costs</topic><topic>Docks</topic><topic>Doors</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Fabrikplanung</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Güterverkehr</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Layouts</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Logistikdienstleister</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Operations Management</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Terminals</topic><topic>Trucks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Konrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysen, Nils</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Operations management research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stephan, Konrad</au><au>Boysen, Nils</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts</atitle><jtitle>Operations management research</jtitle><stitle>Oper Manag Res</stitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>150-163</pages><issn>1936-9735</issn><eissn>1936-9743</eissn><abstract>An important decision problem during the layout phase of a cross dock is related to the arrangement of inbound and outbound operations within a terminal. Either one side of the terminal is exclusively dedicated to inbound and the other to outbound destinations (vis-à-vis policy) or inbound and outbound destinations can facultatively be assigned all around the terminal (mix policy). The latter policy promises more flexibility, when finally assigning dock doors to truck destinations during operational planning, but comes for the price of ambiguous material flows and potential congestions inside the terminal. Both policies are compared with regard to their impact on operational planning, where deterministic, stochastic and unknown inbound loads are differentiated. Our results show the mix policy being superior in most cases except for unknown inbound loads.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1936-9735 |
| ispartof | Operations management research, 2011-12, Vol.4 (3-4), p.150-163 |
| issn | 1936-9735 1936-9743 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019625910 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Business and Management Congestion Distribution costs Docks Doors Engineering Economics Fabrikplanung Flexibility Güterverkehr Industrial and Production Engineering Innovation/Technology Management Layouts Logistics Logistikdienstleister Management Marketing Operations Management Operations research Operations Research/Decision Theory Organization Policies Scheduling Simulation Stochasticity Strategic planning Terminals Trucks |
| title | Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T13%3A26%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vis-%C3%A0-vis%20vs.%20mixed%20dock%20door%20assignment:%20A%20comparison%20of%20different%20cross%20dock%20layouts&rft.jtitle=Operations%20management%20research&rft.au=Stephan,%20Konrad&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=150-163&rft.issn=1936-9735&rft.eissn=1936-9743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA715499342%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900913614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A715499342&rfr_iscdi=true |