Perioperative Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Practice Patterns among Surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM

Anecdotally, there is great variation in the use of strategies to prevent postoperative penile implant infection. To evaluate the perioperative practice patterns of surgeons who insert penile prostheses focusing on their respective infection control routines. An anonymous Web-based survey was sent t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sexual medicine 2012-06, Vol.9 (6), p.1705-1714
Hauptverfasser: Katz, Darren J., Stember, Doron S., Nelson, Christian J., Mulhall, John P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1714
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1705
container_title Journal of sexual medicine
container_volume 9
creator Katz, Darren J.
Stember, Doron S.
Nelson, Christian J.
Mulhall, John P.
description Anecdotally, there is great variation in the use of strategies to prevent postoperative penile implant infection. To evaluate the perioperative practice patterns of surgeons who insert penile prostheses focusing on their respective infection control routines. An anonymous Web-based survey was sent to members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) and the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM). Thirty-nine questions were asked pertaining to the strategies used during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of penile implant surgery to prevent infection. One hundred twenty-nine surgeons responded to the survey (SMSNA 84; ISSM 45). Most surgeons considered themselves sexual medicine specialists. More SMSNA respondents had inserted >100 prosthesis (SMSNA 69%, ISSM 50%). Routine urine culture is not performed by 40% and 50% of SMSNA and ISSM members, respectively. Similar percentages of surgeons from each society request a daily preoperative antimicrobial scrub. About two-thirds of ISSM members use razors for the preoperative shave compared with one-third of SMSNA members. Most ISSM surgeons preferred povidone-iodine for hand and skin preparation while most SMSNA surgeons chose this only for skin preparation. Two-thirds of SMSNA members prepared the skin for at least 10 minutes compared with 34% of ISSM surgeons. There were considerable differences in all aspects of antibiotic usage not only between members of both societies but also among individual members of each society. Most surgeons prefer not to place a drain (SMSNA 70%, ISSM 81%). Discharge timing differs between the two groups. There is great variation in perioperative strategies utilized to prevent penile implant infections including some key differences between surgeons from SMSNA and ISSM. It is unknown if these variations result in changes in the postoperative infection rate; however, the study data may assist in the formation of practice guidelines and form the basis of future prospective studies. Katz DJ, Stember DS, Nelson CJ, and Mulhall JP. Perioperative prevention of penile prosthesis infection: Practice patterns among surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM. J Sex Med 2012;9:1705–1714.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02724.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019620169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743609515340029</els_id><sourcerecordid>1019620169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-21e8c56e493a4108a92ebe24307372769c7c397922337f849184211094f68b8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwF9Aeuezir3jXSBxKoCGoKZE2CG6W48wWp8k62JuQ_ntm2TZXmIvHM-871jwmJGO0YBhv1wUrpcgVo7rglPGC8pLL4viEnJ8aTx9zqkdn5EVKa0oFBn9OzjgfMSq4PCd3c4g-7CDazh8gm0c4QNv50GahyebQ-k1fDKn7CcmnbNo24Pr2O6xazBy2bddBbFNmt6G9zep9vIWAVxxQz-qby8y2q2xa17OX5FljNwlePZwX5NvVp8X4c379dTIdX17nTiolc86gciMFUgsrGa2s5rAELgUtRclLpV3phC4150KUTSU1qyRnuLFsVLWsQFyQN8PcXQy_9pA6s_XJwWZjWwj7ZBhlWiE2pVFaDVKHO6YIjdlFv7XxHkWmR23WpqdoeqKmR23-ojZHtL5-eGW_3MLqZHxki4L3g-A3Qrz_78HmSz3rM_Tng9-nDo4nv413RiGJkfl-MzEfr34s2HgxMRXqPwx6QLYHD9Ek56F1sPIRP82sgv_3Vn8A_PCvLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019620169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perioperative Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Practice Patterns among Surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Katz, Darren J. ; Stember, Doron S. ; Nelson, Christian J. ; Mulhall, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Katz, Darren J. ; Stember, Doron S. ; Nelson, Christian J. ; Mulhall, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Anecdotally, there is great variation in the use of strategies to prevent postoperative penile implant infection. To evaluate the perioperative practice patterns of surgeons who insert penile prostheses focusing on their respective infection control routines. An anonymous Web-based survey was sent to members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) and the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM). Thirty-nine questions were asked pertaining to the strategies used during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of penile implant surgery to prevent infection. One hundred twenty-nine surgeons responded to the survey (SMSNA 84; ISSM 45). Most surgeons considered themselves sexual medicine specialists. More SMSNA respondents had inserted &gt;100 prosthesis (SMSNA 69%, ISSM 50%). Routine urine culture is not performed by 40% and 50% of SMSNA and ISSM members, respectively. Similar percentages of surgeons from each society request a daily preoperative antimicrobial scrub. About two-thirds of ISSM members use razors for the preoperative shave compared with one-third of SMSNA members. Most ISSM surgeons preferred povidone-iodine for hand and skin preparation while most SMSNA surgeons chose this only for skin preparation. Two-thirds of SMSNA members prepared the skin for at least 10 minutes compared with 34% of ISSM surgeons. There were considerable differences in all aspects of antibiotic usage not only between members of both societies but also among individual members of each society. Most surgeons prefer not to place a drain (SMSNA 70%, ISSM 81%). Discharge timing differs between the two groups. There is great variation in perioperative strategies utilized to prevent penile implant infections including some key differences between surgeons from SMSNA and ISSM. It is unknown if these variations result in changes in the postoperative infection rate; however, the study data may assist in the formation of practice guidelines and form the basis of future prospective studies. Katz DJ, Stember DS, Nelson CJ, and Mulhall JP. Perioperative prevention of penile prosthesis infection: Practice patterns among surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM. J Sex Med 2012;9:1705–1714.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-6109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02724.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22510324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Antibiotic Selection ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Erectile Dysfunction - surgery ; Europe ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Infection ; Inflatable Penile Prosthesis ; Latin America ; Male ; North America ; Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Perioperative Care ; Practice Pattern Survey ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Survey of Urologists ; Three-Piece Penile Implant ; Urology - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of sexual medicine, 2012-06, Vol.9 (6), p.1705-1714</ispartof><rights>2012 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>2012 International Society for Sexual Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-21e8c56e493a4108a92ebe24307372769c7c397922337f849184211094f68b8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-21e8c56e493a4108a92ebe24307372769c7c397922337f849184211094f68b8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1743-6109.2012.02724.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1743-6109.2012.02724.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22510324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katz, Darren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stember, Doron S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>Perioperative Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Practice Patterns among Surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM</title><title>Journal of sexual medicine</title><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><description>Anecdotally, there is great variation in the use of strategies to prevent postoperative penile implant infection. To evaluate the perioperative practice patterns of surgeons who insert penile prostheses focusing on their respective infection control routines. An anonymous Web-based survey was sent to members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) and the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM). Thirty-nine questions were asked pertaining to the strategies used during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of penile implant surgery to prevent infection. One hundred twenty-nine surgeons responded to the survey (SMSNA 84; ISSM 45). Most surgeons considered themselves sexual medicine specialists. More SMSNA respondents had inserted &gt;100 prosthesis (SMSNA 69%, ISSM 50%). Routine urine culture is not performed by 40% and 50% of SMSNA and ISSM members, respectively. Similar percentages of surgeons from each society request a daily preoperative antimicrobial scrub. About two-thirds of ISSM members use razors for the preoperative shave compared with one-third of SMSNA members. Most ISSM surgeons preferred povidone-iodine for hand and skin preparation while most SMSNA surgeons chose this only for skin preparation. Two-thirds of SMSNA members prepared the skin for at least 10 minutes compared with 34% of ISSM surgeons. There were considerable differences in all aspects of antibiotic usage not only between members of both societies but also among individual members of each society. Most surgeons prefer not to place a drain (SMSNA 70%, ISSM 81%). Discharge timing differs between the two groups. There is great variation in perioperative strategies utilized to prevent penile implant infections including some key differences between surgeons from SMSNA and ISSM. It is unknown if these variations result in changes in the postoperative infection rate; however, the study data may assist in the formation of practice guidelines and form the basis of future prospective studies. Katz DJ, Stember DS, Nelson CJ, and Mulhall JP. Perioperative prevention of penile prosthesis infection: Practice patterns among surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM. J Sex Med 2012;9:1705–1714.</description><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Antibiotic Selection</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Inflatable Penile Prosthesis</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Practice Pattern Survey</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Survey of Urologists</subject><subject>Three-Piece Penile Implant</subject><subject>Urology - education</subject><issn>1743-6095</issn><issn>1743-6109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwF9Aeuezir3jXSBxKoCGoKZE2CG6W48wWp8k62JuQ_ntm2TZXmIvHM-871jwmJGO0YBhv1wUrpcgVo7rglPGC8pLL4viEnJ8aTx9zqkdn5EVKa0oFBn9OzjgfMSq4PCd3c4g-7CDazh8gm0c4QNv50GahyebQ-k1fDKn7CcmnbNo24Pr2O6xazBy2bddBbFNmt6G9zep9vIWAVxxQz-qby8y2q2xa17OX5FljNwlePZwX5NvVp8X4c379dTIdX17nTiolc86gciMFUgsrGa2s5rAELgUtRclLpV3phC4150KUTSU1qyRnuLFsVLWsQFyQN8PcXQy_9pA6s_XJwWZjWwj7ZBhlWiE2pVFaDVKHO6YIjdlFv7XxHkWmR23WpqdoeqKmR23-ojZHtL5-eGW_3MLqZHxki4L3g-A3Qrz_78HmSz3rM_Tng9-nDo4nv413RiGJkfl-MzEfr34s2HgxMRXqPwx6QLYHD9Ek56F1sPIRP82sgv_3Vn8A_PCvLA</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Katz, Darren J.</creator><creator>Stember, Doron S.</creator><creator>Nelson, Christian J.</creator><creator>Mulhall, John P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Perioperative Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Practice Patterns among Surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM</title><author>Katz, Darren J. ; Stember, Doron S. ; Nelson, Christian J. ; Mulhall, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-21e8c56e493a4108a92ebe24307372769c7c397922337f849184211094f68b8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Antibiotic Selection</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Inflatable Penile Prosthesis</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Practice Pattern Survey</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Survey of Urologists</topic><topic>Three-Piece Penile Implant</topic><topic>Urology - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katz, Darren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stember, Doron S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katz, Darren J.</au><au>Stember, Doron S.</au><au>Nelson, Christian J.</au><au>Mulhall, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perioperative Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Practice Patterns among Surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1705</spage><epage>1714</epage><pages>1705-1714</pages><issn>1743-6095</issn><eissn>1743-6109</eissn><abstract>Anecdotally, there is great variation in the use of strategies to prevent postoperative penile implant infection. To evaluate the perioperative practice patterns of surgeons who insert penile prostheses focusing on their respective infection control routines. An anonymous Web-based survey was sent to members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) and the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM). Thirty-nine questions were asked pertaining to the strategies used during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of penile implant surgery to prevent infection. One hundred twenty-nine surgeons responded to the survey (SMSNA 84; ISSM 45). Most surgeons considered themselves sexual medicine specialists. More SMSNA respondents had inserted &gt;100 prosthesis (SMSNA 69%, ISSM 50%). Routine urine culture is not performed by 40% and 50% of SMSNA and ISSM members, respectively. Similar percentages of surgeons from each society request a daily preoperative antimicrobial scrub. About two-thirds of ISSM members use razors for the preoperative shave compared with one-third of SMSNA members. Most ISSM surgeons preferred povidone-iodine for hand and skin preparation while most SMSNA surgeons chose this only for skin preparation. Two-thirds of SMSNA members prepared the skin for at least 10 minutes compared with 34% of ISSM surgeons. There were considerable differences in all aspects of antibiotic usage not only between members of both societies but also among individual members of each society. Most surgeons prefer not to place a drain (SMSNA 70%, ISSM 81%). Discharge timing differs between the two groups. There is great variation in perioperative strategies utilized to prevent penile implant infections including some key differences between surgeons from SMSNA and ISSM. It is unknown if these variations result in changes in the postoperative infection rate; however, the study data may assist in the formation of practice guidelines and form the basis of future prospective studies. Katz DJ, Stember DS, Nelson CJ, and Mulhall JP. Perioperative prevention of penile prosthesis infection: Practice patterns among surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM. J Sex Med 2012;9:1705–1714.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22510324</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02724.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-6095
ispartof Journal of sexual medicine, 2012-06, Vol.9 (6), p.1705-1714
issn 1743-6095
1743-6109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019620169
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Antibiotic Selection
Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction - surgery
Europe
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Infection
Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
Latin America
Male
North America
Penile Prosthesis - adverse effects
Perioperative Care
Practice Pattern Survey
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control
Survey of Urologists
Three-Piece Penile Implant
Urology - education
title Perioperative Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Practice Patterns among Surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perioperative%20Prevention%20of%20Penile%20Prosthesis%20Infection:%20Practice%20Patterns%20among%20Surgeons%20of%20SMSNA%20and%20ISSM&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sexual%20medicine&rft.au=Katz,%20Darren%20J.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1705&rft.epage=1714&rft.pages=1705-1714&rft.issn=1743-6095&rft.eissn=1743-6109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02724.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1019620169%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019620169&rft_id=info:pmid/22510324&rft_els_id=S1743609515340029&rfr_iscdi=true