Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years

Summary Background  Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products. Objecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.93-100
1. Verfasser: Rendon, Marta I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 2
container_start_page 93
container_title Journal of cosmetic dermatology
container_volume 11
creator Rendon, Marta I
description Summary Background  Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products. Objectives  To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years. Methods  Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years. Results  Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved. Conclusions  Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019618809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1019618809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd9u0zAYxSPExMbgFZAvuUnwn8ROkLhABTpQtUnVEIgby7G_MBcnDna6tXeTeAjejychabtezze2dH7ns31OkiCCMzKuN6uM5IKllPAio5jQDGOOq2zzJDk7Ck-PZ4ZPk-cxrjAmoiLFs-SUUi4oFews-bvw3c90gNAiBXG4gcFq5NeD9i1EdGeHG2S7FehB1Q5Q7902dalTesKUtuYt8nWEcKsG67uIVGdQH3aycijAOKaFzhzUWkUwyHdIO9vtCNj0ECx0GpC_hYCKf_d_tqBCfJGcNMpFeHnYz5Ovnz5ezy7SxdX88-z9ItWMiSrNqdFFoZkwPDe64VCWRHNacKMJFIwTWuG8MHj8dw6iaYQiYHBdV6WAnJOKnSev93P74H-vxwRka6MG51QHfh0lwaTipCzxhJZ7VAcfY4BG9sG2KmxHSE61yJWcEpdT-nKqRe5qkZvR-upwy7puwRyNDz2MwLs9cGcdbB89WH65mn3gu7ele7-NA2yOfhV-SS6YKOS3y7nky_mP2XL5XV6y_w4KrqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019618809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rendon, Marta I</creator><creatorcontrib>Rendon, Marta I</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background  Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products. Objectives  To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years. Methods  Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years. Results  Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved. Conclusions  Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22672273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>calcium hydroxylapatite ; collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite ; Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects ; dermal fillers ; Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects ; Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use ; Esthetics ; Face ; Female ; Humans ; hyaluronic acid ; Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use ; injectable poly-l-lactic acid ; Injections, Intradermal ; Lactic Acid - adverse effects ; Lactic Acid - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Polyesters ; Polymers - adverse effects ; Polymers - therapeutic use ; Rejuvenation ; Retrospective Studies ; soft-tissue augmentation ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.93-100</ispartof><rights>2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1473-2165.2012.00609.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1473-2165.2012.00609.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rendon, Marta I</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary Background  Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products. Objectives  To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years. Methods  Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years. Results  Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved. Conclusions  Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.</description><subject>calcium hydroxylapatite</subject><subject>collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>dermal fillers</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyaluronic acid</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>injectable poly-l-lactic acid</subject><subject>Injections, Intradermal</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polymers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Polymers - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Rejuvenation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>soft-tissue augmentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd9u0zAYxSPExMbgFZAvuUnwn8ROkLhABTpQtUnVEIgby7G_MBcnDna6tXeTeAjejychabtezze2dH7ns31OkiCCMzKuN6uM5IKllPAio5jQDGOOq2zzJDk7Ck-PZ4ZPk-cxrjAmoiLFs-SUUi4oFews-bvw3c90gNAiBXG4gcFq5NeD9i1EdGeHG2S7FehB1Q5Q7902dalTesKUtuYt8nWEcKsG67uIVGdQH3aycijAOKaFzhzUWkUwyHdIO9vtCNj0ECx0GpC_hYCKf_d_tqBCfJGcNMpFeHnYz5Ovnz5ezy7SxdX88-z9ItWMiSrNqdFFoZkwPDe64VCWRHNacKMJFIwTWuG8MHj8dw6iaYQiYHBdV6WAnJOKnSev93P74H-vxwRka6MG51QHfh0lwaTipCzxhJZ7VAcfY4BG9sG2KmxHSE61yJWcEpdT-nKqRe5qkZvR-upwy7puwRyNDz2MwLs9cGcdbB89WH65mn3gu7ele7-NA2yOfhV-SS6YKOS3y7nky_mP2XL5XV6y_w4KrqU</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Rendon, Marta I</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</title><author>Rendon, Marta I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>calcium hydroxylapatite</topic><topic>collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>dermal fillers</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyaluronic acid</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>injectable poly-l-lactic acid</topic><topic>Injections, Intradermal</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polymers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Polymers - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Rejuvenation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>soft-tissue augmentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rendon, Marta I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rendon, Marta I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>93-100</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Summary Background  Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products. Objectives  To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years. Methods  Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years. Results  Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved. Conclusions  Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22672273</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-2130
ispartof Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.93-100
issn 1473-2130
1473-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019618809
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects calcium hydroxylapatite
collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite
Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects
dermal fillers
Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects
Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use
Esthetics
Face
Female
Humans
hyaluronic acid
Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use
injectable poly-l-lactic acid
Injections, Intradermal
Lactic Acid - adverse effects
Lactic Acid - therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Polyesters
Polymers - adverse effects
Polymers - therapeutic use
Rejuvenation
Retrospective Studies
soft-tissue augmentation
Time Factors
title Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A52%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20aesthetic%20outcomes%20with%20injectable%20poly-l-lactic%20acid:%20observations%20and%20practical%20recommendations%20based%20on%20clinical%20experience%20over%205%E2%80%83years&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Rendon,%20Marta%20I&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=93-100&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1019618809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019618809&rft_id=info:pmid/22672273&rfr_iscdi=true