Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years
Summary Background Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products. Objecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.93-100 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Journal of cosmetic dermatology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Rendon, Marta I |
description | Summary
Background Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products.
Objectives To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years.
Methods Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years.
Results Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved.
Conclusions Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019618809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1019618809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd9u0zAYxSPExMbgFZAvuUnwn8ROkLhABTpQtUnVEIgby7G_MBcnDna6tXeTeAjejychabtezze2dH7ns31OkiCCMzKuN6uM5IKllPAio5jQDGOOq2zzJDk7Ck-PZ4ZPk-cxrjAmoiLFs-SUUi4oFews-bvw3c90gNAiBXG4gcFq5NeD9i1EdGeHG2S7FehB1Q5Q7902dalTesKUtuYt8nWEcKsG67uIVGdQH3aycijAOKaFzhzUWkUwyHdIO9vtCNj0ECx0GpC_hYCKf_d_tqBCfJGcNMpFeHnYz5Ovnz5ezy7SxdX88-z9ItWMiSrNqdFFoZkwPDe64VCWRHNacKMJFIwTWuG8MHj8dw6iaYQiYHBdV6WAnJOKnSev93P74H-vxwRka6MG51QHfh0lwaTipCzxhJZ7VAcfY4BG9sG2KmxHSE61yJWcEpdT-nKqRe5qkZvR-upwy7puwRyNDz2MwLs9cGcdbB89WH65mn3gu7ele7-NA2yOfhV-SS6YKOS3y7nky_mP2XL5XV6y_w4KrqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019618809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rendon, Marta I</creator><creatorcontrib>Rendon, Marta I</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products.
Objectives To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years.
Methods Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years.
Results Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved.
Conclusions Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22672273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>calcium hydroxylapatite ; collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite ; Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects ; dermal fillers ; Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects ; Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use ; Esthetics ; Face ; Female ; Humans ; hyaluronic acid ; Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use ; injectable poly-l-lactic acid ; Injections, Intradermal ; Lactic Acid - adverse effects ; Lactic Acid - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Polyesters ; Polymers - adverse effects ; Polymers - therapeutic use ; Rejuvenation ; Retrospective Studies ; soft-tissue augmentation ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.93-100</ispartof><rights>2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1473-2165.2012.00609.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1473-2165.2012.00609.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rendon, Marta I</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary
Background Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products.
Objectives To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years.
Methods Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years.
Results Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved.
Conclusions Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.</description><subject>calcium hydroxylapatite</subject><subject>collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>dermal fillers</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyaluronic acid</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>injectable poly-l-lactic acid</subject><subject>Injections, Intradermal</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polymers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Polymers - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Rejuvenation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>soft-tissue augmentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd9u0zAYxSPExMbgFZAvuUnwn8ROkLhABTpQtUnVEIgby7G_MBcnDna6tXeTeAjejychabtezze2dH7ns31OkiCCMzKuN6uM5IKllPAio5jQDGOOq2zzJDk7Ck-PZ4ZPk-cxrjAmoiLFs-SUUi4oFews-bvw3c90gNAiBXG4gcFq5NeD9i1EdGeHG2S7FehB1Q5Q7902dalTesKUtuYt8nWEcKsG67uIVGdQH3aycijAOKaFzhzUWkUwyHdIO9vtCNj0ECx0GpC_hYCKf_d_tqBCfJGcNMpFeHnYz5Ovnz5ezy7SxdX88-z9ItWMiSrNqdFFoZkwPDe64VCWRHNacKMJFIwTWuG8MHj8dw6iaYQiYHBdV6WAnJOKnSev93P74H-vxwRka6MG51QHfh0lwaTipCzxhJZ7VAcfY4BG9sG2KmxHSE61yJWcEpdT-nKqRe5qkZvR-upwy7puwRyNDz2MwLs9cGcdbB89WH65mn3gu7ele7-NA2yOfhV-SS6YKOS3y7nky_mP2XL5XV6y_w4KrqU</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Rendon, Marta I</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</title><author>Rendon, Marta I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3379-42dc55c37d64dcf6e881c6256dc1e536129045d07914e7ff7a1ed0bb987e46193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>calcium hydroxylapatite</topic><topic>collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>dermal fillers</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyaluronic acid</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>injectable poly-l-lactic acid</topic><topic>Injections, Intradermal</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polymers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Polymers - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Rejuvenation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>soft-tissue augmentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rendon, Marta I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rendon, Marta I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>93-100</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background Facial rejuvenation techniques have evolved in recent decades driven by a paradigm shift to restoration of lost volume, and an increase in the number of available products. As clinical experience has increased, practitioners have further refined the use of these products.
Objectives To share observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience with the aesthetic use of injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid (PLLA) in patients followed for up to 5 years.
Methods Literature review and retrospective case history review of the first 100 patients treated with injectable PLLA, many of whom have been followed for over 5 years.
Results Use of injectable PLLA, alone or in combination with other products, has provided excellent and long‐lasting (up to 5 years) aesthetic results for most of the reviewed patients. Typically, patients have received one or two touch‐up sessions between years 2 and 4 after initial full correction. There were minimal adverse events of papule formation; these eventually resolved.
Conclusions Injectable PLLA is a safe and effective option for achieving long‐term patient satisfaction with soft‐tissue augmentation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22672273</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-2130 |
ispartof | Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2), p.93-100 |
issn | 1473-2130 1473-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019618809 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | calcium hydroxylapatite collagen replacementcalcium hydroxylapatite Cosmetic Techniques - adverse effects dermal fillers Dermatologic Agents - adverse effects Dermatologic Agents - therapeutic use Esthetics Face Female Humans hyaluronic acid Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use injectable poly-l-lactic acid Injections, Intradermal Lactic Acid - adverse effects Lactic Acid - therapeutic use Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Polyesters Polymers - adverse effects Polymers - therapeutic use Rejuvenation Retrospective Studies soft-tissue augmentation Time Factors |
title | Long-term aesthetic outcomes with injectable poly-l-lactic acid: observations and practical recommendations based on clinical experience over 5 years |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A52%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20aesthetic%20outcomes%20with%20injectable%20poly-l-lactic%20acid:%20observations%20and%20practical%20recommendations%20based%20on%20clinical%20experience%20over%205%E2%80%83years&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Rendon,%20Marta%20I&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=93-100&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2012.00609.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1019618809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019618809&rft_id=info:pmid/22672273&rfr_iscdi=true |