Robust methods are needed to investigate association between white rice consumption and type 2 diabetes
The primary outcome in Hu and colleagues' meta-analysis and systematic review was risk of type 2 diabetes, but the authors did not clearly report their methods, giving it as self reported. 1 Table 2 indicates confirmation of type 2 diabetes by medical practitioners, but. on closer inspection me...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2012-05, Vol.344 (may01 2), p.e3094; author reply e3097-e3094 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e3094 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | may01 2 |
| container_start_page | e3094; author reply e3097 |
| container_title | BMJ (Online) |
| container_volume | 344 |
| creator | Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza |
| description | The primary outcome in Hu and colleagues' meta-analysis and systematic review was risk of type 2 diabetes, but the authors did not clearly report their methods, giving it as self reported. 1 Table 2 indicates confirmation of type 2 diabetes by medical practitioners, but. on closer inspection medical testing was carried out only in subjects who self reported diabetes, not in all subjects. The data quality assessment seemed to have been devised by Hu and colleagues and was not a standard tool for critical appraisal. 2 3 The authors reported the results of included studies to be significantly heterogeneous (overall [chi]2=72.2%, P=0.001), but they did not discuss the possible reasons of heterogeneity in their analysis and analysed the pooled findings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.e3094 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019618552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945187689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-f520dfe633150f32c61fe527ec0756573fe2a3f9ea48162317a0da0e7224ce033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1P3DAQBmCroior4NA_UFmCQ3sI-CP-OqJVt1sJilQVrpaTTMDLJl5sp5R_X8MCByROPryPZ8YehD5TckwplyfNsDoGTkz9Ac2oErKimvMdNCNGmEpTrnfRQUorQgjjShspPqFdxkRtiFQzdP07NFPKeIB8E7qEXQQ8AnTQ4RywH_9Cyv7aZcAupdB6l30YcQP5HmDE9ze-JNG3gNswpmnYPMVuLLcfNoAZ7rwrGNI--ti7dYKD53MPXS6-_5kvq7OLHz_np2dVwzXJVS8Y6XqQnFNBes5aSXsQTEFLytOE4j0wx3sDrtZUMk6VI50joBirWyCc76Gv27qbGO6mMrwdfGphvXYjhClZSqiRVAvBCj18Q1dhimOZzlJTC6qV1Kaob1vVxpBShN5uoh9cfCil7OMCbFmAfVpAsV-eK07NAN2rfPnuAqot8CnDv9fcxVtbUiXsr6u5XS4WS8nPjT0v_mjrH3u83_c_BWCbUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1945187689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robust methods are needed to investigate association between white rice consumption and type 2 diabetes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza</creator><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza ; On behalf of Sarah Westwater-Wood, Ghada Alarfaj, Helen Atherton, Charles Cachoeira, Joseph Marcel El Khoury, Mary Ann McLane, Laurence Pollissard-Badroy, Liubov Yashina, Carl Heneghan</creatorcontrib><description>The primary outcome in Hu and colleagues' meta-analysis and systematic review was risk of type 2 diabetes, but the authors did not clearly report their methods, giving it as self reported. 1 Table 2 indicates confirmation of type 2 diabetes by medical practitioners, but. on closer inspection medical testing was carried out only in subjects who self reported diabetes, not in all subjects. The data quality assessment seemed to have been devised by Hu and colleagues and was not a standard tool for critical appraisal. 2 3 The authors reported the results of included studies to be significantly heterogeneous (overall [chi]2=72.2%, P=0.001), but they did not discuss the possible reasons of heterogeneity in their analysis and analysed the pooled findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e3094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22549067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology ; Diet - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Oryza - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2012-05, Vol.344 (may01 2), p.e3094; author reply e3097-e3094</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2012</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-f520dfe633150f32c61fe527ec0756573fe2a3f9ea48162317a0da0e7224ce033</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e3094.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e3094.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22549067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of Sarah Westwater-Wood, Ghada Alarfaj, Helen Atherton, Charles Cachoeira, Joseph Marcel El Khoury, Mary Ann McLane, Laurence Pollissard-Badroy, Liubov Yashina, Carl Heneghan</creatorcontrib><title>Robust methods are needed to investigate association between white rice consumption and type 2 diabetes</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>The primary outcome in Hu and colleagues' meta-analysis and systematic review was risk of type 2 diabetes, but the authors did not clearly report their methods, giving it as self reported. 1 Table 2 indicates confirmation of type 2 diabetes by medical practitioners, but. on closer inspection medical testing was carried out only in subjects who self reported diabetes, not in all subjects. The data quality assessment seemed to have been devised by Hu and colleagues and was not a standard tool for critical appraisal. 2 3 The authors reported the results of included studies to be significantly heterogeneous (overall [chi]2=72.2%, P=0.001), but they did not discuss the possible reasons of heterogeneity in their analysis and analysed the pooled findings.</description><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diet - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oryza - adverse effects</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1P3DAQBmCroior4NA_UFmCQ3sI-CP-OqJVt1sJilQVrpaTTMDLJl5sp5R_X8MCByROPryPZ8YehD5TckwplyfNsDoGTkz9Ac2oErKimvMdNCNGmEpTrnfRQUorQgjjShspPqFdxkRtiFQzdP07NFPKeIB8E7qEXQQ8AnTQ4RywH_9Cyv7aZcAupdB6l30YcQP5HmDE9ze-JNG3gNswpmnYPMVuLLcfNoAZ7rwrGNI--ti7dYKD53MPXS6-_5kvq7OLHz_np2dVwzXJVS8Y6XqQnFNBes5aSXsQTEFLytOE4j0wx3sDrtZUMk6VI50joBirWyCc76Gv27qbGO6mMrwdfGphvXYjhClZSqiRVAvBCj18Q1dhimOZzlJTC6qV1Kaob1vVxpBShN5uoh9cfCil7OMCbFmAfVpAsV-eK07NAN2rfPnuAqot8CnDv9fcxVtbUiXsr6u5XS4WS8nPjT0v_mjrH3u83_c_BWCbUw</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Robust methods are needed to investigate association between white rice consumption and type 2 diabetes</title><author>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-f520dfe633150f32c61fe527ec0756573fe2a3f9ea48162317a0da0e7224ce033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diet - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oryza - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of Sarah Westwater-Wood, Ghada Alarfaj, Helen Atherton, Charles Cachoeira, Joseph Marcel El Khoury, Mary Ann McLane, Laurence Pollissard-Badroy, Liubov Yashina, Carl Heneghan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naqvi, Syed Ali Raza</au><aucorp>On behalf of Sarah Westwater-Wood, Ghada Alarfaj, Helen Atherton, Charles Cachoeira, Joseph Marcel El Khoury, Mary Ann McLane, Laurence Pollissard-Badroy, Liubov Yashina, Carl Heneghan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robust methods are needed to investigate association between white rice consumption and type 2 diabetes</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>344</volume><issue>may01 2</issue><spage>e3094; author reply e3097</spage><epage>e3094</epage><pages>e3094; author reply e3097-e3094</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>The primary outcome in Hu and colleagues' meta-analysis and systematic review was risk of type 2 diabetes, but the authors did not clearly report their methods, giving it as self reported. 1 Table 2 indicates confirmation of type 2 diabetes by medical practitioners, but. on closer inspection medical testing was carried out only in subjects who self reported diabetes, not in all subjects. The data quality assessment seemed to have been devised by Hu and colleagues and was not a standard tool for critical appraisal. 2 3 The authors reported the results of included studies to be significantly heterogeneous (overall [chi]2=72.2%, P=0.001), but they did not discuss the possible reasons of heterogeneity in their analysis and analysed the pooled findings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>22549067</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.e3094</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
| ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2012-05, Vol.344 (may01 2), p.e3094; author reply e3097-e3094 |
| issn | 0959-8138 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019618552 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
| subjects | Diabetes Diabetes mellitus Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology Diet - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Male Oryza - adverse effects |
| title | Robust methods are needed to investigate association between white rice consumption and type 2 diabetes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T08%3A05%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robust%20methods%20are%20needed%20to%20investigate%20association%20between%20white%20rice%20consumption%20and%20type%202%20diabetes&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Naqvi,%20Syed%20Ali%20Raza&rft.aucorp=On%20behalf%20of%20Sarah%20Westwater-Wood,%20Ghada%20Alarfaj,%20Helen%20Atherton,%20Charles%20Cachoeira,%20Joseph%20Marcel%20El%20Khoury,%20Mary%20Ann%20McLane,%20Laurence%20Pollissard-Badroy,%20Liubov%20Yashina,%20Carl%20Heneghan&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=344&rft.issue=may01%202&rft.spage=e3094;%20author%20reply%20e3097&rft.epage=e3094&rft.pages=e3094;%20author%20reply%20e3097-e3094&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.e3094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1945187689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1945187689&rft_id=info:pmid/22549067&rfr_iscdi=true |