Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers
Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Interve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2012-06, Vol.97 (6), p.1338-1342 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1342 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1338 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Shi, Wenhao, M.D Xue, Xia, M.D Zhang, Silin, M.D Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D Liu, Shan, Ph.D Zhou, Hanying, M.D Wang, Min, M.D Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D |
description | Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018636377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028212002853</els_id><sourcerecordid>1018636377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6FSQXwUuPlaTz6Iugiy9YUHBvHkI6qYaM3Z016R6Yb2-aGV3wJBQpKvzq9acIoQz2DJh6c9gPmJe5LPXdc2B8D9Uke0R2TErVSCXFY7IDYLIBbvgVeVbKAQAU0_wpueK8VS0YsSM_vmGOs1vcSN0c6IzpHKR18WnCQtNA266lvetjjQKO8YgZAx1ymminOT3GJcch1i-c-nxKdMluLnW-8pw8GdxY8MXFX5O7jx_ubj43t18_fbl5d9t4qeXSSKelAg8hBAG6N4xhCKbvQkDRgtIMB92CVqBMMKLn0lRcuKBM53vlxDV5fS57n9OvFctip1g8jqOr26zFVsWMEkpoXVFzRn1OpWQc7H2Ok8unCm2csgf7oKzdlLVQTbKa-vLSZe0nDH8T_0hZgVcXwBXvxqGq4GN54GSnjIFthvdnDqskx4jZFh9x9hhiRr_YkOL_TPP2nyJ-jHOsfX_iCcshrXmukltmS02w37dL2A6BcahOCvEbuPCwlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018636377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shi, Wenhao, M.D ; Xue, Xia, M.D ; Zhang, Silin, M.D ; Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D ; Liu, Shan, Ph.D ; Zhou, Hanying, M.D ; Wang, Min, M.D ; Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wenhao, M.D ; Xue, Xia, M.D ; Zhang, Silin, M.D ; Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D ; Liu, Shan, Ph.D ; Zhou, Hanying, M.D ; Wang, Min, M.D ; Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22464083</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Birth Weight ; cleavage-stage embryo ; Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology ; congenital birth defects ; Cryopreservation - statistics & numerical data ; Cryotop ; Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data ; Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics & numerical data ; neonatal outcome ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Vitrification ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2012-06, Vol.97 (6), p.1338-1342</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028212002853$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25968807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22464083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xia, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Silin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Min, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>cleavage-stage embryo</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>congenital birth defects</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Cryotop</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>neonatal outcome</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6FSQXwUuPlaTz6Iugiy9YUHBvHkI6qYaM3Z016R6Yb2-aGV3wJBQpKvzq9acIoQz2DJh6c9gPmJe5LPXdc2B8D9Uke0R2TErVSCXFY7IDYLIBbvgVeVbKAQAU0_wpueK8VS0YsSM_vmGOs1vcSN0c6IzpHKR18WnCQtNA266lvetjjQKO8YgZAx1ymminOT3GJcch1i-c-nxKdMluLnW-8pw8GdxY8MXFX5O7jx_ubj43t18_fbl5d9t4qeXSSKelAg8hBAG6N4xhCKbvQkDRgtIMB92CVqBMMKLn0lRcuKBM53vlxDV5fS57n9OvFctip1g8jqOr26zFVsWMEkpoXVFzRn1OpWQc7H2Ok8unCm2csgf7oKzdlLVQTbKa-vLSZe0nDH8T_0hZgVcXwBXvxqGq4GN54GSnjIFthvdnDqskx4jZFh9x9hhiRr_YkOL_TPP2nyJ-jHOsfX_iCcshrXmukltmS02w37dL2A6BcahOCvEbuPCwlQ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</creator><creator>Xue, Xia, M.D</creator><creator>Zhang, Silin, M.D</creator><creator>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</creator><creator>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</creator><creator>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</creator><creator>Wang, Min, M.D</creator><creator>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</title><author>Shi, Wenhao, M.D ; Xue, Xia, M.D ; Zhang, Silin, M.D ; Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D ; Liu, Shan, Ph.D ; Zhou, Hanying, M.D ; Wang, Min, M.D ; Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>cleavage-stage embryo</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>congenital birth defects</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Cryotop</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>neonatal outcome</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xia, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Silin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Min, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</au><au>Xue, Xia, M.D</au><au>Zhang, Silin, M.D</au><au>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</au><au>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</au><au>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</au><au>Wang, Min, M.D</au><au>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1338</spage><epage>1342</epage><pages>1338-1342</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22464083</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2012-06, Vol.97 (6), p.1338-1342 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018636377 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Birth Weight cleavage-stage embryo Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology congenital birth defects Cryopreservation - statistics & numerical data Cryotop Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infant, Newborn Internal Medicine Male Medical sciences Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics & numerical data neonatal outcome Obstetrics and Gynecology Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sterility. Assisted procreation Vitrification Young Adult |
title | Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20and%20neonatal%20outcomes%20of%20494%20babies%20delivered%20from%20972%20vitrified%20embryo%20transfers&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Shi,%20Wenhao,%20M.D&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1338&rft.epage=1342&rft.pages=1338-1342&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018636377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018636377&rft_id=info:pmid/22464083&rft_els_id=S0015028212002853&rfr_iscdi=true |