Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers

Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Interve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2012-06, Vol.97 (6), p.1338-1342
Hauptverfasser: Shi, Wenhao, M.D, Xue, Xia, M.D, Zhang, Silin, M.D, Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D, Liu, Shan, Ph.D, Zhou, Hanying, M.D, Wang, Min, M.D, Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1342
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1338
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 97
creator Shi, Wenhao, M.D
Xue, Xia, M.D
Zhang, Silin, M.D
Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D
Liu, Shan, Ph.D
Zhou, Hanying, M.D
Wang, Min, M.D
Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D
description Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018636377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028212002853</els_id><sourcerecordid>1018636377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6FSQXwUuPlaTz6Iugiy9YUHBvHkI6qYaM3Z016R6Yb2-aGV3wJBQpKvzq9acIoQz2DJh6c9gPmJe5LPXdc2B8D9Uke0R2TErVSCXFY7IDYLIBbvgVeVbKAQAU0_wpueK8VS0YsSM_vmGOs1vcSN0c6IzpHKR18WnCQtNA266lvetjjQKO8YgZAx1ymminOT3GJcch1i-c-nxKdMluLnW-8pw8GdxY8MXFX5O7jx_ubj43t18_fbl5d9t4qeXSSKelAg8hBAG6N4xhCKbvQkDRgtIMB92CVqBMMKLn0lRcuKBM53vlxDV5fS57n9OvFctip1g8jqOr26zFVsWMEkpoXVFzRn1OpWQc7H2Ok8unCm2csgf7oKzdlLVQTbKa-vLSZe0nDH8T_0hZgVcXwBXvxqGq4GN54GSnjIFthvdnDqskx4jZFh9x9hhiRr_YkOL_TPP2nyJ-jHOsfX_iCcshrXmukltmS02w37dL2A6BcahOCvEbuPCwlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018636377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shi, Wenhao, M.D ; Xue, Xia, M.D ; Zhang, Silin, M.D ; Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D ; Liu, Shan, Ph.D ; Zhou, Hanying, M.D ; Wang, Min, M.D ; Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wenhao, M.D ; Xue, Xia, M.D ; Zhang, Silin, M.D ; Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D ; Liu, Shan, Ph.D ; Zhou, Hanying, M.D ; Wang, Min, M.D ; Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22464083</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Birth Weight ; cleavage-stage embryo ; Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology ; congenital birth defects ; Cryopreservation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cryotop ; Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics &amp; numerical data ; neonatal outcome ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Vitrification ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2012-06, Vol.97 (6), p.1338-1342</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028212002853$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25968807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22464083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xia, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Silin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Min, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>cleavage-stage embryo</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>congenital birth defects</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cryotop</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>neonatal outcome</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQx4Mo7rj6FSQXwUuPlaTz6Iugiy9YUHBvHkI6qYaM3Z016R6Yb2-aGV3wJBQpKvzq9acIoQz2DJh6c9gPmJe5LPXdc2B8D9Uke0R2TErVSCXFY7IDYLIBbvgVeVbKAQAU0_wpueK8VS0YsSM_vmGOs1vcSN0c6IzpHKR18WnCQtNA266lvetjjQKO8YgZAx1ymminOT3GJcch1i-c-nxKdMluLnW-8pw8GdxY8MXFX5O7jx_ubj43t18_fbl5d9t4qeXSSKelAg8hBAG6N4xhCKbvQkDRgtIMB92CVqBMMKLn0lRcuKBM53vlxDV5fS57n9OvFctip1g8jqOr26zFVsWMEkpoXVFzRn1OpWQc7H2Ok8unCm2csgf7oKzdlLVQTbKa-vLSZe0nDH8T_0hZgVcXwBXvxqGq4GN54GSnjIFthvdnDqskx4jZFh9x9hhiRr_YkOL_TPP2nyJ-jHOsfX_iCcshrXmukltmS02w37dL2A6BcahOCvEbuPCwlQ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</creator><creator>Xue, Xia, M.D</creator><creator>Zhang, Silin, M.D</creator><creator>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</creator><creator>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</creator><creator>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</creator><creator>Wang, Min, M.D</creator><creator>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</title><author>Shi, Wenhao, M.D ; Xue, Xia, M.D ; Zhang, Silin, M.D ; Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D ; Liu, Shan, Ph.D ; Zhou, Hanying, M.D ; Wang, Min, M.D ; Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-5a7560c0ddd307b811edd8b9dde340671ef74076068d83b2585603ad689cb6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>cleavage-stage embryo</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>congenital birth defects</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cryotop</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>neonatal outcome</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xia, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Silin, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Min, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Wenhao, M.D</au><au>Xue, Xia, M.D</au><au>Zhang, Silin, M.D</au><au>Zhao, Wanqiu, M.D</au><au>Liu, Shan, Ph.D</au><au>Zhou, Hanying, M.D</au><au>Wang, Min, M.D</au><au>Shi, Juanzi, Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1338</spage><epage>1342</epage><pages>1338-1342</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To evaluate the safety of vitrification of embryos by comparing the perinatal outcome of vitrified day 3 ETs with fresh cleavage-stage ETs. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) A total of 806 women with 494 infants delivered were included. Intervention(s) Supernumerary embryos and embryos of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were vitrified using a Cryotop carrier in an open system and were transferred after warming. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and pregnancy rates, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects. Result(s) A total of 2,543 vitrified embryos were warmed, and 2,375 survived and were transferred. The implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were 26.91%, 47.22%, 6.07%, and 38.58%, respectively. In singletons, the mean birth weight was 3,337.44 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.91, 9.85, and 9.89 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. In multiple gestations, the mean birth weight was 2,556.45 g, and the mean Apgar scores were 8.90, 9.34, and 9.47 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Only seven congenital malformations were observed among the 494 babies. Compared with fresh cleavage-stage ETs, the mean birth weight in the vitrified group was higher in both singleton and multiple gestations. All the other results were similar between the two groups. Conclusion(s) Compared with fresh ETs, vitrified day 3 ET shows no significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that vitrification with Cryotop is an effective and safe method for the cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage (day 3) embryos.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22464083</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2012-06, Vol.97 (6), p.1338-1342
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018636377
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Birth Weight
cleavage-stage embryo
Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology
congenital birth defects
Cryopreservation - statistics & numerical data
Cryotop
Embryo Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data
Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Multiple Birth Offspring - statistics & numerical data
neonatal outcome
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - epidemiology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sterility. Assisted procreation
Vitrification
Young Adult
title Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20and%20neonatal%20outcomes%20of%20494%20babies%20delivered%20from%20972%20vitrified%20embryo%20transfers&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Shi,%20Wenhao,%20M.D&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1338&rft.epage=1342&rft.pages=1338-1342&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018636377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018636377&rft_id=info:pmid/22464083&rft_els_id=S0015028212002853&rfr_iscdi=true