Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal
Abstract Objective Persistent pelvic pain after vaginal mesh surgery is an uncommon but serious complication that greatly affects women's quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate various procedures for mesh removal performed at a tertiary referral center in cases of persistent pelvic pain, and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2012-06, Vol.162 (2), p.224-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 228 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
container_volume | 162 |
creator | Marcus-Braun, Naama Bourret, Antoine von Theobald, Peter |
description | Abstract Objective Persistent pelvic pain after vaginal mesh surgery is an uncommon but serious complication that greatly affects women's quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate various procedures for mesh removal performed at a tertiary referral center in cases of persistent pelvic pain, and to evaluate the ensuing complications and outcomes. Study design A retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Caen, France, including all patients treated for removal or section of vaginal mesh due to pelvic pain as a primary cause, between January 2004 and September 2009. Results Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were diagnosed between 10 months and 3 years after their primary operation. Eight cases followed suburethral sling procedures and two followed mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Patients presented with obturator neuralgia (6), pudendal neuralgia (2), dyspareunia (1), and non-specific pain (1). The surgical treatment to release the mesh included: three cases of extra-peritoneal laparoscopy, four cases of complete vaginal mesh removal, one case of partial mesh removal and two cases of section of the suburethral sling. In all patients with obturator neuralgia, symptoms were resolved or improved, whereas in both cases of pudendal neuralgia the symptoms continued. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operative Retzius hematoma was observed in one patient after laparoscopy. Conclusions Mesh removal in a tertiary center is a safe procedure, necessary in some cases of persistent pelvic pain. Obturator neuralgia seems to be easier to treat than pudendal neuralgia. Early diagnosis is the key to success in prevention of chronic disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018632938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211512001182</els_id><sourcerecordid>1018632938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c70b0039aad140b9a530905663b5b320b3a4ae5ad946d87e36066ff0378298e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v3CAQhlHVqtmm_QdR5WMvdgewMc6hUhX1S4rUSEnOCOPxBhebDdhb7b8PKyc55BIuHHjeGeYZQs4oFBSo-DoUOPhtaAsGlBXACwD2hmyorFlei6p8SzbAgeaM0uqEfIhxgHQ4b96TE8ZKUTKQG3JzhSHaOOM0Zzt0e2uynbZT1nvn_H87bbM56Cnu9dZO2mUjxrssLmGL4XCe6czoJWKCw_oScPR77T6Sd712ET893qfk9uePm4vf-eXfX38uvl_mppR8zk0NbfpRo3VHS2gbXXFooBKCt1XLGbRclxor3TWl6GSNXIAQfQ-8lqyRKPgp-bLW3QV_v2Cc1WijQef0hH6JKnmSgrOGy4SWK2qCjzFgr3bBjjocEnTkhBrU6lMdfSrgKvlMsc-PHZZ2xO459CQwAd9WANOce4tBRWNxMtjZgGZWnbevdXhZwDg7WaPdPzxgHPwSkvg0i4opo66POz2ulDIASiXjD9LjnKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018632938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Marcus-Braun, Naama ; Bourret, Antoine ; von Theobald, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Marcus-Braun, Naama ; Bourret, Antoine ; von Theobald, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Persistent pelvic pain after vaginal mesh surgery is an uncommon but serious complication that greatly affects women's quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate various procedures for mesh removal performed at a tertiary referral center in cases of persistent pelvic pain, and to evaluate the ensuing complications and outcomes. Study design A retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Caen, France, including all patients treated for removal or section of vaginal mesh due to pelvic pain as a primary cause, between January 2004 and September 2009. Results Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were diagnosed between 10 months and 3 years after their primary operation. Eight cases followed suburethral sling procedures and two followed mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Patients presented with obturator neuralgia (6), pudendal neuralgia (2), dyspareunia (1), and non-specific pain (1). The surgical treatment to release the mesh included: three cases of extra-peritoneal laparoscopy, four cases of complete vaginal mesh removal, one case of partial mesh removal and two cases of section of the suburethral sling. In all patients with obturator neuralgia, symptoms were resolved or improved, whereas in both cases of pudendal neuralgia the symptoms continued. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operative Retzius hematoma was observed in one patient after laparoscopy. Conclusions Mesh removal in a tertiary center is a safe procedure, necessary in some cases of persistent pelvic pain. Obturator neuralgia seems to be easier to treat than pudendal neuralgia. Early diagnosis is the key to success in prevention of chronic disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22464208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Device Removal - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Mesh removal ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Obturator neuralgia ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; Pelvic pain ; Pelvic Pain - etiology ; Pelvic Pain - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Pudendal neuralgia ; Retrospective Studies ; Suburethral Slings - adverse effects ; Surgical Mesh - adverse effects ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Vagina - surgery ; Vaginal mesh surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2012-06, Vol.162 (2), p.224-228</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c70b0039aad140b9a530905663b5b320b3a4ae5ad946d87e36066ff0378298e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c70b0039aad140b9a530905663b5b320b3a4ae5ad946d87e36066ff0378298e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211512001182$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22464208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marcus-Braun, Naama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourret, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Theobald, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Persistent pelvic pain after vaginal mesh surgery is an uncommon but serious complication that greatly affects women's quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate various procedures for mesh removal performed at a tertiary referral center in cases of persistent pelvic pain, and to evaluate the ensuing complications and outcomes. Study design A retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Caen, France, including all patients treated for removal or section of vaginal mesh due to pelvic pain as a primary cause, between January 2004 and September 2009. Results Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were diagnosed between 10 months and 3 years after their primary operation. Eight cases followed suburethral sling procedures and two followed mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Patients presented with obturator neuralgia (6), pudendal neuralgia (2), dyspareunia (1), and non-specific pain (1). The surgical treatment to release the mesh included: three cases of extra-peritoneal laparoscopy, four cases of complete vaginal mesh removal, one case of partial mesh removal and two cases of section of the suburethral sling. In all patients with obturator neuralgia, symptoms were resolved or improved, whereas in both cases of pudendal neuralgia the symptoms continued. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operative Retzius hematoma was observed in one patient after laparoscopy. Conclusions Mesh removal in a tertiary center is a safe procedure, necessary in some cases of persistent pelvic pain. Obturator neuralgia seems to be easier to treat than pudendal neuralgia. Early diagnosis is the key to success in prevention of chronic disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Device Removal - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mesh removal</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Obturator neuralgia</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Pelvic pain</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Pudendal neuralgia</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suburethral Slings - adverse effects</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><subject>Vaginal mesh surgery</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v3CAQhlHVqtmm_QdR5WMvdgewMc6hUhX1S4rUSEnOCOPxBhebDdhb7b8PKyc55BIuHHjeGeYZQs4oFBSo-DoUOPhtaAsGlBXACwD2hmyorFlei6p8SzbAgeaM0uqEfIhxgHQ4b96TE8ZKUTKQG3JzhSHaOOM0Zzt0e2uynbZT1nvn_H87bbM56Cnu9dZO2mUjxrssLmGL4XCe6czoJWKCw_oScPR77T6Sd712ET893qfk9uePm4vf-eXfX38uvl_mppR8zk0NbfpRo3VHS2gbXXFooBKCt1XLGbRclxor3TWl6GSNXIAQfQ-8lqyRKPgp-bLW3QV_v2Cc1WijQef0hH6JKnmSgrOGy4SWK2qCjzFgr3bBjjocEnTkhBrU6lMdfSrgKvlMsc-PHZZ2xO459CQwAd9WANOce4tBRWNxMtjZgGZWnbevdXhZwDg7WaPdPzxgHPwSkvg0i4opo66POz2ulDIASiXjD9LjnKQ</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Marcus-Braun, Naama</creator><creator>Bourret, Antoine</creator><creator>von Theobald, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal</title><author>Marcus-Braun, Naama ; Bourret, Antoine ; von Theobald, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-c70b0039aad140b9a530905663b5b320b3a4ae5ad946d87e36066ff0378298e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Device Removal - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mesh removal</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Obturator neuralgia</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Pelvic pain</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Pudendal neuralgia</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suburethral Slings - adverse effects</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><topic>Vaginal mesh surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marcus-Braun, Naama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourret, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Theobald, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marcus-Braun, Naama</au><au>Bourret, Antoine</au><au>von Theobald, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>224-228</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Persistent pelvic pain after vaginal mesh surgery is an uncommon but serious complication that greatly affects women's quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate various procedures for mesh removal performed at a tertiary referral center in cases of persistent pelvic pain, and to evaluate the ensuing complications and outcomes. Study design A retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Caen, France, including all patients treated for removal or section of vaginal mesh due to pelvic pain as a primary cause, between January 2004 and September 2009. Results Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were diagnosed between 10 months and 3 years after their primary operation. Eight cases followed suburethral sling procedures and two followed mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Patients presented with obturator neuralgia (6), pudendal neuralgia (2), dyspareunia (1), and non-specific pain (1). The surgical treatment to release the mesh included: three cases of extra-peritoneal laparoscopy, four cases of complete vaginal mesh removal, one case of partial mesh removal and two cases of section of the suburethral sling. In all patients with obturator neuralgia, symptoms were resolved or improved, whereas in both cases of pudendal neuralgia the symptoms continued. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operative Retzius hematoma was observed in one patient after laparoscopy. Conclusions Mesh removal in a tertiary center is a safe procedure, necessary in some cases of persistent pelvic pain. Obturator neuralgia seems to be easier to treat than pudendal neuralgia. Early diagnosis is the key to success in prevention of chronic disease.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>22464208</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2012-06, Vol.162 (2), p.224-228 |
issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018632938 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Device Removal - methods Female Humans Mesh removal Middle Aged Obstetrics and Gynecology Obturator neuralgia Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery Pelvic pain Pelvic Pain - etiology Pelvic Pain - surgery Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Pudendal neuralgia Retrospective Studies Suburethral Slings - adverse effects Surgical Mesh - adverse effects Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery Vagina - surgery Vaginal mesh surgery |
title | Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Persistent%20pelvic%20pain%20following%20transvaginal%20mesh%20surgery:%20a%20cause%20for%20mesh%20removal&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Marcus-Braun,%20Naama&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=224-228&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018632938%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018632938&rft_id=info:pmid/22464208&rft_els_id=S0301211512001182&rfr_iscdi=true |