Effectiveness and cost of immunization recall at school-based health centers

Effectiveness of recall for immunizations has not been examined in the setting of school-based health centers (SBHCs). We assessed (1) immunization rates achieved with recall among sixth-grade girls (demonstration study); (2) effectiveness of recall among sixth-grade boys (randomized controlled tria...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2012-06, Vol.129 (6), p.e1446-e1452
Hauptverfasser: Kempe, Allison, Barrow, Jennifer, Stokley, Shannon, Saville, Alison, Glazner, Judith E, Suh, Christina, Federico, Steven, Abrams, Lisa, Seewald, Laura, Beaty, Brenda, Daley, Matthew F, Dickinson, L Miriam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1452
container_issue 6
container_start_page e1446
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 129
creator Kempe, Allison
Barrow, Jennifer
Stokley, Shannon
Saville, Alison
Glazner, Judith E
Suh, Christina
Federico, Steven
Abrams, Lisa
Seewald, Laura
Beaty, Brenda
Daley, Matthew F
Dickinson, L Miriam
description Effectiveness of recall for immunizations has not been examined in the setting of school-based health centers (SBHCs). We assessed (1) immunization rates achieved with recall among sixth-grade girls (demonstration study); (2) effectiveness of recall among sixth-grade boys (randomized controlled trial [RCT]); and (3) cost of conducting recall in SBHCs. During October 2008 through March 2009, in 4 Denver public SBHCs, we conducted (1) a demonstration study among 265 girls needing ≥ 1 recommended adolescent vaccine and (2) an RCT among 264 boys needing vaccines, with half randomized to recall and half receiving usual care. Immunization rates for recommended adolescent vaccines were assessed 6 months after recall. First dose costs were assessed by direct observation and examining invoices. At the end of the demonstration study, 77% of girls had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 45% had received all needed adolescent vaccines. Rates of receipt among those needing each of the vaccines were 68% (160/236) for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, 57% (142/248) for quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, and 59% (149/253) for the first human papillomavirus vaccine. At the end of the RCT, 66% of recalled boys had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 59% had received all study vaccines, compared with 45% and 36%, respectively, of the control group (P < .001). Cost of conducting recall ranged from $1.12 to $6.87 per recalled child immunized. SBHC-based recall was effective in improving immunization rates for all adolescent vaccines, with effects sizes exceeding those achieved with younger children in practice settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.2011-2921
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018632236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A297463585</galeid><sourcerecordid>A297463585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cd7c7c28fb1934a819aa203f733c7939462b69065491f1c5c4c520cfe28cf1be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0T2P1DAQBmALgbjloKVElmhosvg7cXlaHR_SStdAbTmT8W1OTrzEDoL79Tjag4JqmmdG7-gl5C1ne66V-HjGIe8F47wRVvBnZMeZ7RolWv2c7BiTvFGM6SvyKucHxpjSrXhJroTQxiiuduR4GwJCGX_ijDlTPw8UUi40BTpO0zqPj76MaaYLgo-R-kIznFKKTe8zDvSEPpYTBZwLLvk1eRF8zPjmaV6T759uvx2-NMe7z18PN8cGpOGlgaGFFkQXem6l8h233gsmQysltFZaZURvLDNaWR44aFCgBYOAooPAe5TX5MPl7nlJP1bMxU1jBozRz5jW7DjjnZFCSFPp-__oQ1qXuabblG2VbS2vqrmoex_RjTOk-s-vAilGvEdXwx_u3I2o3Ejd6er3Fw9LynnB4M7LOPnldz3qtl7c1ovbenFbL3Xh3VOMtZ9w-Mf_FiH_ACxlhxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019749791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and cost of immunization recall at school-based health centers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kempe, Allison ; Barrow, Jennifer ; Stokley, Shannon ; Saville, Alison ; Glazner, Judith E ; Suh, Christina ; Federico, Steven ; Abrams, Lisa ; Seewald, Laura ; Beaty, Brenda ; Daley, Matthew F ; Dickinson, L Miriam</creator><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison ; Barrow, Jennifer ; Stokley, Shannon ; Saville, Alison ; Glazner, Judith E ; Suh, Christina ; Federico, Steven ; Abrams, Lisa ; Seewald, Laura ; Beaty, Brenda ; Daley, Matthew F ; Dickinson, L Miriam</creatorcontrib><description>Effectiveness of recall for immunizations has not been examined in the setting of school-based health centers (SBHCs). We assessed (1) immunization rates achieved with recall among sixth-grade girls (demonstration study); (2) effectiveness of recall among sixth-grade boys (randomized controlled trial [RCT]); and (3) cost of conducting recall in SBHCs. During October 2008 through March 2009, in 4 Denver public SBHCs, we conducted (1) a demonstration study among 265 girls needing ≥ 1 recommended adolescent vaccine and (2) an RCT among 264 boys needing vaccines, with half randomized to recall and half receiving usual care. Immunization rates for recommended adolescent vaccines were assessed 6 months after recall. First dose costs were assessed by direct observation and examining invoices. At the end of the demonstration study, 77% of girls had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 45% had received all needed adolescent vaccines. Rates of receipt among those needing each of the vaccines were 68% (160/236) for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, 57% (142/248) for quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, and 59% (149/253) for the first human papillomavirus vaccine. At the end of the RCT, 66% of recalled boys had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 59% had received all study vaccines, compared with 45% and 36%, respectively, of the control group (P &lt; .001). Cost of conducting recall ranged from $1.12 to $6.87 per recalled child immunized. SBHC-based recall was effective in improving immunization rates for all adolescent vaccines, with effects sizes exceeding those achieved with younger children in practice settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-2921</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22566414</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Child ; Clinics ; Company business management ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics ; Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Effectiveness studies ; Elementary school students ; Female ; Humans ; Immunization ; Immunization - economics ; Immunization - trends ; Male ; Management ; Meningococcal Vaccines - economics ; Meningococcal Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - economics ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Patient Participation - economics ; Patient Participation - trends ; Pediatrics ; Recall ; School Health Services - economics ; School Health Services - trends ; School-based health clinics ; Statistics ; Tetanus Toxoid - economics ; Tetanus Toxoid - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2012-06, Vol.129 (6), p.e1446-e1452</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cd7c7c28fb1934a819aa203f733c7939462b69065491f1c5c4c520cfe28cf1be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cd7c7c28fb1934a819aa203f733c7939462b69065491f1c5c4c520cfe28cf1be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22566414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokley, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saville, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazner, Judith E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Federico, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seewald, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, L Miriam</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and cost of immunization recall at school-based health centers</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Effectiveness of recall for immunizations has not been examined in the setting of school-based health centers (SBHCs). We assessed (1) immunization rates achieved with recall among sixth-grade girls (demonstration study); (2) effectiveness of recall among sixth-grade boys (randomized controlled trial [RCT]); and (3) cost of conducting recall in SBHCs. During October 2008 through March 2009, in 4 Denver public SBHCs, we conducted (1) a demonstration study among 265 girls needing ≥ 1 recommended adolescent vaccine and (2) an RCT among 264 boys needing vaccines, with half randomized to recall and half receiving usual care. Immunization rates for recommended adolescent vaccines were assessed 6 months after recall. First dose costs were assessed by direct observation and examining invoices. At the end of the demonstration study, 77% of girls had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 45% had received all needed adolescent vaccines. Rates of receipt among those needing each of the vaccines were 68% (160/236) for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, 57% (142/248) for quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, and 59% (149/253) for the first human papillomavirus vaccine. At the end of the RCT, 66% of recalled boys had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 59% had received all study vaccines, compared with 45% and 36%, respectively, of the control group (P &lt; .001). Cost of conducting recall ranged from $1.12 to $6.87 per recalled child immunized. SBHC-based recall was effective in improving immunization rates for all adolescent vaccines, with effects sizes exceeding those achieved with younger children in practice settings.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics</subject><subject>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunization - economics</subject><subject>Immunization - trends</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Meningococcal Vaccines - economics</subject><subject>Meningococcal Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - economics</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Patient Participation - economics</subject><subject>Patient Participation - trends</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>School Health Services - economics</subject><subject>School Health Services - trends</subject><subject>School-based health clinics</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Tetanus Toxoid - economics</subject><subject>Tetanus Toxoid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0T2P1DAQBmALgbjloKVElmhosvg7cXlaHR_SStdAbTmT8W1OTrzEDoL79Tjag4JqmmdG7-gl5C1ne66V-HjGIe8F47wRVvBnZMeZ7RolWv2c7BiTvFGM6SvyKucHxpjSrXhJroTQxiiuduR4GwJCGX_ijDlTPw8UUi40BTpO0zqPj76MaaYLgo-R-kIznFKKTe8zDvSEPpYTBZwLLvk1eRF8zPjmaV6T759uvx2-NMe7z18PN8cGpOGlgaGFFkQXem6l8h233gsmQysltFZaZURvLDNaWR44aFCgBYOAooPAe5TX5MPl7nlJP1bMxU1jBozRz5jW7DjjnZFCSFPp-__oQ1qXuabblG2VbS2vqrmoex_RjTOk-s-vAilGvEdXwx_u3I2o3Ejd6er3Fw9LynnB4M7LOPnldz3qtl7c1ovbenFbL3Xh3VOMtZ9w-Mf_FiH_ACxlhxw</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Kempe, Allison</creator><creator>Barrow, Jennifer</creator><creator>Stokley, Shannon</creator><creator>Saville, Alison</creator><creator>Glazner, Judith E</creator><creator>Suh, Christina</creator><creator>Federico, Steven</creator><creator>Abrams, Lisa</creator><creator>Seewald, Laura</creator><creator>Beaty, Brenda</creator><creator>Daley, Matthew F</creator><creator>Dickinson, L Miriam</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and cost of immunization recall at school-based health centers</title><author>Kempe, Allison ; Barrow, Jennifer ; Stokley, Shannon ; Saville, Alison ; Glazner, Judith E ; Suh, Christina ; Federico, Steven ; Abrams, Lisa ; Seewald, Laura ; Beaty, Brenda ; Daley, Matthew F ; Dickinson, L Miriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cd7c7c28fb1934a819aa203f733c7939462b69065491f1c5c4c520cfe28cf1be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics</topic><topic>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunization - economics</topic><topic>Immunization - trends</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Meningococcal Vaccines - economics</topic><topic>Meningococcal Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - economics</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Patient Participation - economics</topic><topic>Patient Participation - trends</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>School Health Services - economics</topic><topic>School Health Services - trends</topic><topic>School-based health clinics</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Tetanus Toxoid - economics</topic><topic>Tetanus Toxoid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokley, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saville, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazner, Judith E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Federico, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seewald, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, L Miriam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kempe, Allison</au><au>Barrow, Jennifer</au><au>Stokley, Shannon</au><au>Saville, Alison</au><au>Glazner, Judith E</au><au>Suh, Christina</au><au>Federico, Steven</au><au>Abrams, Lisa</au><au>Seewald, Laura</au><au>Beaty, Brenda</au><au>Daley, Matthew F</au><au>Dickinson, L Miriam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness and cost of immunization recall at school-based health centers</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e1446</spage><epage>e1452</epage><pages>e1446-e1452</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>Effectiveness of recall for immunizations has not been examined in the setting of school-based health centers (SBHCs). We assessed (1) immunization rates achieved with recall among sixth-grade girls (demonstration study); (2) effectiveness of recall among sixth-grade boys (randomized controlled trial [RCT]); and (3) cost of conducting recall in SBHCs. During October 2008 through March 2009, in 4 Denver public SBHCs, we conducted (1) a demonstration study among 265 girls needing ≥ 1 recommended adolescent vaccine and (2) an RCT among 264 boys needing vaccines, with half randomized to recall and half receiving usual care. Immunization rates for recommended adolescent vaccines were assessed 6 months after recall. First dose costs were assessed by direct observation and examining invoices. At the end of the demonstration study, 77% of girls had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 45% had received all needed adolescent vaccines. Rates of receipt among those needing each of the vaccines were 68% (160/236) for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, 57% (142/248) for quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, and 59% (149/253) for the first human papillomavirus vaccine. At the end of the RCT, 66% of recalled boys had received ≥ 1 vaccine and 59% had received all study vaccines, compared with 45% and 36%, respectively, of the control group (P &lt; .001). Cost of conducting recall ranged from $1.12 to $6.87 per recalled child immunized. SBHC-based recall was effective in improving immunization rates for all adolescent vaccines, with effects sizes exceeding those achieved with younger children in practice settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>22566414</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2011-2921</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2012-06, Vol.129 (6), p.e1446-e1452
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018632236
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Child
Clinics
Company business management
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use
Effectiveness studies
Elementary school students
Female
Humans
Immunization
Immunization - economics
Immunization - trends
Male
Management
Meningococcal Vaccines - economics
Meningococcal Vaccines - therapeutic use
Papillomavirus Vaccines - economics
Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use
Patient Participation - economics
Patient Participation - trends
Pediatrics
Recall
School Health Services - economics
School Health Services - trends
School-based health clinics
Statistics
Tetanus Toxoid - economics
Tetanus Toxoid - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Vaccines
title Effectiveness and cost of immunization recall at school-based health centers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20cost%20of%20immunization%20recall%20at%20school-based%20health%20centers&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Kempe,%20Allison&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e1446&rft.epage=e1452&rft.pages=e1446-e1452&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2011-2921&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA297463585%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019749791&rft_id=info:pmid/22566414&rft_galeid=A297463585&rfr_iscdi=true