Surgical Outcome of Different Types of Primary Hypospadias Repair During Three Decades in a Single Center

Objective To evaluate the surgical outcome of different techniques of primary hypospadias repair in a single department. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the medical files of all patients who had undergone primary hypospadias repair at our department during the past 3 decades (1978-2009). Result...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2012-06, Vol.79 (6), p.1350-1354
Hauptverfasser: Prat, Dan, Natasha, Alaadin, Polak, Avner, Koulikov, Dmitry, Prat, Orly, Zilberman, Moshe, Abu Arafeh, Wael, Moriel, Eviatar Z, Shenfeld, Ofer Z, Mor, Yoram, Farkas, Amicur, Chertin, Boris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1354
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1350
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 79
creator Prat, Dan
Natasha, Alaadin
Polak, Avner
Koulikov, Dmitry
Prat, Orly
Zilberman, Moshe
Abu Arafeh, Wael
Moriel, Eviatar Z
Shenfeld, Ofer Z
Mor, Yoram
Farkas, Amicur
Chertin, Boris
description Objective To evaluate the surgical outcome of different techniques of primary hypospadias repair in a single department. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the medical files of all patients who had undergone primary hypospadias repair at our department during the past 3 decades (1978-2009). Results A total of 820 patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group of 309 patients (37.7%) had glanular hypospadias, the second group of 398 patients (48.5%) had distal hypospadias, and the third group of 113 patients (13.8%) had proximal hypospadias. Of these 820 patients, 67 (8.2%) required corpoplasty to straighten the penis. In the first group, 67 (21.7%) children underwent meatal advancement or meatoplasty, 211 (68.3%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, 8 (2.6%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair, and 23 (7.4%) underwent Mathieu flap hypospadias repair. In the second group, 196 (49.2%) underwent Mathieu hypospadias repair, 38 (9.5%) underwent tubularized incised plate repair, 142 (35.7%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, and 22 (5.5%) underwent onlay-type hypospadias repair. In the third group, 28 (24.8%) underwent 2-stage hypospadias repair, 85 (75.2%) underwent single-stage surgery (including 68 [60.2%] onlay and 11 [9.7%] tubularized island flap), and 6 (5.3%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Immediate complications developed in 46 (14.9%) in the first, 123 (30.9%) in the second, and 66 (58.4%) in the third group; 38 (4.6%) required additional surgery during or after adolescence. Conclusion Our data have shown that despite the numerous techniques used for hypospadias surgery, the incidence of complications is still high in patients who undergo hypospadias repair.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018631263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0090429512001331</els_id><sourcerecordid>1018631263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5383f9dd4f3def34c063060297512f7995a206299ed00fa3e53db7a4c4d3b3b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFklGLEzEQgBdRvN7pT1DyIviydZJsss2LIq3nCQcntj6HNJnU1O3umuwK--_N0qrgizAQGL6ZZL5MUbygsKRA5Zvjcoxd0x2mJQNKlzlgJR4VCypYXSqlxONiAaCgrJgSV8V1SkcAkFLWT4srxgTwWtaLImzHeAjWNORhHGx3QtJ5sgneY8R2ILupxzSnPsdwMnEid1Pfpd64YBL5gr0JkWzGGNoD2X2LiGSD1rhcElpiyDbnGyTr3Anjs-KJN03C55fzpvh6-2G3vivvHz5-Wr-_L20lYCgFX3GvnKs8d-h5ZUFykMBULSjzdR7MMJBMKXQA3nAU3O1rU9nK8T3fr_hN8frct4_djxHToE8hWWwa02I3Jp3trSSnTPKMijNqY5dSRK_785gZmjmpj_piWc-WdY5sOde9vFwx7k_o_lT91pqBVxfApOzWR9PakP5yQslaCZa5d2cOs5CfAaNONmBr0YWIdtCuC_99ytt_OtgmtPOHfscJ07EbY5tta6oT06C380rMG0EZAOWc8l8Y4rIq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018631263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Outcome of Different Types of Primary Hypospadias Repair During Three Decades in a Single Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Prat, Dan ; Natasha, Alaadin ; Polak, Avner ; Koulikov, Dmitry ; Prat, Orly ; Zilberman, Moshe ; Abu Arafeh, Wael ; Moriel, Eviatar Z ; Shenfeld, Ofer Z ; Mor, Yoram ; Farkas, Amicur ; Chertin, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Prat, Dan ; Natasha, Alaadin ; Polak, Avner ; Koulikov, Dmitry ; Prat, Orly ; Zilberman, Moshe ; Abu Arafeh, Wael ; Moriel, Eviatar Z ; Shenfeld, Ofer Z ; Mor, Yoram ; Farkas, Amicur ; Chertin, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the surgical outcome of different techniques of primary hypospadias repair in a single department. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the medical files of all patients who had undergone primary hypospadias repair at our department during the past 3 decades (1978-2009). Results A total of 820 patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group of 309 patients (37.7%) had glanular hypospadias, the second group of 398 patients (48.5%) had distal hypospadias, and the third group of 113 patients (13.8%) had proximal hypospadias. Of these 820 patients, 67 (8.2%) required corpoplasty to straighten the penis. In the first group, 67 (21.7%) children underwent meatal advancement or meatoplasty, 211 (68.3%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, 8 (2.6%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair, and 23 (7.4%) underwent Mathieu flap hypospadias repair. In the second group, 196 (49.2%) underwent Mathieu hypospadias repair, 38 (9.5%) underwent tubularized incised plate repair, 142 (35.7%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, and 22 (5.5%) underwent onlay-type hypospadias repair. In the third group, 28 (24.8%) underwent 2-stage hypospadias repair, 85 (75.2%) underwent single-stage surgery (including 68 [60.2%] onlay and 11 [9.7%] tubularized island flap), and 6 (5.3%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Immediate complications developed in 46 (14.9%) in the first, 123 (30.9%) in the second, and 66 (58.4%) in the third group; 38 (4.6%) required additional surgery during or after adolescence. Conclusion Our data have shown that despite the numerous techniques used for hypospadias surgery, the incidence of complications is still high in patients who undergo hypospadias repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22503767</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Hypospadias - classification ; Hypospadias - surgery ; Infant ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Malformations of the urinary system ; Medical sciences ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Non tumoral diseases ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - adverse effects ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2012-06, Vol.79 (6), p.1350-1354</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5383f9dd4f3def34c063060297512f7995a206299ed00fa3e53db7a4c4d3b3b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5383f9dd4f3def34c063060297512f7995a206299ed00fa3e53db7a4c4d3b3b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429512001331$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25967952$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22503767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prat, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natasha, Alaadin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polak, Avner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulikov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prat, Orly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu Arafeh, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriel, Eviatar Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenfeld, Ofer Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mor, Yoram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farkas, Amicur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertin, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Outcome of Different Types of Primary Hypospadias Repair During Three Decades in a Single Center</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the surgical outcome of different techniques of primary hypospadias repair in a single department. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the medical files of all patients who had undergone primary hypospadias repair at our department during the past 3 decades (1978-2009). Results A total of 820 patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group of 309 patients (37.7%) had glanular hypospadias, the second group of 398 patients (48.5%) had distal hypospadias, and the third group of 113 patients (13.8%) had proximal hypospadias. Of these 820 patients, 67 (8.2%) required corpoplasty to straighten the penis. In the first group, 67 (21.7%) children underwent meatal advancement or meatoplasty, 211 (68.3%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, 8 (2.6%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair, and 23 (7.4%) underwent Mathieu flap hypospadias repair. In the second group, 196 (49.2%) underwent Mathieu hypospadias repair, 38 (9.5%) underwent tubularized incised plate repair, 142 (35.7%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, and 22 (5.5%) underwent onlay-type hypospadias repair. In the third group, 28 (24.8%) underwent 2-stage hypospadias repair, 85 (75.2%) underwent single-stage surgery (including 68 [60.2%] onlay and 11 [9.7%] tubularized island flap), and 6 (5.3%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Immediate complications developed in 46 (14.9%) in the first, 123 (30.9%) in the second, and 66 (58.4%) in the third group; 38 (4.6%) required additional surgery during or after adolescence. Conclusion Our data have shown that despite the numerous techniques used for hypospadias surgery, the incidence of complications is still high in patients who undergo hypospadias repair.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypospadias - classification</subject><subject>Hypospadias - surgery</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Malformations of the urinary system</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFklGLEzEQgBdRvN7pT1DyIviydZJsss2LIq3nCQcntj6HNJnU1O3umuwK--_N0qrgizAQGL6ZZL5MUbygsKRA5Zvjcoxd0x2mJQNKlzlgJR4VCypYXSqlxONiAaCgrJgSV8V1SkcAkFLWT4srxgTwWtaLImzHeAjWNORhHGx3QtJ5sgneY8R2ILupxzSnPsdwMnEid1Pfpd64YBL5gr0JkWzGGNoD2X2LiGSD1rhcElpiyDbnGyTr3Anjs-KJN03C55fzpvh6-2G3vivvHz5-Wr-_L20lYCgFX3GvnKs8d-h5ZUFykMBULSjzdR7MMJBMKXQA3nAU3O1rU9nK8T3fr_hN8frct4_djxHToE8hWWwa02I3Jp3trSSnTPKMijNqY5dSRK_785gZmjmpj_piWc-WdY5sOde9vFwx7k_o_lT91pqBVxfApOzWR9PakP5yQslaCZa5d2cOs5CfAaNONmBr0YWIdtCuC_99ytt_OtgmtPOHfscJ07EbY5tta6oT06C380rMG0EZAOWc8l8Y4rIq</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Prat, Dan</creator><creator>Natasha, Alaadin</creator><creator>Polak, Avner</creator><creator>Koulikov, Dmitry</creator><creator>Prat, Orly</creator><creator>Zilberman, Moshe</creator><creator>Abu Arafeh, Wael</creator><creator>Moriel, Eviatar Z</creator><creator>Shenfeld, Ofer Z</creator><creator>Mor, Yoram</creator><creator>Farkas, Amicur</creator><creator>Chertin, Boris</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Surgical Outcome of Different Types of Primary Hypospadias Repair During Three Decades in a Single Center</title><author>Prat, Dan ; Natasha, Alaadin ; Polak, Avner ; Koulikov, Dmitry ; Prat, Orly ; Zilberman, Moshe ; Abu Arafeh, Wael ; Moriel, Eviatar Z ; Shenfeld, Ofer Z ; Mor, Yoram ; Farkas, Amicur ; Chertin, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-5383f9dd4f3def34c063060297512f7995a206299ed00fa3e53db7a4c4d3b3b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypospadias - classification</topic><topic>Hypospadias - surgery</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Malformations of the urinary system</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prat, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natasha, Alaadin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polak, Avner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulikov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prat, Orly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu Arafeh, Wael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriel, Eviatar Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenfeld, Ofer Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mor, Yoram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farkas, Amicur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertin, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prat, Dan</au><au>Natasha, Alaadin</au><au>Polak, Avner</au><au>Koulikov, Dmitry</au><au>Prat, Orly</au><au>Zilberman, Moshe</au><au>Abu Arafeh, Wael</au><au>Moriel, Eviatar Z</au><au>Shenfeld, Ofer Z</au><au>Mor, Yoram</au><au>Farkas, Amicur</au><au>Chertin, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Outcome of Different Types of Primary Hypospadias Repair During Three Decades in a Single Center</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1350</spage><epage>1354</epage><pages>1350-1354</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objective To evaluate the surgical outcome of different techniques of primary hypospadias repair in a single department. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the medical files of all patients who had undergone primary hypospadias repair at our department during the past 3 decades (1978-2009). Results A total of 820 patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group of 309 patients (37.7%) had glanular hypospadias, the second group of 398 patients (48.5%) had distal hypospadias, and the third group of 113 patients (13.8%) had proximal hypospadias. Of these 820 patients, 67 (8.2%) required corpoplasty to straighten the penis. In the first group, 67 (21.7%) children underwent meatal advancement or meatoplasty, 211 (68.3%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, 8 (2.6%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair, and 23 (7.4%) underwent Mathieu flap hypospadias repair. In the second group, 196 (49.2%) underwent Mathieu hypospadias repair, 38 (9.5%) underwent tubularized incised plate repair, 142 (35.7%) underwent meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, and 22 (5.5%) underwent onlay-type hypospadias repair. In the third group, 28 (24.8%) underwent 2-stage hypospadias repair, 85 (75.2%) underwent single-stage surgery (including 68 [60.2%] onlay and 11 [9.7%] tubularized island flap), and 6 (5.3%) underwent tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Immediate complications developed in 46 (14.9%) in the first, 123 (30.9%) in the second, and 66 (58.4%) in the third group; 38 (4.6%) required additional surgery during or after adolescence. Conclusion Our data have shown that despite the numerous techniques used for hypospadias surgery, the incidence of complications is still high in patients who undergo hypospadias repair.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22503767</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.085</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2012-06, Vol.79 (6), p.1350-1354
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018631263
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Child, Preschool
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Hypospadias - classification
Hypospadias - surgery
Infant
Male
Male genital diseases
Malformations of the urinary system
Medical sciences
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Non tumoral diseases
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - adverse effects
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods
Urology
title Surgical Outcome of Different Types of Primary Hypospadias Repair During Three Decades in a Single Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Outcome%20of%20Different%20Types%20of%20Primary%20Hypospadias%20Repair%20During%20Three%20Decades%20in%20a%20Single%20Center&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Prat,%20Dan&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1350&rft.epage=1354&rft.pages=1350-1354&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018631263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018631263&rft_id=info:pmid/22503767&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0090429512001331&rfr_iscdi=true