Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrauterine treatment with formosulphathiazole of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows

In cattle, elimination of bacterial contamination from the uterine lumen after parturition is often delayed or compromised, and pathogenic bacteria can persist, causing uterine disease and infertility. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and bacteriologic recovery following a single in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theriogenology 2012-07, Vol.78 (1), p.189-200
Hauptverfasser: Mari, G, Iacono, E, Toni, F, Predieri, P.G, Merlo, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue 1
container_start_page 189
container_title Theriogenology
container_volume 78
creator Mari, G
Iacono, E
Toni, F
Predieri, P.G
Merlo, B
description In cattle, elimination of bacterial contamination from the uterine lumen after parturition is often delayed or compromised, and pathogenic bacteria can persist, causing uterine disease and infertility. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and bacteriologic recovery following a single intrauterine administration of formosulphatiazole, cephapirin or placebo in cows with clinical endometritis. Cows (n = 80), no less than 28 days postpartum, with clinical endometritis were enrolled in the study. Endometritis was diagnosed by a complete reproductive examination, including rectal palpation, ultrasonography, vaginoscopy and uterine swab. All cows were randomly assigned to receive one of three intrauterine treatments (T0): 2500 mg of formosulphatiazole (Group A); 500 mg of cephapirin (Group B); placebo (4250 mg of propylene glycol; Group C). Cows were examined at the first estrus after treatment or no more than 30 days after (T1). Bacteria isolated were E. coli, A. pyogenes, Pasteurella spp. and Streptococcus spp. After treatment, in Group A and B only 6/30 (20.0%) and 6/24 (25.0%) cows showed a positive bacteriologic culture (P > 0.05), while in Group C the number of positive animals was significantly higher (19/26; 73.1%; P < 0.05). At T0, total clinical scores were similar between the three groups (Group A: 5.84 ± 1.07; Group B: 5.91 ± 1.0; Group C: 5.62 ± 1.17; P > 0.05) and indicative of clinical endometritis. At T1, endometritis scores were significantly lower than those reported before uterine infusion (P < 0.05); however, Group A and B score, 0.4 ± 0.9 and 1.0 ± 2.1, respectively, correspond to no and slight endometritis, while animals in Group C reported a total endometritis score significantly higher (4.6 ± 3.5; P < 0.05) corresponding to endometritis. In the present study, a commercial formosulphatiazole preparation was as effective as cephapirin and more effective than placebo for the treatment of clinical endometritis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.01.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018631170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X12000714</els_id><sourcerecordid>1018631170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-627684259d43cf9bad0c6be7d6cbe8ecb7b19d53a11dbce77f28ecdfa4632cb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxRtR3HH1K2gOHrx0mz89STd4kWVXhQUPuuAtpJPKTIbupE3Ss4xnP7hpZhW8iKeC4vdeFe9V1WuCG4IJf3to8h6iCzvwYQy7U0MxoQ0mDWb8UbUhnehrRhl5XG0w7lnNe_LtonqW0gHjgnDytLqgtOUt6bab6uf1UY2Lyi54FCwq1gisBZ3dETyktC6dz1EtuRz1gHIElSfwGd27vEc2xCmkZZz3Ku-d-hFGWCV6dN5pNSLwJkyQo8suFSM0h5RnFfMyIaNcPCEd7tPz6olVY4IXD_Oyuru5_nr1sb79_OHT1fvbWreszTWngnct3famZdr2gzJY8wGE4XqADvQgBtKbLVOEmEGDEJaWrbGq5YzqoWOX1Zuz7xzD9wVSlpNLGsZReQhLkiXfjjNCBC7ouzOqY0gpgpVzdJOKpwKtHJcH-XcPcu1BYiJLyEX-8uHSMkxg_oh_B1-AV2fAqiDVLrok774Uh3YtSQhC_kmQvhW0EDdnAkpmRwdRJu3AazAulgalCe7_vv0FCme6cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018631170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrauterine treatment with formosulphathiazole of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mari, G ; Iacono, E ; Toni, F ; Predieri, P.G ; Merlo, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Mari, G ; Iacono, E ; Toni, F ; Predieri, P.G ; Merlo, B</creatorcontrib><description>In cattle, elimination of bacterial contamination from the uterine lumen after parturition is often delayed or compromised, and pathogenic bacteria can persist, causing uterine disease and infertility. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and bacteriologic recovery following a single intrauterine administration of formosulphatiazole, cephapirin or placebo in cows with clinical endometritis. Cows (n = 80), no less than 28 days postpartum, with clinical endometritis were enrolled in the study. Endometritis was diagnosed by a complete reproductive examination, including rectal palpation, ultrasonography, vaginoscopy and uterine swab. All cows were randomly assigned to receive one of three intrauterine treatments (T0): 2500 mg of formosulphatiazole (Group A); 500 mg of cephapirin (Group B); placebo (4250 mg of propylene glycol; Group C). Cows were examined at the first estrus after treatment or no more than 30 days after (T1). Bacteria isolated were E. coli, A. pyogenes, Pasteurella spp. and Streptococcus spp. After treatment, in Group A and B only 6/30 (20.0%) and 6/24 (25.0%) cows showed a positive bacteriologic culture (P &gt; 0.05), while in Group C the number of positive animals was significantly higher (19/26; 73.1%; P &lt; 0.05). At T0, total clinical scores were similar between the three groups (Group A: 5.84 ± 1.07; Group B: 5.91 ± 1.0; Group C: 5.62 ± 1.17; P &gt; 0.05) and indicative of clinical endometritis. At T1, endometritis scores were significantly lower than those reported before uterine infusion (P &lt; 0.05); however, Group A and B score, 0.4 ± 0.9 and 1.0 ± 2.1, respectively, correspond to no and slight endometritis, while animals in Group C reported a total endometritis score significantly higher (4.6 ± 3.5; P &lt; 0.05) corresponding to endometritis. In the present study, a commercial formosulphatiazole preparation was as effective as cephapirin and more effective than placebo for the treatment of clinical endometritis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.01.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22464185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravaginal ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; bacteria ; bacterial contamination ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - drug therapy ; cephapirin ; Cephapirin - administration &amp; dosage ; colposcopy ; Dairy cows ; Dairying ; Endometritis ; Endometritis - drug therapy ; Endometritis - veterinary ; Escherichia coli ; estrus ; Female ; formosulphathiazole ; intrauterine administration ; parturition ; Pasteurella ; Placebos ; Postpartum ; Postpartum Period - drug effects ; propylene glycol ; Puerperal Disorders - drug therapy ; Puerperal Disorders - veterinary ; Streptococcus ; Sulfathiazoles - administration &amp; dosage ; Treatment Outcome ; ultrasonography ; Uterus - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2012-07, Vol.78 (1), p.189-200</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-627684259d43cf9bad0c6be7d6cbe8ecb7b19d53a11dbce77f28ecdfa4632cb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-627684259d43cf9bad0c6be7d6cbe8ecb7b19d53a11dbce77f28ecdfa4632cb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X12000714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22464185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mari, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iacono, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toni, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Predieri, P.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlo, B</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrauterine treatment with formosulphathiazole of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>In cattle, elimination of bacterial contamination from the uterine lumen after parturition is often delayed or compromised, and pathogenic bacteria can persist, causing uterine disease and infertility. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and bacteriologic recovery following a single intrauterine administration of formosulphatiazole, cephapirin or placebo in cows with clinical endometritis. Cows (n = 80), no less than 28 days postpartum, with clinical endometritis were enrolled in the study. Endometritis was diagnosed by a complete reproductive examination, including rectal palpation, ultrasonography, vaginoscopy and uterine swab. All cows were randomly assigned to receive one of three intrauterine treatments (T0): 2500 mg of formosulphatiazole (Group A); 500 mg of cephapirin (Group B); placebo (4250 mg of propylene glycol; Group C). Cows were examined at the first estrus after treatment or no more than 30 days after (T1). Bacteria isolated were E. coli, A. pyogenes, Pasteurella spp. and Streptococcus spp. After treatment, in Group A and B only 6/30 (20.0%) and 6/24 (25.0%) cows showed a positive bacteriologic culture (P &gt; 0.05), while in Group C the number of positive animals was significantly higher (19/26; 73.1%; P &lt; 0.05). At T0, total clinical scores were similar between the three groups (Group A: 5.84 ± 1.07; Group B: 5.91 ± 1.0; Group C: 5.62 ± 1.17; P &gt; 0.05) and indicative of clinical endometritis. At T1, endometritis scores were significantly lower than those reported before uterine infusion (P &lt; 0.05); however, Group A and B score, 0.4 ± 0.9 and 1.0 ± 2.1, respectively, correspond to no and slight endometritis, while animals in Group C reported a total endometritis score significantly higher (4.6 ± 3.5; P &lt; 0.05) corresponding to endometritis. In the present study, a commercial formosulphatiazole preparation was as effective as cephapirin and more effective than placebo for the treatment of clinical endometritis.</description><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial contamination</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>cephapirin</subject><subject>Cephapirin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>colposcopy</subject><subject>Dairy cows</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>Endometritis</subject><subject>Endometritis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Endometritis - veterinary</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>estrus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>formosulphathiazole</subject><subject>intrauterine administration</subject><subject>parturition</subject><subject>Pasteurella</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Postpartum</subject><subject>Postpartum Period - drug effects</subject><subject>propylene glycol</subject><subject>Puerperal Disorders - drug therapy</subject><subject>Puerperal Disorders - veterinary</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>Sulfathiazoles - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ultrasonography</subject><subject>Uterus - drug effects</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxRtR3HH1K2gOHrx0mz89STd4kWVXhQUPuuAtpJPKTIbupE3Ss4xnP7hpZhW8iKeC4vdeFe9V1WuCG4IJf3to8h6iCzvwYQy7U0MxoQ0mDWb8UbUhnehrRhl5XG0w7lnNe_LtonqW0gHjgnDytLqgtOUt6bab6uf1UY2Lyi54FCwq1gisBZ3dETyktC6dz1EtuRz1gHIElSfwGd27vEc2xCmkZZz3Ku-d-hFGWCV6dN5pNSLwJkyQo8suFSM0h5RnFfMyIaNcPCEd7tPz6olVY4IXD_Oyuru5_nr1sb79_OHT1fvbWreszTWngnct3famZdr2gzJY8wGE4XqADvQgBtKbLVOEmEGDEJaWrbGq5YzqoWOX1Zuz7xzD9wVSlpNLGsZReQhLkiXfjjNCBC7ouzOqY0gpgpVzdJOKpwKtHJcH-XcPcu1BYiJLyEX-8uHSMkxg_oh_B1-AV2fAqiDVLrok774Uh3YtSQhC_kmQvhW0EDdnAkpmRwdRJu3AazAulgalCe7_vv0FCme6cw</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Mari, G</creator><creator>Iacono, E</creator><creator>Toni, F</creator><creator>Predieri, P.G</creator><creator>Merlo, B</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrauterine treatment with formosulphathiazole of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows</title><author>Mari, G ; Iacono, E ; Toni, F ; Predieri, P.G ; Merlo, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-627684259d43cf9bad0c6be7d6cbe8ecb7b19d53a11dbce77f28ecdfa4632cb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial contamination</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>cephapirin</topic><topic>Cephapirin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>colposcopy</topic><topic>Dairy cows</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>Endometritis</topic><topic>Endometritis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Endometritis - veterinary</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>estrus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>formosulphathiazole</topic><topic>intrauterine administration</topic><topic>parturition</topic><topic>Pasteurella</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Postpartum</topic><topic>Postpartum Period - drug effects</topic><topic>propylene glycol</topic><topic>Puerperal Disorders - drug therapy</topic><topic>Puerperal Disorders - veterinary</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>Sulfathiazoles - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ultrasonography</topic><topic>Uterus - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mari, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iacono, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toni, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Predieri, P.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlo, B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mari, G</au><au>Iacono, E</au><au>Toni, F</au><au>Predieri, P.G</au><au>Merlo, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrauterine treatment with formosulphathiazole of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>189-200</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>In cattle, elimination of bacterial contamination from the uterine lumen after parturition is often delayed or compromised, and pathogenic bacteria can persist, causing uterine disease and infertility. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and bacteriologic recovery following a single intrauterine administration of formosulphatiazole, cephapirin or placebo in cows with clinical endometritis. Cows (n = 80), no less than 28 days postpartum, with clinical endometritis were enrolled in the study. Endometritis was diagnosed by a complete reproductive examination, including rectal palpation, ultrasonography, vaginoscopy and uterine swab. All cows were randomly assigned to receive one of three intrauterine treatments (T0): 2500 mg of formosulphatiazole (Group A); 500 mg of cephapirin (Group B); placebo (4250 mg of propylene glycol; Group C). Cows were examined at the first estrus after treatment or no more than 30 days after (T1). Bacteria isolated were E. coli, A. pyogenes, Pasteurella spp. and Streptococcus spp. After treatment, in Group A and B only 6/30 (20.0%) and 6/24 (25.0%) cows showed a positive bacteriologic culture (P &gt; 0.05), while in Group C the number of positive animals was significantly higher (19/26; 73.1%; P &lt; 0.05). At T0, total clinical scores were similar between the three groups (Group A: 5.84 ± 1.07; Group B: 5.91 ± 1.0; Group C: 5.62 ± 1.17; P &gt; 0.05) and indicative of clinical endometritis. At T1, endometritis scores were significantly lower than those reported before uterine infusion (P &lt; 0.05); however, Group A and B score, 0.4 ± 0.9 and 1.0 ± 2.1, respectively, correspond to no and slight endometritis, while animals in Group C reported a total endometritis score significantly higher (4.6 ± 3.5; P &lt; 0.05) corresponding to endometritis. In the present study, a commercial formosulphatiazole preparation was as effective as cephapirin and more effective than placebo for the treatment of clinical endometritis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22464185</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.01.036</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-691X
ispartof Theriogenology, 2012-07, Vol.78 (1), p.189-200
issn 0093-691X
1879-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018631170
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Administration, Intravaginal
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
bacteria
bacterial contamination
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - drug therapy
cephapirin
Cephapirin - administration & dosage
colposcopy
Dairy cows
Dairying
Endometritis
Endometritis - drug therapy
Endometritis - veterinary
Escherichia coli
estrus
Female
formosulphathiazole
intrauterine administration
parturition
Pasteurella
Placebos
Postpartum
Postpartum Period - drug effects
propylene glycol
Puerperal Disorders - drug therapy
Puerperal Disorders - veterinary
Streptococcus
Sulfathiazoles - administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
ultrasonography
Uterus - drug effects
title Evaluation of the effectiveness of intrauterine treatment with formosulphathiazole of clinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20intrauterine%20treatment%20with%20formosulphathiazole%20of%20clinical%20endometritis%20in%20postpartum%20dairy%20cows&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Mari,%20G&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=189-200&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.01.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018631170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018631170&rft_id=info:pmid/22464185&rft_els_id=S0093691X12000714&rfr_iscdi=true