Airborne microbes in different dental environments in comparison to a public area
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate quantitatively and qualitatively the airborne microbial load in a multi-chair dental clinic, a normal dental practice and a non-dental public area over a time period of four days and at different time points to estimate the risk of infectio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of oral biology 2012-06, Vol.57 (6), p.689-696 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 696 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 689 |
container_title | Archives of oral biology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Kimmerle, H Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M Pelz, K Wittmer, A Hellwig, E Al-Ahmad, A |
description | Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate quantitatively and qualitatively the airborne microbial load in a multi-chair dental clinic, a normal dental practice and a non-dental public area over a time period of four days and at different time points to estimate the risk of infections during dental surgery. Methods A multi-chair and a single chair treatment room each were examined in comparison to a non-medical public area over a period of four days. The colony forming units m−3 (CFUs) were determined and isolated bacteria were characterised by morphological and biochemical analysis, gas chromatography and by 16S rRNA-gene sequencing. In the analyses enterococci were selectively searched for. Results The CFUs in the multi-chair treatment room were between 20 and 1050 CFU m−3 . During treatment the maxima reached were below 800 CFU m−3 . The values in the dental practice were between 200 and 600 CFU m−3 and remain slightly but not significantly below the levels of the clinic ( p > 0.05). In the common area, the CFUs were between 200 and 800 CFU m−3 . The proportion of micrococci was 56.8% in the clinic, 56.07% in the practice and 69.67% in the public area Coagulase-negative staphylococci constituted 35% at the dental clinic, 25% at the bank and 38% at the dental practice. No significant differences amongst the units were detected in the microbial composition of their dental aerosols ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Although, the bacterial counts in dental room were not significantly higher than the bacterial counts in a public area, the risk from dental clinic might be higher than a public area due to the type of micro-organisms, host susceptibility and the exposure time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.11.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018367290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000399691100392X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1018367290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-aa376dc643c91694c73e2584b81cd9ed631e617a34e11e25abf07307460d8b3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFr3DAMx81YWW_dvsJw3_aSq2XnnPilUI62GxRK6QZ7M46tMN8S-2YnhX77Or1ujD0VhGzhnyTrL0JOga2BgTzbrU2yP2MyQ-fjmjOAdTEG_A1ZQduoCjZMviUrxpiolJLqmLzPeVfCjZTwjhxzDlIVtyJ3Fz51MQWko7cpdpipD9T5vseEYaKuODNQDA8-xTCW6Bmwcdyb5HMMdIrU0P3cDd5Sk9B8IEe9GTJ-fDlPyPery2_bL9XN7fXX7cVNZWvBp8oY0UhnZS2sKp-pbSOQb9q6a8E6hU4KQAmNETUClBfT9awRrKklc20nUJyQz4e6-xR_z5gnPfpscRhMwDhnXZRqhWy4YgVVB7RMmHPCXu-TH016LNDCSb3T_yiqF0V1saJoyf300mbuRnR_M_9IWIDtAcAy7IPHpLP1GCw6n9BO2kX_qjbn_1Wxgw_emuEXPmLexTmFoqYGnblm-n5Z7bJZgOXCf4gnvvSiGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018367290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Airborne microbes in different dental environments in comparison to a public area</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kimmerle, H ; Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M ; Pelz, K ; Wittmer, A ; Hellwig, E ; Al-Ahmad, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimmerle, H ; Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M ; Pelz, K ; Wittmer, A ; Hellwig, E ; Al-Ahmad, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate quantitatively and qualitatively the airborne microbial load in a multi-chair dental clinic, a normal dental practice and a non-dental public area over a time period of four days and at different time points to estimate the risk of infections during dental surgery. Methods A multi-chair and a single chair treatment room each were examined in comparison to a non-medical public area over a period of four days. The colony forming units m−3 (CFUs) were determined and isolated bacteria were characterised by morphological and biochemical analysis, gas chromatography and by 16S rRNA-gene sequencing. In the analyses enterococci were selectively searched for. Results The CFUs in the multi-chair treatment room were between 20 and 1050 CFU m−3 . During treatment the maxima reached were below 800 CFU m−3 . The values in the dental practice were between 200 and 600 CFU m−3 and remain slightly but not significantly below the levels of the clinic ( p > 0.05). In the common area, the CFUs were between 200 and 800 CFU m−3 . The proportion of micrococci was 56.8% in the clinic, 56.07% in the practice and 69.67% in the public area Coagulase-negative staphylococci constituted 35% at the dental clinic, 25% at the bank and 38% at the dental practice. No significant differences amongst the units were detected in the microbial composition of their dental aerosols ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Although, the bacterial counts in dental room were not significantly higher than the bacterial counts in a public area, the risk from dental clinic might be higher than a public area due to the type of micro-organisms, host susceptibility and the exposure time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.11.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22169221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>16S rRNA ; Advanced Basic Science ; Aerosols ; Air Microbiology ; Airborne bacterial load ; Analysis of Variance ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Biochemical tests ; Chromatography, Gas ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Cross Infection - transmission ; Dental aerosols ; Dental Equipment - microbiology ; Dental Facilities ; Dentistry ; Gas chromatography ; Humans ; RNA, Ribosomal - analysis</subject><ispartof>Archives of oral biology, 2012-06, Vol.57 (6), p.689-696</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-aa376dc643c91694c73e2584b81cd9ed631e617a34e11e25abf07307460d8b3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-aa376dc643c91694c73e2584b81cd9ed631e617a34e11e25abf07307460d8b3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000399691100392X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22169221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimmerle, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelz, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellwig, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Ahmad, A</creatorcontrib><title>Airborne microbes in different dental environments in comparison to a public area</title><title>Archives of oral biology</title><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate quantitatively and qualitatively the airborne microbial load in a multi-chair dental clinic, a normal dental practice and a non-dental public area over a time period of four days and at different time points to estimate the risk of infections during dental surgery. Methods A multi-chair and a single chair treatment room each were examined in comparison to a non-medical public area over a period of four days. The colony forming units m−3 (CFUs) were determined and isolated bacteria were characterised by morphological and biochemical analysis, gas chromatography and by 16S rRNA-gene sequencing. In the analyses enterococci were selectively searched for. Results The CFUs in the multi-chair treatment room were between 20 and 1050 CFU m−3 . During treatment the maxima reached were below 800 CFU m−3 . The values in the dental practice were between 200 and 600 CFU m−3 and remain slightly but not significantly below the levels of the clinic ( p > 0.05). In the common area, the CFUs were between 200 and 800 CFU m−3 . The proportion of micrococci was 56.8% in the clinic, 56.07% in the practice and 69.67% in the public area Coagulase-negative staphylococci constituted 35% at the dental clinic, 25% at the bank and 38% at the dental practice. No significant differences amongst the units were detected in the microbial composition of their dental aerosols ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Although, the bacterial counts in dental room were not significantly higher than the bacterial counts in a public area, the risk from dental clinic might be higher than a public area due to the type of micro-organisms, host susceptibility and the exposure time.</description><subject>16S rRNA</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Airborne bacterial load</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biochemical tests</subject><subject>Chromatography, Gas</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cross Infection - transmission</subject><subject>Dental aerosols</subject><subject>Dental Equipment - microbiology</subject><subject>Dental Facilities</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal - analysis</subject><issn>0003-9969</issn><issn>1879-1506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVFr3DAMx81YWW_dvsJw3_aSq2XnnPilUI62GxRK6QZ7M46tMN8S-2YnhX77Or1ujD0VhGzhnyTrL0JOga2BgTzbrU2yP2MyQ-fjmjOAdTEG_A1ZQduoCjZMviUrxpiolJLqmLzPeVfCjZTwjhxzDlIVtyJ3Fz51MQWko7cpdpipD9T5vseEYaKuODNQDA8-xTCW6Bmwcdyb5HMMdIrU0P3cDd5Sk9B8IEe9GTJ-fDlPyPery2_bL9XN7fXX7cVNZWvBp8oY0UhnZS2sKp-pbSOQb9q6a8E6hU4KQAmNETUClBfT9awRrKklc20nUJyQz4e6-xR_z5gnPfpscRhMwDhnXZRqhWy4YgVVB7RMmHPCXu-TH016LNDCSb3T_yiqF0V1saJoyf300mbuRnR_M_9IWIDtAcAy7IPHpLP1GCw6n9BO2kX_qjbn_1Wxgw_emuEXPmLexTmFoqYGnblm-n5Z7bJZgOXCf4gnvvSiGw</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Kimmerle, H</creator><creator>Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M</creator><creator>Pelz, K</creator><creator>Wittmer, A</creator><creator>Hellwig, E</creator><creator>Al-Ahmad, A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Airborne microbes in different dental environments in comparison to a public area</title><author>Kimmerle, H ; Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M ; Pelz, K ; Wittmer, A ; Hellwig, E ; Al-Ahmad, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-aa376dc643c91694c73e2584b81cd9ed631e617a34e11e25abf07307460d8b3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Airborne bacterial load</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biochemical tests</topic><topic>Chromatography, Gas</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cross Infection - transmission</topic><topic>Dental aerosols</topic><topic>Dental Equipment - microbiology</topic><topic>Dental Facilities</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimmerle, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelz, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellwig, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Ahmad, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimmerle, H</au><au>Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M</au><au>Pelz, K</au><au>Wittmer, A</au><au>Hellwig, E</au><au>Al-Ahmad, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Airborne microbes in different dental environments in comparison to a public area</atitle><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>689</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>689-696</pages><issn>0003-9969</issn><eissn>1879-1506</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate quantitatively and qualitatively the airborne microbial load in a multi-chair dental clinic, a normal dental practice and a non-dental public area over a time period of four days and at different time points to estimate the risk of infections during dental surgery. Methods A multi-chair and a single chair treatment room each were examined in comparison to a non-medical public area over a period of four days. The colony forming units m−3 (CFUs) were determined and isolated bacteria were characterised by morphological and biochemical analysis, gas chromatography and by 16S rRNA-gene sequencing. In the analyses enterococci were selectively searched for. Results The CFUs in the multi-chair treatment room were between 20 and 1050 CFU m−3 . During treatment the maxima reached were below 800 CFU m−3 . The values in the dental practice were between 200 and 600 CFU m−3 and remain slightly but not significantly below the levels of the clinic ( p > 0.05). In the common area, the CFUs were between 200 and 800 CFU m−3 . The proportion of micrococci was 56.8% in the clinic, 56.07% in the practice and 69.67% in the public area Coagulase-negative staphylococci constituted 35% at the dental clinic, 25% at the bank and 38% at the dental practice. No significant differences amongst the units were detected in the microbial composition of their dental aerosols ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Although, the bacterial counts in dental room were not significantly higher than the bacterial counts in a public area, the risk from dental clinic might be higher than a public area due to the type of micro-organisms, host susceptibility and the exposure time.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22169221</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.11.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9969 |
ispartof | Archives of oral biology, 2012-06, Vol.57 (6), p.689-696 |
issn | 0003-9969 1879-1506 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018367290 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | 16S rRNA Advanced Basic Science Aerosols Air Microbiology Airborne bacterial load Analysis of Variance Bacteria - isolation & purification Biochemical tests Chromatography, Gas Colony Count, Microbial Cross Infection - prevention & control Cross Infection - transmission Dental aerosols Dental Equipment - microbiology Dental Facilities Dentistry Gas chromatography Humans RNA, Ribosomal - analysis |
title | Airborne microbes in different dental environments in comparison to a public area |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A58%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Airborne%20microbes%20in%20different%20dental%20environments%20in%20comparison%20to%20a%20public%20area&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20oral%20biology&rft.au=Kimmerle,%20H&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=689-696&rft.issn=0003-9969&rft.eissn=1879-1506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018367290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018367290&rft_id=info:pmid/22169221&rft_els_id=S000399691100392X&rfr_iscdi=true |