Woody biomass and mill waste utilization opportunities in Alabama: Transportation cost minimization, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and impact
Four biorefinery technologies were studied for feedstock allocation, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and their economic impacts on Alabama. The studied technologies are: (1) circulated fluidized bed gasification of woody biomass for Fischer‐Tropsch (F‐T) fuels and power production;...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental progress 2011-12, Vol.30 (4), p.720-732 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 732 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 720 |
| container_title | Environmental progress |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Aksoy, Burak Cullinan, Harry Webster, David Gue, Kevin Sukumaran, Sujith Eden, Mario Sammons Jr, Norman |
| description | Four biorefinery technologies were studied for feedstock allocation, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and their economic impacts on Alabama. The studied technologies are: (1) circulated fluidized bed gasification of woody biomass for Fischer‐Tropsch (F‐T) fuels and power production; (2) simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of paper sludge for ethanol production; (3) direct spouted bed (DSB) gasification with air and steam of woody biomass for power; and (4) direct combustion of woody biomass for power production. The optimum biorefinery locations for all four processes were southwestern Alabama. The average transportation distance for woody biomass was about 32 miles (51.5 km) to the biorefinery plants; however, longer transportation distances were required for paper sludge where the feedstock is provided by the pulp and paper plants in the region. The SSF process along with the DSB gasification process were the only economically feasible biorefinery technologies with an over 80 and 22.5% internal rate of return, respectively. Economic impacts of all the studied biorefinery technologies were comparable to each other. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2010. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ep.10501 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017984315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017984315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3941-d81435fcd71661091ec0daab6bfae140ee3964c6fa0fb21312c3e008bbe9c8b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhgdRsFahPyEgghcdTSaZzIx3pa1boagX24-7cJLJQGo-xkmGuv4af6rZ3XEFwasTeJ_zcMhbFCcEvyMYV-_1mGeNyZPiiHSMlQ2r8dPDm1XPixcxPmDMKeu6o-LXXQj9BkkTHMSIwPfIGWvRI8Sk0ZyMNT8hmeBRGMcwpdmbZHRExqMzCxIcfEDrCXzchntQhZiyxBu3rJ7m3WTc7NAAKgvTBtmglkir4IMzCg0aopG7-HR3h3EjqPSyeDaAjfrVMo-Lm4-X6_Or8vrL6tP52XWpaMdI2beE0XpQfUM4J7gjWuEeQHI5gCYMa007zhQfAA-yIpRUimqMWyl1p1rJ6HHxdu8dp_B91jEJZ6LS1oLXYY6CYNJ0LaOkzujrf9CHME8-XydIw3m7Beu_QjWFGCc9iHEyDqZNVoltVUKPYldVRt8sQogK7JD_U5l44Ku64m1FcebKPfdorN781ycuv_7xLrzJZf448DB9E7yhTS3uPq9Egy_u11e3F2JFfwNXDrQV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766817985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Woody biomass and mill waste utilization opportunities in Alabama: Transportation cost minimization, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and impact</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Aksoy, Burak ; Cullinan, Harry ; Webster, David ; Gue, Kevin ; Sukumaran, Sujith ; Eden, Mario ; Sammons Jr, Norman</creator><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Burak ; Cullinan, Harry ; Webster, David ; Gue, Kevin ; Sukumaran, Sujith ; Eden, Mario ; Sammons Jr, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>Four biorefinery technologies were studied for feedstock allocation, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and their economic impacts on Alabama. The studied technologies are: (1) circulated fluidized bed gasification of woody biomass for Fischer‐Tropsch (F‐T) fuels and power production; (2) simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of paper sludge for ethanol production; (3) direct spouted bed (DSB) gasification with air and steam of woody biomass for power; and (4) direct combustion of woody biomass for power production. The optimum biorefinery locations for all four processes were southwestern Alabama. The average transportation distance for woody biomass was about 32 miles (51.5 km) to the biorefinery plants; however, longer transportation distances were required for paper sludge where the feedstock is provided by the pulp and paper plants in the region. The SSF process along with the DSB gasification process were the only economically feasible biorefinery technologies with an over 80 and 22.5% internal rate of return, respectively. Economic impacts of all the studied biorefinery technologies were comparable to each other. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2010.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.10501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; biorefinery ; Biotechnology ; Chemical engineering ; decision support system ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluidization ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General treatment and storage processes ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Others ; paper sludge ; Pollution ; Various methods and equipments ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Environmental progress, 2011-12, Vol.30 (4), p.720-732</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3941-d81435fcd71661091ec0daab6bfae140ee3964c6fa0fb21312c3e008bbe9c8b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3941-d81435fcd71661091ec0daab6bfae140ee3964c6fa0fb21312c3e008bbe9c8b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.10501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.10501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25268230$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullinan, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gue, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Sujith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eden, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammons Jr, Norman</creatorcontrib><title>Woody biomass and mill waste utilization opportunities in Alabama: Transportation cost minimization, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and impact</title><title>Environmental progress</title><addtitle>Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy</addtitle><description>Four biorefinery technologies were studied for feedstock allocation, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and their economic impacts on Alabama. The studied technologies are: (1) circulated fluidized bed gasification of woody biomass for Fischer‐Tropsch (F‐T) fuels and power production; (2) simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of paper sludge for ethanol production; (3) direct spouted bed (DSB) gasification with air and steam of woody biomass for power; and (4) direct combustion of woody biomass for power production. The optimum biorefinery locations for all four processes were southwestern Alabama. The average transportation distance for woody biomass was about 32 miles (51.5 km) to the biorefinery plants; however, longer transportation distances were required for paper sludge where the feedstock is provided by the pulp and paper plants in the region. The SSF process along with the DSB gasification process were the only economically feasible biorefinery technologies with an over 80 and 22.5% internal rate of return, respectively. Economic impacts of all the studied biorefinery technologies were comparable to each other. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2010.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biorefinery</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>decision support system</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluidization</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Others</subject><subject>paper sludge</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhgdRsFahPyEgghcdTSaZzIx3pa1boagX24-7cJLJQGo-xkmGuv4af6rZ3XEFwasTeJ_zcMhbFCcEvyMYV-_1mGeNyZPiiHSMlQ2r8dPDm1XPixcxPmDMKeu6o-LXXQj9BkkTHMSIwPfIGWvRI8Sk0ZyMNT8hmeBRGMcwpdmbZHRExqMzCxIcfEDrCXzchntQhZiyxBu3rJ7m3WTc7NAAKgvTBtmglkir4IMzCg0aopG7-HR3h3EjqPSyeDaAjfrVMo-Lm4-X6_Or8vrL6tP52XWpaMdI2beE0XpQfUM4J7gjWuEeQHI5gCYMa007zhQfAA-yIpRUimqMWyl1p1rJ6HHxdu8dp_B91jEJZ6LS1oLXYY6CYNJ0LaOkzujrf9CHME8-XydIw3m7Beu_QjWFGCc9iHEyDqZNVoltVUKPYldVRt8sQogK7JD_U5l44Ku64m1FcebKPfdorN781ycuv_7xLrzJZf448DB9E7yhTS3uPq9Egy_u11e3F2JFfwNXDrQV</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Aksoy, Burak</creator><creator>Cullinan, Harry</creator><creator>Webster, David</creator><creator>Gue, Kevin</creator><creator>Sukumaran, Sujith</creator><creator>Eden, Mario</creator><creator>Sammons Jr, Norman</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Woody biomass and mill waste utilization opportunities in Alabama: Transportation cost minimization, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and impact</title><author>Aksoy, Burak ; Cullinan, Harry ; Webster, David ; Gue, Kevin ; Sukumaran, Sujith ; Eden, Mario ; Sammons Jr, Norman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3941-d81435fcd71661091ec0daab6bfae140ee3964c6fa0fb21312c3e008bbe9c8b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biorefinery</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>decision support system</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluidization</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Others</topic><topic>paper sludge</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullinan, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gue, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Sujith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eden, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammons Jr, Norman</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aksoy, Burak</au><au>Cullinan, Harry</au><au>Webster, David</au><au>Gue, Kevin</au><au>Sukumaran, Sujith</au><au>Eden, Mario</au><au>Sammons Jr, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Woody biomass and mill waste utilization opportunities in Alabama: Transportation cost minimization, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and impact</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>720</spage><epage>732</epage><pages>720-732</pages><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><abstract>Four biorefinery technologies were studied for feedstock allocation, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and their economic impacts on Alabama. The studied technologies are: (1) circulated fluidized bed gasification of woody biomass for Fischer‐Tropsch (F‐T) fuels and power production; (2) simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of paper sludge for ethanol production; (3) direct spouted bed (DSB) gasification with air and steam of woody biomass for power; and (4) direct combustion of woody biomass for power production. The optimum biorefinery locations for all four processes were southwestern Alabama. The average transportation distance for woody biomass was about 32 miles (51.5 km) to the biorefinery plants; however, longer transportation distances were required for paper sludge where the feedstock is provided by the pulp and paper plants in the region. The SSF process along with the DSB gasification process were the only economically feasible biorefinery technologies with an over 80 and 22.5% internal rate of return, respectively. Economic impacts of all the studied biorefinery technologies were comparable to each other. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2010.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.10501</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1944-7442 |
| ispartof | Environmental progress, 2011-12, Vol.30 (4), p.720-732 |
| issn | 1944-7442 1944-7450 1944-7450 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017984315 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences biorefinery Biotechnology Chemical engineering decision support system Exact sciences and technology Fluidization Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General treatment and storage processes Methods. Procedures. Technologies Others paper sludge Pollution Various methods and equipments Wastes |
| title | Woody biomass and mill waste utilization opportunities in Alabama: Transportation cost minimization, optimum facility location, economic feasibility, and impact |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Woody%20biomass%20and%20mill%20waste%20utilization%20opportunities%20in%20Alabama:%20Transportation%20cost%20minimization,%20optimum%20facility%20location,%20economic%20feasibility,%20and%20impact&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress&rft.au=Aksoy,%20Burak&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=732&rft.pages=720-732&rft.issn=1944-7442&rft.eissn=1944-7450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.10501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017984315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766817985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |