Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale

River regulation can alter the frequency and magnitude of subdaily flow variations causing major impacts on ecological structure and function. We developed an approach to quantify subdaily flow variation for multiple sites across a large watershed to assess the potential impacts of different dam ope...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2010-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1246-1260
Hauptverfasser: Zimmerman, Julie K.H, Letcher, Benjamin H, Nislow, Keith H, Lutz, Kimberly A, Magilligan, Francis J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1260
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1246
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 26
creator Zimmerman, Julie K.H
Letcher, Benjamin H
Nislow, Keith H
Lutz, Kimberly A
Magilligan, Francis J
description River regulation can alter the frequency and magnitude of subdaily flow variations causing major impacts on ecological structure and function. We developed an approach to quantify subdaily flow variation for multiple sites across a large watershed to assess the potential impacts of different dam operations (flood control, run‐of‐river hydropower and peaking hydropower) on natural communities. We used hourly flow data over a 9‐year period from 30 stream gages throughout the Connecticut River basin to calculate four metrics of subdaily flow variation and to compare sites downstream of dams with unregulated sites. Our objectives were to (1) determine the temporal scale of data needed to characterize subdaily variability; (2) compare the frequency of days with high subdaily flow variation downstream of dams and unregulated sites; (3) analyse the magnitude of subdaily variation at all sites and (4) identify individual sites that had subdaily variation significantly higher than unregulated locations. We found that estimates of flow variability based on daily mean flow data were not sufficient to characterize subdaily flow patterns. Alteration of subdaily flows was evident in the number of days natural ranges of variability were exceeded, rather than in the magnitude of subdaily variation, suggesting that all rivers may exhibit highly variable subdaily flows, but altered rivers exhibit this variability more frequently. Peaking hydropower facilities had the most highly altered subdaily flows; however, we observed significantly altered ranges of subdaily variability downstream of some flood‐control and run‐of‐river hydropower dams. Our analysis can be used to identify situations where dam operating procedures could be modified to reduce the level of hydrologic alteration. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.1324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017973458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017973458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-330284d0351fee976eb6141dec5d9371b98f9f7c0e4e4d3eb6a8c0588e41f33f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtO3DAUBuCoolK5SX2DelOpm4Ad23G8pEMJSIhKUC6byjrjHIPbTDLYGaaz4xH6jDwJHs1oWLGy5fPpl8-fZZ8ZPWCUFochwAHjhfiQbTPJZc5EqbY2d6k_ZTsx_qGUqUpX29nvYxwwTHznu3syPCBB59AOkfSONDBJZ0fibNyAbxfkCYKHwacn35HgnzAQ1_bzSGAgQOYPfYsvz__HENM4WmhxL_vooI24vz53s-uTH79Gp_n5z_psdHSeWyFLkXNOi0o0lEvmELUqcVwywRq0stFcsbGunHbKUhQoGp6mUFkqqwoFc5w7vpt9W-VOQ_84wziYiY8W2xY67GfRsLSuVlzI6o3a0McY0Jlp8BMIi4TMskGTGjTLBhP9uk6F5TYuQGd93PiCi1IopZPLV27uW1y8m2cuL4_WuWvv44D_Nh7CX1MqrqS5vajN6c3J97quR-Yu-S8r76A3cB_SH66vCso4ZZrJVBB_BaMCmCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017973458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zimmerman, Julie K.H ; Letcher, Benjamin H ; Nislow, Keith H ; Lutz, Kimberly A ; Magilligan, Francis J</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Julie K.H ; Letcher, Benjamin H ; Nislow, Keith H ; Lutz, Kimberly A ; Magilligan, Francis J</creatorcontrib><description>River regulation can alter the frequency and magnitude of subdaily flow variations causing major impacts on ecological structure and function. We developed an approach to quantify subdaily flow variation for multiple sites across a large watershed to assess the potential impacts of different dam operations (flood control, run‐of‐river hydropower and peaking hydropower) on natural communities. We used hourly flow data over a 9‐year period from 30 stream gages throughout the Connecticut River basin to calculate four metrics of subdaily flow variation and to compare sites downstream of dams with unregulated sites. Our objectives were to (1) determine the temporal scale of data needed to characterize subdaily variability; (2) compare the frequency of days with high subdaily flow variation downstream of dams and unregulated sites; (3) analyse the magnitude of subdaily variation at all sites and (4) identify individual sites that had subdaily variation significantly higher than unregulated locations. We found that estimates of flow variability based on daily mean flow data were not sufficient to characterize subdaily flow patterns. Alteration of subdaily flows was evident in the number of days natural ranges of variability were exceeded, rather than in the magnitude of subdaily variation, suggesting that all rivers may exhibit highly variable subdaily flows, but altered rivers exhibit this variability more frequently. Peaking hydropower facilities had the most highly altered subdaily flows; however, we observed significantly altered ranges of subdaily variability downstream of some flood‐control and run‐of‐river hydropower dams. Our analysis can be used to identify situations where dam operating procedures could be modified to reduce the level of hydrologic alteration. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.1324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Alterations ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Connecticut River ; Dams ; Dams and subsidiary installations ; Damsites ; Ecology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flood control ; flow restoration ; flow variability ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hydraulic constructions ; hydrologic alteration ; Hydrology ; hydropower ; Rivers ; subdaily variation ; Synecology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2010-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1246-1260</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-330284d0351fee976eb6141dec5d9371b98f9f7c0e4e4d3eb6a8c0588e41f33f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-330284d0351fee976eb6141dec5d9371b98f9f7c0e4e4d3eb6a8c0588e41f33f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.1324$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.1324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23464779$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Julie K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letcher, Benjamin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nislow, Keith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Kimberly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magilligan, Francis J</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale</title><title>River research and applications</title><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><description>River regulation can alter the frequency and magnitude of subdaily flow variations causing major impacts on ecological structure and function. We developed an approach to quantify subdaily flow variation for multiple sites across a large watershed to assess the potential impacts of different dam operations (flood control, run‐of‐river hydropower and peaking hydropower) on natural communities. We used hourly flow data over a 9‐year period from 30 stream gages throughout the Connecticut River basin to calculate four metrics of subdaily flow variation and to compare sites downstream of dams with unregulated sites. Our objectives were to (1) determine the temporal scale of data needed to characterize subdaily variability; (2) compare the frequency of days with high subdaily flow variation downstream of dams and unregulated sites; (3) analyse the magnitude of subdaily variation at all sites and (4) identify individual sites that had subdaily variation significantly higher than unregulated locations. We found that estimates of flow variability based on daily mean flow data were not sufficient to characterize subdaily flow patterns. Alteration of subdaily flows was evident in the number of days natural ranges of variability were exceeded, rather than in the magnitude of subdaily variation, suggesting that all rivers may exhibit highly variable subdaily flows, but altered rivers exhibit this variability more frequently. Peaking hydropower facilities had the most highly altered subdaily flows; however, we observed significantly altered ranges of subdaily variability downstream of some flood‐control and run‐of‐river hydropower dams. Our analysis can be used to identify situations where dam operating procedures could be modified to reduce the level of hydrologic alteration. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Alterations</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Connecticut River</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Dams and subsidiary installations</subject><subject>Damsites</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>flow restoration</subject><subject>flow variability</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hydraulic constructions</subject><subject>hydrologic alteration</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>hydropower</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>subdaily variation</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtO3DAUBuCoolK5SX2DelOpm4Ad23G8pEMJSIhKUC6byjrjHIPbTDLYGaaz4xH6jDwJHs1oWLGy5fPpl8-fZZ8ZPWCUFochwAHjhfiQbTPJZc5EqbY2d6k_ZTsx_qGUqUpX29nvYxwwTHznu3syPCBB59AOkfSONDBJZ0fibNyAbxfkCYKHwacn35HgnzAQ1_bzSGAgQOYPfYsvz__HENM4WmhxL_vooI24vz53s-uTH79Gp_n5z_psdHSeWyFLkXNOi0o0lEvmELUqcVwywRq0stFcsbGunHbKUhQoGp6mUFkqqwoFc5w7vpt9W-VOQ_84wziYiY8W2xY67GfRsLSuVlzI6o3a0McY0Jlp8BMIi4TMskGTGjTLBhP9uk6F5TYuQGd93PiCi1IopZPLV27uW1y8m2cuL4_WuWvv44D_Nh7CX1MqrqS5vajN6c3J97quR-Yu-S8r76A3cB_SH66vCso4ZZrJVBB_BaMCmCg</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Zimmerman, Julie K.H</creator><creator>Letcher, Benjamin H</creator><creator>Nislow, Keith H</creator><creator>Lutz, Kimberly A</creator><creator>Magilligan, Francis J</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale</title><author>Zimmerman, Julie K.H ; Letcher, Benjamin H ; Nislow, Keith H ; Lutz, Kimberly A ; Magilligan, Francis J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-330284d0351fee976eb6141dec5d9371b98f9f7c0e4e4d3eb6a8c0588e41f33f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Alterations</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Connecticut River</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Dams and subsidiary installations</topic><topic>Damsites</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>flow restoration</topic><topic>flow variability</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hydraulic constructions</topic><topic>hydrologic alteration</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>hydropower</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>subdaily variation</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Julie K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letcher, Benjamin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nislow, Keith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Kimberly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magilligan, Francis J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmerman, Julie K.H</au><au>Letcher, Benjamin H</au><au>Nislow, Keith H</au><au>Lutz, Kimberly A</au><au>Magilligan, Francis J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1246</spage><epage>1260</epage><pages>1246-1260</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>River regulation can alter the frequency and magnitude of subdaily flow variations causing major impacts on ecological structure and function. We developed an approach to quantify subdaily flow variation for multiple sites across a large watershed to assess the potential impacts of different dam operations (flood control, run‐of‐river hydropower and peaking hydropower) on natural communities. We used hourly flow data over a 9‐year period from 30 stream gages throughout the Connecticut River basin to calculate four metrics of subdaily flow variation and to compare sites downstream of dams with unregulated sites. Our objectives were to (1) determine the temporal scale of data needed to characterize subdaily variability; (2) compare the frequency of days with high subdaily flow variation downstream of dams and unregulated sites; (3) analyse the magnitude of subdaily variation at all sites and (4) identify individual sites that had subdaily variation significantly higher than unregulated locations. We found that estimates of flow variability based on daily mean flow data were not sufficient to characterize subdaily flow patterns. Alteration of subdaily flows was evident in the number of days natural ranges of variability were exceeded, rather than in the magnitude of subdaily variation, suggesting that all rivers may exhibit highly variable subdaily flows, but altered rivers exhibit this variability more frequently. Peaking hydropower facilities had the most highly altered subdaily flows; however, we observed significantly altered ranges of subdaily variability downstream of some flood‐control and run‐of‐river hydropower dams. Our analysis can be used to identify situations where dam operating procedures could be modified to reduce the level of hydrologic alteration. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.1324</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2010-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1246-1260
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017973458
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alterations
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Buildings. Public works
Connecticut River
Dams
Dams and subsidiary installations
Damsites
Ecology
Exact sciences and technology
Flood control
flow restoration
flow variability
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hydraulic constructions
hydrologic alteration
Hydrology
hydropower
Rivers
subdaily variation
Synecology
Watersheds
title Determining the effects of dams on subdaily variation in river flows at a whole‐basin scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A26%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20effects%20of%20dams%20on%20subdaily%20variation%20in%20river%20flows%20at%20a%20whole%E2%80%90basin%20scale&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Zimmerman,%20Julie%20K.H&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1246&rft.epage=1260&rft.pages=1246-1260&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.1324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017973458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017973458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true