Downstream channel changes after a small dam removal: Using aerial photos and measurement error for context; Calapooia River, Oregon

Dam removal is often implemented without adequate baseline monitoring to distinguish background variability from channel changes due to the removal. This study evaluated aerial photos as substitutes for multiple‐year pre‐removal field data to assess downstream channel changes associated with a small...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2010-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1220-1245
Hauptverfasser: Walter, Cara, Tullos, Desiree D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1245
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1220
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 26
creator Walter, Cara
Tullos, Desiree D
description Dam removal is often implemented without adequate baseline monitoring to distinguish background variability from channel changes due to the removal. This study evaluated aerial photos as substitutes for multiple‐year pre‐removal field data to assess downstream channel changes associated with a small dam removal. The Brownsville Dam, a 2.1 m tall concrete dam on the Calapooia River, Oregon, was removed in 2007. We mapped bars and the low flow channel downstream from the dam and in an upstream control reach using aerial photos (1994-2008) and in the field prior to (2007) and following (2008) removal. The locations and magnitudes of changes in bar area and wetted width, relative to errors, indicate that downstream channel changes were a result of the removal. The maximum changes (−3520 ± 1460 m² for bar area, 32 ± 8 m for wetted width) observed prior to dam removal with aerial photos were far downstream. In contrast, the maximum changes after removal were immediately below the dam (200 ± 90 m² for bar area, −11 ± 3 m for wetted width), and small in the upstream control (−150 ± 130 m² for bar area, 9 ± 4 m for wetted width). The dominant errors were photo specific: exposure error for spring to summer comparisons, position error for photos not processed for this study and identification error for small scale photos not scanned from film. We found aerial photos to be an acceptable but coarse substitute for multi‐year pre‐removal field data, and suggest best practices to minimize errors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.1323
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017973444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017973444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4793-3ef4efb4b44dcfffb02fda6d7562ff4e1e7aed9c86fd1739f69c53bda693a68a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFu1DAQBuAIgUQpSLwBviBxICWOnTiGU7WFtlKh0tIV3KxZZ7wNOPZ2nG3pnQfHZVfLiYM1lubTr9FfFC95dcSrqn5HBEdc1OJRccAb0ZRcturx_t_op8WzlH5UFVed7g6K3yfxLqSJEEZmryEE9H_nChMDNyExYGkE71mfBeEYb8G_Z4s0hBUDpAE8W1_HKWYeejYipE1WGCaGRJGYy8_GMOGv6QObgYd1jAOw-XCL9JZdEq5ieF48ceATvtjNw2Lx6ePV7Ky8uDw9nx1flCCVFqVAJ9Et5VLK3jrnllXtemh71bS1yyuOCrDXtmtdz5XQrtW2EctMtIC2A3FYvNnmrinebDBNZhySRe8hYNwkw3MrWgkp5T9qKaZE6MyahhHoPiPzULTJRZuHojN9vUuFZME7gmCHtPe1kK1Uqsuu3Lq7weP9f_PMfH68y935IeX29h7op2mVUI359uXUfP5-MldXTWVm2b_aegfRwIryDYuvdcVFxTVvtGjFH8k6pz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017973444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Downstream channel changes after a small dam removal: Using aerial photos and measurement error for context; Calapooia River, Oregon</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Walter, Cara ; Tullos, Desiree D</creator><creatorcontrib>Walter, Cara ; Tullos, Desiree D</creatorcontrib><description>Dam removal is often implemented without adequate baseline monitoring to distinguish background variability from channel changes due to the removal. This study evaluated aerial photos as substitutes for multiple‐year pre‐removal field data to assess downstream channel changes associated with a small dam removal. The Brownsville Dam, a 2.1 m tall concrete dam on the Calapooia River, Oregon, was removed in 2007. We mapped bars and the low flow channel downstream from the dam and in an upstream control reach using aerial photos (1994-2008) and in the field prior to (2007) and following (2008) removal. The locations and magnitudes of changes in bar area and wetted width, relative to errors, indicate that downstream channel changes were a result of the removal. The maximum changes (−3520 ± 1460 m² for bar area, 32 ± 8 m for wetted width) observed prior to dam removal with aerial photos were far downstream. In contrast, the maximum changes after removal were immediately below the dam (200 ± 90 m² for bar area, −11 ± 3 m for wetted width), and small in the upstream control (−150 ± 130 m² for bar area, 9 ± 4 m for wetted width). The dominant errors were photo specific: exposure error for spring to summer comparisons, position error for photos not processed for this study and identification error for small scale photos not scanned from film. We found aerial photos to be an acceptable but coarse substitute for multi‐year pre‐removal field data, and suggest best practices to minimize errors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.1323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>aerial photography ; Aerials ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Calapooia River ; Channels ; dam removal ; Dams and subsidiary installations ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hydraulic constructions ; Monitoring ; Rivers ; Springs ; Synecology ; topographic survey ; Upstream</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2010-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1220-1245</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4793-3ef4efb4b44dcfffb02fda6d7562ff4e1e7aed9c86fd1739f69c53bda693a68a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4793-3ef4efb4b44dcfffb02fda6d7562ff4e1e7aed9c86fd1739f69c53bda693a68a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.1323$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.1323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23464778$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walter, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullos, Desiree D</creatorcontrib><title>Downstream channel changes after a small dam removal: Using aerial photos and measurement error for context; Calapooia River, Oregon</title><title>River research and applications</title><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><description>Dam removal is often implemented without adequate baseline monitoring to distinguish background variability from channel changes due to the removal. This study evaluated aerial photos as substitutes for multiple‐year pre‐removal field data to assess downstream channel changes associated with a small dam removal. The Brownsville Dam, a 2.1 m tall concrete dam on the Calapooia River, Oregon, was removed in 2007. We mapped bars and the low flow channel downstream from the dam and in an upstream control reach using aerial photos (1994-2008) and in the field prior to (2007) and following (2008) removal. The locations and magnitudes of changes in bar area and wetted width, relative to errors, indicate that downstream channel changes were a result of the removal. The maximum changes (−3520 ± 1460 m² for bar area, 32 ± 8 m for wetted width) observed prior to dam removal with aerial photos were far downstream. In contrast, the maximum changes after removal were immediately below the dam (200 ± 90 m² for bar area, −11 ± 3 m for wetted width), and small in the upstream control (−150 ± 130 m² for bar area, 9 ± 4 m for wetted width). The dominant errors were photo specific: exposure error for spring to summer comparisons, position error for photos not processed for this study and identification error for small scale photos not scanned from film. We found aerial photos to be an acceptable but coarse substitute for multi‐year pre‐removal field data, and suggest best practices to minimize errors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>aerial photography</subject><subject>Aerials</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Calapooia River</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>dam removal</subject><subject>Dams and subsidiary installations</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hydraulic constructions</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>topographic survey</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MFu1DAQBuAIgUQpSLwBviBxICWOnTiGU7WFtlKh0tIV3KxZZ7wNOPZ2nG3pnQfHZVfLiYM1lubTr9FfFC95dcSrqn5HBEdc1OJRccAb0ZRcturx_t_op8WzlH5UFVed7g6K3yfxLqSJEEZmryEE9H_nChMDNyExYGkE71mfBeEYb8G_Z4s0hBUDpAE8W1_HKWYeejYipE1WGCaGRJGYy8_GMOGv6QObgYd1jAOw-XCL9JZdEq5ieF48ceATvtjNw2Lx6ePV7Ky8uDw9nx1flCCVFqVAJ9Et5VLK3jrnllXtemh71bS1yyuOCrDXtmtdz5XQrtW2EctMtIC2A3FYvNnmrinebDBNZhySRe8hYNwkw3MrWgkp5T9qKaZE6MyahhHoPiPzULTJRZuHojN9vUuFZME7gmCHtPe1kK1Uqsuu3Lq7weP9f_PMfH68y935IeX29h7op2mVUI359uXUfP5-MldXTWVm2b_aegfRwIryDYuvdcVFxTVvtGjFH8k6pz4</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Walter, Cara</creator><creator>Tullos, Desiree D</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Downstream channel changes after a small dam removal: Using aerial photos and measurement error for context; Calapooia River, Oregon</title><author>Walter, Cara ; Tullos, Desiree D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4793-3ef4efb4b44dcfffb02fda6d7562ff4e1e7aed9c86fd1739f69c53bda693a68a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>aerial photography</topic><topic>Aerials</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Calapooia River</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>dam removal</topic><topic>Dams and subsidiary installations</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hydraulic constructions</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>topographic survey</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walter, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullos, Desiree D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walter, Cara</au><au>Tullos, Desiree D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Downstream channel changes after a small dam removal: Using aerial photos and measurement error for context; Calapooia River, Oregon</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1220</spage><epage>1245</epage><pages>1220-1245</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Dam removal is often implemented without adequate baseline monitoring to distinguish background variability from channel changes due to the removal. This study evaluated aerial photos as substitutes for multiple‐year pre‐removal field data to assess downstream channel changes associated with a small dam removal. The Brownsville Dam, a 2.1 m tall concrete dam on the Calapooia River, Oregon, was removed in 2007. We mapped bars and the low flow channel downstream from the dam and in an upstream control reach using aerial photos (1994-2008) and in the field prior to (2007) and following (2008) removal. The locations and magnitudes of changes in bar area and wetted width, relative to errors, indicate that downstream channel changes were a result of the removal. The maximum changes (−3520 ± 1460 m² for bar area, 32 ± 8 m for wetted width) observed prior to dam removal with aerial photos were far downstream. In contrast, the maximum changes after removal were immediately below the dam (200 ± 90 m² for bar area, −11 ± 3 m for wetted width), and small in the upstream control (−150 ± 130 m² for bar area, 9 ± 4 m for wetted width). The dominant errors were photo specific: exposure error for spring to summer comparisons, position error for photos not processed for this study and identification error for small scale photos not scanned from film. We found aerial photos to be an acceptable but coarse substitute for multi‐year pre‐removal field data, and suggest best practices to minimize errors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.1323</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2010-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1220-1245
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017973444
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects aerial photography
Aerials
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Buildings. Public works
Calapooia River
Channels
dam removal
Dams and subsidiary installations
Error analysis
Errors
Exact sciences and technology
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hydraulic constructions
Monitoring
Rivers
Springs
Synecology
topographic survey
Upstream
title Downstream channel changes after a small dam removal: Using aerial photos and measurement error for context; Calapooia River, Oregon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Downstream%20channel%20changes%20after%20a%20small%20dam%20removal:%20Using%20aerial%20photos%20and%20measurement%20error%20for%20context;%20Calapooia%20River,%20Oregon&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Walter,%20Cara&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1220&rft.epage=1245&rft.pages=1220-1245&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.1323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017973444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017973444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true