Evaluation of modified DRAINMOD in predicting groundwater table fluctuations and yield of canola in paddy fields under snowy conditions (case study: Rasht Iran)
The computer simulation hydrologic model DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD (Luo et al. 2000) for cold condition was used to predict the performance of surface drainage and yield of canola as post‐rice cultivation during the wet growing season of 2004–2005 in Rasht Iran. Performance of surface drainage...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Irrigation and drainage 2011-12, Vol.60 (5), p.660-667 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 667 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 660 |
container_title | Irrigation and drainage |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Hassanpour, B Parsinejad, M Yazdani, M.R Dalivand, F. Salahshour Kossari, H |
description | The computer simulation hydrologic model DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD (Luo et al. 2000) for cold condition was used to predict the performance of surface drainage and yield of canola as post‐rice cultivation during the wet growing season of 2004–2005 in Rasht Iran. Performance of surface drainage system treatments with 2 m spacing and 15 cm drain depth as compared with plots having no drainage (4 × 10 m2) were used to evaluate the models. Evaluation of predicted daily groundwater table depths as compared with measured values shows that the root mean square error (RMSE) was about 10.2 and 9.9 cm for DRAINMOD versus 11.0 and 11.5 for modified DRAINMOD in 2 m drain spacing and no drainage treatment respectively. Original DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD predictions for groundwater table depth was on average about 4 and 7% less than measured values for the surface drainage treatment and 22 and 14% greater for the no drainage treatment whereas the standard error of original DRAINMOD was 1.4 and 1.51 (cm) respectively. The average absolute deviations were 8.67 and 9.22 (cm). However by using the modified DRAINMOD these values were decreased to 1.34 1.3 8.05 and 8.19 cm respectively. Comparisons show that modifications introduced in DRAINMOD for snowy conditions improved the capability of the model to predict groundwater table fluctuations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ird.614 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017972711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017972711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-f57f539031176067390096bf2a8c3897dee8742f7edc74887807c51fc54489943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10d9OFDEUBvCJkURE4yPYOzFmoJ1Op1PvgAXcZIFkFU28aUr_rNVuu7Ydl3kbH5UuY7jzqifp73zJyVdVbxA8QhA2xzaqow61z6p9RDCqIe7Q86eZ4BfVy5R-QggZa-h-9ff8j3CDyDZ4EAxYB2WN1QrMlifz66ubGbAebKJWVmbrV2AVw-DVVmQdQRZ3TgPjBpmngASEV2C02qldlhQ-OPEYIJQagdl9JFD2y3LyYTsCGbyy0-qhFEmDlAc1fgRLkX5kMI_Cv39V7Rnhkn797z2obi_Ov5x9qhc3l_Ozk0UtMena2hBqCGYQI0Q72NEyQtbdmUb0EveMKq172jaGaiVp2_e0h1QSZCRp256xFh9Uh1PuJobfg06Zr22S2jnhdRgSRxBRRhuKUKHvJipjSClqwzfRrkUcC-K7DnjpgJcOivwwya11evwf4_PlbNL1pG3K-v5Ji_iLl4Mo4d-uL_mi__q9PyUNvyj-7eSNCFysok389nMDEYaIEYZwhx8A6PKgPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017972711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of modified DRAINMOD in predicting groundwater table fluctuations and yield of canola in paddy fields under snowy conditions (case study: Rasht Iran)</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hassanpour, B ; Parsinejad, M ; Yazdani, M.R ; Dalivand, F. Salahshour ; Kossari, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Hassanpour, B ; Parsinejad, M ; Yazdani, M.R ; Dalivand, F. Salahshour ; Kossari, H</creatorcontrib><description>The computer simulation hydrologic model DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD (Luo et al. 2000) for cold condition was used to predict the performance of surface drainage and yield of canola as post‐rice cultivation during the wet growing season of 2004–2005 in Rasht Iran. Performance of surface drainage system treatments with 2 m spacing and 15 cm drain depth as compared with plots having no drainage (4 × 10 m2) were used to evaluate the models. Evaluation of predicted daily groundwater table depths as compared with measured values shows that the root mean square error (RMSE) was about 10.2 and 9.9 cm for DRAINMOD versus 11.0 and 11.5 for modified DRAINMOD in 2 m drain spacing and no drainage treatment respectively. Original DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD predictions for groundwater table depth was on average about 4 and 7% less than measured values for the surface drainage treatment and 22 and 14% greater for the no drainage treatment whereas the standard error of original DRAINMOD was 1.4 and 1.51 (cm) respectively. The average absolute deviations were 8.67 and 9.22 (cm). However by using the modified DRAINMOD these values were decreased to 1.34 1.3 8.05 and 8.19 cm respectively. Comparisons show that modifications introduced in DRAINMOD for snowy conditions improved the capability of the model to predict groundwater table fluctuations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-0353</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1531-0361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ird.614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>canola ; case studies ; computers ; crop yield ; Drainage ; drainage de surface ; Drainage measurement ; Drainage systems ; DRAINMOD ; Drains ; Groundwater ; Groundwater treatment ; hydrologic models ; l'infiltration ; les champs de paddy ; les rendements ; Mathematical models ; paddy fields ; prediction ; seepage ; simulation models ; surface drainage ; Tables (data) ; water table ; wet season ; yields</subject><ispartof>Irrigation and drainage, 2011-12, Vol.60 (5), p.660-667</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-f57f539031176067390096bf2a8c3897dee8742f7edc74887807c51fc54489943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-f57f539031176067390096bf2a8c3897dee8742f7edc74887807c51fc54489943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fird.614$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fird.614$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hassanpour, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsinejad, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdani, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalivand, F. Salahshour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kossari, H</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of modified DRAINMOD in predicting groundwater table fluctuations and yield of canola in paddy fields under snowy conditions (case study: Rasht Iran)</title><title>Irrigation and drainage</title><addtitle>Irrig. and Drain</addtitle><description>The computer simulation hydrologic model DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD (Luo et al. 2000) for cold condition was used to predict the performance of surface drainage and yield of canola as post‐rice cultivation during the wet growing season of 2004–2005 in Rasht Iran. Performance of surface drainage system treatments with 2 m spacing and 15 cm drain depth as compared with plots having no drainage (4 × 10 m2) were used to evaluate the models. Evaluation of predicted daily groundwater table depths as compared with measured values shows that the root mean square error (RMSE) was about 10.2 and 9.9 cm for DRAINMOD versus 11.0 and 11.5 for modified DRAINMOD in 2 m drain spacing and no drainage treatment respectively. Original DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD predictions for groundwater table depth was on average about 4 and 7% less than measured values for the surface drainage treatment and 22 and 14% greater for the no drainage treatment whereas the standard error of original DRAINMOD was 1.4 and 1.51 (cm) respectively. The average absolute deviations were 8.67 and 9.22 (cm). However by using the modified DRAINMOD these values were decreased to 1.34 1.3 8.05 and 8.19 cm respectively. Comparisons show that modifications introduced in DRAINMOD for snowy conditions improved the capability of the model to predict groundwater table fluctuations.</description><subject>canola</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>computers</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>drainage de surface</subject><subject>Drainage measurement</subject><subject>Drainage systems</subject><subject>DRAINMOD</subject><subject>Drains</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater treatment</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>l'infiltration</subject><subject>les champs de paddy</subject><subject>les rendements</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>paddy fields</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>seepage</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>surface drainage</subject><subject>Tables (data)</subject><subject>water table</subject><subject>wet season</subject><subject>yields</subject><issn>1531-0353</issn><issn>1531-0361</issn><issn>1531-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10d9OFDEUBvCJkURE4yPYOzFmoJ1Op1PvgAXcZIFkFU28aUr_rNVuu7Ydl3kbH5UuY7jzqifp73zJyVdVbxA8QhA2xzaqow61z6p9RDCqIe7Q86eZ4BfVy5R-QggZa-h-9ff8j3CDyDZ4EAxYB2WN1QrMlifz66ubGbAebKJWVmbrV2AVw-DVVmQdQRZ3TgPjBpmngASEV2C02qldlhQ-OPEYIJQagdl9JFD2y3LyYTsCGbyy0-qhFEmDlAc1fgRLkX5kMI_Cv39V7Rnhkn797z2obi_Ov5x9qhc3l_Ozk0UtMena2hBqCGYQI0Q72NEyQtbdmUb0EveMKq172jaGaiVp2_e0h1QSZCRp256xFh9Uh1PuJobfg06Zr22S2jnhdRgSRxBRRhuKUKHvJipjSClqwzfRrkUcC-K7DnjpgJcOivwwya11evwf4_PlbNL1pG3K-v5Ji_iLl4Mo4d-uL_mi__q9PyUNvyj-7eSNCFysok389nMDEYaIEYZwhx8A6PKgPw</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Hassanpour, B</creator><creator>Parsinejad, M</creator><creator>Yazdani, M.R</creator><creator>Dalivand, F. Salahshour</creator><creator>Kossari, H</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Evaluation of modified DRAINMOD in predicting groundwater table fluctuations and yield of canola in paddy fields under snowy conditions (case study: Rasht Iran)</title><author>Hassanpour, B ; Parsinejad, M ; Yazdani, M.R ; Dalivand, F. Salahshour ; Kossari, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-f57f539031176067390096bf2a8c3897dee8742f7edc74887807c51fc54489943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>canola</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>computers</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>drainage de surface</topic><topic>Drainage measurement</topic><topic>Drainage systems</topic><topic>DRAINMOD</topic><topic>Drains</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater treatment</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>l'infiltration</topic><topic>les champs de paddy</topic><topic>les rendements</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>paddy fields</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>seepage</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>surface drainage</topic><topic>Tables (data)</topic><topic>water table</topic><topic>wet season</topic><topic>yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hassanpour, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsinejad, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdani, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalivand, F. Salahshour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kossari, H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Irrigation and drainage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hassanpour, B</au><au>Parsinejad, M</au><au>Yazdani, M.R</au><au>Dalivand, F. Salahshour</au><au>Kossari, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of modified DRAINMOD in predicting groundwater table fluctuations and yield of canola in paddy fields under snowy conditions (case study: Rasht Iran)</atitle><jtitle>Irrigation and drainage</jtitle><addtitle>Irrig. and Drain</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>660</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>660-667</pages><issn>1531-0353</issn><issn>1531-0361</issn><eissn>1531-0361</eissn><abstract>The computer simulation hydrologic model DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD (Luo et al. 2000) for cold condition was used to predict the performance of surface drainage and yield of canola as post‐rice cultivation during the wet growing season of 2004–2005 in Rasht Iran. Performance of surface drainage system treatments with 2 m spacing and 15 cm drain depth as compared with plots having no drainage (4 × 10 m2) were used to evaluate the models. Evaluation of predicted daily groundwater table depths as compared with measured values shows that the root mean square error (RMSE) was about 10.2 and 9.9 cm for DRAINMOD versus 11.0 and 11.5 for modified DRAINMOD in 2 m drain spacing and no drainage treatment respectively. Original DRAINMOD and modified DRAINMOD predictions for groundwater table depth was on average about 4 and 7% less than measured values for the surface drainage treatment and 22 and 14% greater for the no drainage treatment whereas the standard error of original DRAINMOD was 1.4 and 1.51 (cm) respectively. The average absolute deviations were 8.67 and 9.22 (cm). However by using the modified DRAINMOD these values were decreased to 1.34 1.3 8.05 and 8.19 cm respectively. Comparisons show that modifications introduced in DRAINMOD for snowy conditions improved the capability of the model to predict groundwater table fluctuations.</abstract><cop>Chichester UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ird.614</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1531-0353 |
ispartof | Irrigation and drainage, 2011-12, Vol.60 (5), p.660-667 |
issn | 1531-0353 1531-0361 1531-0361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017972711 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | canola case studies computers crop yield Drainage drainage de surface Drainage measurement Drainage systems DRAINMOD Drains Groundwater Groundwater treatment hydrologic models l'infiltration les champs de paddy les rendements Mathematical models paddy fields prediction seepage simulation models surface drainage Tables (data) water table wet season yields |
title | Evaluation of modified DRAINMOD in predicting groundwater table fluctuations and yield of canola in paddy fields under snowy conditions (case study: Rasht Iran) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A01%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20modified%20DRAINMOD%20in%20predicting%20groundwater%20table%20fluctuations%20and%20yield%20of%20canola%20in%20paddy%20fields%20under%20snowy%20conditions%20(case%20study:%20Rasht%20Iran)&rft.jtitle=Irrigation%20and%20drainage&rft.au=Hassanpour,%20B&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=660-667&rft.issn=1531-0353&rft.eissn=1531-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ird.614&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017972711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017972711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |