impact of dams on flood flows in the United States

Natural flood regimes provide a wide array of important ecological functions. Our goal is to assess the hydrologic impact of dams on flood flows throughout the United States. Regional regression models of the median annual 1‐day maximum flow were developed as a function of natural watershed characte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2011-12, Vol.27 (10), p.1192-1215
Hauptverfasser: FitzHugh, Thomas W, Vogel, Richard M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1215
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1192
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 27
creator FitzHugh, Thomas W
Vogel, Richard M
description Natural flood regimes provide a wide array of important ecological functions. Our goal is to assess the hydrologic impact of dams on flood flows throughout the United States. Regional regression models of the median annual 1‐day maximum flow were developed as a function of natural watershed characteristics, dam storage, and population density. Most of the regressions have adjusted R2 values in excess of 0.80, and overall the models covered 78% of the area of the continental U.S. Alteration of flood flows is present in every region of the country, and is more severe west of the Mississippi and especially in the southern Great Plains, desert Southwest, and northern California. The percent of U.S. rivers with greater than a 25% reduction in the median annual flood is 55% for large rivers, 25% for medium rivers, and 10% for small rivers. The majority of freshwater ecoregions in the country have at least 10% of their rivers with 25% or greater alteration in all three river size classes. A simple model based on the ratio of dam storage to mean annual runoff was developed for assessing alteration in ungauged rivers, and was found to be generally useful for classifying rivers into categories of potential alteration. Overall, we document the alteration of natural flood flows across the U.S. in more detail than has been previously accomplished, and demonstrate the efficacy of multivariate regional regression models and other indicators for assessing hydrologic alteration.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.1417
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017972656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017972656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-2907dbe8225e3535175f3fade9da3daa2d24accf023d658621c164ce2e81c2433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10UtLAzEQB_AgCtYq-A3ci-Blax6b7O6xFq1KqdBa9BbGPHR1HzXZUvvtTelST14mOfz4JzOD0DnBA4IxvXYOBiQh6QHqEc54TBKRHu7vPD9GJ95_YkzSLM96iBbVElQbNTbSUPmoqSNbNo3e1rWPijpqP0y0qIvW6GjeQmv8KTqyUHpz1p19tLi7fR7dx5On8cNoOIkVy3Ea01D0m8ko5YaF10nKLbOgTa6BaQCqaQJKWUyZFjwTlCgiEmWoyYiiCWN9dLXLXbrme2V8K6vCK1OWUJtm5SUJPeQpFVz8UeUa752xcumKCtwmILkdiwxjkduxBHrZpYJXUFoHtSr83lNOGRYiDy7euXVRms2_eXI2G3a5nS98a372HtyXFClLuXyZjuXrGM-m7IbLx-Avdt5CI-HdhT8s5hSTJKwmCXvi7Bfbl4aZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017972656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>impact of dams on flood flows in the United States</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>FitzHugh, Thomas W ; Vogel, Richard M</creator><creatorcontrib>FitzHugh, Thomas W ; Vogel, Richard M</creatorcontrib><description>Natural flood regimes provide a wide array of important ecological functions. Our goal is to assess the hydrologic impact of dams on flood flows throughout the United States. Regional regression models of the median annual 1‐day maximum flow were developed as a function of natural watershed characteristics, dam storage, and population density. Most of the regressions have adjusted R2 values in excess of 0.80, and overall the models covered 78% of the area of the continental U.S. Alteration of flood flows is present in every region of the country, and is more severe west of the Mississippi and especially in the southern Great Plains, desert Southwest, and northern California. The percent of U.S. rivers with greater than a 25% reduction in the median annual flood is 55% for large rivers, 25% for medium rivers, and 10% for small rivers. The majority of freshwater ecoregions in the country have at least 10% of their rivers with 25% or greater alteration in all three river size classes. A simple model based on the ratio of dam storage to mean annual runoff was developed for assessing alteration in ungauged rivers, and was found to be generally useful for classifying rivers into categories of potential alteration. Overall, we document the alteration of natural flood flows across the U.S. in more detail than has been previously accomplished, and demonstrate the efficacy of multivariate regional regression models and other indicators for assessing hydrologic alteration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.1417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Alterations ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Dams ; Dams and subsidiary installations ; ecological flows ; ecological function ; ecoregions ; environmental flows ; Exact sciences and technology ; flood control ; Floods ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hydraulic constructions ; hydrologic alteration ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; population density ; Regional ; Regression ; regression analysis ; Rivers ; runoff ; Synecology ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2011-12, Vol.27 (10), p.1192-1215</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-2907dbe8225e3535175f3fade9da3daa2d24accf023d658621c164ce2e81c2433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-2907dbe8225e3535175f3fade9da3daa2d24accf023d658621c164ce2e81c2433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.1417$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.1417$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25230669$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FitzHugh, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Richard M</creatorcontrib><title>impact of dams on flood flows in the United States</title><title>River research and applications</title><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><description>Natural flood regimes provide a wide array of important ecological functions. Our goal is to assess the hydrologic impact of dams on flood flows throughout the United States. Regional regression models of the median annual 1‐day maximum flow were developed as a function of natural watershed characteristics, dam storage, and population density. Most of the regressions have adjusted R2 values in excess of 0.80, and overall the models covered 78% of the area of the continental U.S. Alteration of flood flows is present in every region of the country, and is more severe west of the Mississippi and especially in the southern Great Plains, desert Southwest, and northern California. The percent of U.S. rivers with greater than a 25% reduction in the median annual flood is 55% for large rivers, 25% for medium rivers, and 10% for small rivers. The majority of freshwater ecoregions in the country have at least 10% of their rivers with 25% or greater alteration in all three river size classes. A simple model based on the ratio of dam storage to mean annual runoff was developed for assessing alteration in ungauged rivers, and was found to be generally useful for classifying rivers into categories of potential alteration. Overall, we document the alteration of natural flood flows across the U.S. in more detail than has been previously accomplished, and demonstrate the efficacy of multivariate regional regression models and other indicators for assessing hydrologic alteration.</description><subject>Alterations</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Dams and subsidiary installations</subject><subject>ecological flows</subject><subject>ecological function</subject><subject>ecoregions</subject><subject>environmental flows</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>flood control</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hydraulic constructions</subject><subject>hydrologic alteration</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>Regional</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10UtLAzEQB_AgCtYq-A3ci-Blax6b7O6xFq1KqdBa9BbGPHR1HzXZUvvtTelST14mOfz4JzOD0DnBA4IxvXYOBiQh6QHqEc54TBKRHu7vPD9GJ95_YkzSLM96iBbVElQbNTbSUPmoqSNbNo3e1rWPijpqP0y0qIvW6GjeQmv8KTqyUHpz1p19tLi7fR7dx5On8cNoOIkVy3Ea01D0m8ko5YaF10nKLbOgTa6BaQCqaQJKWUyZFjwTlCgiEmWoyYiiCWN9dLXLXbrme2V8K6vCK1OWUJtm5SUJPeQpFVz8UeUa752xcumKCtwmILkdiwxjkduxBHrZpYJXUFoHtSr83lNOGRYiDy7euXVRms2_eXI2G3a5nS98a372HtyXFClLuXyZjuXrGM-m7IbLx-Avdt5CI-HdhT8s5hSTJKwmCXvi7Bfbl4aZ</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>FitzHugh, Thomas W</creator><creator>Vogel, Richard M</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>impact of dams on flood flows in the United States</title><author>FitzHugh, Thomas W ; Vogel, Richard M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-2907dbe8225e3535175f3fade9da3daa2d24accf023d658621c164ce2e81c2433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alterations</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Dams and subsidiary installations</topic><topic>ecological flows</topic><topic>ecological function</topic><topic>ecoregions</topic><topic>environmental flows</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>flood control</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hydraulic constructions</topic><topic>hydrologic alteration</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>Regional</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FitzHugh, Thomas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Richard M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FitzHugh, Thomas W</au><au>Vogel, Richard M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>impact of dams on flood flows in the United States</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1192</spage><epage>1215</epage><pages>1192-1215</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Natural flood regimes provide a wide array of important ecological functions. Our goal is to assess the hydrologic impact of dams on flood flows throughout the United States. Regional regression models of the median annual 1‐day maximum flow were developed as a function of natural watershed characteristics, dam storage, and population density. Most of the regressions have adjusted R2 values in excess of 0.80, and overall the models covered 78% of the area of the continental U.S. Alteration of flood flows is present in every region of the country, and is more severe west of the Mississippi and especially in the southern Great Plains, desert Southwest, and northern California. The percent of U.S. rivers with greater than a 25% reduction in the median annual flood is 55% for large rivers, 25% for medium rivers, and 10% for small rivers. The majority of freshwater ecoregions in the country have at least 10% of their rivers with 25% or greater alteration in all three river size classes. A simple model based on the ratio of dam storage to mean annual runoff was developed for assessing alteration in ungauged rivers, and was found to be generally useful for classifying rivers into categories of potential alteration. Overall, we document the alteration of natural flood flows across the U.S. in more detail than has been previously accomplished, and demonstrate the efficacy of multivariate regional regression models and other indicators for assessing hydrologic alteration.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.1417</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2011-12, Vol.27 (10), p.1192-1215
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017972656
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alterations
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Buildings. Public works
Dams
Dams and subsidiary installations
ecological flows
ecological function
ecoregions
environmental flows
Exact sciences and technology
flood control
Floods
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hydraulic constructions
hydrologic alteration
Hydrology
Mathematical models
population density
Regional
Regression
regression analysis
Rivers
runoff
Synecology
watersheds
title impact of dams on flood flows in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=impact%20of%20dams%20on%20flood%20flows%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=FitzHugh,%20Thomas%20W&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1192&rft.epage=1215&rft.pages=1192-1215&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.1417&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017972656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017972656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true