Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip
Objectives The authors report the results of a selective ultrasound screening programme for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) over a period of 20 years, with the aim of defining the rate of screening, conservative treatment and late presentation requiring surgery. Methods All neonates born fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2012-05, Vol.97 (5), p.423-429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 429 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Clarke, Nicholas M P Reading, Isabel C Corbin, Charles Taylor, Colm C Bochmann, Thomas |
description | Objectives The authors report the results of a selective ultrasound screening programme for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) over a period of 20 years, with the aim of defining the rate of screening, conservative treatment and late presentation requiring surgery. Methods All neonates born from June 1988 to December 2008 (inclusive) were included in the prospective cohort, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All underwent an early clinical examination of the hips and those with clinical instability were referred for ultrasound at 2 weeks; those with risk factors were sonographically examined at 6 weeks. Risk factors were defined as breech presentation, family history or foot deformity. Results 107 440 live births were clinically examined, 20 344 (18.9%) were referred for ultrasound assessment at either 2 weeks (due to clinical signs) or 6 weeks (due to risk factors). 774 (3.8%) were diagnosed with dysplasia with a crude overall treatment rate of 7.2 per 1000 live births. 37 (0.34 per 1000) presented late, that is, after 12 weeks of age; none had detectable clinical signs or risk factors. There were no false negatives. Conclusion Elective screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in association with one stop treatment and monitoring is an effective programme. The number of infants referred increased statistically significantly year on year over the study period and generated more activity. Pavlik harness treatment rates remained acceptable and steady over the period, despite the increase in referrals. The incidence of late presenting cases ranged from 0 to 4 per year, with no secular trend and there were no ultrasound false negatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301085 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017962049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A296515558</galeid><sourcerecordid>A296515558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-f764cdcd74c8710e2d47e4906b27fc3f43e228fc5b2225e135f11bbd0c137b083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAX0CWEBKbgB_xI8tReWvELCggsbEc56Z1ce1iJzD99zhqmUGsZuXX53vPPaeqEMEvCWHilUl207tsN873NcWE1AwTrPi9akEaocpV09yvFhhjVrdKqbPqUc5bjAlVij2szihtyMwsKrf6DWE8oAOYlBFc7yE5CBZQHFAGD3Z0v6DsbAy9SQc0-TGZHKfQo2wTQHBhjYaYUAHW5TQaj4oyH60ZXQxzmXEDaOP2j6sHg_EZnpzW8-rL2zer5fv68urdh-XFZd1xKcZ6kKKxve1lY5UkGGjfSGhaLDoqB8uGhgGlarC8o5RyIIwPhHRdjy1hssOKnVcvjnX3Kf6cII96V5wC702AOGVNMJGtKNO3d0Bxy5kUhBb02X_oNk4plEE0UbOrbcPm3vWRWhsP2oViygjXo43ewxp0mXN5pS9oKzjhnM-8OvI2xZwTDHqf3K74XFrrOWn9b9J6Tlofky5fn54ETd0O-puPf6MtwPMTYLI1fkgmWJdvOYFpqwS51exy0XrzbtIPLSSTXH_6utSv8er7528flV4Wnh35bre9u9w_sYvUUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828839438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Clarke, Nicholas M P ; Reading, Isabel C ; Corbin, Charles ; Taylor, Colm C ; Bochmann, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Nicholas M P ; Reading, Isabel C ; Corbin, Charles ; Taylor, Colm C ; Bochmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The authors report the results of a selective ultrasound screening programme for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) over a period of 20 years, with the aim of defining the rate of screening, conservative treatment and late presentation requiring surgery. Methods All neonates born from June 1988 to December 2008 (inclusive) were included in the prospective cohort, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All underwent an early clinical examination of the hips and those with clinical instability were referred for ultrasound at 2 weeks; those with risk factors were sonographically examined at 6 weeks. Risk factors were defined as breech presentation, family history or foot deformity. Results 107 440 live births were clinically examined, 20 344 (18.9%) were referred for ultrasound assessment at either 2 weeks (due to clinical signs) or 6 weeks (due to risk factors). 774 (3.8%) were diagnosed with dysplasia with a crude overall treatment rate of 7.2 per 1000 live births. 37 (0.34 per 1000) presented late, that is, after 12 weeks of age; none had detectable clinical signs or risk factors. There were no false negatives. Conclusion Elective screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in association with one stop treatment and monitoring is an effective programme. The number of infants referred increased statistically significantly year on year over the study period and generated more activity. Pavlik harness treatment rates remained acceptable and steady over the period, despite the increase in referrals. The incidence of late presenting cases ranged from 0 to 4 per year, with no secular trend and there were no ultrasound false negatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22412044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Age ; Algorithms ; Babies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Births ; Children ; Costs ; Court Litigation ; Diagnosis ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Dislocation ; Dysplasia ; Follow-Up Studies ; General aspects ; Genetics ; Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Hip dislocation ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - economics ; Hip Dislocation, Congenital - therapy ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Infants (Newborn) ; Litigation ; Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Medical examination ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Miscellaneous ; Neonatal screening ; Neonates ; Orthotic Devices - economics ; Orthotic Devices - utilization ; Pediatrics ; Physical Examination - methods ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data ; Referral and Consultation - trends ; Risk factors ; Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound imaging ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-05, Vol.97 (5), p.423-429</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-f764cdcd74c8710e2d47e4906b27fc3f43e228fc5b2225e135f11bbd0c137b083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/5/423.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/5/423.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26029861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22412044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Nicholas M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reading, Isabel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Colm C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Objectives The authors report the results of a selective ultrasound screening programme for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) over a period of 20 years, with the aim of defining the rate of screening, conservative treatment and late presentation requiring surgery. Methods All neonates born from June 1988 to December 2008 (inclusive) were included in the prospective cohort, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All underwent an early clinical examination of the hips and those with clinical instability were referred for ultrasound at 2 weeks; those with risk factors were sonographically examined at 6 weeks. Risk factors were defined as breech presentation, family history or foot deformity. Results 107 440 live births were clinically examined, 20 344 (18.9%) were referred for ultrasound assessment at either 2 weeks (due to clinical signs) or 6 weeks (due to risk factors). 774 (3.8%) were diagnosed with dysplasia with a crude overall treatment rate of 7.2 per 1000 live births. 37 (0.34 per 1000) presented late, that is, after 12 weeks of age; none had detectable clinical signs or risk factors. There were no false negatives. Conclusion Elective screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in association with one stop treatment and monitoring is an effective programme. The number of infants referred increased statistically significantly year on year over the study period and generated more activity. Pavlik harness treatment rates remained acceptable and steady over the period, despite the increase in referrals. The incidence of late presenting cases ranged from 0 to 4 per year, with no secular trend and there were no ultrasound false negatives.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Court Litigation</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Dislocation</subject><subject>Dysplasia</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hip dislocation</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - economics</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - therapy</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neonatal screening</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Orthotic Devices - economics</subject><subject>Orthotic Devices - utilization</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - trends</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuP0zAUhSMEYsrAX0CWEBKbgB_xI8tReWvELCggsbEc56Z1ce1iJzD99zhqmUGsZuXX53vPPaeqEMEvCWHilUl207tsN873NcWE1AwTrPi9akEaocpV09yvFhhjVrdKqbPqUc5bjAlVij2szihtyMwsKrf6DWE8oAOYlBFc7yE5CBZQHFAGD3Z0v6DsbAy9SQc0-TGZHKfQo2wTQHBhjYaYUAHW5TQaj4oyH60ZXQxzmXEDaOP2j6sHg_EZnpzW8-rL2zer5fv68urdh-XFZd1xKcZ6kKKxve1lY5UkGGjfSGhaLDoqB8uGhgGlarC8o5RyIIwPhHRdjy1hssOKnVcvjnX3Kf6cII96V5wC702AOGVNMJGtKNO3d0Bxy5kUhBb02X_oNk4plEE0UbOrbcPm3vWRWhsP2oViygjXo43ewxp0mXN5pS9oKzjhnM-8OvI2xZwTDHqf3K74XFrrOWn9b9J6Tlofky5fn54ETd0O-puPf6MtwPMTYLI1fkgmWJdvOYFpqwS51exy0XrzbtIPLSSTXH_6utSv8er7528flV4Wnh35bre9u9w_sYvUUw</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Clarke, Nicholas M P</creator><creator>Reading, Isabel C</creator><creator>Corbin, Charles</creator><creator>Taylor, Colm C</creator><creator>Bochmann, Thomas</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip</title><author>Clarke, Nicholas M P ; Reading, Isabel C ; Corbin, Charles ; Taylor, Colm C ; Bochmann, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b576t-f764cdcd74c8710e2d47e4906b27fc3f43e228fc5b2225e135f11bbd0c137b083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Court Litigation</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Dislocation</topic><topic>Dysplasia</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hip dislocation</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - economics</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation, Congenital - therapy</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neonatal screening</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Orthotic Devices - economics</topic><topic>Orthotic Devices - utilization</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - trends</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Nicholas M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reading, Isabel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Colm C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, Nicholas M P</au><au>Reading, Isabel C</au><au>Corbin, Charles</au><au>Taylor, Colm C</au><au>Bochmann, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>423-429</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Objectives The authors report the results of a selective ultrasound screening programme for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) over a period of 20 years, with the aim of defining the rate of screening, conservative treatment and late presentation requiring surgery. Methods All neonates born from June 1988 to December 2008 (inclusive) were included in the prospective cohort, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All underwent an early clinical examination of the hips and those with clinical instability were referred for ultrasound at 2 weeks; those with risk factors were sonographically examined at 6 weeks. Risk factors were defined as breech presentation, family history or foot deformity. Results 107 440 live births were clinically examined, 20 344 (18.9%) were referred for ultrasound assessment at either 2 weeks (due to clinical signs) or 6 weeks (due to risk factors). 774 (3.8%) were diagnosed with dysplasia with a crude overall treatment rate of 7.2 per 1000 live births. 37 (0.34 per 1000) presented late, that is, after 12 weeks of age; none had detectable clinical signs or risk factors. There were no false negatives. Conclusion Elective screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in association with one stop treatment and monitoring is an effective programme. The number of infants referred increased statistically significantly year on year over the study period and generated more activity. Pavlik harness treatment rates remained acceptable and steady over the period, despite the increase in referrals. The incidence of late presenting cases ranged from 0 to 4 per year, with no secular trend and there were no ultrasound false negatives.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><pmid>22412044</pmid><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2011-301085</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-05, Vol.97 (5), p.423-429 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017962049 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Age Algorithms Babies Biological and medical sciences Births Children Costs Court Litigation Diagnosis Diseases of the osteoarticular system Dislocation Dysplasia Follow-Up Studies General aspects Genetics Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data Hip dislocation Hip Dislocation, Congenital - diagnostic imaging Hip Dislocation, Congenital - economics Hip Dislocation, Congenital - therapy Hip joint Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Infants Infants (Newborn) Litigation Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations Mass Screening - economics Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - utilization Medical examination Medical sciences Methods Miscellaneous Neonatal screening Neonates Orthotic Devices - economics Orthotic Devices - utilization Pediatrics Physical Examination - methods Prevention and actions Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data Referral and Consultation - trends Risk factors Surgery Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography Ultrasound imaging Young Children |
title | Twenty years experience of selective secondary ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T22%3A52%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twenty%20years%20experience%20of%20selective%20secondary%20ultrasound%20screening%20for%20congenital%20dislocation%20of%20the%20hip&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Clarke,%20Nicholas%20M%20P&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=423-429&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2011-301085&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA296515558%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828839438&rft_id=info:pmid/22412044&rft_galeid=A296515558&rfr_iscdi=true |