Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of arctic ungulates?

With climate change, modelling has suggested that increased inaccessibility of forage through snow may endanger some populations of arctic ungulates; however, contemporaneous data on snow-cover conditions, other ecological factors and ungulate responses are lacking at the landscape scale. Researcher...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wildlife Biology 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.75-87
Hauptverfasser: Maher, Andrew I., Treitz, Paul M., Ferguson, Michael A.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 18
creator Maher, Andrew I.
Treitz, Paul M.
Ferguson, Michael A.D
description With climate change, modelling has suggested that increased inaccessibility of forage through snow may endanger some populations of arctic ungulates; however, contemporaneous data on snow-cover conditions, other ecological factors and ungulate responses are lacking at the landscape scale. Researchers have increasingly used remote sensing to map snow cover with higher accuracy, but such tools have not been utilized in research and management of arctic ungulate populations. We estimated field-measured percent snow-covered area (F-SCA) in wintering areas of endangered Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in the Bathurst Island complex (BIC) and developed a threshold for a normalized difference snow index (NDSI) using Landsat data. We used our NDSI threshold and another threshold to estimate snow-covered area (SCA) in Peary caribou habitats in the BIC during 1993-2003, compared these estimates with snow data from the nearest weather station and assessed the adequacy of Landsat data for arctic ungulate research. Our calculated NDSI threshold of 0.70 reflected field observations better than the published threshold, and our estimated SCAs showed greater variation between study areas, between years and during snow melt. Estimated SCAs were not correlated with total snowfall or snow depth at the nearest weather station. We conclude that SCA using remotely-sensed data for ungulate habitats would be more useful than weather-station data. Our methods could detect winters with relatively mild snow-cover conditions, but not those with very severe conditions; therefore, we recommend development of NDSI thresholds corresponding to ≥ 75% F-SCA, instead of ≥ 50%. NDSI-derived SCA methods should prove more useful for southerly arctic regions where sun angles would be less limiting than in the BIC. Higher resolution imagery may be more suited than Landsat for the assessment of snow cover in arctic ungulate ecology. With climate change, further development of remotely-sensed indices of snow cover, such as NDSI and SCA, should enhance our understanding of how arctic ungulates may or may not adapt.
doi_str_mv 10.2981/11-055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017959172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A298411268</galeid><sourcerecordid>A298411268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5461-c634b383e7fcc67d37d2387f11b6c5a4e25bfc0998c7646e7fb6920a6ed927c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10l1rFDEUBuBBFFyr_gUDiigybT4mmcmVbJdWC4uC7VLvwplMZpuym9Qk023_vRlGkBU3uQgcnjc5CSmK1wQfU9mQE0JKzPmTYkYkZiWl-OfTYoYllqVgUjwvXsR4i3FV8aaeFasFOLQE10VIqIMEqDPJ6ITuIVhI1ruIrEPR-R3S_t4EtLPpJlduoLUJUkS-RxB0shoNbj1sIJn4-WXxrIdNNK_-rEfF6vzsavG1XH7_crGYL8uWV4KUWrCqZQ0zda-1qDtWd5Q1dU9IKzSHylDe9hpL2ehaVCKzVkiKQZhO0lpTdlR8mPa9C_7XYGJSWxu12WzAGT9ERTCpJZekHunbf-itH4LL3Y0KM8oZ4X_VGjZGWdf7FECPm6p5ftyKECqarI7_o_LszNZq70xvc30v8HEvkE0yD2kNQ4zq4vLHvv102M6vrhff9vX7SevgYwymV3fBbiE85lup8TsoQlT-DhmeTHCXe3s8oNT18pSdnmPccJITb6ZED17BOtioVpcUE4HzyK81ineTaK3Ptz509G-wY8TK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010325315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of arctic ungulates?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Maher, Andrew I. ; Treitz, Paul M. ; Ferguson, Michael A.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Maher, Andrew I. ; Treitz, Paul M. ; Ferguson, Michael A.D</creatorcontrib><description>With climate change, modelling has suggested that increased inaccessibility of forage through snow may endanger some populations of arctic ungulates; however, contemporaneous data on snow-cover conditions, other ecological factors and ungulate responses are lacking at the landscape scale. Researchers have increasingly used remote sensing to map snow cover with higher accuracy, but such tools have not been utilized in research and management of arctic ungulate populations. We estimated field-measured percent snow-covered area (F-SCA) in wintering areas of endangered Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in the Bathurst Island complex (BIC) and developed a threshold for a normalized difference snow index (NDSI) using Landsat data. We used our NDSI threshold and another threshold to estimate snow-covered area (SCA) in Peary caribou habitats in the BIC during 1993-2003, compared these estimates with snow data from the nearest weather station and assessed the adequacy of Landsat data for arctic ungulate research. Our calculated NDSI threshold of 0.70 reflected field observations better than the published threshold, and our estimated SCAs showed greater variation between study areas, between years and during snow melt. Estimated SCAs were not correlated with total snowfall or snow depth at the nearest weather station. We conclude that SCA using remotely-sensed data for ungulate habitats would be more useful than weather-station data. Our methods could detect winters with relatively mild snow-cover conditions, but not those with very severe conditions; therefore, we recommend development of NDSI thresholds corresponding to ≥ 75% F-SCA, instead of ≥ 50%. NDSI-derived SCA methods should prove more useful for southerly arctic regions where sun angles would be less limiting than in the BIC. Higher resolution imagery may be more suited than Landsat for the assessment of snow cover in arctic ungulate ecology. With climate change, further development of remotely-sensed indices of snow cover, such as NDSI and SCA, should enhance our understanding of how arctic ungulates may or may not adapt.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-6396</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1903-220X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1903-220X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2981/11-055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hornslet: Nordic Council for Wildlife Research (NKV)</publisher><subject>Bathurst Island ; Canada ; climate change ; Earth resources technology satellites ; endangered species ; Environmental aspects ; forage ; habitats ; Landsat ; landscapes ; melting ; muskoxen ; NDSI ; normalized difference snow index ; Nunavut ; Original s ; Ovibos moschatus ; Peary caribou ; Population biology ; Rangifer tarandus caribou ; Rangifer tarandus pearyi ; remote sensing ; researchers ; Snow ; snow covered area ; snowmelt ; snowpack ; ungulates ; winter ; wintering grounds</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Biology, 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.75-87</ispartof><rights>Wildlife Biology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</rights><rights>Copyright Nordic Board for Wildlife Research Mar 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5461-c634b383e7fcc67d37d2387f11b6c5a4e25bfc0998c7646e7fb6920a6ed927c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5461-c634b383e7fcc67d37d2387f11b6c5a4e25bfc0998c7646e7fb6920a6ed927c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2981/11-055$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2981%2F11-055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,776,780,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,52694</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2981%2F11-055$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maher, Andrew I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treitz, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Michael A.D</creatorcontrib><title>Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of arctic ungulates?</title><title>Wildlife Biology</title><description>With climate change, modelling has suggested that increased inaccessibility of forage through snow may endanger some populations of arctic ungulates; however, contemporaneous data on snow-cover conditions, other ecological factors and ungulate responses are lacking at the landscape scale. Researchers have increasingly used remote sensing to map snow cover with higher accuracy, but such tools have not been utilized in research and management of arctic ungulate populations. We estimated field-measured percent snow-covered area (F-SCA) in wintering areas of endangered Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in the Bathurst Island complex (BIC) and developed a threshold for a normalized difference snow index (NDSI) using Landsat data. We used our NDSI threshold and another threshold to estimate snow-covered area (SCA) in Peary caribou habitats in the BIC during 1993-2003, compared these estimates with snow data from the nearest weather station and assessed the adequacy of Landsat data for arctic ungulate research. Our calculated NDSI threshold of 0.70 reflected field observations better than the published threshold, and our estimated SCAs showed greater variation between study areas, between years and during snow melt. Estimated SCAs were not correlated with total snowfall or snow depth at the nearest weather station. We conclude that SCA using remotely-sensed data for ungulate habitats would be more useful than weather-station data. Our methods could detect winters with relatively mild snow-cover conditions, but not those with very severe conditions; therefore, we recommend development of NDSI thresholds corresponding to ≥ 75% F-SCA, instead of ≥ 50%. NDSI-derived SCA methods should prove more useful for southerly arctic regions where sun angles would be less limiting than in the BIC. Higher resolution imagery may be more suited than Landsat for the assessment of snow cover in arctic ungulate ecology. With climate change, further development of remotely-sensed indices of snow cover, such as NDSI and SCA, should enhance our understanding of how arctic ungulates may or may not adapt.</description><subject>Bathurst Island</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Earth resources technology satellites</subject><subject>endangered species</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>melting</subject><subject>muskoxen</subject><subject>NDSI</subject><subject>normalized difference snow index</subject><subject>Nunavut</subject><subject>Original s</subject><subject>Ovibos moschatus</subject><subject>Peary caribou</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Rangifer tarandus caribou</subject><subject>Rangifer tarandus pearyi</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><subject>researchers</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>snow covered area</subject><subject>snowmelt</subject><subject>snowpack</subject><subject>ungulates</subject><subject>winter</subject><subject>wintering grounds</subject><issn>0909-6396</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10l1rFDEUBuBBFFyr_gUDiigybT4mmcmVbJdWC4uC7VLvwplMZpuym9Qk023_vRlGkBU3uQgcnjc5CSmK1wQfU9mQE0JKzPmTYkYkZiWl-OfTYoYllqVgUjwvXsR4i3FV8aaeFasFOLQE10VIqIMEqDPJ6ITuIVhI1ruIrEPR-R3S_t4EtLPpJlduoLUJUkS-RxB0shoNbj1sIJn4-WXxrIdNNK_-rEfF6vzsavG1XH7_crGYL8uWV4KUWrCqZQ0zda-1qDtWd5Q1dU9IKzSHylDe9hpL2ehaVCKzVkiKQZhO0lpTdlR8mPa9C_7XYGJSWxu12WzAGT9ERTCpJZekHunbf-itH4LL3Y0KM8oZ4X_VGjZGWdf7FECPm6p5ftyKECqarI7_o_LszNZq70xvc30v8HEvkE0yD2kNQ4zq4vLHvv102M6vrhff9vX7SevgYwymV3fBbiE85lup8TsoQlT-DhmeTHCXe3s8oNT18pSdnmPccJITb6ZED17BOtioVpcUE4HzyK81ineTaK3Ptz509G-wY8TK</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Maher, Andrew I.</creator><creator>Treitz, Paul M.</creator><creator>Ferguson, Michael A.D</creator><general>Nordic Council for Wildlife Research (NKV)</general><general>Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of arctic ungulates?</title><author>Maher, Andrew I. ; Treitz, Paul M. ; Ferguson, Michael A.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5461-c634b383e7fcc67d37d2387f11b6c5a4e25bfc0998c7646e7fb6920a6ed927c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bathurst Island</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Earth resources technology satellites</topic><topic>endangered species</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>melting</topic><topic>muskoxen</topic><topic>NDSI</topic><topic>normalized difference snow index</topic><topic>Nunavut</topic><topic>Original s</topic><topic>Ovibos moschatus</topic><topic>Peary caribou</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Rangifer tarandus caribou</topic><topic>Rangifer tarandus pearyi</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><topic>researchers</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>snow covered area</topic><topic>snowmelt</topic><topic>snowpack</topic><topic>ungulates</topic><topic>winter</topic><topic>wintering grounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maher, Andrew I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treitz, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Michael A.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maher, Andrew I.</au><au>Treitz, Paul M.</au><au>Ferguson, Michael A.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of arctic ungulates?</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Biology</jtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>75-87</pages><issn>0909-6396</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><eissn>1903-220X</eissn><abstract>With climate change, modelling has suggested that increased inaccessibility of forage through snow may endanger some populations of arctic ungulates; however, contemporaneous data on snow-cover conditions, other ecological factors and ungulate responses are lacking at the landscape scale. Researchers have increasingly used remote sensing to map snow cover with higher accuracy, but such tools have not been utilized in research and management of arctic ungulate populations. We estimated field-measured percent snow-covered area (F-SCA) in wintering areas of endangered Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in the Bathurst Island complex (BIC) and developed a threshold for a normalized difference snow index (NDSI) using Landsat data. We used our NDSI threshold and another threshold to estimate snow-covered area (SCA) in Peary caribou habitats in the BIC during 1993-2003, compared these estimates with snow data from the nearest weather station and assessed the adequacy of Landsat data for arctic ungulate research. Our calculated NDSI threshold of 0.70 reflected field observations better than the published threshold, and our estimated SCAs showed greater variation between study areas, between years and during snow melt. Estimated SCAs were not correlated with total snowfall or snow depth at the nearest weather station. We conclude that SCA using remotely-sensed data for ungulate habitats would be more useful than weather-station data. Our methods could detect winters with relatively mild snow-cover conditions, but not those with very severe conditions; therefore, we recommend development of NDSI thresholds corresponding to ≥ 75% F-SCA, instead of ≥ 50%. NDSI-derived SCA methods should prove more useful for southerly arctic regions where sun angles would be less limiting than in the BIC. Higher resolution imagery may be more suited than Landsat for the assessment of snow cover in arctic ungulate ecology. With climate change, further development of remotely-sensed indices of snow cover, such as NDSI and SCA, should enhance our understanding of how arctic ungulates may or may not adapt.</abstract><cop>Hornslet</cop><pub>Nordic Council for Wildlife Research (NKV)</pub><doi>10.2981/11-055</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0909-6396
ispartof Wildlife Biology, 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.75-87
issn 0909-6396
1903-220X
1903-220X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017959172
source Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Bathurst Island
Canada
climate change
Earth resources technology satellites
endangered species
Environmental aspects
forage
habitats
Landsat
landscapes
melting
muskoxen
NDSI
normalized difference snow index
Nunavut
Original s
Ovibos moschatus
Peary caribou
Population biology
Rangifer tarandus caribou
Rangifer tarandus pearyi
remote sensing
researchers
Snow
snow covered area
snowmelt
snowpack
ungulates
winter
wintering grounds
title Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of arctic ungulates?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A05%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Landsat%20data%20detect%20variations%20in%20snow%20cover%20within%20habitats%20of%20arctic%20ungulates?&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Biology&rft.au=Maher,%20Andrew%20I.&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=75-87&rft.issn=0909-6396&rft.eissn=1903-220X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2981/11-055&rft_dat=%3Cgale_24P%3EA298411268%3C/gale_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010325315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A298411268&rfr_iscdi=true