Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Summary Background and aim Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Although most studies have reported the utility of EBUS-TBNA in malignancy, its use has been extended to b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2012-06, Vol.106 (6), p.883-892
Hauptverfasser: Agarwal, Ritesh, Srinivasan, Arjun, Aggarwal, Ashutosh N, Gupta, Dheeraj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 892
container_issue 6
container_start_page 883
container_title Respiratory medicine
container_volume 106
creator Agarwal, Ritesh
Srinivasan, Arjun
Aggarwal, Ashutosh N
Gupta, Dheeraj
description Summary Background and aim Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Although most studies have reported the utility of EBUS-TBNA in malignancy, its use has been extended to benign conditions including sarcoidosis. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. Methods We searched the PubMed and EmBase databases for relevant studies published from 2004 to 2011, and included studies that have reported the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. The quality of studies was assessed using the QualSyst tool. We calculated the proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in individual studies and then pooled the results using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and Cochran-Q tests while publication bias was assessed using both graphical and statistical methods. Results Our search yielded 15 studies (553 patients of sarcoidosis). The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA ranged from 54 to 93% with the pooled diagnostic accuracy being 79% (95% CI, 71–86%) by the random effects model. The yield was not statistically different in studies employing on-site cytological evaluation (80.1%) vs. those without (81.3%). However, the diagnostic yield was significantly higher in prospective studies (83.9%) vs. the retrospective studies (74.3%). Only five minor complications were reported in 553 patients. There was evidence of heterogeneity and publication bias. Conclusions EBUS-TBNA is a safe and efficacious procedure in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and should be routinely employed wherever available.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017958934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0954611112000820</els_id><sourcerecordid>2745534991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-d671c6f103ea67beaceeb9f89123e045821ee337843af9d286b6d2c5e5dc9bd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModq3-AS8kIII3s-Ykk8yMiLAt6wcUvWh7HTLJCWSdj5rMVuffm3G3FHohQiAXed435-Ml5CWwNTBQ73br2KNbcwZ8zfKB8hFZgRS8EEyVj8mKNbIsFACckGcp7RhjTVmyp-SE8xKqStQrYrfeB2vsTM3gaDIep5mOntpxuMXf9CaOLdLt2fVlcXX2bUPDkJlox-DGFNJ7uqFpThP2ZgqWRrwN-OuvUY-TKcxgujljz8kTb7qEL473Kbn-tL06_1JcfP_89XxzUVgFfCqcqsAqD0ygUVWLxiK2ja8b4AJZKWsOiEJUdSmMbxyvVasctxKls03rQJyStwffXPXPPaZJ9yFZ7Doz4LhPOg-tamTdiPI_UAaN4pJVGX39AN2N-5hbWyghQcimWgz5gbJxTCmi1zcx9CbOGVo-Vnqnl23pZVua5QOL6NXRet8ub3eSu_Vk4M0RMMmazkcz2JDuOZn7YVxk7sOBwzzevISokw04WHQhop20G8O_6_j4QG67MORYdD9wxnTfr05ZoC-XXC2xAp4jVXMm_gBhl8Wb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035135974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Agarwal, Ritesh ; Srinivasan, Arjun ; Aggarwal, Ashutosh N ; Gupta, Dheeraj</creator><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ritesh ; Srinivasan, Arjun ; Aggarwal, Ashutosh N ; Gupta, Dheeraj</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background and aim Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Although most studies have reported the utility of EBUS-TBNA in malignancy, its use has been extended to benign conditions including sarcoidosis. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. Methods We searched the PubMed and EmBase databases for relevant studies published from 2004 to 2011, and included studies that have reported the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. The quality of studies was assessed using the QualSyst tool. We calculated the proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in individual studies and then pooled the results using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and Cochran-Q tests while publication bias was assessed using both graphical and statistical methods. Results Our search yielded 15 studies (553 patients of sarcoidosis). The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA ranged from 54 to 93% with the pooled diagnostic accuracy being 79% (95% CI, 71–86%) by the random effects model. The yield was not statistically different in studies employing on-site cytological evaluation (80.1%) vs. those without (81.3%). However, the diagnostic yield was significantly higher in prospective studies (83.9%) vs. the retrospective studies (74.3%). Only five minor complications were reported in 553 patients. There was evidence of heterogeneity and publication bias. Conclusions EBUS-TBNA is a safe and efficacious procedure in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and should be routinely employed wherever available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22417738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Benign ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Confidence intervals ; EBUS ; Endobronchial ultrasound ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphadenopathy ; Lymphoma ; Malignancy ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Pneumology ; Probes ; Pulmonary/Respiratory ; Reviews ; Sarcoidosis ; Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging ; Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - pathology ; Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Statistics ; Studies ; TBNA ; Transbronchial needle aspiration ; Tuberculosis ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 2012-06, Vol.106 (6), p.883-892</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-d671c6f103ea67beaceeb9f89123e045821ee337843af9d286b6d2c5e5dc9bd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-d671c6f103ea67beaceeb9f89123e045821ee337843af9d286b6d2c5e5dc9bd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25795023$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22417738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ritesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Arjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Ashutosh N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Dheeraj</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><description>Summary Background and aim Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Although most studies have reported the utility of EBUS-TBNA in malignancy, its use has been extended to benign conditions including sarcoidosis. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. Methods We searched the PubMed and EmBase databases for relevant studies published from 2004 to 2011, and included studies that have reported the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. The quality of studies was assessed using the QualSyst tool. We calculated the proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in individual studies and then pooled the results using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and Cochran-Q tests while publication bias was assessed using both graphical and statistical methods. Results Our search yielded 15 studies (553 patients of sarcoidosis). The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA ranged from 54 to 93% with the pooled diagnostic accuracy being 79% (95% CI, 71–86%) by the random effects model. The yield was not statistically different in studies employing on-site cytological evaluation (80.1%) vs. those without (81.3%). However, the diagnostic yield was significantly higher in prospective studies (83.9%) vs. the retrospective studies (74.3%). Only five minor complications were reported in 553 patients. There was evidence of heterogeneity and publication bias. Conclusions EBUS-TBNA is a safe and efficacious procedure in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and should be routinely employed wherever available.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>EBUS</subject><subject>Endobronchial ultrasound</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphadenopathy</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Pulmonary/Respiratory</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>TBNA</subject><subject>Transbronchial needle aspiration</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModq3-AS8kIII3s-Ykk8yMiLAt6wcUvWh7HTLJCWSdj5rMVuffm3G3FHohQiAXed435-Ml5CWwNTBQ73br2KNbcwZ8zfKB8hFZgRS8EEyVj8mKNbIsFACckGcp7RhjTVmyp-SE8xKqStQrYrfeB2vsTM3gaDIep5mOntpxuMXf9CaOLdLt2fVlcXX2bUPDkJlox-DGFNJ7uqFpThP2ZgqWRrwN-OuvUY-TKcxgujljz8kTb7qEL473Kbn-tL06_1JcfP_89XxzUVgFfCqcqsAqD0ygUVWLxiK2ja8b4AJZKWsOiEJUdSmMbxyvVasctxKls03rQJyStwffXPXPPaZJ9yFZ7Doz4LhPOg-tamTdiPI_UAaN4pJVGX39AN2N-5hbWyghQcimWgz5gbJxTCmi1zcx9CbOGVo-Vnqnl23pZVua5QOL6NXRet8ub3eSu_Vk4M0RMMmazkcz2JDuOZn7YVxk7sOBwzzevISokw04WHQhop20G8O_6_j4QG67MORYdD9wxnTfr05ZoC-XXC2xAp4jVXMm_gBhl8Wb</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Agarwal, Ritesh</creator><creator>Srinivasan, Arjun</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Ashutosh N</creator><creator>Gupta, Dheeraj</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Agarwal, Ritesh ; Srinivasan, Arjun ; Aggarwal, Ashutosh N ; Gupta, Dheeraj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-d671c6f103ea67beaceeb9f89123e045821ee337843af9d286b6d2c5e5dc9bd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>EBUS</topic><topic>Endobronchial ultrasound</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphadenopathy</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Pulmonary/Respiratory</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>TBNA</topic><topic>Transbronchial needle aspiration</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ritesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Arjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Ashutosh N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Dheeraj</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agarwal, Ritesh</au><au>Srinivasan, Arjun</au><au>Aggarwal, Ashutosh N</au><au>Gupta, Dheeraj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>883-892</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>Summary Background and aim Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Although most studies have reported the utility of EBUS-TBNA in malignancy, its use has been extended to benign conditions including sarcoidosis. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. Methods We searched the PubMed and EmBase databases for relevant studies published from 2004 to 2011, and included studies that have reported the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. The quality of studies was assessed using the QualSyst tool. We calculated the proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in individual studies and then pooled the results using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and Cochran-Q tests while publication bias was assessed using both graphical and statistical methods. Results Our search yielded 15 studies (553 patients of sarcoidosis). The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA ranged from 54 to 93% with the pooled diagnostic accuracy being 79% (95% CI, 71–86%) by the random effects model. The yield was not statistically different in studies employing on-site cytological evaluation (80.1%) vs. those without (81.3%). However, the diagnostic yield was significantly higher in prospective studies (83.9%) vs. the retrospective studies (74.3%). Only five minor complications were reported in 553 patients. There was evidence of heterogeneity and publication bias. Conclusions EBUS-TBNA is a safe and efficacious procedure in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and should be routinely employed wherever available.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22417738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-6111
ispartof Respiratory medicine, 2012-06, Vol.106 (6), p.883-892
issn 0954-6111
1532-3064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017958934
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Airway management
Benign
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Confidence intervals
EBUS
Endobronchial ultrasound
Humans
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphadenopathy
Lymphoma
Malignancy
Medical diagnosis
Medical sciences
Meta-analysis
Pneumology
Probes
Pulmonary/Respiratory
Reviews
Sarcoidosis
Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging
Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary - pathology
Sarcoidosis. Granulomatous diseases of unproved etiology. Connective tissue diseases. Elastic tissue diseases. Vasculitis
Sensitivity analysis
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Statistics
Studies
TBNA
Transbronchial needle aspiration
Tuberculosis
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
title Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A11%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20convex%20probe%20EBUS-TBNA%20in%20sarcoidosis:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=Agarwal,%20Ritesh&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=883-892&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2745534991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035135974&rft_id=info:pmid/22417738&rft_els_id=S0954611112000820&rfr_iscdi=true