Effects of type of ionophore and carrier on in vitro ruminal dry matter disappearance, gas production, and fermentation end products of a concentrate substrate
Effects of ionophore type and carrier on in vitro ruminal digestion and fermentation patterns of a concentrate substrate were evaluated at various incubation times. Treatments were: control (no ionophore); lasalocid sodium commercial premix (Bov); lasalocid sodium mycelium cake (LasBio); laidlomycin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal feed science and technology 2012-02, Vol.171 (2-4), p.223-229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2-4 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Animal feed science and technology |
container_volume | 171 |
creator | Ponce, C.H. Smith, D.R. Branine, M.E. Hubbert, M.E. Galyean, M.L. |
description | Effects of ionophore type and carrier on in vitro ruminal digestion and fermentation patterns of a concentrate substrate were evaluated at various incubation times. Treatments were: control (no ionophore); lasalocid sodium commercial premix (Bov); lasalocid sodium mycelium cake (LasBio); laidlomycin sodium salt (LaidNa); laidlomycin propionate commercial premix (LaidPro); monensin sodium salt (Mon); and monensin sodium commercial premix (Rum). The Bov, LasBio, Mon, and Rum treatments supplied 4μg of ionophore/mL of culture volume, whereas the LaidNa and LaidPro treatments supplied 1.33μg of ionophore/mL. Total gas and methane production did not differ among treatments at any of the incubation times (P>0.09). Similarly, in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) was not affected by treatment (P>0.28) at 6, 18, and 24h of incubation; however, IVDMD (P=0.03) was greater for ionophores than for the control at 12h of incubation. Molar proportions of acetate (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017957130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840111004639</els_id><sourcerecordid>1017957130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-df4d659c0d29e8ab1f33be6f569c84576c0758f12fa0497aae3352292d919d043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQDaLguPofchE8bI_56M-jLrsqLHjRc1OTVDRDd9Im6YX5Nf5Vq2cGPQoFFSqv3kveY4xLsZdCtu-PewjeIdps_F4JKfdUQuhnbCf7TldKyfY52wnddVVfC_mSvcr5KIRUvVY79vveOTQl8-h4OS24dR9DXH7GhByC5QZS8ph4DNwH_uRLijytsw8wcZtOfIZS6Nr6DMuCkCAYvOU_IPMlRbuaQnS3ZyaHacZQYJtwpMEVcBYHbiJthpKgIM_rIZ9Pr9kLB1PGN9d-w74_3H-7-1w9fv305e7DY2V0L0tlXW3bZjDCqgF7OEin9QFb17SD6euma43omt5J5UDUQweAWjdKDcoOcrCi1jfs3YWX3vRrxVzG2WeD0wQB45pH8robmk5qQdD-AjUp5pzQjUvyM6QTgTZcOx7Hf5mMWyYjFWVCq2-vKpANTG4zy-e_-6qphagbSbiPFxzSl5_I_ZGYkOyxPlFao43-_2J_ACoMqlY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017957130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of type of ionophore and carrier on in vitro ruminal dry matter disappearance, gas production, and fermentation end products of a concentrate substrate</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ponce, C.H. ; Smith, D.R. ; Branine, M.E. ; Hubbert, M.E. ; Galyean, M.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ponce, C.H. ; Smith, D.R. ; Branine, M.E. ; Hubbert, M.E. ; Galyean, M.L.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Effects of ionophore type and carrier on in vitro ruminal digestion and fermentation patterns of a concentrate substrate were evaluated at various incubation times. Treatments were: control (no ionophore); lasalocid sodium commercial premix (Bov); lasalocid sodium mycelium cake (LasBio); laidlomycin sodium salt (LaidNa); laidlomycin propionate commercial premix (LaidPro); monensin sodium salt (Mon); and monensin sodium commercial premix (Rum). The Bov, LasBio, Mon, and Rum treatments supplied 4μg of ionophore/mL of culture volume, whereas the LaidNa and LaidPro treatments supplied 1.33μg of ionophore/mL. Total gas and methane production did not differ among treatments at any of the incubation times (P>0.09). Similarly, in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) was not affected by treatment (P>0.28) at 6, 18, and 24h of incubation; however, IVDMD (P=0.03) was greater for ionophores than for the control at 12h of incubation. Molar proportions of acetate (P<0.01), acetate:propionate (P<0.01), and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (P<0.01) were decreased and propionate was increased (P<0.001) for the average of all ionophore-containing substrates compared with the control. Total VFA were decreased by Bov, LaidNa, and Rum, contrasted with their specific counterparts (LasBio, LaidPro, and Mon, respectively; P<0.05). Differences were detected among ionophore types for acetate (lasalocid vs. laidlomycin; P<0.05), propionate (lasalocid vs. monensin; P<0.05), and butyrate (monensin vs. lasalocid or laidlomycin; P<0.05). Capture of metabolic hydrogen in end products of fermentation was greater for ionophore-containing treatments (P<0.01) than for the control. These data suggest limited unique effects of ionophore type or carrier on IVDMD, total gas production, and methane; however, VFA proportions varied among ionophore types and carriers, which deserves further study.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFSTDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Biological and medical sciences ; Feed and pet food industries ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; In vitro ; Ionophores ; Methane ; Ruminal fermentation ; Volatile fatty acids</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2012-02, Vol.171 (2-4), p.223-229</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-df4d659c0d29e8ab1f33be6f569c84576c0758f12fa0497aae3352292d919d043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-df4d659c0d29e8ab1f33be6f569c84576c0758f12fa0497aae3352292d919d043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25400451$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ponce, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branine, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbert, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galyean, M.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of type of ionophore and carrier on in vitro ruminal dry matter disappearance, gas production, and fermentation end products of a concentrate substrate</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description><![CDATA[Effects of ionophore type and carrier on in vitro ruminal digestion and fermentation patterns of a concentrate substrate were evaluated at various incubation times. Treatments were: control (no ionophore); lasalocid sodium commercial premix (Bov); lasalocid sodium mycelium cake (LasBio); laidlomycin sodium salt (LaidNa); laidlomycin propionate commercial premix (LaidPro); monensin sodium salt (Mon); and monensin sodium commercial premix (Rum). The Bov, LasBio, Mon, and Rum treatments supplied 4μg of ionophore/mL of culture volume, whereas the LaidNa and LaidPro treatments supplied 1.33μg of ionophore/mL. Total gas and methane production did not differ among treatments at any of the incubation times (P>0.09). Similarly, in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) was not affected by treatment (P>0.28) at 6, 18, and 24h of incubation; however, IVDMD (P=0.03) was greater for ionophores than for the control at 12h of incubation. Molar proportions of acetate (P<0.01), acetate:propionate (P<0.01), and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (P<0.01) were decreased and propionate was increased (P<0.001) for the average of all ionophore-containing substrates compared with the control. Total VFA were decreased by Bov, LaidNa, and Rum, contrasted with their specific counterparts (LasBio, LaidPro, and Mon, respectively; P<0.05). Differences were detected among ionophore types for acetate (lasalocid vs. laidlomycin; P<0.05), propionate (lasalocid vs. monensin; P<0.05), and butyrate (monensin vs. lasalocid or laidlomycin; P<0.05). Capture of metabolic hydrogen in end products of fermentation was greater for ionophore-containing treatments (P<0.01) than for the control. These data suggest limited unique effects of ionophore type or carrier on IVDMD, total gas production, and methane; however, VFA proportions varied among ionophore types and carriers, which deserves further study.]]></description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>In vitro</subject><subject>Ionophores</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Ruminal fermentation</subject><subject>Volatile fatty acids</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQDaLguPofchE8bI_56M-jLrsqLHjRc1OTVDRDd9Im6YX5Nf5Vq2cGPQoFFSqv3kveY4xLsZdCtu-PewjeIdps_F4JKfdUQuhnbCf7TldKyfY52wnddVVfC_mSvcr5KIRUvVY79vveOTQl8-h4OS24dR9DXH7GhByC5QZS8ph4DNwH_uRLijytsw8wcZtOfIZS6Nr6DMuCkCAYvOU_IPMlRbuaQnS3ZyaHacZQYJtwpMEVcBYHbiJthpKgIM_rIZ9Pr9kLB1PGN9d-w74_3H-7-1w9fv305e7DY2V0L0tlXW3bZjDCqgF7OEin9QFb17SD6euma43omt5J5UDUQweAWjdKDcoOcrCi1jfs3YWX3vRrxVzG2WeD0wQB45pH8robmk5qQdD-AjUp5pzQjUvyM6QTgTZcOx7Hf5mMWyYjFWVCq2-vKpANTG4zy-e_-6qphagbSbiPFxzSl5_I_ZGYkOyxPlFao43-_2J_ACoMqlY</recordid><startdate>20120210</startdate><enddate>20120210</enddate><creator>Ponce, C.H.</creator><creator>Smith, D.R.</creator><creator>Branine, M.E.</creator><creator>Hubbert, M.E.</creator><creator>Galyean, M.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120210</creationdate><title>Effects of type of ionophore and carrier on in vitro ruminal dry matter disappearance, gas production, and fermentation end products of a concentrate substrate</title><author>Ponce, C.H. ; Smith, D.R. ; Branine, M.E. ; Hubbert, M.E. ; Galyean, M.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-df4d659c0d29e8ab1f33be6f569c84576c0758f12fa0497aae3352292d919d043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>In vitro</topic><topic>Ionophores</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Ruminal fermentation</topic><topic>Volatile fatty acids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ponce, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branine, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbert, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galyean, M.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ponce, C.H.</au><au>Smith, D.R.</au><au>Branine, M.E.</au><au>Hubbert, M.E.</au><au>Galyean, M.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of type of ionophore and carrier on in vitro ruminal dry matter disappearance, gas production, and fermentation end products of a concentrate substrate</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2012-02-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>171</volume><issue>2-4</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>223-229</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><coden>AFSTDH</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Effects of ionophore type and carrier on in vitro ruminal digestion and fermentation patterns of a concentrate substrate were evaluated at various incubation times. Treatments were: control (no ionophore); lasalocid sodium commercial premix (Bov); lasalocid sodium mycelium cake (LasBio); laidlomycin sodium salt (LaidNa); laidlomycin propionate commercial premix (LaidPro); monensin sodium salt (Mon); and monensin sodium commercial premix (Rum). The Bov, LasBio, Mon, and Rum treatments supplied 4μg of ionophore/mL of culture volume, whereas the LaidNa and LaidPro treatments supplied 1.33μg of ionophore/mL. Total gas and methane production did not differ among treatments at any of the incubation times (P>0.09). Similarly, in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) was not affected by treatment (P>0.28) at 6, 18, and 24h of incubation; however, IVDMD (P=0.03) was greater for ionophores than for the control at 12h of incubation. Molar proportions of acetate (P<0.01), acetate:propionate (P<0.01), and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (P<0.01) were decreased and propionate was increased (P<0.001) for the average of all ionophore-containing substrates compared with the control. Total VFA were decreased by Bov, LaidNa, and Rum, contrasted with their specific counterparts (LasBio, LaidPro, and Mon, respectively; P<0.05). Differences were detected among ionophore types for acetate (lasalocid vs. laidlomycin; P<0.05), propionate (lasalocid vs. monensin; P<0.05), and butyrate (monensin vs. lasalocid or laidlomycin; P<0.05). Capture of metabolic hydrogen in end products of fermentation was greater for ionophore-containing treatments (P<0.01) than for the control. These data suggest limited unique effects of ionophore type or carrier on IVDMD, total gas production, and methane; however, VFA proportions varied among ionophore types and carriers, which deserves further study.]]></abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-8401 |
ispartof | Animal feed science and technology, 2012-02, Vol.171 (2-4), p.223-229 |
issn | 0377-8401 1873-2216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017957130 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acetic acid Biological and medical sciences Feed and pet food industries Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology In vitro Ionophores Methane Ruminal fermentation Volatile fatty acids |
title | Effects of type of ionophore and carrier on in vitro ruminal dry matter disappearance, gas production, and fermentation end products of a concentrate substrate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A31%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20type%20of%20ionophore%20and%20carrier%20on%20in%20vitro%20ruminal%20dry%20matter%20disappearance,%20gas%20production,%20and%20fermentation%20end%20products%20of%20a%20concentrate%20substrate&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Ponce,%20C.H.&rft.date=2012-02-10&rft.volume=171&rft.issue=2-4&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=223-229&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft.coden=AFSTDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017957130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017957130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377840111004639&rfr_iscdi=true |