The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy
Abstract Although many properties of the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test as a diagnostic test in lumbopelvic pain (LPP) are well documented, various elements are lacking. A cross-sectional study was performed to compute sensitivity and specificity, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Manual therapy 2012-08, Vol.17 (4), p.364-368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 364 |
container_title | Manual therapy |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Mens, Jan M.A Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies |
description | Abstract Although many properties of the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test as a diagnostic test in lumbopelvic pain (LPP) are well documented, various elements are lacking. A cross-sectional study was performed to compute sensitivity and specificity, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of various cutoff points, to analyze the relation between the ASLR test and the Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (PPPP) test, and to investigate the relation with confounders. Data of 110 women with LPP and 72 without LPP were available. The advantages and disadvantages of four cutoff points of ASLR, and combinations of the ASLR and PPPP, were investigated by comparing sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). The influence of the site of pain was analyzed by means of AUC. The relation with confounders was measured using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results show that for diagnostic use the best cutoff for the ASLR test in pregnancy is between score 0 and 1. Specificity of the ASLR test is good (88%). Sensitivity for all types of LPP during pregnancy is moderate (54%), and is larger in case of more pain and disability. When combined with the PPPP test, sensitivity of the ASLR test is larger (68%). Isolated symphyseal pain, isolated low back pain and isolated coccyx pain are not diagnosed by these two tests. The ASLR test is not influenced by age, number of previous deliveries, BMI, cause of LPP (pregnancy-related or not), the existence of urinary incontinence and/or level of fatigue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.math.2012.01.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017622605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1356689X12000082</els_id><sourcerecordid>1017622605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f8f885a0f9eea4fc64850573924734f12842c016f027ef8fbad5c6d42cd94c403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVJaR7NH8giaJmNnStZkm0IgRCaBwwUmhSyExr5ekYTvyLZA_PvKzNJFll0pcvlOwfdcwg5Y5AyYOpyk7ZmXKccGE-BpQD5N3LEZMYTnqvyIM6ZVIkqypdDchzCBgBKAfIHOeQ8U1IU4ojcP6-R3tjRbZE-jd641XqkC1zRP8YFpCOGkbqONlO77Adsts7SwcRFNXnXrejgcdWZzu5-ku-1aQKevr8n5O_dr-fbh2Tx-_7x9maRWJHnY1IXdVFIA3WJaERtlSgkyDwrucgzUTNeCG7jbTXwHCO8NJW0qorLqhRWQHZCLva-g-_fpvg73bpgsWlMh_0UdAwmV5wrkBHle9T6PgSPtR68a43fRWjmlN7oOUA9B6iB6RhgFJ2_-0_LFqtPyUdiEbjaAxiv3Dr0OliHncXKebSjrnr3f__rL3LbuM5Z07ziDsOmn3wX89NMh6jRT3OFc4OMx_ag4Nk_NceVsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017622605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mens, Jan M.A ; Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H ; Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</creator><creatorcontrib>Mens, Jan M.A ; Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H ; Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Although many properties of the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test as a diagnostic test in lumbopelvic pain (LPP) are well documented, various elements are lacking. A cross-sectional study was performed to compute sensitivity and specificity, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of various cutoff points, to analyze the relation between the ASLR test and the Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (PPPP) test, and to investigate the relation with confounders. Data of 110 women with LPP and 72 without LPP were available. The advantages and disadvantages of four cutoff points of ASLR, and combinations of the ASLR and PPPP, were investigated by comparing sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). The influence of the site of pain was analyzed by means of AUC. The relation with confounders was measured using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results show that for diagnostic use the best cutoff for the ASLR test in pregnancy is between score 0 and 1. Specificity of the ASLR test is good (88%). Sensitivity for all types of LPP during pregnancy is moderate (54%), and is larger in case of more pain and disability. When combined with the PPPP test, sensitivity of the ASLR test is larger (68%). Isolated symphyseal pain, isolated low back pain and isolated coccyx pain are not diagnosed by these two tests. The ASLR test is not influenced by age, number of previous deliveries, BMI, cause of LPP (pregnancy-related or not), the existence of urinary incontinence and/or level of fatigue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-689X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22365484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnostics ; Female ; Humans ; Leg ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - diagnosis ; Movement ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pelvic girdle pain ; Pelvic Girdle Pain - diagnosis ; Physical Examination - methods ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis ; Pregnancy Trimester, Third ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Manual therapy, 2012-08, Vol.17 (4), p.364-368</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f8f885a0f9eea4fc64850573924734f12842c016f027ef8fbad5c6d42cd94c403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f8f885a0f9eea4fc64850573924734f12842c016f027ef8fbad5c6d42cd94c403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X12000082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22365484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mens, Jan M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</creatorcontrib><title>The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy</title><title>Manual therapy</title><addtitle>Man Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Although many properties of the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test as a diagnostic test in lumbopelvic pain (LPP) are well documented, various elements are lacking. A cross-sectional study was performed to compute sensitivity and specificity, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of various cutoff points, to analyze the relation between the ASLR test and the Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (PPPP) test, and to investigate the relation with confounders. Data of 110 women with LPP and 72 without LPP were available. The advantages and disadvantages of four cutoff points of ASLR, and combinations of the ASLR and PPPP, were investigated by comparing sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). The influence of the site of pain was analyzed by means of AUC. The relation with confounders was measured using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results show that for diagnostic use the best cutoff for the ASLR test in pregnancy is between score 0 and 1. Specificity of the ASLR test is good (88%). Sensitivity for all types of LPP during pregnancy is moderate (54%), and is larger in case of more pain and disability. When combined with the PPPP test, sensitivity of the ASLR test is larger (68%). Isolated symphyseal pain, isolated low back pain and isolated coccyx pain are not diagnosed by these two tests. The ASLR test is not influenced by age, number of previous deliveries, BMI, cause of LPP (pregnancy-related or not), the existence of urinary incontinence and/or level of fatigue.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pelvic girdle pain</subject><subject>Pelvic Girdle Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1356-689X</issn><issn>1532-2769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVJaR7NH8giaJmNnStZkm0IgRCaBwwUmhSyExr5ekYTvyLZA_PvKzNJFll0pcvlOwfdcwg5Y5AyYOpyk7ZmXKccGE-BpQD5N3LEZMYTnqvyIM6ZVIkqypdDchzCBgBKAfIHOeQ8U1IU4ojcP6-R3tjRbZE-jd641XqkC1zRP8YFpCOGkbqONlO77Adsts7SwcRFNXnXrejgcdWZzu5-ku-1aQKevr8n5O_dr-fbh2Tx-_7x9maRWJHnY1IXdVFIA3WJaERtlSgkyDwrucgzUTNeCG7jbTXwHCO8NJW0qorLqhRWQHZCLva-g-_fpvg73bpgsWlMh_0UdAwmV5wrkBHle9T6PgSPtR68a43fRWjmlN7oOUA9B6iB6RhgFJ2_-0_LFqtPyUdiEbjaAxiv3Dr0OliHncXKebSjrnr3f__rL3LbuM5Z07ziDsOmn3wX89NMh6jRT3OFc4OMx_ag4Nk_NceVsw</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Mens, Jan M.A</creator><creator>Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H</creator><creator>Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy</title><author>Mens, Jan M.A ; Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H ; Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-f8f885a0f9eea4fc64850573924734f12842c016f027ef8fbad5c6d42cd94c403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pelvic girdle pain</topic><topic>Pelvic Girdle Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mens, Jan M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Manual therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mens, Jan M.A</au><au>Huis in ’t Veld, Yvonne H</au><au>Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Manual therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Man Ther</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>364</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>364-368</pages><issn>1356-689X</issn><eissn>1532-2769</eissn><abstract>Abstract Although many properties of the Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test as a diagnostic test in lumbopelvic pain (LPP) are well documented, various elements are lacking. A cross-sectional study was performed to compute sensitivity and specificity, to assess the advantages and disadvantages of various cutoff points, to analyze the relation between the ASLR test and the Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (PPPP) test, and to investigate the relation with confounders. Data of 110 women with LPP and 72 without LPP were available. The advantages and disadvantages of four cutoff points of ASLR, and combinations of the ASLR and PPPP, were investigated by comparing sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). The influence of the site of pain was analyzed by means of AUC. The relation with confounders was measured using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results show that for diagnostic use the best cutoff for the ASLR test in pregnancy is between score 0 and 1. Specificity of the ASLR test is good (88%). Sensitivity for all types of LPP during pregnancy is moderate (54%), and is larger in case of more pain and disability. When combined with the PPPP test, sensitivity of the ASLR test is larger (68%). Isolated symphyseal pain, isolated low back pain and isolated coccyx pain are not diagnosed by these two tests. The ASLR test is not influenced by age, number of previous deliveries, BMI, cause of LPP (pregnancy-related or not), the existence of urinary incontinence and/or level of fatigue.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22365484</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.math.2012.01.007</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-689X |
ispartof | Manual therapy, 2012-08, Vol.17 (4), p.364-368 |
issn | 1356-689X 1532-2769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017622605 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnostics Female Humans Leg Low back pain Low Back Pain - diagnosis Movement Pain Measurement - methods Pelvic girdle pain Pelvic Girdle Pain - diagnosis Physical Examination - methods Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis Pregnancy Trimester, Third Sensitivity and Specificity Statistics, Nonparametric Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
title | The Active Straight Leg Raise test in lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A34%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Active%20Straight%20Leg%20Raise%20test%20in%20lumbopelvic%20pain%20during%20pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Manual%20therapy&rft.au=Mens,%20Jan%20M.A&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=364&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=364-368&rft.issn=1356-689X&rft.eissn=1532-2769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.math.2012.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017622605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017622605&rft_id=info:pmid/22365484&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1356689X12000082&rfr_iscdi=true |