Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking

A major problem in structure-based virtual screening applications is the appropriate selection of a single or even multiple protein structures to be used in the virtual screening process. A priori it is unknown which protein structure(s) will perform best in a virtual screening experiment. We invest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical information and modeling 2012-05, Vol.52 (5), p.1262-1274
Hauptverfasser: Korb, Oliver, Olsson, Tjelvar S. G., Bowden, Simon J., Hall, Richard J., Verdonk, Marcel L., Liebeschuetz, John W., Cole, Jason C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1274
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1262
container_title Journal of chemical information and modeling
container_volume 52
creator Korb, Oliver
Olsson, Tjelvar S. G.
Bowden, Simon J.
Hall, Richard J.
Verdonk, Marcel L.
Liebeschuetz, John W.
Cole, Jason C.
description A major problem in structure-based virtual screening applications is the appropriate selection of a single or even multiple protein structures to be used in the virtual screening process. A priori it is unknown which protein structure(s) will perform best in a virtual screening experiment. We investigated the performance of ensemble docking, as a function of ensemble size, for eight targets of pharmaceutical interest. Starting from single protein structure docking results, for each ensemble size up to 500 000 combinations of protein structures were generated, and, for each ensemble, pose prediction and virtual screening results were derived. Comparison of single to multiple protein structure results suggests improvements when looking at the performance of the worst and the average over all single protein structures to the performance of the worst and average over all protein ensembles of size two or greater, respectively. We identified several key factors affecting ensemble docking performance, including the sampling accuracy of the docking algorithm, the choice of the scoring function, and the similarity of database ligands to the cocrystallized ligands of ligand-bound protein structures in an ensemble. Due to these factors, the prospective selection of optimum ensembles is a challenging task, shown by a reassessment of published ensemble selection protocols.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ci2005934
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1016670239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1016670239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-8b3ebaa5e2c8d435f19454a77e26798ff94344fd6ec90a1e77cbbd31cc2113ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0MtKxDAUBuAgijOOLnwBKYigi2ruaZYyjhco6ELBXUnTRDK2ydi0C9_eDnOTWZ2z-PjP4QfgHMFbBDG60w5DyCShB2CMGJWp5PDzcLMzyUfgJMY5hIRIjo_BCGOaYSHoGKRvoTO-c6pOlK-S3DWuU50LPibBJjMfTVPWJnkI-tv5r1NwZFUdzdl6TsDH4-x9-pzmr08v0_s8VZTILs1KYkqlmME6qyhhFknKqBLCYC5kZq2khFJbcaMlVMgIocuyIkhrjBAxFZmA61Xuog0_vYld0bioTV0rb0IfCwQR5wJiIgd6uUfnoW_98N1SCc4kEnBQNyul2xBja2yxaF2j2t8BFcsOi22Hg71YJ_ZlY6qt3JQ2gKs1UFGr2rbKaxd3jklKBcx2Tun4_6v9g3_MUoIi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017659170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Publications</source><creator>Korb, Oliver ; Olsson, Tjelvar S. G. ; Bowden, Simon J. ; Hall, Richard J. ; Verdonk, Marcel L. ; Liebeschuetz, John W. ; Cole, Jason C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Korb, Oliver ; Olsson, Tjelvar S. G. ; Bowden, Simon J. ; Hall, Richard J. ; Verdonk, Marcel L. ; Liebeschuetz, John W. ; Cole, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><description>A major problem in structure-based virtual screening applications is the appropriate selection of a single or even multiple protein structures to be used in the virtual screening process. A priori it is unknown which protein structure(s) will perform best in a virtual screening experiment. We investigated the performance of ensemble docking, as a function of ensemble size, for eight targets of pharmaceutical interest. Starting from single protein structure docking results, for each ensemble size up to 500 000 combinations of protein structures were generated, and, for each ensemble, pose prediction and virtual screening results were derived. Comparison of single to multiple protein structure results suggests improvements when looking at the performance of the worst and the average over all single protein structures to the performance of the worst and average over all protein ensembles of size two or greater, respectively. We identified several key factors affecting ensemble docking performance, including the sampling accuracy of the docking algorithm, the choice of the scoring function, and the similarity of database ligands to the cocrystallized ligands of ligand-bound protein structures in an ensemble. Due to these factors, the prospective selection of optimum ensembles is a challenging task, shown by a reassessment of published ensemble selection protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-9596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-960X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ci2005934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22482774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry ; Binding Sites ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry ; Crystals ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Drug Discovery ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General and physical chemistry ; General pharmacology ; General. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry ; Interactions. Associations ; Intermolecular phenomena ; Ligands ; Medical sciences ; Molecular biophysics ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; Small Molecule Libraries ; Theory of reactions, general kinetics. Catalysis. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2012-05, Vol.52 (5), p.1262-1274</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society May 25, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-8b3ebaa5e2c8d435f19454a77e26798ff94344fd6ec90a1e77cbbd31cc2113ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-8b3ebaa5e2c8d435f19454a77e26798ff94344fd6ec90a1e77cbbd31cc2113ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ci2005934$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci2005934$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25944708$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22482774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korb, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Tjelvar S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdonk, Marcel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebeschuetz, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking</title><title>Journal of chemical information and modeling</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><description>A major problem in structure-based virtual screening applications is the appropriate selection of a single or even multiple protein structures to be used in the virtual screening process. A priori it is unknown which protein structure(s) will perform best in a virtual screening experiment. We investigated the performance of ensemble docking, as a function of ensemble size, for eight targets of pharmaceutical interest. Starting from single protein structure docking results, for each ensemble size up to 500 000 combinations of protein structures were generated, and, for each ensemble, pose prediction and virtual screening results were derived. Comparison of single to multiple protein structure results suggests improvements when looking at the performance of the worst and the average over all single protein structures to the performance of the worst and average over all protein ensembles of size two or greater, respectively. We identified several key factors affecting ensemble docking performance, including the sampling accuracy of the docking algorithm, the choice of the scoring function, and the similarity of database ligands to the cocrystallized ligands of ligand-bound protein structures in an ensemble. Due to these factors, the prospective selection of optimum ensembles is a challenging task, shown by a reassessment of published ensemble selection protocols.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Drug Discovery</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General and physical chemistry</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>General. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry</subject><subject>Interactions. Associations</subject><subject>Intermolecular phenomena</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular biophysics</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Small Molecule Libraries</subject><subject>Theory of reactions, general kinetics. Catalysis. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry</subject><issn>1549-9596</issn><issn>1549-960X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0MtKxDAUBuAgijOOLnwBKYigi2ruaZYyjhco6ELBXUnTRDK2ydi0C9_eDnOTWZ2z-PjP4QfgHMFbBDG60w5DyCShB2CMGJWp5PDzcLMzyUfgJMY5hIRIjo_BCGOaYSHoGKRvoTO-c6pOlK-S3DWuU50LPibBJjMfTVPWJnkI-tv5r1NwZFUdzdl6TsDH4-x9-pzmr08v0_s8VZTILs1KYkqlmME6qyhhFknKqBLCYC5kZq2khFJbcaMlVMgIocuyIkhrjBAxFZmA61Xuog0_vYld0bioTV0rb0IfCwQR5wJiIgd6uUfnoW_98N1SCc4kEnBQNyul2xBja2yxaF2j2t8BFcsOi22Hg71YJ_ZlY6qt3JQ2gKs1UFGr2rbKaxd3jklKBcx2Tun4_6v9g3_MUoIi</recordid><startdate>20120525</startdate><enddate>20120525</enddate><creator>Korb, Oliver</creator><creator>Olsson, Tjelvar S. G.</creator><creator>Bowden, Simon J.</creator><creator>Hall, Richard J.</creator><creator>Verdonk, Marcel L.</creator><creator>Liebeschuetz, John W.</creator><creator>Cole, Jason C.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120525</creationdate><title>Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking</title><author>Korb, Oliver ; Olsson, Tjelvar S. G. ; Bowden, Simon J. ; Hall, Richard J. ; Verdonk, Marcel L. ; Liebeschuetz, John W. ; Cole, Jason C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-8b3ebaa5e2c8d435f19454a77e26798ff94344fd6ec90a1e77cbbd31cc2113ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Drug Discovery</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General and physical chemistry</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>General. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry</topic><topic>Interactions. Associations</topic><topic>Intermolecular phenomena</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular biophysics</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Small Molecule Libraries</topic><topic>Theory of reactions, general kinetics. Catalysis. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korb, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, Tjelvar S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdonk, Marcel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebeschuetz, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korb, Oliver</au><au>Olsson, Tjelvar S. G.</au><au>Bowden, Simon J.</au><au>Hall, Richard J.</au><au>Verdonk, Marcel L.</au><au>Liebeschuetz, John W.</au><au>Cole, Jason C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical information and modeling</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Inf. Model</addtitle><date>2012-05-25</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1262</spage><epage>1274</epage><pages>1262-1274</pages><issn>1549-9596</issn><eissn>1549-960X</eissn><abstract>A major problem in structure-based virtual screening applications is the appropriate selection of a single or even multiple protein structures to be used in the virtual screening process. A priori it is unknown which protein structure(s) will perform best in a virtual screening experiment. We investigated the performance of ensemble docking, as a function of ensemble size, for eight targets of pharmaceutical interest. Starting from single protein structure docking results, for each ensemble size up to 500 000 combinations of protein structures were generated, and, for each ensemble, pose prediction and virtual screening results were derived. Comparison of single to multiple protein structure results suggests improvements when looking at the performance of the worst and the average over all single protein structures to the performance of the worst and average over all protein ensembles of size two or greater, respectively. We identified several key factors affecting ensemble docking performance, including the sampling accuracy of the docking algorithm, the choice of the scoring function, and the similarity of database ligands to the cocrystallized ligands of ligand-bound protein structures in an ensemble. Due to these factors, the prospective selection of optimum ensembles is a challenging task, shown by a reassessment of published ensemble selection protocols.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>22482774</pmid><doi>10.1021/ci2005934</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-9596
ispartof Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2012-05, Vol.52 (5), p.1262-1274
issn 1549-9596
1549-960X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1016670239
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Publications
subjects Algorithms
Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry
Binding Sites
Biological and medical sciences
Chemistry
Crystals
Drug Delivery Systems
Drug Discovery
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General and physical chemistry
General pharmacology
General. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry
Interactions. Associations
Intermolecular phenomena
Ligands
Medical sciences
Molecular biophysics
Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Proteins
Proteins - chemistry
Small Molecule Libraries
Theory of reactions, general kinetics. Catalysis. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry
title Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20and%20Limitations%20of%20Ensemble%20Docking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20information%20and%20modeling&rft.au=Korb,%20Oliver&rft.date=2012-05-25&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1262&rft.epage=1274&rft.pages=1262-1274&rft.issn=1549-9596&rft.eissn=1549-960X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ci2005934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1016670239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017659170&rft_id=info:pmid/22482774&rfr_iscdi=true