Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length
The Exeter stems vary in length from 90 to 150 mm. The shorter stems generally have lower offsets. The purpose of this study was to determine if length of stem, with fixed offset, affected rotational stability. Mechanical testing was carried out on 10 implant-cement constructs with 2 loading profile...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2012-06, Vol.27 (6), p.934-939 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 939 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 934 |
| container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Wilson, Lance J Roe, John A Pearcy, Mark J Crawford, Ross W |
| description | The Exeter stems vary in length from 90 to 150 mm. The shorter stems generally have lower offsets. The purpose of this study was to determine if length of stem, with fixed offset, affected rotational stability. Mechanical testing was carried out on 10 implant-cement constructs with 2 loading profiles, rising from chair and stair climbing, at different simulated implant lengths using purpose-built apparatus. This paper presents a mechanism for clinically observed rotational stability and explains the mechanical characteristics required for rotational stability in Exeter femoral stems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1015243876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1015243876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-32e8eaf979198d15ddbdb22e48d7819ba6caf7a36d873e170a5f90a4fdfc94db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0kREvhB1ggL9kk2I7zYocqXlIlFsA6cuJx6yqxW9up6HfwwxhoN6xmdOfM6yJ0RUlKCS1u16lwYZUyQmkUUkLZCZrSPGNJxUkxQefer0ks5jk_QxPGKC-yik_R19vKugBGmyXuYAATQGIFg3Wix3rY9MIEf4eFwdrgnQ7OxmQHPuilCNoaHCzejhHSao_hEwK4_-3Y2fDLRskH0epehz3eeez1MPbiZ-GR7MEsw-oCnSrRe7g8xBn6eHx4nz8ni9enl_n9ItkwSkOSMahAqLqsaV1JmkvZypYx4JUsK1q3ouiEKkVWyKrMgJZE5KomgiupuprLNpuhm7-5G2e3Y_ypGbTvoI-ngB19E43NGc-qsojo9QEd2wFks3F6EG7fHI3MvgFCfnnP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1015243876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wilson, Lance J ; Roe, John A ; Pearcy, Mark J ; Crawford, Ross W</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lance J ; Roe, John A ; Pearcy, Mark J ; Crawford, Ross W</creatorcontrib><description>The Exeter stems vary in length from 90 to 150 mm. The shorter stems generally have lower offsets. The purpose of this study was to determine if length of stem, with fixed offset, affected rotational stability. Mechanical testing was carried out on 10 implant-cement constructs with 2 loading profiles, rising from chair and stair climbing, at different simulated implant lengths using purpose-built apparatus. This paper presents a mechanism for clinically observed rotational stability and explains the mechanical characteristics required for rotational stability in Exeter femoral stems.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22146384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Cements ; Femur ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Joint Instability - prevention & control ; Linear Models ; Materials Testing - methods ; Prosthesis Design ; Rotation ; Stress, Mechanical ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2012-06, Vol.27 (6), p.934-939</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22146384$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lance J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearcy, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Ross W</creatorcontrib><title>Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>The Exeter stems vary in length from 90 to 150 mm. The shorter stems generally have lower offsets. The purpose of this study was to determine if length of stem, with fixed offset, affected rotational stability. Mechanical testing was carried out on 10 implant-cement constructs with 2 loading profiles, rising from chair and stair climbing, at different simulated implant lengths using purpose-built apparatus. This paper presents a mechanism for clinically observed rotational stability and explains the mechanical characteristics required for rotational stability in Exeter femoral stems.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Joint Instability - prevention & control</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0kREvhB1ggL9kk2I7zYocqXlIlFsA6cuJx6yqxW9up6HfwwxhoN6xmdOfM6yJ0RUlKCS1u16lwYZUyQmkUUkLZCZrSPGNJxUkxQefer0ks5jk_QxPGKC-yik_R19vKugBGmyXuYAATQGIFg3Wix3rY9MIEf4eFwdrgnQ7OxmQHPuilCNoaHCzejhHSao_hEwK4_-3Y2fDLRskH0epehz3eeez1MPbiZ-GR7MEsw-oCnSrRe7g8xBn6eHx4nz8ni9enl_n9ItkwSkOSMahAqLqsaV1JmkvZypYx4JUsK1q3ouiEKkVWyKrMgJZE5KomgiupuprLNpuhm7-5G2e3Y_ypGbTvoI-ngB19E43NGc-qsojo9QEd2wFks3F6EG7fHI3MvgFCfnnP</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Wilson, Lance J</creator><creator>Roe, John A</creator><creator>Pearcy, Mark J</creator><creator>Crawford, Ross W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length</title><author>Wilson, Lance J ; Roe, John A ; Pearcy, Mark J ; Crawford, Ross W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-32e8eaf979198d15ddbdb22e48d7819ba6caf7a36d873e170a5f90a4fdfc94db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Joint Instability - prevention & control</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lance J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearcy, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Ross W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Lance J</au><au>Roe, John A</au><au>Pearcy, Mark J</au><au>Crawford, Ross W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>934</spage><epage>939</epage><pages>934-939</pages><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>The Exeter stems vary in length from 90 to 150 mm. The shorter stems generally have lower offsets. The purpose of this study was to determine if length of stem, with fixed offset, affected rotational stability. Mechanical testing was carried out on 10 implant-cement constructs with 2 loading profiles, rising from chair and stair climbing, at different simulated implant lengths using purpose-built apparatus. This paper presents a mechanism for clinically observed rotational stability and explains the mechanical characteristics required for rotational stability in Exeter femoral stems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22146384</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.012</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 1532-8406 |
| ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2012-06, Vol.27 (6), p.934-939 |
| issn | 1532-8406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1015243876 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation Biomechanical Phenomena Bone Cements Femur Hip Prosthesis Humans In Vitro Techniques Joint Instability - prevention & control Linear Models Materials Testing - methods Prosthesis Design Rotation Stress, Mechanical Weight-Bearing |
| title | Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shortening%20cemented%20femoral%20implants:%20an%20in%20vitro%20investigation%20to%20quantify%20exeter%20femoral%20implant%20rotational%20stability%20vs%20simulated%20implant%20length&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Wilson,%20Lance%20J&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=934&rft.epage=939&rft.pages=934-939&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1015243876%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1015243876&rft_id=info:pmid/22146384&rfr_iscdi=true |