Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures

Objectives This study was undertaken to explore aspects of the hemodynamic function of different biologic tissue aortic valve root replacements. We set out to image and display the spatiotemporal distributions of axially directed blood velocity through the aortic root. Methods The flow velocities th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2012-06, Vol.143 (6), p.1422-1428.e2
Hauptverfasser: Torii, Ryo, PhD, El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD, Donya, Mohamed, MD, Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP, Ibrahim, Michael, MD, Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD, Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC, Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD, Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1428.e2
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1422
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 143
creator Torii, Ryo, PhD
El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD
Donya, Mohamed, MD
Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP
Ibrahim, Michael, MD
Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD
Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC
Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD
Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS
description Objectives This study was undertaken to explore aspects of the hemodynamic function of different biologic tissue aortic valve root replacements. We set out to image and display the spatiotemporal distributions of axially directed blood velocity through the aortic root. Methods The flow velocities through a plane transecting the aortic root were measured by 2-dimensional cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping in 44 subjects: 29 patients who had undergone aortic root replacement approximately 10 years previously (13 autografts, 10 stentless xenografts, and 6 homografts) and 15 healthy control subjects. With cine as well as velocity images, aortic sinus dimensions, effective orifice area, and several velocity parameters were measured. Color-coded plots of velocity relative to the sinus cross sections and velocity-time plots were used to compare spatiotemporal distributions of velocity. Results Peak flow velocity was similar between the autografts (102 ± 28.0 cm/s) and control valves (119 ± 20.0 cm/s) but was higher in xenografts (167 ± 36.0 cm/s) and homografts (206 ± 91.0 cm/s). These measurements showed an inverse relationship with the effective orifice area (7.27 ± 0.20, 4.24 ± 0.81, 3.37 ± 0.32, and 3.28 ± 0.87 cm2 , respectively). Autograft peak flow velocity showed no significant difference from control valve peak flow velocity, despite larger root dimensions ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1015097597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022522311014528</els_id><sourcerecordid>1015097597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c1759d7f0bf4db2020b3d6c9a7908c44aa37baf0589c1c9f46c70ea7ec7ac3f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6CwTpi-Cl2yT9mYPCsvixsOBBBW8hXV3ZTdvdGVPpgQV_vOmdUcGLp0B43qrUk2LsueCF4KJ5PRZjhAMVkgtRCFnwsnrAdoKrNm-6-ttDtuNcyryWsjxjT4hGznnLhXrMztJVI2TV7djPqyXiTTARh2z2YX_rJ3_jIDPLkNl1gej8YqbMECHRjEvMvM3iLWbGh5i44H3MjI0YssFZi2FDoiNaMTuY6YBHIuB-MoD3BfbBAw5rQHrKHlkzET47nefs6_t3Xy4_5tefPlxdXlznUHUq5iDaWg2t5b2thl5yyftyaECZVvEOqsqYsu2N5XWnQICyVQMtR9MitAZKK8tz9upYN7X-sSJFPTsCnCazoF9JJ5110larNqHlEYXgiQJavQ9uNuEuQRvX6FHfa9ebdi2kTtpT6sWpwdrPOPzJ_PacgJcnwBCYyQazgKO_XK2qTnQicW-OHCYdB4dBEzhcki8XEKIevPvPQ97-k4fJLS61_I53SKNfQ_rONLGmFNCftw3ZFkSkilUtu_IXT9-6Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1015097597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Torii, Ryo, PhD ; El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD ; Donya, Mohamed, MD ; Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP ; Ibrahim, Michael, MD ; Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD ; Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC ; Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD ; Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</creator><creatorcontrib>Torii, Ryo, PhD ; El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD ; Donya, Mohamed, MD ; Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP ; Ibrahim, Michael, MD ; Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD ; Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC ; Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD ; Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study was undertaken to explore aspects of the hemodynamic function of different biologic tissue aortic valve root replacements. We set out to image and display the spatiotemporal distributions of axially directed blood velocity through the aortic root. Methods The flow velocities through a plane transecting the aortic root were measured by 2-dimensional cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping in 44 subjects: 29 patients who had undergone aortic root replacement approximately 10 years previously (13 autografts, 10 stentless xenografts, and 6 homografts) and 15 healthy control subjects. With cine as well as velocity images, aortic sinus dimensions, effective orifice area, and several velocity parameters were measured. Color-coded plots of velocity relative to the sinus cross sections and velocity-time plots were used to compare spatiotemporal distributions of velocity. Results Peak flow velocity was similar between the autografts (102 ± 28.0 cm/s) and control valves (119 ± 20.0 cm/s) but was higher in xenografts (167 ± 36.0 cm/s) and homografts (206 ± 91.0 cm/s). These measurements showed an inverse relationship with the effective orifice area (7.27 ± 0.20, 4.24 ± 0.81, 3.37 ± 0.32, and 3.28 ± 0.87 cm2 , respectively). Autograft peak flow velocity showed no significant difference from control valve peak flow velocity, despite larger root dimensions ( P  &lt; .001). The graphic displays provided further spatiotemporal information. Conclusions Peak velocities and spatiotemporal flow patterns depend on the type of valve substitute. In the parameters measured, autograft replacements differed least from normal aortic valves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22361248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JTCSAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aortic Valve - pathology ; Aortic Valve - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - pathology ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioprosthesis ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Female ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; London ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pneumology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prosthesis Design ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2012-06, Vol.143 (6), p.1422-1428.e2</ispartof><rights>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c1759d7f0bf4db2020b3d6c9a7908c44aa37baf0589c1c9f46c70ea7ec7ac3f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c1759d7f0bf4db2020b3d6c9a7908c44aa37baf0589c1c9f46c70ea7ec7ac3f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25948181$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22361248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torii, Ryo, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donya, Mohamed, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives This study was undertaken to explore aspects of the hemodynamic function of different biologic tissue aortic valve root replacements. We set out to image and display the spatiotemporal distributions of axially directed blood velocity through the aortic root. Methods The flow velocities through a plane transecting the aortic root were measured by 2-dimensional cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping in 44 subjects: 29 patients who had undergone aortic root replacement approximately 10 years previously (13 autografts, 10 stentless xenografts, and 6 homografts) and 15 healthy control subjects. With cine as well as velocity images, aortic sinus dimensions, effective orifice area, and several velocity parameters were measured. Color-coded plots of velocity relative to the sinus cross sections and velocity-time plots were used to compare spatiotemporal distributions of velocity. Results Peak flow velocity was similar between the autografts (102 ± 28.0 cm/s) and control valves (119 ± 20.0 cm/s) but was higher in xenografts (167 ± 36.0 cm/s) and homografts (206 ± 91.0 cm/s). These measurements showed an inverse relationship with the effective orifice area (7.27 ± 0.20, 4.24 ± 0.81, 3.37 ± 0.32, and 3.28 ± 0.87 cm2 , respectively). Autograft peak flow velocity showed no significant difference from control valve peak flow velocity, despite larger root dimensions ( P  &lt; .001). The graphic displays provided further spatiotemporal information. Conclusions Peak velocities and spatiotemporal flow patterns depend on the type of valve substitute. In the parameters measured, autograft replacements differed least from normal aortic valves.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6CwTpi-Cl2yT9mYPCsvixsOBBBW8hXV3ZTdvdGVPpgQV_vOmdUcGLp0B43qrUk2LsueCF4KJ5PRZjhAMVkgtRCFnwsnrAdoKrNm-6-ttDtuNcyryWsjxjT4hGznnLhXrMztJVI2TV7djPqyXiTTARh2z2YX_rJ3_jIDPLkNl1gej8YqbMECHRjEvMvM3iLWbGh5i44H3MjI0YssFZi2FDoiNaMTuY6YBHIuB-MoD3BfbBAw5rQHrKHlkzET47nefs6_t3Xy4_5tefPlxdXlznUHUq5iDaWg2t5b2thl5yyftyaECZVvEOqsqYsu2N5XWnQICyVQMtR9MitAZKK8tz9upYN7X-sSJFPTsCnCazoF9JJ5110larNqHlEYXgiQJavQ9uNuEuQRvX6FHfa9ebdi2kTtpT6sWpwdrPOPzJ_PacgJcnwBCYyQazgKO_XK2qTnQicW-OHCYdB4dBEzhcki8XEKIevPvPQ97-k4fJLS61_I53SKNfQ_rONLGmFNCftw3ZFkSkilUtu_IXT9-6Ig</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Torii, Ryo, PhD</creator><creator>El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Donya, Mohamed, MD</creator><creator>Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Michael, MD</creator><creator>Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC</creator><creator>Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD</creator><creator>Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures</title><author>Torii, Ryo, PhD ; El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD ; Donya, Mohamed, MD ; Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP ; Ibrahim, Michael, MD ; Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD ; Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC ; Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD ; Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c1759d7f0bf4db2020b3d6c9a7908c44aa37baf0589c1c9f46c70ea7ec7ac3f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torii, Ryo, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donya, Mohamed, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torii, Ryo, PhD</au><au>El-Hamamsy, Ismail, MD, PhD</au><au>Donya, Mohamed, MD</au><au>Babu-Narayan, Sonya V., MB BS, BSc, PhD, MRCP</au><au>Ibrahim, Michael, MD</au><au>Kilner, Philip J., MD, PhD</au><au>Mohiaddin, Raad H., MD, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FESC</au><au>Xu, Xiao Yun, PhD</au><au>Yacoub, Magdi H., MD, DSc, FRCS, FRCP, FRS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1422</spage><epage>1428.e2</epage><pages>1422-1428.e2</pages><issn>0022-5223</issn><eissn>1097-685X</eissn><coden>JTCSAQ</coden><abstract>Objectives This study was undertaken to explore aspects of the hemodynamic function of different biologic tissue aortic valve root replacements. We set out to image and display the spatiotemporal distributions of axially directed blood velocity through the aortic root. Methods The flow velocities through a plane transecting the aortic root were measured by 2-dimensional cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping in 44 subjects: 29 patients who had undergone aortic root replacement approximately 10 years previously (13 autografts, 10 stentless xenografts, and 6 homografts) and 15 healthy control subjects. With cine as well as velocity images, aortic sinus dimensions, effective orifice area, and several velocity parameters were measured. Color-coded plots of velocity relative to the sinus cross sections and velocity-time plots were used to compare spatiotemporal distributions of velocity. Results Peak flow velocity was similar between the autografts (102 ± 28.0 cm/s) and control valves (119 ± 20.0 cm/s) but was higher in xenografts (167 ± 36.0 cm/s) and homografts (206 ± 91.0 cm/s). These measurements showed an inverse relationship with the effective orifice area (7.27 ± 0.20, 4.24 ± 0.81, 3.37 ± 0.32, and 3.28 ± 0.87 cm2 , respectively). Autograft peak flow velocity showed no significant difference from control valve peak flow velocity, despite larger root dimensions ( P  &lt; .001). The graphic displays provided further spatiotemporal information. Conclusions Peak velocities and spatiotemporal flow patterns depend on the type of valve substitute. In the parameters measured, autograft replacements differed least from normal aortic valves.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22361248</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.034</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2012-06, Vol.143 (6), p.1422-1428.e2
issn 0022-5223
1097-685X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1015097597
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis of Variance
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Aortic Valve - pathology
Aortic Valve - physiopathology
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - pathology
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Bioprosthesis
Blood Flow Velocity
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Hemodynamics
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
London
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pneumology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prosthesis Design
Time Factors
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplantation, Homologous
Treatment Outcome
title Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20morphologic%20and%20functional%20assessment%20of%20the%20aortic%20root%20after%20different%20tissue%20valve%20root%20replacement%20procedures&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Torii,%20Ryo,%20PhD&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1422&rft.epage=1428.e2&rft.pages=1422-1428.e2&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft.eissn=1097-685X&rft.coden=JTCSAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1015097597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1015097597&rft_id=info:pmid/22361248&rft_els_id=S0022522311014528&rfr_iscdi=true