Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study

Summary Background Successful donation of organs after cardiac death (DCD) requires identification of patients who will die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aimed to validate a straightforward model to predict the likelihood of death within 60 min of WLST in patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lancet neurology 2012-05, Vol.11 (5), p.414-419
Hauptverfasser: Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof, Yee, Alan H, DO, Mandrekar, Jay, PhD, Fugate, Jennifer E, DO, de Groot, Yorick J, MD, Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD, Shutter, Lori A, MD, Freeman, W David, MD, Rubin, Michael A, MD, Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 5
container_start_page 414
container_title Lancet neurology
container_volume 11
creator Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof
Yee, Alan H, DO
Mandrekar, Jay, PhD
Fugate, Jennifer E, DO
de Groot, Yorick J, MD
Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD
Shutter, Lori A, MD
Freeman, W David, MD
Rubin, Michael A, MD
Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD
description Summary Background Successful donation of organs after cardiac death (DCD) requires identification of patients who will die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aimed to validate a straightforward model to predict the likelihood of death within 60 min of WLST in patients with irreversible brain injury. Methods In this multicentre, observational study, we prospectively enrolled consecutive comatose patients with irreversible brain injury undergoing WLST at six medical centres in the USA and the Netherlands. We assessed four clinical characteristics (corneal reflex, cough reflex, best motor response, and oxygenation index) as predictor variables, which were selected on the basis of previous findings. We excluded patients who had brain death or were not intubated. The primary endpoint was death within 60 min of WLST. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess associations with predictor variables. Points attributed to each variable were summed to create a predictive score for cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state (the DCD-N score). We assessed performance of the score using area under the curve analysis. Findings We included 178 patients, 82 (46%) of whom died within 60 min of WLST. Absent corneal reflexes (odds ratio [OR] 2·67, 95% CI 1·19–6·01; p=0·0173; 1 point), absent cough reflex (4·16, 1·79–9·70; p=0·0009; 2 points), extensor or absent motor responses (2·99, 1·22–7·34; p=0·0168; 1 point), and an oxygenation index score of more than 3·0 (2·31, 1·10–4·88; p=0·0276; 1 point) were predictive of death within 60 min of WLST. 59 of 82 patients who died within 60 min of WLST had DCD-N scores of 3 or more (72% sensitivity), and 75 of 96 of those who did not die within this interval had scores of 0–2 (78% specificity); taking into account the prevalence of death within 60 min in this population, a score of 3 or more was translated into a 74% chance of death within 60 min (positive predictive value) and a score of 0–2 translated into a 77% chance of survival beyond 60 min (negative predictive value). Interpretation The DCD-N score can be used to predict potential candidates for DCD in patients with non-survivable brain injury. However, this score needs to be tested specifically in a cohort of potential donors participating in DCD protocols. Funding None.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70060-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1014101170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1474442212700601</els_id><sourcerecordid>1008831641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-bc0bbdeef2324132066980e6c22d344685ae6b65952c165f8c8df4eaf28264d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0Eou3CTwBZ4tIeAvbE9mY5gFDFl1QJJOBsOfYEXLJxajsr7Z0fjpNditQLHCxbnmfe-XgJecLZc864evGFi7WohAA453CxZkyxit8jp8dvJe_fvgFOyFlK14wBFw1_SE4AxEZspDwlvz5HdN5mHwYaOjqGjEP2pqddiDTE72agLgxmiZsuY6TWROeNpQ5N_kH9QMcSLUlpfg84xWCjz94WjZRNxpfU0DGGNGKpskMa2oRxtyguyOT2j8iDzvQJHx_vFfn27u3Xyw_V1af3Hy_fXFW2tJ2r1rK2dYgd1CB4DUypTcNQWQBXl5EbaVC1Sm4kWK5k19jGdQJNBw0o4aBekfODbunnZsKU9dYni31vBgxT0mWxohy-Zv-BsqapuSp9rMizO-h1mGIZ7khJKVVdKHmgbNlFitjpMfqtifsCzYWVXhzVs12ag14c1bP606P61G7R3Wb9sbAArw8Als3tPEadbPHDFltjWbl2wf-zxKs7Crb3w-zgT9xj-juNTqDZQWTW4LAo8Po3JknFvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008855563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof ; Yee, Alan H, DO ; Mandrekar, Jay, PhD ; Fugate, Jennifer E, DO ; de Groot, Yorick J, MD ; Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD ; Shutter, Lori A, MD ; Freeman, W David, MD ; Rubin, Michael A, MD ; Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof ; Yee, Alan H, DO ; Mandrekar, Jay, PhD ; Fugate, Jennifer E, DO ; de Groot, Yorick J, MD ; Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD ; Shutter, Lori A, MD ; Freeman, W David, MD ; Rubin, Michael A, MD ; Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Successful donation of organs after cardiac death (DCD) requires identification of patients who will die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aimed to validate a straightforward model to predict the likelihood of death within 60 min of WLST in patients with irreversible brain injury. Methods In this multicentre, observational study, we prospectively enrolled consecutive comatose patients with irreversible brain injury undergoing WLST at six medical centres in the USA and the Netherlands. We assessed four clinical characteristics (corneal reflex, cough reflex, best motor response, and oxygenation index) as predictor variables, which were selected on the basis of previous findings. We excluded patients who had brain death or were not intubated. The primary endpoint was death within 60 min of WLST. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess associations with predictor variables. Points attributed to each variable were summed to create a predictive score for cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state (the DCD-N score). We assessed performance of the score using area under the curve analysis. Findings We included 178 patients, 82 (46%) of whom died within 60 min of WLST. Absent corneal reflexes (odds ratio [OR] 2·67, 95% CI 1·19–6·01; p=0·0173; 1 point), absent cough reflex (4·16, 1·79–9·70; p=0·0009; 2 points), extensor or absent motor responses (2·99, 1·22–7·34; p=0·0168; 1 point), and an oxygenation index score of more than 3·0 (2·31, 1·10–4·88; p=0·0276; 1 point) were predictive of death within 60 min of WLST. 59 of 82 patients who died within 60 min of WLST had DCD-N scores of 3 or more (72% sensitivity), and 75 of 96 of those who did not die within this interval had scores of 0–2 (78% specificity); taking into account the prevalence of death within 60 min in this population, a score of 3 or more was translated into a 74% chance of death within 60 min (positive predictive value) and a score of 0–2 translated into a 77% chance of survival beyond 60 min (negative predictive value). Interpretation The DCD-N score can be used to predict potential candidates for DCD in patients with non-survivable brain injury. However, this score needs to be tested specifically in a cohort of potential donors participating in DCD protocols. Funding None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-4422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70060-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22494955</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Blood & organ donations ; Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality ; Brain death ; Brain injury ; Cell survival ; Coma ; Cornea ; Cough ; Critical Care - statistics & numerical data ; Data collection ; Data Collection - statistics & numerical data ; Death ; Heart ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Neurology ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Probability ; Prospective Studies ; Reflexes ; Regression analysis ; ROC Curve ; Time and Motion Studies ; Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics & numerical data ; Transplants & implants ; Traumatic brain injury ; Variables ; Vital Signs ; Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>Lancet neurology, 2012-05, Vol.11 (5), p.414-419</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-bc0bbdeef2324132066980e6c22d344685ae6b65952c165f8c8df4eaf28264d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-bc0bbdeef2324132066980e6c22d344685ae6b65952c165f8c8df4eaf28264d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442212700601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22494955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Alan H, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandrekar, Jay, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugate, Jennifer E, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Yorick J, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shutter, Lori A, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, W David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Michael A, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study</title><title>Lancet neurology</title><addtitle>Lancet Neurol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Successful donation of organs after cardiac death (DCD) requires identification of patients who will die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aimed to validate a straightforward model to predict the likelihood of death within 60 min of WLST in patients with irreversible brain injury. Methods In this multicentre, observational study, we prospectively enrolled consecutive comatose patients with irreversible brain injury undergoing WLST at six medical centres in the USA and the Netherlands. We assessed four clinical characteristics (corneal reflex, cough reflex, best motor response, and oxygenation index) as predictor variables, which were selected on the basis of previous findings. We excluded patients who had brain death or were not intubated. The primary endpoint was death within 60 min of WLST. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess associations with predictor variables. Points attributed to each variable were summed to create a predictive score for cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state (the DCD-N score). We assessed performance of the score using area under the curve analysis. Findings We included 178 patients, 82 (46%) of whom died within 60 min of WLST. Absent corneal reflexes (odds ratio [OR] 2·67, 95% CI 1·19–6·01; p=0·0173; 1 point), absent cough reflex (4·16, 1·79–9·70; p=0·0009; 2 points), extensor or absent motor responses (2·99, 1·22–7·34; p=0·0168; 1 point), and an oxygenation index score of more than 3·0 (2·31, 1·10–4·88; p=0·0276; 1 point) were predictive of death within 60 min of WLST. 59 of 82 patients who died within 60 min of WLST had DCD-N scores of 3 or more (72% sensitivity), and 75 of 96 of those who did not die within this interval had scores of 0–2 (78% specificity); taking into account the prevalence of death within 60 min in this population, a score of 3 or more was translated into a 74% chance of death within 60 min (positive predictive value) and a score of 0–2 translated into a 77% chance of survival beyond 60 min (negative predictive value). Interpretation The DCD-N score can be used to predict potential candidates for DCD in patients with non-survivable brain injury. However, this score needs to be tested specifically in a cohort of potential donors participating in DCD protocols. Funding None.</description><subject>Blood &amp; organ donations</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality</subject><subject>Brain death</subject><subject>Brain injury</subject><subject>Cell survival</subject><subject>Coma</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reflexes</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Time and Motion Studies</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vital Signs</subject><subject>Withholding Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1474-4422</issn><issn>1474-4465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0Eou3CTwBZ4tIeAvbE9mY5gFDFl1QJJOBsOfYEXLJxajsr7Z0fjpNditQLHCxbnmfe-XgJecLZc864evGFi7WohAA453CxZkyxit8jp8dvJe_fvgFOyFlK14wBFw1_SE4AxEZspDwlvz5HdN5mHwYaOjqGjEP2pqddiDTE72agLgxmiZsuY6TWROeNpQ5N_kH9QMcSLUlpfg84xWCjz94WjZRNxpfU0DGGNGKpskMa2oRxtyguyOT2j8iDzvQJHx_vFfn27u3Xyw_V1af3Hy_fXFW2tJ2r1rK2dYgd1CB4DUypTcNQWQBXl5EbaVC1Sm4kWK5k19jGdQJNBw0o4aBekfODbunnZsKU9dYni31vBgxT0mWxohy-Zv-BsqapuSp9rMizO-h1mGIZ7khJKVVdKHmgbNlFitjpMfqtifsCzYWVXhzVs12ag14c1bP606P61G7R3Wb9sbAArw8Als3tPEadbPHDFltjWbl2wf-zxKs7Crb3w-zgT9xj-juNTqDZQWTW4LAo8Po3JknFvA</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof</creator><creator>Yee, Alan H, DO</creator><creator>Mandrekar, Jay, PhD</creator><creator>Fugate, Jennifer E, DO</creator><creator>de Groot, Yorick J, MD</creator><creator>Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD</creator><creator>Shutter, Lori A, MD</creator><creator>Freeman, W David, MD</creator><creator>Rubin, Michael A, MD</creator><creator>Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study</title><author>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof ; Yee, Alan H, DO ; Mandrekar, Jay, PhD ; Fugate, Jennifer E, DO ; de Groot, Yorick J, MD ; Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD ; Shutter, Lori A, MD ; Freeman, W David, MD ; Rubin, Michael A, MD ; Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-bc0bbdeef2324132066980e6c22d344685ae6b65952c165f8c8df4eaf28264d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Blood &amp; organ donations</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality</topic><topic>Brain death</topic><topic>Brain injury</topic><topic>Cell survival</topic><topic>Coma</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Critical Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data Collection - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reflexes</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Time and Motion Studies</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vital Signs</topic><topic>Withholding Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Alan H, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandrekar, Jay, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugate, Jennifer E, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Yorick J, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shutter, Lori A, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, W David, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Michael A, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lancet neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rabinstein, Alejandro A, Prof</au><au>Yee, Alan H, DO</au><au>Mandrekar, Jay, PhD</au><au>Fugate, Jennifer E, DO</au><au>de Groot, Yorick J, MD</au><au>Kompanje, Erwin JO, PhD</au><au>Shutter, Lori A, MD</au><au>Freeman, W David, MD</au><au>Rubin, Michael A, MD</au><au>Wijdicks, Eelco FM, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study</atitle><jtitle>Lancet neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Neurol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>414-419</pages><issn>1474-4422</issn><eissn>1474-4465</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Successful donation of organs after cardiac death (DCD) requires identification of patients who will die within 60 min of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). We aimed to validate a straightforward model to predict the likelihood of death within 60 min of WLST in patients with irreversible brain injury. Methods In this multicentre, observational study, we prospectively enrolled consecutive comatose patients with irreversible brain injury undergoing WLST at six medical centres in the USA and the Netherlands. We assessed four clinical characteristics (corneal reflex, cough reflex, best motor response, and oxygenation index) as predictor variables, which were selected on the basis of previous findings. We excluded patients who had brain death or were not intubated. The primary endpoint was death within 60 min of WLST. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess associations with predictor variables. Points attributed to each variable were summed to create a predictive score for cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state (the DCD-N score). We assessed performance of the score using area under the curve analysis. Findings We included 178 patients, 82 (46%) of whom died within 60 min of WLST. Absent corneal reflexes (odds ratio [OR] 2·67, 95% CI 1·19–6·01; p=0·0173; 1 point), absent cough reflex (4·16, 1·79–9·70; p=0·0009; 2 points), extensor or absent motor responses (2·99, 1·22–7·34; p=0·0168; 1 point), and an oxygenation index score of more than 3·0 (2·31, 1·10–4·88; p=0·0276; 1 point) were predictive of death within 60 min of WLST. 59 of 82 patients who died within 60 min of WLST had DCD-N scores of 3 or more (72% sensitivity), and 75 of 96 of those who did not die within this interval had scores of 0–2 (78% specificity); taking into account the prevalence of death within 60 min in this population, a score of 3 or more was translated into a 74% chance of death within 60 min (positive predictive value) and a score of 0–2 translated into a 77% chance of survival beyond 60 min (negative predictive value). Interpretation The DCD-N score can be used to predict potential candidates for DCD in patients with non-survivable brain injury. However, this score needs to be tested specifically in a cohort of potential donors participating in DCD protocols. Funding None.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22494955</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70060-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-4422
ispartof Lancet neurology, 2012-05, Vol.11 (5), p.414-419
issn 1474-4422
1474-4465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1014101170
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Blood & organ donations
Brain Damage, Chronic - mortality
Brain death
Brain injury
Cell survival
Coma
Cornea
Cough
Critical Care - statistics & numerical data
Data collection
Data Collection - statistics & numerical data
Death
Heart
Humans
Ischemia
Neurology
Observational studies
Patients
Probability
Prospective Studies
Reflexes
Regression analysis
ROC Curve
Time and Motion Studies
Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics & numerical data
Transplants & implants
Traumatic brain injury
Variables
Vital Signs
Withholding Treatment - statistics & numerical data
title Prediction of potential for organ donation after cardiac death in patients in neurocritical state: a prospective observational study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A45%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20potential%20for%20organ%20donation%20after%20cardiac%20death%20in%20patients%20in%20neurocritical%20state:%20a%20prospective%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Lancet%20neurology&rft.au=Rabinstein,%20Alejandro%20A,%20Prof&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=414-419&rft.issn=1474-4422&rft.eissn=1474-4465&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70060-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008831641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008855563&rft_id=info:pmid/22494955&rft_els_id=S1474442212700601&rfr_iscdi=true