Resistance to acaricides in Italian strains of Tetranychus urticae: toxicological and enzymatic assays
Problems with Tetranychus urticae are frequently reported in protected crops in Italy, particularly in roses where many introduced acaricides show a progressive loss of effectiveness. We have conducted bioassays to assess the response of some Italian strains of T. urticae to a number of acaricides....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental & applied acarology 2012-05, Vol.57 (1), p.53-64 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 64 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 53 |
| container_title | Experimental & applied acarology |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Tirello, Paola Pozzebon, Alberto Cassanelli, Stefano Van Leeuwen, Thomas Duso, Carlo |
| description | Problems with Tetranychus urticae are frequently reported in protected crops in Italy, particularly in roses where many introduced acaricides show a progressive loss of effectiveness. We have conducted bioassays to assess the response of some Italian strains of T. urticae to a number of acaricides. These include compounds that were widespread and frequently used in the past, but also some recently registered compounds. We investigated two T. urticae strains collected from rose growers where control failures were reported (SAN and PSE), together with a strain collected from unsprayed vegetables (BOSA). Adult females of the rose strains (SAN and PSE) were resistant to tebufenpyrad (Resistant Ratio—RR, RR50 = 48.4 and 163.6) and fenpyroximate (RR50 = 74.1 and 25.9) when compared to the susceptible BOSA strain. Lethal concentrations for these products were higher than the registered field rate. The PSE strain proved to be highly resistant to abamectin (RR50 = 1,294.1). Variation in bifenazate susceptibility was detected amongst strains, but LC90 values of SAN and PSE were still in the range of the registered field rate. In egg bioassays, the SAN and PSE strains exhibited high resistance levels to clofentezine (RR50 = 66,473 and 170,714), hexythiazox (RR50 = 70,244 and 159,493) and flufenoxuron (RR50 = 61.9 and 117.9). But the recently introduced ovi/larvicides etoxazole and spirodiclofen exhibited high activity on all strains. The activity of detoxifying enzymes such as esterases, glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (MFOs) was determined in these strains as a preliminary attempt to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Enzymatic assays showed that the rose strains exhibited 2.66 and 1.95-fold increased MFOs activity compared to the susceptible strain. Assays for GSTs revealed that only the SAN strain exhibited a significantly higher activity. In contrast, only the PSE strain showed a significant higher hydrolysis of 1-naphthyl acetate. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10493-012-9536-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1014099540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630389021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f93fa28a295fcaea8489e54aab60b8466fba46f4ca762704975e6c6ebe5f6fd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhSMEotvCD-ACFicugbFjOzY3VEGpVAkJ2rM167UXV1mneBKJ8OvxKgUkDj3Zo_nes2de07zg8JYD9O-Ig7RdC1y0VnW6XR41G676WvUgHjcb4Nq0hmtx0pwS3QKAAq2eNidCSNmD5Jsmfg2UaMLsA5tGhh5L8mkXiKXMLiccEmZGU8GUiY2RXYd6z4v_PhOby5Q8hvdV-DP5cRj3tRwY5h0L-ddywNpmSIQLPWueRBwoPL8_z5qbTx-vzz-3V18uLs8_XLVeKj610XYRhUFhVazOaKSxQUnErYatkVrHLUodpcdeizqA7VXQXodtUFHHnenOmjer710Zf8yBJndI5MMwYA7jTI4Dl2CtklDR1_-ht-Nccv2ds7aD3lT_CvEV8mUkKiG6u5IOWJbq5I4ZuDUDVzNwxwzcUjUv743n7SHs_ir-LL0CYgWotvI-lH8vP-T6ahVFHB3uSyJ3800cxwGQugfzICHq8kz3G4ripeY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993078704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance to acaricides in Italian strains of Tetranychus urticae: toxicological and enzymatic assays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tirello, Paola ; Pozzebon, Alberto ; Cassanelli, Stefano ; Van Leeuwen, Thomas ; Duso, Carlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Tirello, Paola ; Pozzebon, Alberto ; Cassanelli, Stefano ; Van Leeuwen, Thomas ; Duso, Carlo</creatorcontrib><description>Problems with Tetranychus urticae are frequently reported in protected crops in Italy, particularly in roses where many introduced acaricides show a progressive loss of effectiveness. We have conducted bioassays to assess the response of some Italian strains of T. urticae to a number of acaricides. These include compounds that were widespread and frequently used in the past, but also some recently registered compounds. We investigated two T. urticae strains collected from rose growers where control failures were reported (SAN and PSE), together with a strain collected from unsprayed vegetables (BOSA). Adult females of the rose strains (SAN and PSE) were resistant to tebufenpyrad (Resistant Ratio—RR, RR50 = 48.4 and 163.6) and fenpyroximate (RR50 = 74.1 and 25.9) when compared to the susceptible BOSA strain. Lethal concentrations for these products were higher than the registered field rate. The PSE strain proved to be highly resistant to abamectin (RR50 = 1,294.1). Variation in bifenazate susceptibility was detected amongst strains, but LC90 values of SAN and PSE were still in the range of the registered field rate. In egg bioassays, the SAN and PSE strains exhibited high resistance levels to clofentezine (RR50 = 66,473 and 170,714), hexythiazox (RR50 = 70,244 and 159,493) and flufenoxuron (RR50 = 61.9 and 117.9). But the recently introduced ovi/larvicides etoxazole and spirodiclofen exhibited high activity on all strains. The activity of detoxifying enzymes such as esterases, glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (MFOs) was determined in these strains as a preliminary attempt to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Enzymatic assays showed that the rose strains exhibited 2.66 and 1.95-fold increased MFOs activity compared to the susceptible strain. Assays for GSTs revealed that only the SAN strain exhibited a significantly higher activity. In contrast, only the PSE strain showed a significant higher hydrolysis of 1-naphthyl acetate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10493-012-9536-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22447041</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EAACEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>abamectin ; Acaricides ; acetates ; adults ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Animals ; Bioassays ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; clofentezine ; crops ; cytochrome P-450 ; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System - metabolism ; Drug Resistance ; eggs ; Entomology ; esterases ; Esterases - metabolism ; Female ; females ; fenpyroximate ; flufenoxuron ; Fungicides ; Glutathione Transferase - metabolism ; growers ; hexythiazox ; hydrolysis ; Insecticides ; Italy ; larvicides ; Life Sciences ; Ovum - enzymology ; resistance mechanisms ; Rosa ; spirodiclofen ; Tetranychidae - enzymology ; Tetranychus urticae ; vegetables</subject><ispartof>Experimental & applied acarology, 2012-05, Vol.57 (1), p.53-64</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f93fa28a295fcaea8489e54aab60b8466fba46f4ca762704975e6c6ebe5f6fd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f93fa28a295fcaea8489e54aab60b8466fba46f4ca762704975e6c6ebe5f6fd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10493-012-9536-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10493-012-9536-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22447041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tirello, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzebon, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassanelli, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Leeuwen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duso, Carlo</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance to acaricides in Italian strains of Tetranychus urticae: toxicological and enzymatic assays</title><title>Experimental & applied acarology</title><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><description>Problems with Tetranychus urticae are frequently reported in protected crops in Italy, particularly in roses where many introduced acaricides show a progressive loss of effectiveness. We have conducted bioassays to assess the response of some Italian strains of T. urticae to a number of acaricides. These include compounds that were widespread and frequently used in the past, but also some recently registered compounds. We investigated two T. urticae strains collected from rose growers where control failures were reported (SAN and PSE), together with a strain collected from unsprayed vegetables (BOSA). Adult females of the rose strains (SAN and PSE) were resistant to tebufenpyrad (Resistant Ratio—RR, RR50 = 48.4 and 163.6) and fenpyroximate (RR50 = 74.1 and 25.9) when compared to the susceptible BOSA strain. Lethal concentrations for these products were higher than the registered field rate. The PSE strain proved to be highly resistant to abamectin (RR50 = 1,294.1). Variation in bifenazate susceptibility was detected amongst strains, but LC90 values of SAN and PSE were still in the range of the registered field rate. In egg bioassays, the SAN and PSE strains exhibited high resistance levels to clofentezine (RR50 = 66,473 and 170,714), hexythiazox (RR50 = 70,244 and 159,493) and flufenoxuron (RR50 = 61.9 and 117.9). But the recently introduced ovi/larvicides etoxazole and spirodiclofen exhibited high activity on all strains. The activity of detoxifying enzymes such as esterases, glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (MFOs) was determined in these strains as a preliminary attempt to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Enzymatic assays showed that the rose strains exhibited 2.66 and 1.95-fold increased MFOs activity compared to the susceptible strain. Assays for GSTs revealed that only the SAN strain exhibited a significantly higher activity. In contrast, only the PSE strain showed a significant higher hydrolysis of 1-naphthyl acetate.</description><subject>abamectin</subject><subject>Acaricides</subject><subject>acetates</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>clofentezine</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>cytochrome P-450</subject><subject>Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System - metabolism</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>eggs</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>esterases</subject><subject>Esterases - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>fenpyroximate</subject><subject>flufenoxuron</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Glutathione Transferase - metabolism</subject><subject>growers</subject><subject>hexythiazox</subject><subject>hydrolysis</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>larvicides</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ovum - enzymology</subject><subject>resistance mechanisms</subject><subject>Rosa</subject><subject>spirodiclofen</subject><subject>Tetranychidae - enzymology</subject><subject>Tetranychus urticae</subject><subject>vegetables</subject><issn>0168-8162</issn><issn>1572-9702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhSMEotvCD-ACFicugbFjOzY3VEGpVAkJ2rM167UXV1mneBKJ8OvxKgUkDj3Zo_nes2de07zg8JYD9O-Ig7RdC1y0VnW6XR41G676WvUgHjcb4Nq0hmtx0pwS3QKAAq2eNidCSNmD5Jsmfg2UaMLsA5tGhh5L8mkXiKXMLiccEmZGU8GUiY2RXYd6z4v_PhOby5Q8hvdV-DP5cRj3tRwY5h0L-ddywNpmSIQLPWueRBwoPL8_z5qbTx-vzz-3V18uLs8_XLVeKj610XYRhUFhVazOaKSxQUnErYatkVrHLUodpcdeizqA7VXQXodtUFHHnenOmjer710Zf8yBJndI5MMwYA7jTI4Dl2CtklDR1_-ht-Nccv2ds7aD3lT_CvEV8mUkKiG6u5IOWJbq5I4ZuDUDVzNwxwzcUjUv743n7SHs_ir-LL0CYgWotvI-lH8vP-T6ahVFHB3uSyJ3800cxwGQugfzICHq8kz3G4ripeY</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Tirello, Paola</creator><creator>Pozzebon, Alberto</creator><creator>Cassanelli, Stefano</creator><creator>Van Leeuwen, Thomas</creator><creator>Duso, Carlo</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7U7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Resistance to acaricides in Italian strains of Tetranychus urticae: toxicological and enzymatic assays</title><author>Tirello, Paola ; Pozzebon, Alberto ; Cassanelli, Stefano ; Van Leeuwen, Thomas ; Duso, Carlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-f93fa28a295fcaea8489e54aab60b8466fba46f4ca762704975e6c6ebe5f6fd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>abamectin</topic><topic>Acaricides</topic><topic>acetates</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>clofentezine</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>cytochrome P-450</topic><topic>Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System - metabolism</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>eggs</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>esterases</topic><topic>Esterases - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>fenpyroximate</topic><topic>flufenoxuron</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Glutathione Transferase - metabolism</topic><topic>growers</topic><topic>hexythiazox</topic><topic>hydrolysis</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>larvicides</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ovum - enzymology</topic><topic>resistance mechanisms</topic><topic>Rosa</topic><topic>spirodiclofen</topic><topic>Tetranychidae - enzymology</topic><topic>Tetranychus urticae</topic><topic>vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tirello, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzebon, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassanelli, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Leeuwen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duso, Carlo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tirello, Paola</au><au>Pozzebon, Alberto</au><au>Cassanelli, Stefano</au><au>Van Leeuwen, Thomas</au><au>Duso, Carlo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance to acaricides in Italian strains of Tetranychus urticae: toxicological and enzymatic assays</atitle><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle><stitle>Exp Appl Acarol</stitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>53-64</pages><issn>0168-8162</issn><eissn>1572-9702</eissn><coden>EAACEM</coden><abstract>Problems with Tetranychus urticae are frequently reported in protected crops in Italy, particularly in roses where many introduced acaricides show a progressive loss of effectiveness. We have conducted bioassays to assess the response of some Italian strains of T. urticae to a number of acaricides. These include compounds that were widespread and frequently used in the past, but also some recently registered compounds. We investigated two T. urticae strains collected from rose growers where control failures were reported (SAN and PSE), together with a strain collected from unsprayed vegetables (BOSA). Adult females of the rose strains (SAN and PSE) were resistant to tebufenpyrad (Resistant Ratio—RR, RR50 = 48.4 and 163.6) and fenpyroximate (RR50 = 74.1 and 25.9) when compared to the susceptible BOSA strain. Lethal concentrations for these products were higher than the registered field rate. The PSE strain proved to be highly resistant to abamectin (RR50 = 1,294.1). Variation in bifenazate susceptibility was detected amongst strains, but LC90 values of SAN and PSE were still in the range of the registered field rate. In egg bioassays, the SAN and PSE strains exhibited high resistance levels to clofentezine (RR50 = 66,473 and 170,714), hexythiazox (RR50 = 70,244 and 159,493) and flufenoxuron (RR50 = 61.9 and 117.9). But the recently introduced ovi/larvicides etoxazole and spirodiclofen exhibited high activity on all strains. The activity of detoxifying enzymes such as esterases, glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (MFOs) was determined in these strains as a preliminary attempt to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Enzymatic assays showed that the rose strains exhibited 2.66 and 1.95-fold increased MFOs activity compared to the susceptible strain. Assays for GSTs revealed that only the SAN strain exhibited a significantly higher activity. In contrast, only the PSE strain showed a significant higher hydrolysis of 1-naphthyl acetate.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22447041</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10493-012-9536-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0168-8162 |
| ispartof | Experimental & applied acarology, 2012-05, Vol.57 (1), p.53-64 |
| issn | 0168-8162 1572-9702 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1014099540 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | abamectin Acaricides acetates adults Animal Ecology Animal Genetics and Genomics Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Animals Bioassays Biomedical and Life Sciences clofentezine crops cytochrome P-450 Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System - metabolism Drug Resistance eggs Entomology esterases Esterases - metabolism Female females fenpyroximate flufenoxuron Fungicides Glutathione Transferase - metabolism growers hexythiazox hydrolysis Insecticides Italy larvicides Life Sciences Ovum - enzymology resistance mechanisms Rosa spirodiclofen Tetranychidae - enzymology Tetranychus urticae vegetables |
| title | Resistance to acaricides in Italian strains of Tetranychus urticae: toxicological and enzymatic assays |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T18%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20to%20acaricides%20in%20Italian%20strains%20of%20Tetranychus%20urticae:%20toxicological%20and%20enzymatic%20assays&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20&%20applied%20acarology&rft.au=Tirello,%20Paola&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=53-64&rft.issn=0168-8162&rft.eissn=1572-9702&rft.coden=EAACEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10493-012-9536-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630389021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993078704&rft_id=info:pmid/22447041&rfr_iscdi=true |