Disagreement and the Cost of Capital

We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that othe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of accounting research 2011-03, Vol.49 (1), p.41-68
Hauptverfasser: BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT, FISCHER, PAUL E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Journal of accounting research
container_volume 49
creator BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT
FISCHER, PAUL E.
description We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1013748605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20869862</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20869862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtu1DAUtRBIDIVPQIoQCzaZ-hU_FizKFNpC1Ypn2V25yQ1NyEyCnYGZv-eGoFmwwtL1sXweujqMZYIvBZ3jdim0LXJj_del5PTLuXJ-ubvHFgfiPltwLkXudGEeskcptZxzXyixYM9PmxS-RcQ1bsYsbKpsvMNs1acx6-tsFYZmDN1j9qAOXcInf_GIfX7z-tPqPL-8PrtYnVzmpRHG50F6qXnJC1tJI2t364SXBffWOOsKg17YCk0dAi90cMoTVBUqYbEKVmqjjtiLOXeI_Y8tphHWTSqx68IG-20CwYWy2hlekPTZP9K238YNbQdOc2u0FlOem0Vl7FOKWMMQm3WIe0qCqT1oYSoJppJgag_-tAc7sp7P1ogDlgffbRfaPkRM8BNU0J6uPQ1ZBUFDM-EwcQKMg7txTVEv56hfTYf7_14B3l6ffKAX-Z_O_jaNfTz4JXfGOyOJz2e-SSPuDnyI3ylUUfTN1RlcfXn3yr-3H-FG_QbIuaPH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>840764416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT ; FISCHER, PAUL E.</creator><creatorcontrib>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT ; FISCHER, PAUL E.</creatorcontrib><description>We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aggregation ; Capital costs ; Capital investments ; Coefficients ; Cost efficiency ; Covariance matrices ; Difference ; Disclosure ; Discounts ; Disputes ; Economic costs ; Financial analysis ; Financial information ; Financial performance ; Financing methods ; Investors ; Risk aversion ; Stockholders ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2011-03, Vol.49 (1), p.41-68</ispartof><rights>2011 The Accounting Research Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business</rights><rights>University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20869862$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20869862$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,3994,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajoares/v_3a49_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a41-68.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISCHER, PAUL E.</creatorcontrib><title>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.</description><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Covariance matrices</subject><subject>Difference</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Financial information</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Financing methods</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMtu1DAUtRBIDIVPQIoQCzaZ-hU_FizKFNpC1Ypn2V25yQ1NyEyCnYGZv-eGoFmwwtL1sXweujqMZYIvBZ3jdim0LXJj_del5PTLuXJ-ubvHFgfiPltwLkXudGEeskcptZxzXyixYM9PmxS-RcQ1bsYsbKpsvMNs1acx6-tsFYZmDN1j9qAOXcInf_GIfX7z-tPqPL-8PrtYnVzmpRHG50F6qXnJC1tJI2t364SXBffWOOsKg17YCk0dAi90cMoTVBUqYbEKVmqjjtiLOXeI_Y8tphHWTSqx68IG-20CwYWy2hlekPTZP9K238YNbQdOc2u0FlOem0Vl7FOKWMMQm3WIe0qCqT1oYSoJppJgag_-tAc7sp7P1ogDlgffbRfaPkRM8BNU0J6uPQ1ZBUFDM-EwcQKMg7txTVEv56hfTYf7_14B3l6ffKAX-Z_O_jaNfTz4JXfGOyOJz2e-SSPuDnyI3ylUUfTN1RlcfXn3yr-3H-FG_QbIuaPH</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</creator><creator>FISCHER, PAUL E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</title><author>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT ; FISCHER, PAUL E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Covariance matrices</topic><topic>Difference</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Financial information</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Financing methods</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISCHER, PAUL E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</au><au>FISCHER, PAUL E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>41-68</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8456
ispartof Journal of accounting research, 2011-03, Vol.49 (1), p.41-68
issn 0021-8456
1475-679X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1013748605
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aggregation
Capital costs
Capital investments
Coefficients
Cost efficiency
Covariance matrices
Difference
Disclosure
Discounts
Disputes
Economic costs
Financial analysis
Financial information
Financial performance
Financing methods
Investors
Risk aversion
Stockholders
Studies
title Disagreement and the Cost of Capital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A29%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disagreement%20and%20the%20Cost%20of%20Capital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=BLOOMFIELD,%20ROBERT&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=41-68&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20869862%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=840764416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20869862&rfr_iscdi=true