Disagreement and the Cost of Capital
We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that othe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of accounting research 2011-03, Vol.49 (1), p.41-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 68 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Journal of accounting research |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT FISCHER, PAUL E. |
description | We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1013748605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20869862</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20869862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtu1DAUtRBIDIVPQIoQCzaZ-hU_FizKFNpC1Ypn2V25yQ1NyEyCnYGZv-eGoFmwwtL1sXweujqMZYIvBZ3jdim0LXJj_del5PTLuXJ-ubvHFgfiPltwLkXudGEeskcptZxzXyixYM9PmxS-RcQ1bsYsbKpsvMNs1acx6-tsFYZmDN1j9qAOXcInf_GIfX7z-tPqPL-8PrtYnVzmpRHG50F6qXnJC1tJI2t364SXBffWOOsKg17YCk0dAi90cMoTVBUqYbEKVmqjjtiLOXeI_Y8tphHWTSqx68IG-20CwYWy2hlekPTZP9K238YNbQdOc2u0FlOem0Vl7FOKWMMQm3WIe0qCqT1oYSoJppJgag_-tAc7sp7P1ogDlgffbRfaPkRM8BNU0J6uPQ1ZBUFDM-EwcQKMg7txTVEv56hfTYf7_14B3l6ffKAX-Z_O_jaNfTz4JXfGOyOJz2e-SSPuDnyI3ylUUfTN1RlcfXn3yr-3H-FG_QbIuaPH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>840764416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT ; FISCHER, PAUL E.</creator><creatorcontrib>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT ; FISCHER, PAUL E.</creatorcontrib><description>We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aggregation ; Capital costs ; Capital investments ; Coefficients ; Cost efficiency ; Covariance matrices ; Difference ; Disclosure ; Discounts ; Disputes ; Economic costs ; Financial analysis ; Financial information ; Financial performance ; Financing methods ; Investors ; Risk aversion ; Stockholders ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2011-03, Vol.49 (1), p.41-68</ispartof><rights>2011 The Accounting Research Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business</rights><rights>University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20869862$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20869862$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,3994,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajoares/v_3a49_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a41-68.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISCHER, PAUL E.</creatorcontrib><title>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.</description><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Covariance matrices</subject><subject>Difference</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Financial information</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Financing methods</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMtu1DAUtRBIDIVPQIoQCzaZ-hU_FizKFNpC1Ypn2V25yQ1NyEyCnYGZv-eGoFmwwtL1sXweujqMZYIvBZ3jdim0LXJj_del5PTLuXJ-ubvHFgfiPltwLkXudGEeskcptZxzXyixYM9PmxS-RcQ1bsYsbKpsvMNs1acx6-tsFYZmDN1j9qAOXcInf_GIfX7z-tPqPL-8PrtYnVzmpRHG50F6qXnJC1tJI2t364SXBffWOOsKg17YCk0dAi90cMoTVBUqYbEKVmqjjtiLOXeI_Y8tphHWTSqx68IG-20CwYWy2hlekPTZP9K238YNbQdOc2u0FlOem0Vl7FOKWMMQm3WIe0qCqT1oYSoJppJgag_-tAc7sp7P1ogDlgffbRfaPkRM8BNU0J6uPQ1ZBUFDM-EwcQKMg7txTVEv56hfTYf7_14B3l6ffKAX-Z_O_jaNfTz4JXfGOyOJz2e-SSPuDnyI3ylUUfTN1RlcfXn3yr-3H-FG_QbIuaPH</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</creator><creator>FISCHER, PAUL E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</title><author>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT ; FISCHER, PAUL E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6169-a29240c057d262f8b81925097687856e917de6faa054a839054dde317eda72463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Covariance matrices</topic><topic>Difference</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Financial information</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Financing methods</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISCHER, PAUL E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLOOMFIELD, ROBERT</au><au>FISCHER, PAUL E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disagreement and the Cost of Capital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>41-68</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>We assess how forms of disagreement among investors affect a firm's cost of capital. Firms experience a lower cost of capital if investors perceive that other investors are ignoring relevant disclosures (perceived errors of omission), but a higher cost of capital if investors perceive that others are responding to irrelevant disclosures (perceived errors of commission). The impact of these two sources of disagreement on the cost of capital is determined by the distribution of opinion and the nature of disclosure. For example, even though aggregated disclosures reveal less to investors, aggregated disclosures may decrease the cost of capital by eliminating disagreement associated with perceived errors of commission. These and additional results arise because the cost of capital is driven not only by investors' uncertainty about the firm's future earnings performance, but also by investors' uncertainty about the evolution of beliefs, which partly determines the path of prices.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8456 |
ispartof | Journal of accounting research, 2011-03, Vol.49 (1), p.41-68 |
issn | 0021-8456 1475-679X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1013748605 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aggregation Capital costs Capital investments Coefficients Cost efficiency Covariance matrices Difference Disclosure Discounts Disputes Economic costs Financial analysis Financial information Financial performance Financing methods Investors Risk aversion Stockholders Studies |
title | Disagreement and the Cost of Capital |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A29%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disagreement%20and%20the%20Cost%20of%20Capital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=BLOOMFIELD,%20ROBERT&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=41-68&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00389.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20869862%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=840764416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20869862&rfr_iscdi=true |