NEANDERTAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE?
Summary The cognitive and social capacities of Neandertals have been questioned by a number of authors, while others suggest that such capacities did not differ markedly from those of anatomically modern humans in the last 30,000 years. What does the material evidence indicate? The information that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oxford journal of archaeology 2012-02, Vol.31 (1), p.1-26 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Oxford journal of archaeology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | HAYDEN, BRIAN |
description | Summary
The cognitive and social capacities of Neandertals have been questioned by a number of authors, while others suggest that such capacities did not differ markedly from those of anatomically modern humans in the last 30,000 years. What does the material evidence indicate? The information that can be gleaned from Middle Palaeolithic sites indicates that there were Neandertal bands of about 12–24 people that formed alliances with 10–20 other bands and had enemy relationships as well. Rituals probably helped hold alliances together. These conclusions indicate that there were language or dialect groups that were probably ethnically self‐conscious. Some of the postulated band ranges and population densities in the literature appear unrealistic. Sexual division of labour was probably pronounced and Neandertals appear to have used rudimentary status markers, including predator pelts, bird wings or claws, colorants, and a range of speciality items. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2011.00376.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1013741171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557911481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5076-891a1adb546b1a96730678581ac05307b2c2f5d80b2f8f6c2f1563a92fef23493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_wMMQBC-tX5ImaQ8is6tzY7QwOzyGtGuhtVtns-H2703t2MGTuXwJed6XjwehAQYbm_NY2tjhrgXgEZsAxjYAFdzen6He6eMc9YBwYjHC6CW60roEAM4E66HbMBiGo2AeD2eD98iftCOeL_x4MQ-er9FFriqd3RxnHy1eg9h_s2bReOIPZ1bKQHDL9bDCapkwhydYeVxQ4MJlLlYpMAoiISnJ2dKFhORuzs0DM06VR_IsJ9TxaB89dL2bpv7aZXorV4VOs6pS66zeaYkBU-FgLLBB7_6gZb1r1mY76WEGrgBBDeR2UNrUWjdZLjdNsVLNwTTJ1posZStHtnJka03-WpN7E70_9iudqipv1Dot9ClvBHrgCDDcU8d9F1V2-He_jKbR0NxM3uryhd5m-1NeNZ_S-BNMfoRjOWXxiHnkRYb0B6aniFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>915087073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NEANDERTAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>HAYDEN, BRIAN</creator><creatorcontrib>HAYDEN, BRIAN</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The cognitive and social capacities of Neandertals have been questioned by a number of authors, while others suggest that such capacities did not differ markedly from those of anatomically modern humans in the last 30,000 years. What does the material evidence indicate? The information that can be gleaned from Middle Palaeolithic sites indicates that there were Neandertal bands of about 12–24 people that formed alliances with 10–20 other bands and had enemy relationships as well. Rituals probably helped hold alliances together. These conclusions indicate that there were language or dialect groups that were probably ethnically self‐conscious. Some of the postulated band ranges and population densities in the literature appear unrealistic. Sexual division of labour was probably pronounced and Neandertals appear to have used rudimentary status markers, including predator pelts, bird wings or claws, colorants, and a range of speciality items.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0262-5253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2011.00376.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Ancient civilizations ; Archaeology ; Archanthropus and paleanthropus ; Division of labour ; Group dynamics ; Human paleontology ; Linguistic groups ; Methodology and general studies ; Neanderthals ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Ritual ; Social archaeology ; Social structure</subject><ispartof>Oxford journal of archaeology, 2012-02, Vol.31 (1), p.1-26</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5076-891a1adb546b1a96730678581ac05307b2c2f5d80b2f8f6c2f1563a92fef23493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5076-891a1adb546b1a96730678581ac05307b2c2f5d80b2f8f6c2f1563a92fef23493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0092.2011.00376.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0092.2011.00376.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25390470$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HAYDEN, BRIAN</creatorcontrib><title>NEANDERTAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE?</title><title>Oxford journal of archaeology</title><description>Summary
The cognitive and social capacities of Neandertals have been questioned by a number of authors, while others suggest that such capacities did not differ markedly from those of anatomically modern humans in the last 30,000 years. What does the material evidence indicate? The information that can be gleaned from Middle Palaeolithic sites indicates that there were Neandertal bands of about 12–24 people that formed alliances with 10–20 other bands and had enemy relationships as well. Rituals probably helped hold alliances together. These conclusions indicate that there were language or dialect groups that were probably ethnically self‐conscious. Some of the postulated band ranges and population densities in the literature appear unrealistic. Sexual division of labour was probably pronounced and Neandertals appear to have used rudimentary status markers, including predator pelts, bird wings or claws, colorants, and a range of speciality items.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Ancient civilizations</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Archanthropus and paleanthropus</subject><subject>Division of labour</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Human paleontology</subject><subject>Linguistic groups</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Neanderthals</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Ritual</subject><subject>Social archaeology</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><issn>0262-5253</issn><issn>1468-0092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_wMMQBC-tX5ImaQ8is6tzY7QwOzyGtGuhtVtns-H2703t2MGTuXwJed6XjwehAQYbm_NY2tjhrgXgEZsAxjYAFdzen6He6eMc9YBwYjHC6CW60roEAM4E66HbMBiGo2AeD2eD98iftCOeL_x4MQ-er9FFriqd3RxnHy1eg9h_s2bReOIPZ1bKQHDL9bDCapkwhydYeVxQ4MJlLlYpMAoiISnJ2dKFhORuzs0DM06VR_IsJ9TxaB89dL2bpv7aZXorV4VOs6pS66zeaYkBU-FgLLBB7_6gZb1r1mY76WEGrgBBDeR2UNrUWjdZLjdNsVLNwTTJ1posZStHtnJka03-WpN7E70_9iudqipv1Dot9ClvBHrgCDDcU8d9F1V2-He_jKbR0NxM3uryhd5m-1NeNZ_S-BNMfoRjOWXxiHnkRYb0B6aniFU</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>HAYDEN, BRIAN</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>NEANDERTAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE?</title><author>HAYDEN, BRIAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5076-891a1adb546b1a96730678581ac05307b2c2f5d80b2f8f6c2f1563a92fef23493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Ancient civilizations</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Archanthropus and paleanthropus</topic><topic>Division of labour</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Human paleontology</topic><topic>Linguistic groups</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Neanderthals</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Ritual</topic><topic>Social archaeology</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HAYDEN, BRIAN</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Oxford journal of archaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HAYDEN, BRIAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NEANDERTAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE?</atitle><jtitle>Oxford journal of archaeology</jtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><issn>0262-5253</issn><eissn>1468-0092</eissn><abstract>Summary
The cognitive and social capacities of Neandertals have been questioned by a number of authors, while others suggest that such capacities did not differ markedly from those of anatomically modern humans in the last 30,000 years. What does the material evidence indicate? The information that can be gleaned from Middle Palaeolithic sites indicates that there were Neandertal bands of about 12–24 people that formed alliances with 10–20 other bands and had enemy relationships as well. Rituals probably helped hold alliances together. These conclusions indicate that there were language or dialect groups that were probably ethnically self‐conscious. Some of the postulated band ranges and population densities in the literature appear unrealistic. Sexual division of labour was probably pronounced and Neandertals appear to have used rudimentary status markers, including predator pelts, bird wings or claws, colorants, and a range of speciality items.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-0092.2011.00376.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0262-5253 |
ispartof | Oxford journal of archaeology, 2012-02, Vol.31 (1), p.1-26 |
issn | 0262-5253 1468-0092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1013741171 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Alliances Ancient civilizations Archaeology Archanthropus and paleanthropus Division of labour Group dynamics Human paleontology Linguistic groups Methodology and general studies Neanderthals Prehistory and protohistory Ritual Social archaeology Social structure |
title | NEANDERTAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A22%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NEANDERTAL%20SOCIAL%20STRUCTURE?&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20journal%20of%20archaeology&rft.au=HAYDEN,%20BRIAN&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.issn=0262-5253&rft.eissn=1468-0092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-0092.2011.00376.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557911481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=915087073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |