Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep

In order to obtain better fertility, we evaluated two ovine artificial insemination (AI) catheters that were manufactured according to the anatomical structure of the ewe cervix. Morphometric data of the cervix in Churra and Assaf breeds were used to design two types of curved catheters: CAT06 with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal reproduction science 2012-04, Vol.131 (3-4), p.153-159
Hauptverfasser: Álvarez, M, Chamorro, C.A, Kaabi, M, Anel-López, L, Boixo, J.C, Anel, E, Anel, L, de Paz, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 153
container_title Animal reproduction science
container_volume 131
creator Álvarez, M
Chamorro, C.A
Kaabi, M
Anel-López, L
Boixo, J.C
Anel, E
Anel, L
de Paz, P
description In order to obtain better fertility, we evaluated two ovine artificial insemination (AI) catheters that were manufactured according to the anatomical structure of the ewe cervix. Morphometric data of the cervix in Churra and Assaf breeds were used to design two types of curved catheters: CAT06 with one curvature and ZIGZAG with five curvatures in a zigzag shape. Two commercial catheters (IMV® and Minitüb®) were used as controls. In experiment 1, cervical penetration and the degree of reflux were measured in a Cervical AI simulated assay both Churra (n=28) and Assaf ewes (n=28). In experiment 2, a fertility study was performed with three catheters (only one commercial control catheter – IMV) in 465 inseminations (Assaf); and a second study analyzed only the top two catheters (IMV and CAT06) in 428 inseminations (210 Assaf and 218 Churra). The ewes were synchronized using intravaginal sponges (40 FGA mg during 14 days) and 500IU of eCG. Deeper penetration of the cervix was obtained with the new catheters compared with the commercial ones (1.5, 1.3, 3.5 and 3.2cm for the IMV, Minitüb, CAT06 and ZIGZAG catheters, respectively). The cervical penetration and the reflux grade of each catheter showed no differences between breeds. In experiment 2, the degree of penetration had no correlation with fertility of different catheters. The best percentage of lambing ewes was obtained with the IMV and CAT06 catheters (39.5 and 48.1%, respectively. vs 27.2% for ZIGZAG catheter, in the Assaf breed). Regarding effect of breed, Assaf (39.3% and 49.5 for IMV and CAT06, respectively) showed better lambing rates than Churra (29.0% and 39.0%, respectively), and the CAT06 catheter showed significantly higher rates for each breed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.03.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011541236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378432012000796</els_id><sourcerecordid>1011541236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f6a0d9230843a260867b2ee815b4bc46a49ef902894deb573d56579c6403a573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi1ERYfCK4DZsUnqvzjJEg1QkCqxoKwtx7lpPcrYUzsJYtcHgZfrk_SOUhArxMq2fO7nT8eEvOGs5Izr811pg09wSDE7XwrGRclkyRh_Qja8qWUhhBRPyYbJuimUFOyUPM95xxirtW6fkVMhVCOlVBty-x6yvw7Uhp7e3_30gS5-ifd3vygsdpzt5GOgcaDT90htbw8T9NTZ6QYmSJkOMVEfpmRnPPoAFLchO0iLd3bEqwx7H9YQjM43AIcX5GSwY4aXj-sZufr44Wr7qbj8cvF5--6ycEpUUzFoy_pWSNYoaYVmja47AdDwqlOdU9qqFoaWiaZVPXRVLftKV3XrtGLS4vGMvF1j0dLtDHkye4_NxtEGiHM2KJJXigupEW1X1KHQnGAwh-T3Nv1A6MhpszN_CTdH4YZJg8Jx9tXjM3O3h_7P5G_DCLxegcFGY6-Tz-bbV0xQ-BuqkpX-JyFqzo_EdiUAfS0eksEaEBz0WMpNpo_-P6o-AGOjrSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011541236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Álvarez, M ; Chamorro, C.A ; Kaabi, M ; Anel-López, L ; Boixo, J.C ; Anel, E ; Anel, L ; de Paz, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Álvarez, M ; Chamorro, C.A ; Kaabi, M ; Anel-López, L ; Boixo, J.C ; Anel, E ; Anel, L ; de Paz, P</creatorcontrib><description>In order to obtain better fertility, we evaluated two ovine artificial insemination (AI) catheters that were manufactured according to the anatomical structure of the ewe cervix. Morphometric data of the cervix in Churra and Assaf breeds were used to design two types of curved catheters: CAT06 with one curvature and ZIGZAG with five curvatures in a zigzag shape. Two commercial catheters (IMV® and Minitüb®) were used as controls. In experiment 1, cervical penetration and the degree of reflux were measured in a Cervical AI simulated assay both Churra (n=28) and Assaf ewes (n=28). In experiment 2, a fertility study was performed with three catheters (only one commercial control catheter – IMV) in 465 inseminations (Assaf); and a second study analyzed only the top two catheters (IMV and CAT06) in 428 inseminations (210 Assaf and 218 Churra). The ewes were synchronized using intravaginal sponges (40 FGA mg during 14 days) and 500IU of eCG. Deeper penetration of the cervix was obtained with the new catheters compared with the commercial ones (1.5, 1.3, 3.5 and 3.2cm for the IMV, Minitüb, CAT06 and ZIGZAG catheters, respectively). The cervical penetration and the reflux grade of each catheter showed no differences between breeds. In experiment 2, the degree of penetration had no correlation with fertility of different catheters. The best percentage of lambing ewes was obtained with the IMV and CAT06 catheters (39.5 and 48.1%, respectively. vs 27.2% for ZIGZAG catheter, in the Assaf breed). Regarding effect of breed, Assaf (39.3% and 49.5 for IMV and CAT06, respectively) showed better lambing rates than Churra (29.0% and 39.0%, respectively), and the CAT06 catheter showed significantly higher rates for each breed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2232</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.03.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22483334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Artificial insemination ; Bent catheter ; breeds ; catheters ; Catheters - veterinary ; Cervix ; Cervix Uteri - anatomy &amp; histology ; Cervix Uteri - physiology ; controlled internal drug release devices ; equine chorionic gonadotropin ; ewes ; Female ; Fertility ; insemination ; Insemination, Artificial - instrumentation ; Insemination, Artificial - methods ; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary ; morphometry ; Ovine ; Pregnancy ; Sheep - anatomy &amp; histology ; Sheep - physiology</subject><ispartof>Animal reproduction science, 2012-04, Vol.131 (3-4), p.153-159</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f6a0d9230843a260867b2ee815b4bc46a49ef902894deb573d56579c6403a573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f6a0d9230843a260867b2ee815b4bc46a49ef902894deb573d56579c6403a573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432012000796$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22483334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Álvarez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaabi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anel-López, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boixo, J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anel, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paz, P</creatorcontrib><title>Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep</title><title>Animal reproduction science</title><addtitle>Anim Reprod Sci</addtitle><description>In order to obtain better fertility, we evaluated two ovine artificial insemination (AI) catheters that were manufactured according to the anatomical structure of the ewe cervix. Morphometric data of the cervix in Churra and Assaf breeds were used to design two types of curved catheters: CAT06 with one curvature and ZIGZAG with five curvatures in a zigzag shape. Two commercial catheters (IMV® and Minitüb®) were used as controls. In experiment 1, cervical penetration and the degree of reflux were measured in a Cervical AI simulated assay both Churra (n=28) and Assaf ewes (n=28). In experiment 2, a fertility study was performed with three catheters (only one commercial control catheter – IMV) in 465 inseminations (Assaf); and a second study analyzed only the top two catheters (IMV and CAT06) in 428 inseminations (210 Assaf and 218 Churra). The ewes were synchronized using intravaginal sponges (40 FGA mg during 14 days) and 500IU of eCG. Deeper penetration of the cervix was obtained with the new catheters compared with the commercial ones (1.5, 1.3, 3.5 and 3.2cm for the IMV, Minitüb, CAT06 and ZIGZAG catheters, respectively). The cervical penetration and the reflux grade of each catheter showed no differences between breeds. In experiment 2, the degree of penetration had no correlation with fertility of different catheters. The best percentage of lambing ewes was obtained with the IMV and CAT06 catheters (39.5 and 48.1%, respectively. vs 27.2% for ZIGZAG catheter, in the Assaf breed). Regarding effect of breed, Assaf (39.3% and 49.5 for IMV and CAT06, respectively) showed better lambing rates than Churra (29.0% and 39.0%, respectively), and the CAT06 catheter showed significantly higher rates for each breed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artificial insemination</subject><subject>Bent catheter</subject><subject>breeds</subject><subject>catheters</subject><subject>Catheters - veterinary</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - physiology</subject><subject>controlled internal drug release devices</subject><subject>equine chorionic gonadotropin</subject><subject>ewes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>insemination</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - instrumentation</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</subject><subject>morphometry</subject><subject>Ovine</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Sheep - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><issn>0378-4320</issn><issn>1873-2232</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi1ERYfCK4DZsUnqvzjJEg1QkCqxoKwtx7lpPcrYUzsJYtcHgZfrk_SOUhArxMq2fO7nT8eEvOGs5Izr811pg09wSDE7XwrGRclkyRh_Qja8qWUhhBRPyYbJuimUFOyUPM95xxirtW6fkVMhVCOlVBty-x6yvw7Uhp7e3_30gS5-ifd3vygsdpzt5GOgcaDT90htbw8T9NTZ6QYmSJkOMVEfpmRnPPoAFLchO0iLd3bEqwx7H9YQjM43AIcX5GSwY4aXj-sZufr44Wr7qbj8cvF5--6ycEpUUzFoy_pWSNYoaYVmja47AdDwqlOdU9qqFoaWiaZVPXRVLftKV3XrtGLS4vGMvF1j0dLtDHkye4_NxtEGiHM2KJJXigupEW1X1KHQnGAwh-T3Nv1A6MhpszN_CTdH4YZJg8Jx9tXjM3O3h_7P5G_DCLxegcFGY6-Tz-bbV0xQ-BuqkpX-JyFqzo_EdiUAfS0eksEaEBz0WMpNpo_-P6o-AGOjrSg</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Álvarez, M</creator><creator>Chamorro, C.A</creator><creator>Kaabi, M</creator><creator>Anel-López, L</creator><creator>Boixo, J.C</creator><creator>Anel, E</creator><creator>Anel, L</creator><creator>de Paz, P</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep</title><author>Álvarez, M ; Chamorro, C.A ; Kaabi, M ; Anel-López, L ; Boixo, J.C ; Anel, E ; Anel, L ; de Paz, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f6a0d9230843a260867b2ee815b4bc46a49ef902894deb573d56579c6403a573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artificial insemination</topic><topic>Bent catheter</topic><topic>breeds</topic><topic>catheters</topic><topic>Catheters - veterinary</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - physiology</topic><topic>controlled internal drug release devices</topic><topic>equine chorionic gonadotropin</topic><topic>ewes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>insemination</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - instrumentation</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</topic><topic>morphometry</topic><topic>Ovine</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Sheep - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Álvarez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaabi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anel-López, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boixo, J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anel, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paz, P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal reproduction science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Álvarez, M</au><au>Chamorro, C.A</au><au>Kaabi, M</au><au>Anel-López, L</au><au>Boixo, J.C</au><au>Anel, E</au><au>Anel, L</au><au>de Paz, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep</atitle><jtitle>Animal reproduction science</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Reprod Sci</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>153-159</pages><issn>0378-4320</issn><eissn>1873-2232</eissn><abstract>In order to obtain better fertility, we evaluated two ovine artificial insemination (AI) catheters that were manufactured according to the anatomical structure of the ewe cervix. Morphometric data of the cervix in Churra and Assaf breeds were used to design two types of curved catheters: CAT06 with one curvature and ZIGZAG with five curvatures in a zigzag shape. Two commercial catheters (IMV® and Minitüb®) were used as controls. In experiment 1, cervical penetration and the degree of reflux were measured in a Cervical AI simulated assay both Churra (n=28) and Assaf ewes (n=28). In experiment 2, a fertility study was performed with three catheters (only one commercial control catheter – IMV) in 465 inseminations (Assaf); and a second study analyzed only the top two catheters (IMV and CAT06) in 428 inseminations (210 Assaf and 218 Churra). The ewes were synchronized using intravaginal sponges (40 FGA mg during 14 days) and 500IU of eCG. Deeper penetration of the cervix was obtained with the new catheters compared with the commercial ones (1.5, 1.3, 3.5 and 3.2cm for the IMV, Minitüb, CAT06 and ZIGZAG catheters, respectively). The cervical penetration and the reflux grade of each catheter showed no differences between breeds. In experiment 2, the degree of penetration had no correlation with fertility of different catheters. The best percentage of lambing ewes was obtained with the IMV and CAT06 catheters (39.5 and 48.1%, respectively. vs 27.2% for ZIGZAG catheter, in the Assaf breed). Regarding effect of breed, Assaf (39.3% and 49.5 for IMV and CAT06, respectively) showed better lambing rates than Churra (29.0% and 39.0%, respectively), and the CAT06 catheter showed significantly higher rates for each breed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22483334</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.03.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4320
ispartof Animal reproduction science, 2012-04, Vol.131 (3-4), p.153-159
issn 0378-4320
1873-2232
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011541236
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Artificial insemination
Bent catheter
breeds
catheters
Catheters - veterinary
Cervix
Cervix Uteri - anatomy & histology
Cervix Uteri - physiology
controlled internal drug release devices
equine chorionic gonadotropin
ewes
Female
Fertility
insemination
Insemination, Artificial - instrumentation
Insemination, Artificial - methods
Insemination, Artificial - veterinary
morphometry
Ovine
Pregnancy
Sheep - anatomy & histology
Sheep - physiology
title Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A05%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20and%20%E2%80%9Cin%20vivo%E2%80%9D%20evaluation%20of%20two%20adapted%20catheters%20for%20intrauterine%20transcervical%20insemination%20in%20sheep&rft.jtitle=Animal%20reproduction%20science&rft.au=%C3%81lvarez,%20M&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=153-159&rft.issn=0378-4320&rft.eissn=1873-2232&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011541236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011541236&rft_id=info:pmid/22483334&rft_els_id=S0378432012000796&rfr_iscdi=true