Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life

Purpose Despite advances in therapies that offer improved survival rates, clinical course of brain tumours leads to a progressive functional deterioration in patients with modifications in their psychological reaction to the disease. Patients with brain tumours are rarely assessed for quality of lif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2012-06, Vol.20 (6), p.1327-1332
Hauptverfasser: Lamperti, Elena, Pantaleo, Giuseppe, Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne, Silvani, Antonio, Botturi, Andrea, Gaviani, Paola, Sarno, Lucio, Salmaggi, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1332
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1327
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 20
creator Lamperti, Elena
Pantaleo, Giuseppe
Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne
Silvani, Antonio
Botturi, Andrea
Gaviani, Paola
Sarno, Lucio
Salmaggi, Andrea
description Purpose Despite advances in therapies that offer improved survival rates, clinical course of brain tumours leads to a progressive functional deterioration in patients with modifications in their psychological reaction to the disease. Patients with brain tumours are rarely assessed for quality of life and psychological variables, and even fewer studies have assessed patients who have experienced a recurrence of brain tumours. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the patients with recurrent brain tumours and their reaction to the illness. Method We enrolled 81 patients with recurrent CNS tumours. Karnofsky Performance Status scale (KPS) was used to evaluate functional status of patients; the multidimensional aspect of quality of life was assessed through “Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain” (FACT-Br), “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” and “Psychological Distress Inventory”. These were all used as tests of psychological well-being. Results Distress and almost all mean FACT-Br subscale scores seemed to be significantly lower in patients, in comparison with normative data. Surprisingly, the emotional well-being mean score was significantly higher in our recurrence sample than in patients with brain tumours at first diagnosis. Anxiety seemed not to be influenced by a relapse diagnosis; instead, depression was higher and differed significantly from normative data. Low correlation between KPS and FACT-Br total and some sub-scores was found. Conclusions Apparent dissociation between patients' judgment on their quality of life (bad except for emotional) and their reported distress (low) is the most intriguing finding, suggesting highly preserved coping strategies in the emotional sphere, despite intact judgment and disease awareness.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-011-1220-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011176180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A357967564</galeid><sourcerecordid>A357967564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b623b6bf3daf30923d8787abff5c10588a67220dcf429bc60cce3b725839993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnR6Dj6A9wYEhe6qfIopbgxk4mvxMRE3RNKQZm0dIR2Mf9emvEdDQsIfOfeczkAHGB0ihHiZxEhRlCGMM4wSYfVBpjgnNKMUyo2wQSJHGc5ZWwH7Ma4QAhzzsg22CGYE1aScgIuHoweQjC-h1VQzsN-aLshnMP-xUDXLpXuYWehaxpvYoSdh0vVu4QfR9g4a_bAllVNNPvv-xQ8Xl0-zW-yu_vr2_nsLtM5FX1WFYRWRWVprSxFgtC65CVXlbVMY8TKUhU8TVBrmxNR6QJpbWg1mqRCCDoFJ-uqy9C9Dib2snVRm6ZR3nRDlDh9AeYFLlFCj36hizSPT95GiuY5F1h8Uc-qMdJ52_VB6bGonFHGRcFZkSfq9A8qrdq0TnfeWJfufwjwWqBDF2MwVi6Da1VYpd5yjEyuI5PJrxwjk6ukOXw3PFStqT8VHxklgKyBmJ78swnfJ_qv6hu-dZ4r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1013447919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lamperti, Elena ; Pantaleo, Giuseppe ; Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne ; Silvani, Antonio ; Botturi, Andrea ; Gaviani, Paola ; Sarno, Lucio ; Salmaggi, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamperti, Elena ; Pantaleo, Giuseppe ; Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne ; Silvani, Antonio ; Botturi, Andrea ; Gaviani, Paola ; Sarno, Lucio ; Salmaggi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Despite advances in therapies that offer improved survival rates, clinical course of brain tumours leads to a progressive functional deterioration in patients with modifications in their psychological reaction to the disease. Patients with brain tumours are rarely assessed for quality of life and psychological variables, and even fewer studies have assessed patients who have experienced a recurrence of brain tumours. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the patients with recurrent brain tumours and their reaction to the illness. Method We enrolled 81 patients with recurrent CNS tumours. Karnofsky Performance Status scale (KPS) was used to evaluate functional status of patients; the multidimensional aspect of quality of life was assessed through “Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain” (FACT-Br), “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” and “Psychological Distress Inventory”. These were all used as tests of psychological well-being. Results Distress and almost all mean FACT-Br subscale scores seemed to be significantly lower in patients, in comparison with normative data. Surprisingly, the emotional well-being mean score was significantly higher in our recurrence sample than in patients with brain tumours at first diagnosis. Anxiety seemed not to be influenced by a relapse diagnosis; instead, depression was higher and differed significantly from normative data. Low correlation between KPS and FACT-Br total and some sub-scores was found. Conclusions Apparent dissociation between patients' judgment on their quality of life (bad except for emotional) and their reported distress (low) is the most intriguing finding, suggesting highly preserved coping strategies in the emotional sphere, despite intact judgment and disease awareness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1220-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21725828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety - epidemiology ; Anxiety - etiology ; Attitude to Health ; Brain cancer ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain Neoplasms - psychology ; Brain tumors ; Depression - epidemiology ; Depression - etiology ; Depression, Mental ; Diseases ; Emotions ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Karnofsky Performance Status ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental depression ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - psychology ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Quality of Life ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Relapse ; Stress (Psychology) ; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2012-06, Vol.20 (6), p.1327-1332</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b623b6bf3daf30923d8787abff5c10588a67220dcf429bc60cce3b725839993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b623b6bf3daf30923d8787abff5c10588a67220dcf429bc60cce3b725839993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-011-1220-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-011-1220-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21725828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamperti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantaleo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvani, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botturi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaviani, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarno, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmaggi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose Despite advances in therapies that offer improved survival rates, clinical course of brain tumours leads to a progressive functional deterioration in patients with modifications in their psychological reaction to the disease. Patients with brain tumours are rarely assessed for quality of life and psychological variables, and even fewer studies have assessed patients who have experienced a recurrence of brain tumours. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the patients with recurrent brain tumours and their reaction to the illness. Method We enrolled 81 patients with recurrent CNS tumours. Karnofsky Performance Status scale (KPS) was used to evaluate functional status of patients; the multidimensional aspect of quality of life was assessed through “Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain” (FACT-Br), “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” and “Psychological Distress Inventory”. These were all used as tests of psychological well-being. Results Distress and almost all mean FACT-Br subscale scores seemed to be significantly lower in patients, in comparison with normative data. Surprisingly, the emotional well-being mean score was significantly higher in our recurrence sample than in patients with brain tumours at first diagnosis. Anxiety seemed not to be influenced by a relapse diagnosis; instead, depression was higher and differed significantly from normative data. Low correlation between KPS and FACT-Br total and some sub-scores was found. Conclusions Apparent dissociation between patients' judgment on their quality of life (bad except for emotional) and their reported distress (low) is the most intriguing finding, suggesting highly preserved coping strategies in the emotional sphere, despite intact judgment and disease awareness.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anxiety - etiology</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Karnofsky Performance Status</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Stress (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnR6Dj6A9wYEhe6qfIopbgxk4mvxMRE3RNKQZm0dIR2Mf9emvEdDQsIfOfeczkAHGB0ihHiZxEhRlCGMM4wSYfVBpjgnNKMUyo2wQSJHGc5ZWwH7Ma4QAhzzsg22CGYE1aScgIuHoweQjC-h1VQzsN-aLshnMP-xUDXLpXuYWehaxpvYoSdh0vVu4QfR9g4a_bAllVNNPvv-xQ8Xl0-zW-yu_vr2_nsLtM5FX1WFYRWRWVprSxFgtC65CVXlbVMY8TKUhU8TVBrmxNR6QJpbWg1mqRCCDoFJ-uqy9C9Dib2snVRm6ZR3nRDlDh9AeYFLlFCj36hizSPT95GiuY5F1h8Uc-qMdJ52_VB6bGonFHGRcFZkSfq9A8qrdq0TnfeWJfufwjwWqBDF2MwVi6Da1VYpd5yjEyuI5PJrxwjk6ukOXw3PFStqT8VHxklgKyBmJ78swnfJ_qv6hu-dZ4r</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Lamperti, Elena</creator><creator>Pantaleo, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne</creator><creator>Silvani, Antonio</creator><creator>Botturi, Andrea</creator><creator>Gaviani, Paola</creator><creator>Sarno, Lucio</creator><creator>Salmaggi, Andrea</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life</title><author>Lamperti, Elena ; Pantaleo, Giuseppe ; Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne ; Silvani, Antonio ; Botturi, Andrea ; Gaviani, Paola ; Sarno, Lucio ; Salmaggi, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b623b6bf3daf30923d8787abff5c10588a67220dcf429bc60cce3b725839993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anxiety - etiology</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Karnofsky Performance Status</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Stress (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamperti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantaleo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvani, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botturi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaviani, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarno, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmaggi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamperti, Elena</au><au>Pantaleo, Giuseppe</au><au>Finocchiaro, Claudia Yvonne</au><au>Silvani, Antonio</au><au>Botturi, Andrea</au><au>Gaviani, Paola</au><au>Sarno, Lucio</au><au>Salmaggi, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1327</spage><epage>1332</epage><pages>1327-1332</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose Despite advances in therapies that offer improved survival rates, clinical course of brain tumours leads to a progressive functional deterioration in patients with modifications in their psychological reaction to the disease. Patients with brain tumours are rarely assessed for quality of life and psychological variables, and even fewer studies have assessed patients who have experienced a recurrence of brain tumours. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the patients with recurrent brain tumours and their reaction to the illness. Method We enrolled 81 patients with recurrent CNS tumours. Karnofsky Performance Status scale (KPS) was used to evaluate functional status of patients; the multidimensional aspect of quality of life was assessed through “Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain” (FACT-Br), “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” and “Psychological Distress Inventory”. These were all used as tests of psychological well-being. Results Distress and almost all mean FACT-Br subscale scores seemed to be significantly lower in patients, in comparison with normative data. Surprisingly, the emotional well-being mean score was significantly higher in our recurrence sample than in patients with brain tumours at first diagnosis. Anxiety seemed not to be influenced by a relapse diagnosis; instead, depression was higher and differed significantly from normative data. Low correlation between KPS and FACT-Br total and some sub-scores was found. Conclusions Apparent dissociation between patients' judgment on their quality of life (bad except for emotional) and their reported distress (low) is the most intriguing finding, suggesting highly preserved coping strategies in the emotional sphere, despite intact judgment and disease awareness.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21725828</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-011-1220-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2012-06, Vol.20 (6), p.1327-1332
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011176180
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adult
Anxiety - epidemiology
Anxiety - etiology
Attitude to Health
Brain cancer
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Brain Neoplasms - psychology
Brain tumors
Depression - epidemiology
Depression - etiology
Depression, Mental
Diseases
Emotions
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Karnofsky Performance Status
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental depression
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - psychology
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Quality of Life
Rehabilitation Medicine
Relapse
Stress (Psychology)
Stress, Psychological - epidemiology
Stress, Psychological - etiology
title Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A14%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recurrent%20brain%20tumour:%20the%20impact%20of%20illness%20on%20patient's%20life&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Lamperti,%20Elena&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1327&rft.epage=1332&rft.pages=1327-1332&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-011-1220-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA357967564%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1013447919&rft_id=info:pmid/21725828&rft_galeid=A357967564&rfr_iscdi=true