Effect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit

Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out with ABAQUS/Explicit finite element code to study the influence of target span and configuration on its ballistic limit. 1 mm thick 1100-H12 aluminum targets of varying span diameter and configuration were impacted by blunt and ogive nosed pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of impact engineering 2012-04, Vol.42, p.11-24
Hauptverfasser: Iqbal, M.A., Gupta, P.K., Deore, V.S., Tak, S.K., Tiwari, G., Gupta, N.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title International journal of impact engineering
container_volume 42
creator Iqbal, M.A.
Gupta, P.K.
Deore, V.S.
Tak, S.K.
Tiwari, G.
Gupta, N.K.
description Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out with ABAQUS/Explicit finite element code to study the influence of target span and configuration on its ballistic limit. 1 mm thick 1100-H12 aluminum targets of varying span diameter and configuration were impacted by blunt and ogive nosed projectiles of 19 mm diameter and 52.5 g mass. The effect of target span was studied by varying the span diameter of 1 mm thick monolithic target as 50 mm, 100 mm, 204 mm, 255 mm and 500 mm. The effect of configuration was studied by taking the monolithic, double layered in-contact and double layered spaced targets of 1 mm equivalent thickness and 255 mm span diameter. The spacing between the layers was varied as 2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm. In each case the target was impacted normally by blunt and ogive nosed projectile to obtain the ballistic limit. The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target followed by layered in-contact and spaced targets respectively. The variation of spacing between the layers did not have significant influence on the ballistic limit in the case of ogive projectile but some effect was seen in the case of blunt projectile. The ballistic limit was found to increase with increase in target span diameter for both the projectiles and it was found to be higher for blunt nosed projectile as compared to that of ogive nosed projectile for all the spans considered excepting in the case of 50 mm span for which it was higher for ogive nosed projectile. ► The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target. ► The ballistic limit of layered in-contact target was found higher than spaced target. ► The variation of spacing between the layers did not influence the ballistic limit. ► The ballistic limit was found to increase with an increase in target span diameter. ► In general, the bunt nosed projectile experienced higher ballistic limit velocity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010895866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0734743X11001722</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010895866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-326e6d7ff868a952697e60619bd5d25a1f302fca380bcc37ce5c684967a001693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLwzAYhoMoOKd_QXIjeNOaNM3pRpQxDzDwRsG7kqXJTGnTmmSC_96MTW-FQODjefN-eQC4xKjECLObrnSdGybjN2WFMM7DEqH6CMyw4LIgFMljMEOc1AWvyfspOIuxQwhzRNEM3C6tNTrB0cKkwsYkGCflofIt1KO3brMNKrnRw3zSh4Fr1fcuJqdh7waXzsGJVX00F4d7Dt4elq-Lp2L18vi8uF8VmnCaClIxw1purWBCSVoxyQ1DDMt1S9uKKmwJqqxWRKC1zhFtqGailoyrvCmTZA6u9-9OYfzcmpiawUVt-l55M25jk0UgIalgLKNsj-owxhiMbabgBhW-M7TjWNM1v8KanbDdPAvLwatDh4pa9TYor138S1eU5RIsMne350z-8JczoYnaGa9N60JW2bSj-6_qBwm7g3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010895866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Iqbal, M.A. ; Gupta, P.K. ; Deore, V.S. ; Tak, S.K. ; Tiwari, G. ; Gupta, N.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, M.A. ; Gupta, P.K. ; Deore, V.S. ; Tak, S.K. ; Tiwari, G. ; Gupta, N.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out with ABAQUS/Explicit finite element code to study the influence of target span and configuration on its ballistic limit. 1 mm thick 1100-H12 aluminum targets of varying span diameter and configuration were impacted by blunt and ogive nosed projectiles of 19 mm diameter and 52.5 g mass. The effect of target span was studied by varying the span diameter of 1 mm thick monolithic target as 50 mm, 100 mm, 204 mm, 255 mm and 500 mm. The effect of configuration was studied by taking the monolithic, double layered in-contact and double layered spaced targets of 1 mm equivalent thickness and 255 mm span diameter. The spacing between the layers was varied as 2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm. In each case the target was impacted normally by blunt and ogive nosed projectile to obtain the ballistic limit. The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target followed by layered in-contact and spaced targets respectively. The variation of spacing between the layers did not have significant influence on the ballistic limit in the case of ogive projectile but some effect was seen in the case of blunt projectile. The ballistic limit was found to increase with increase in target span diameter for both the projectiles and it was found to be higher for blunt nosed projectile as compared to that of ogive nosed projectile for all the spans considered excepting in the case of 50 mm span for which it was higher for ogive nosed projectile. ► The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target. ► The ballistic limit of layered in-contact target was found higher than spaced target. ► The variation of spacing between the layers did not influence the ballistic limit. ► The ballistic limit was found to increase with an increase in target span diameter. ► In general, the bunt nosed projectile experienced higher ballistic limit velocity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-743X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.10.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJIED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>ABAQUS ; Computer simulation ; Equivalence ; Exact sciences and technology ; Finite element method ; Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...) ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...) ; Layered target ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Ogives ; Physics ; Projectile nose shape ; Projectiles ; Solid mechanics ; Spaced target ; Span diameter ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Three dimensional</subject><ispartof>International journal of impact engineering, 2012-04, Vol.42, p.11-24</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-326e6d7ff868a952697e60619bd5d25a1f302fca380bcc37ce5c684967a001693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-326e6d7ff868a952697e60619bd5d25a1f302fca380bcc37ce5c684967a001693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25601018$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, P.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deore, V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tak, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, N.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit</title><title>International journal of impact engineering</title><description>Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out with ABAQUS/Explicit finite element code to study the influence of target span and configuration on its ballistic limit. 1 mm thick 1100-H12 aluminum targets of varying span diameter and configuration were impacted by blunt and ogive nosed projectiles of 19 mm diameter and 52.5 g mass. The effect of target span was studied by varying the span diameter of 1 mm thick monolithic target as 50 mm, 100 mm, 204 mm, 255 mm and 500 mm. The effect of configuration was studied by taking the monolithic, double layered in-contact and double layered spaced targets of 1 mm equivalent thickness and 255 mm span diameter. The spacing between the layers was varied as 2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm. In each case the target was impacted normally by blunt and ogive nosed projectile to obtain the ballistic limit. The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target followed by layered in-contact and spaced targets respectively. The variation of spacing between the layers did not have significant influence on the ballistic limit in the case of ogive projectile but some effect was seen in the case of blunt projectile. The ballistic limit was found to increase with increase in target span diameter for both the projectiles and it was found to be higher for blunt nosed projectile as compared to that of ogive nosed projectile for all the spans considered excepting in the case of 50 mm span for which it was higher for ogive nosed projectile. ► The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target. ► The ballistic limit of layered in-contact target was found higher than spaced target. ► The variation of spacing between the layers did not influence the ballistic limit. ► The ballistic limit was found to increase with an increase in target span diameter. ► In general, the bunt nosed projectile experienced higher ballistic limit velocity.</description><subject>ABAQUS</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</subject><subject>Layered target</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Ogives</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Projectile nose shape</subject><subject>Projectiles</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Spaced target</subject><subject>Span diameter</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><issn>0734-743X</issn><issn>1879-3509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLwzAYhoMoOKd_QXIjeNOaNM3pRpQxDzDwRsG7kqXJTGnTmmSC_96MTW-FQODjefN-eQC4xKjECLObrnSdGybjN2WFMM7DEqH6CMyw4LIgFMljMEOc1AWvyfspOIuxQwhzRNEM3C6tNTrB0cKkwsYkGCflofIt1KO3brMNKrnRw3zSh4Fr1fcuJqdh7waXzsGJVX00F4d7Dt4elq-Lp2L18vi8uF8VmnCaClIxw1purWBCSVoxyQ1DDMt1S9uKKmwJqqxWRKC1zhFtqGailoyrvCmTZA6u9-9OYfzcmpiawUVt-l55M25jk0UgIalgLKNsj-owxhiMbabgBhW-M7TjWNM1v8KanbDdPAvLwatDh4pa9TYor138S1eU5RIsMne350z-8JczoYnaGa9N60JW2bSj-6_qBwm7g3w</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Iqbal, M.A.</creator><creator>Gupta, P.K.</creator><creator>Deore, V.S.</creator><creator>Tak, S.K.</creator><creator>Tiwari, G.</creator><creator>Gupta, N.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Effect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit</title><author>Iqbal, M.A. ; Gupta, P.K. ; Deore, V.S. ; Tak, S.K. ; Tiwari, G. ; Gupta, N.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-326e6d7ff868a952697e60619bd5d25a1f302fca380bcc37ce5c684967a001693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>ABAQUS</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</topic><topic>Layered target</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Ogives</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Projectile nose shape</topic><topic>Projectiles</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Spaced target</topic><topic>Span diameter</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, P.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deore, V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tak, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, N.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of impact engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iqbal, M.A.</au><au>Gupta, P.K.</au><au>Deore, V.S.</au><au>Tak, S.K.</au><au>Tiwari, G.</au><au>Gupta, N.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit</atitle><jtitle>International journal of impact engineering</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>11-24</pages><issn>0734-743X</issn><eissn>1879-3509</eissn><coden>IJIED4</coden><abstract>Three-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out with ABAQUS/Explicit finite element code to study the influence of target span and configuration on its ballistic limit. 1 mm thick 1100-H12 aluminum targets of varying span diameter and configuration were impacted by blunt and ogive nosed projectiles of 19 mm diameter and 52.5 g mass. The effect of target span was studied by varying the span diameter of 1 mm thick monolithic target as 50 mm, 100 mm, 204 mm, 255 mm and 500 mm. The effect of configuration was studied by taking the monolithic, double layered in-contact and double layered spaced targets of 1 mm equivalent thickness and 255 mm span diameter. The spacing between the layers was varied as 2 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm. In each case the target was impacted normally by blunt and ogive nosed projectile to obtain the ballistic limit. The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target followed by layered in-contact and spaced targets respectively. The variation of spacing between the layers did not have significant influence on the ballistic limit in the case of ogive projectile but some effect was seen in the case of blunt projectile. The ballistic limit was found to increase with increase in target span diameter for both the projectiles and it was found to be higher for blunt nosed projectile as compared to that of ogive nosed projectile for all the spans considered excepting in the case of 50 mm span for which it was higher for ogive nosed projectile. ► The highest ballistic limit was observed for monolithic target. ► The ballistic limit of layered in-contact target was found higher than spaced target. ► The variation of spacing between the layers did not influence the ballistic limit. ► The ballistic limit was found to increase with an increase in target span diameter. ► In general, the bunt nosed projectile experienced higher ballistic limit velocity.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.10.004</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0734-743X
ispartof International journal of impact engineering, 2012-04, Vol.42, p.11-24
issn 0734-743X
1879-3509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010895866
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects ABAQUS
Computer simulation
Equivalence
Exact sciences and technology
Finite element method
Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)
Layered target
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Ogives
Physics
Projectile nose shape
Projectiles
Solid mechanics
Spaced target
Span diameter
Structural and continuum mechanics
Three dimensional
title Effect of target span and configuration on the ballistic limit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20target%20span%20and%20configuration%20on%20the%20ballistic%20limit&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20impact%20engineering&rft.au=Iqbal,%20M.A.&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=11-24&rft.issn=0734-743X&rft.eissn=1879-3509&rft.coden=IJIED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010895866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010895866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0734743X11001722&rfr_iscdi=true