Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects

Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry O 2 at 1073, 1173, and 1273 K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the SiO 2 thickness and composition of the Si 1 - x Ge x layer to determine the oxidat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2012-02, Vol.272, p.334-337
Hauptverfasser: Dedyulin, S.N., Goncharova, L.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 337
container_issue
container_start_page 334
container_title Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms
container_volume 272
creator Dedyulin, S.N.
Goncharova, L.V.
description Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry O 2 at 1073, 1173, and 1273 K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the SiO 2 thickness and composition of the Si 1 - x Ge x layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010883132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168583X11001182</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010883132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU89emnNx6ZNxYssugoLgq7gLeRjglnaZk26ov_elPXsMDCHed7hfQehS4Irgkl9va0G3-uKYkIqnLvlR2hGREPLlovFMZplSJRcsPdTdJbSFufijM8Q33xA7FVXhG9v1ejDUARXrKD0_a5Twwi2ePU3xUvoYFpYcGDGdI5OnOoSXPzNOXp7uN8sH8v18-ppebcuDWNsLBtsOdeNFtkIcNsKgQ22gLFzjNYcU0qsporUNYBVqqlNq7UGx5oFa61bsDm6OtzdxfC5hzTK3icDXXYGYZ9kzo6FYITRjNIDamJIKYKTu-h7FX8yNHG13MrpR3L6kcS5W55FtwcR5BBfHqJMxsNgwPqYc0ob_H_yX256bqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010883132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Dedyulin, S.N. ; Goncharova, L.V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dedyulin, S.N. ; Goncharova, L.V.</creatorcontrib><description>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry O 2 at 1073, 1173, and 1273 K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the SiO 2 thickness and composition of the Si 1 - x Ge x layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-583X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Damage ; Defects ; Implantation ; Oxidation ; Samples ; SiGe ; Silicon ; Silicon germanides ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Thermal oxidation</subject><ispartof>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2012-02, Vol.272, p.334-337</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dedyulin, S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goncharova, L.V.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</title><title>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms</title><description>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry O 2 at 1073, 1173, and 1273 K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the SiO 2 thickness and composition of the Si 1 - x Ge x layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.</description><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>SiGe</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Silicon germanides</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Thermal oxidation</subject><issn>0168-583X</issn><issn>1872-9584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU89emnNx6ZNxYssugoLgq7gLeRjglnaZk26ov_elPXsMDCHed7hfQehS4Irgkl9va0G3-uKYkIqnLvlR2hGREPLlovFMZplSJRcsPdTdJbSFufijM8Q33xA7FVXhG9v1ejDUARXrKD0_a5Twwi2ePU3xUvoYFpYcGDGdI5OnOoSXPzNOXp7uN8sH8v18-ppebcuDWNsLBtsOdeNFtkIcNsKgQ22gLFzjNYcU0qsporUNYBVqqlNq7UGx5oFa61bsDm6OtzdxfC5hzTK3icDXXYGYZ9kzo6FYITRjNIDamJIKYKTu-h7FX8yNHG13MrpR3L6kcS5W55FtwcR5BBfHqJMxsNgwPqYc0ob_H_yX256bqU</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Dedyulin, S.N.</creator><creator>Goncharova, L.V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</title><author>Dedyulin, S.N. ; Goncharova, L.V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>SiGe</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Silicon germanides</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Thermal oxidation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dedyulin, S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goncharova, L.V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dedyulin, S.N.</au><au>Goncharova, L.V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>272</volume><spage>334</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>334-337</pages><issn>0168-583X</issn><eissn>1872-9584</eissn><abstract>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry O 2 at 1073, 1173, and 1273 K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the SiO 2 thickness and composition of the Si 1 - x Ge x layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-583X
ispartof Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2012-02, Vol.272, p.334-337
issn 0168-583X
1872-9584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010883132
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Damage
Defects
Implantation
Oxidation
Samples
SiGe
Silicon
Silicon germanides
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Thermal oxidation
title Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A38%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermal%20oxidation%20of%20Ge-implanted%20Si:%20Role%20of%20defects&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20instruments%20&%20methods%20in%20physics%20research.%20Section%20B,%20Beam%20interactions%20with%20materials%20and%20atoms&rft.au=Dedyulin,%20S.N.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=272&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=334-337&rft.issn=0168-583X&rft.eissn=1872-9584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010883132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010883132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168583X11001182&rfr_iscdi=true