Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects
Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry O 2 at 1073, 1173, and 1273 K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the SiO 2 thickness and composition of the Si 1 - x Ge x layer to determine the oxidat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2012-02, Vol.272, p.334-337 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 337 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 334 |
container_title | Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms |
container_volume | 272 |
creator | Dedyulin, S.N. Goncharova, L.V. |
description | Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry
O
2
at 1073, 1173, and 1273
K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the
SiO
2
thickness and composition of the
Si
1
-
x
Ge
x
layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010883132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168583X11001182</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010883132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU89emnNx6ZNxYssugoLgq7gLeRjglnaZk26ov_elPXsMDCHed7hfQehS4Irgkl9va0G3-uKYkIqnLvlR2hGREPLlovFMZplSJRcsPdTdJbSFufijM8Q33xA7FVXhG9v1ejDUARXrKD0_a5Twwi2ePU3xUvoYFpYcGDGdI5OnOoSXPzNOXp7uN8sH8v18-ppebcuDWNsLBtsOdeNFtkIcNsKgQ22gLFzjNYcU0qsporUNYBVqqlNq7UGx5oFa61bsDm6OtzdxfC5hzTK3icDXXYGYZ9kzo6FYITRjNIDamJIKYKTu-h7FX8yNHG13MrpR3L6kcS5W55FtwcR5BBfHqJMxsNgwPqYc0ob_H_yX256bqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010883132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Dedyulin, S.N. ; Goncharova, L.V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dedyulin, S.N. ; Goncharova, L.V.</creatorcontrib><description>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry
O
2
at 1073, 1173, and 1273
K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the
SiO
2
thickness and composition of the
Si
1
-
x
Ge
x
layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-583X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Damage ; Defects ; Implantation ; Oxidation ; Samples ; SiGe ; Silicon ; Silicon germanides ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Thermal oxidation</subject><ispartof>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2012-02, Vol.272, p.334-337</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dedyulin, S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goncharova, L.V.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</title><title>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms</title><description>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry
O
2
at 1073, 1173, and 1273
K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the
SiO
2
thickness and composition of the
Si
1
-
x
Ge
x
layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.</description><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>SiGe</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Silicon germanides</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Thermal oxidation</subject><issn>0168-583X</issn><issn>1872-9584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU89emnNx6ZNxYssugoLgq7gLeRjglnaZk26ov_elPXsMDCHed7hfQehS4Irgkl9va0G3-uKYkIqnLvlR2hGREPLlovFMZplSJRcsPdTdJbSFufijM8Q33xA7FVXhG9v1ejDUARXrKD0_a5Twwi2ePU3xUvoYFpYcGDGdI5OnOoSXPzNOXp7uN8sH8v18-ppebcuDWNsLBtsOdeNFtkIcNsKgQ22gLFzjNYcU0qsporUNYBVqqlNq7UGx5oFa61bsDm6OtzdxfC5hzTK3icDXXYGYZ9kzo6FYITRjNIDamJIKYKTu-h7FX8yNHG13MrpR3L6kcS5W55FtwcR5BBfHqJMxsNgwPqYc0ob_H_yX256bqU</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Dedyulin, S.N.</creator><creator>Goncharova, L.V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</title><author>Dedyulin, S.N. ; Goncharova, L.V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-70d55b7b8872e5d9880c0de00ff32650221db2a166eedaa76c9bbbef37439df43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>SiGe</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Silicon germanides</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Thermal oxidation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dedyulin, S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goncharova, L.V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dedyulin, S.N.</au><au>Goncharova, L.V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>272</volume><spage>334</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>334-337</pages><issn>0168-583X</issn><eissn>1872-9584</eissn><abstract>Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si (SiGe) was carried out in dry
O
2
at 1073, 1173, and 1273
K for various times. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry in random and channeling geometry was used to characterize the
SiO
2
thickness and composition of the
Si
1
-
x
Ge
x
layer to determine the oxidation kinetics and to monitor changes in the Ge distribution in the implanted layer. Oxide thicknesses obtained in this work were compared with published results for SiGe from the Deal and Grove (DG) model perspective with modified constants for SiGe oxidation. Reasonable agreement between the data and the “ideal” DG curve is achieved, namely, the residuals are randomly scattered around zero, but the results of a statistical test suggest that the DG model equation explains only 70% of the variation of the data. The possible influence of point defects in implanted samples on the oxidation rate was further tested by preannealing the implantation damage. It was found that oxide thicknesses measured for preannealed samples differ from those for as implanted samples by less than 10%, which cannot explain the observed discrepancies with the DG model. We thus suggest that the implantation damage is being annealed during the thermal oxidation itself.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-583X |
ispartof | Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2012-02, Vol.272, p.334-337 |
issn | 0168-583X 1872-9584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010883132 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Damage Defects Implantation Oxidation Samples SiGe Silicon Silicon germanides Statistical analysis Statistical methods Thermal oxidation |
title | Thermal oxidation of Ge-implanted Si: Role of defects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A38%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermal%20oxidation%20of%20Ge-implanted%20Si:%20Role%20of%20defects&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20instruments%20&%20methods%20in%20physics%20research.%20Section%20B,%20Beam%20interactions%20with%20materials%20and%20atoms&rft.au=Dedyulin,%20S.N.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=272&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=334-337&rft.issn=0168-583X&rft.eissn=1872-9584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010883132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010883132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168583X11001182&rfr_iscdi=true |