Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals

Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2012-05, Vol.38 (3), p.686-708
1. Verfasser: Le Pelley, M. E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 708
container_issue 3
container_start_page 686
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 38
creator Le Pelley, M. E
description Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0026478
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010638617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ991430</ericid><sourcerecordid>916695338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-eea9f3d12a482622dba43983eab4348db96d4c14adbe3b0a323fdf29f314c32e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1rFDEUBuAgFrtWwR8gEhShN6NJTjIzuZKlrFrZKqi9HjKZMzV1JlmTGXH_fbN2twXB3CQkT958HEKecfaGM6jeGsZEKav6AVlwDbrgolYPyYKJqi4q0HBMHqd0zXYN6kfkWAihmGZqQaYLnIwNV95N7jfSi-B_4jbREOkypWCd-Tu99G40Q3pHv7lxMyD9is73IVoc0U90jSZ656_o6s9mMM4neuktxikPpy11nn4O_sc8Gn_IeUKO-tzh031_Qi7fr76ffSzWXz6cny3XhZVKTQWi0T10XBhZi1KIrjUSdA1oWgmy7lpddtJyaboWoWUGBPRdL_IeLi0IhBNyepu7ieHXjGlqRpcsDoPxGObUcMZZCXXJq0xf_kOvwxx9vl2jeVlqBVBn9Op_aBdVQSmZuj_VxpBSxL7ZxPzsuM2o2ZWrOZQr0xf7wLkdsbuDh_pk8HoPTLJm6KPx1qV7p_LHKC2ye37rMDp7t7z6pDWXwOAGKh2lfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916695338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Le Pelley, M. E</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Pelley, M. E</creatorcontrib><description>Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0026478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22250905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal cognition ; Animal Learning ; Animals ; Association Learning - physiology ; Associative Learning ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cognition - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Discrimination Learning ; Experimental psychology ; Feedback (Response) ; Feedback, Physiological ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Haplorhini ; Humans ; Learning ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Models, Psychological ; Monkeys ; Monkeys &amp; apes ; Perception ; Perceptual Discrimination ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Task Analysis ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2012-05, Vol.38 (3), p.686-708</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2012</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-eea9f3d12a482622dba43983eab4348db96d4c14adbe3b0a323fdf29f314c32e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ991430$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25826592$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22250905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Pelley, M. E</creatorcontrib><title>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animal Learning</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Association Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Associative Learning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Feedback, Physiological</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Haplorhini</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Monkeys &amp; apes</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Discrimination</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10V1rFDEUBuAgFrtWwR8gEhShN6NJTjIzuZKlrFrZKqi9HjKZMzV1JlmTGXH_fbN2twXB3CQkT958HEKecfaGM6jeGsZEKav6AVlwDbrgolYPyYKJqi4q0HBMHqd0zXYN6kfkWAihmGZqQaYLnIwNV95N7jfSi-B_4jbREOkypWCd-Tu99G40Q3pHv7lxMyD9is73IVoc0U90jSZ656_o6s9mMM4neuktxikPpy11nn4O_sc8Gn_IeUKO-tzh031_Qi7fr76ffSzWXz6cny3XhZVKTQWi0T10XBhZi1KIrjUSdA1oWgmy7lpddtJyaboWoWUGBPRdL_IeLi0IhBNyepu7ieHXjGlqRpcsDoPxGObUcMZZCXXJq0xf_kOvwxx9vl2jeVlqBVBn9Op_aBdVQSmZuj_VxpBSxL7ZxPzsuM2o2ZWrOZQr0xf7wLkdsbuDh_pk8HoPTLJm6KPx1qV7p_LHKC2ye37rMDp7t7z6pDWXwOAGKh2lfQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Le Pelley, M. E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</title><author>Le Pelley, M. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-eea9f3d12a482622dba43983eab4348db96d4c14adbe3b0a323fdf29f314c32e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animal Learning</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Association Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Associative Learning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Feedback, Physiological</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Haplorhini</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Monkeys &amp; apes</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Discrimination</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Pelley, M. E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Pelley, M. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ991430</ericid><atitle>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>686-708</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>22250905</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0026478</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2012-05, Vol.38 (3), p.686-708
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010638617
source APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE
subjects Animal
Animal cognition
Animal Learning
Animals
Association Learning - physiology
Associative Learning
Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior - physiology
Cognition - physiology
Computer Simulation
Discrimination Learning
Experimental psychology
Feedback (Response)
Feedback, Physiological
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Haplorhini
Humans
Learning
Learning. Memory
Memory
Metacognition
Models, Psychological
Monkeys
Monkeys & apes
Perception
Perceptual Discrimination
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reinforcement
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Task Analysis
Uncertainty
title Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T01%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metacognitive%20Monkeys%20or%20Associative%20Animals?%20Simple%20Reinforcement%20Learning%20Explains%20Uncertainty%20in%20Nonhuman%20Animals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Le%20Pelley,%20M.%20E&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=686-708&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0026478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916695338%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916695338&rft_id=info:pmid/22250905&rft_ericid=EJ991430&rfr_iscdi=true