Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals
Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2012-05, Vol.38 (3), p.686-708 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 708 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 686 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Le Pelley, M. E |
description | Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0026478 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010638617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ991430</ericid><sourcerecordid>916695338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-eea9f3d12a482622dba43983eab4348db96d4c14adbe3b0a323fdf29f314c32e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10V1rFDEUBuAgFrtWwR8gEhShN6NJTjIzuZKlrFrZKqi9HjKZMzV1JlmTGXH_fbN2twXB3CQkT958HEKecfaGM6jeGsZEKav6AVlwDbrgolYPyYKJqi4q0HBMHqd0zXYN6kfkWAihmGZqQaYLnIwNV95N7jfSi-B_4jbREOkypWCd-Tu99G40Q3pHv7lxMyD9is73IVoc0U90jSZ656_o6s9mMM4neuktxikPpy11nn4O_sc8Gn_IeUKO-tzh031_Qi7fr76ffSzWXz6cny3XhZVKTQWi0T10XBhZi1KIrjUSdA1oWgmy7lpddtJyaboWoWUGBPRdL_IeLi0IhBNyepu7ieHXjGlqRpcsDoPxGObUcMZZCXXJq0xf_kOvwxx9vl2jeVlqBVBn9Op_aBdVQSmZuj_VxpBSxL7ZxPzsuM2o2ZWrOZQr0xf7wLkdsbuDh_pk8HoPTLJm6KPx1qV7p_LHKC2ye37rMDp7t7z6pDWXwOAGKh2lfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916695338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Le Pelley, M. E</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Pelley, M. E</creatorcontrib><description>Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0026478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22250905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal cognition ; Animal Learning ; Animals ; Association Learning - physiology ; Associative Learning ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cognition - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Discrimination Learning ; Experimental psychology ; Feedback (Response) ; Feedback, Physiological ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Haplorhini ; Humans ; Learning ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Models, Psychological ; Monkeys ; Monkeys & apes ; Perception ; Perceptual Discrimination ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Task Analysis ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2012-05, Vol.38 (3), p.686-708</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2012</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-eea9f3d12a482622dba43983eab4348db96d4c14adbe3b0a323fdf29f314c32e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ991430$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25826592$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22250905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Pelley, M. E</creatorcontrib><title>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animal Learning</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Association Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Associative Learning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Feedback, Physiological</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Haplorhini</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Monkeys & apes</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Discrimination</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10V1rFDEUBuAgFrtWwR8gEhShN6NJTjIzuZKlrFrZKqi9HjKZMzV1JlmTGXH_fbN2twXB3CQkT958HEKecfaGM6jeGsZEKav6AVlwDbrgolYPyYKJqi4q0HBMHqd0zXYN6kfkWAihmGZqQaYLnIwNV95N7jfSi-B_4jbREOkypWCd-Tu99G40Q3pHv7lxMyD9is73IVoc0U90jSZ656_o6s9mMM4neuktxikPpy11nn4O_sc8Gn_IeUKO-tzh031_Qi7fr76ffSzWXz6cny3XhZVKTQWi0T10XBhZi1KIrjUSdA1oWgmy7lpddtJyaboWoWUGBPRdL_IeLi0IhBNyepu7ieHXjGlqRpcsDoPxGObUcMZZCXXJq0xf_kOvwxx9vl2jeVlqBVBn9Op_aBdVQSmZuj_VxpBSxL7ZxPzsuM2o2ZWrOZQr0xf7wLkdsbuDh_pk8HoPTLJm6KPx1qV7p_LHKC2ye37rMDp7t7z6pDWXwOAGKh2lfQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Le Pelley, M. E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</title><author>Le Pelley, M. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-eea9f3d12a482622dba43983eab4348db96d4c14adbe3b0a323fdf29f314c32e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animal Learning</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Association Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Associative Learning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Feedback, Physiological</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Haplorhini</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Monkeys & apes</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Discrimination</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Pelley, M. E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Pelley, M. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ991430</ericid><atitle>Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>686-708</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (Contains 12 figures and 9 footnotes.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>22250905</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0026478</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2012-05, Vol.38 (3), p.686-708 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010638617 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE |
subjects | Animal Animal cognition Animal Learning Animals Association Learning - physiology Associative Learning Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior - physiology Cognition - physiology Computer Simulation Discrimination Learning Experimental psychology Feedback (Response) Feedback, Physiological Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Haplorhini Humans Learning Learning. Memory Memory Metacognition Models, Psychological Monkeys Monkeys & apes Perception Perceptual Discrimination Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reinforcement Reinforcement (Psychology) Task Analysis Uncertainty |
title | Metacognitive Monkeys or Associative Animals? Simple Reinforcement Learning Explains Uncertainty in Nonhuman Animals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T01%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metacognitive%20Monkeys%20or%20Associative%20Animals?%20Simple%20Reinforcement%20Learning%20Explains%20Uncertainty%20in%20Nonhuman%20Animals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Le%20Pelley,%20M.%20E&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=686-708&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0026478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E916695338%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916695338&rft_id=info:pmid/22250905&rft_ericid=EJ991430&rfr_iscdi=true |