The Parentification Inventory: Development, Validation, and Cross-Validation

Despite the ubiquitous nature of parentification, few instruments allow for the empirical study of the roles, responsibilities, and processes that undergird this construct. To fill this need, the researchers developed and refined a new instrument, the Parentification Inventory (PI; Hooper, 2009 ). A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of family therapy 2011-05, Vol.39 (3), p.226-241
Hauptverfasser: Hooper, Lisa M., Doehler, Kirsten, Wallace, Scyatta A., Hannah, Natalie J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 241
container_issue 3
container_start_page 226
container_title The American journal of family therapy
container_volume 39
creator Hooper, Lisa M.
Doehler, Kirsten
Wallace, Scyatta A.
Hannah, Natalie J.
description Despite the ubiquitous nature of parentification, few instruments allow for the empirical study of the roles, responsibilities, and processes that undergird this construct. To fill this need, the researchers developed and refined a new instrument, the Parentification Inventory (PI; Hooper, 2009 ). A sample of 847 college students was split into two random, non-overlapping samples. For these initial survey development and cross-validation studies, the factor structure and psychometric properties of the PI were examined. To assess the PI's reliability, the researchers conducted an exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) using the first sub-sample of 431 students (mean age = 20.86, SD = 3.55). The researchers used the results to refine the PI and conducted a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2) using the second, non-overlapping sample of 416 students (mean age = 20.89, SD = 3.83). The best fitting and most parsimonious model resulted in 22 items that cohered into three unique, replicable factors that were found to be fairly stable and associated, although small in magnitude, with mental health constructs and psychopathology in theoretically expected directions. Implications and directions for future research on the measurement of parentification are considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01926187.2010.531652
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010634911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2469319781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-fb9e4edd9f921fe72deb654317e79c0b97674f6cc6c9881d9610db75c4a44563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMXgykWnJpNMMnEjUl-Fgi6K25DJA1Omk5pMK_33ZhxFcOHqcg7fPdx7ADhHcIpgBa8g4gVFFZsWMFklRrQsDsAIlQXKIa7wIRj1SN4zx-AkxhWEiSTFCCyWbyZ7kcG0nbNOyc75Npu3u6R92F9nd2ZnGr9ZJz3JXmXj9BcyyWSrs1nwMea_7ik4srKJ5ux7jsHy4X45e8oXz4_z2e0iV5iyLrc1N8RozS0vkDWs0KamJcGIGcYVrDmjjFiqFFW8qpDmFEFds1IRSUhJ8RhcDrGb4N-3JnZi7aIyTSNb47dRoPQbxYQjlNCLP-jKb0ObjhMVJ4hXuCwTRAZI9f8EY8UmuLUM-5Qk-oLFT8GiL1gMBae1m2HNtdaHtfzwodGik_vGBxtkq1wU-N-ET9phgOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>894198355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Parentification Inventory: Development, Validation, and Cross-Validation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Hooper, Lisa M. ; Doehler, Kirsten ; Wallace, Scyatta A. ; Hannah, Natalie J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Lisa M. ; Doehler, Kirsten ; Wallace, Scyatta A. ; Hannah, Natalie J.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the ubiquitous nature of parentification, few instruments allow for the empirical study of the roles, responsibilities, and processes that undergird this construct. To fill this need, the researchers developed and refined a new instrument, the Parentification Inventory (PI; Hooper, 2009 ). A sample of 847 college students was split into two random, non-overlapping samples. For these initial survey development and cross-validation studies, the factor structure and psychometric properties of the PI were examined. To assess the PI's reliability, the researchers conducted an exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) using the first sub-sample of 431 students (mean age = 20.86, SD = 3.55). The researchers used the results to refine the PI and conducted a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2) using the second, non-overlapping sample of 416 students (mean age = 20.89, SD = 3.83). The best fitting and most parsimonious model resulted in 22 items that cohered into three unique, replicable factors that were found to be fairly stable and associated, although small in magnitude, with mental health constructs and psychopathology in theoretically expected directions. Implications and directions for future research on the measurement of parentification are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2010.531652</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJFTDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect ; College Students ; Discriminant analysis ; Mental Health ; Psychopathology ; Roles ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>The American journal of family therapy, 2011-05, Vol.39 (3), p.226-241</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Brunner-Mazel Publishing Company 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-fb9e4edd9f921fe72deb654317e79c0b97674f6cc6c9881d9610db75c4a44563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33755,33756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doehler, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Scyatta A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Natalie J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Parentification Inventory: Development, Validation, and Cross-Validation</title><title>The American journal of family therapy</title><description>Despite the ubiquitous nature of parentification, few instruments allow for the empirical study of the roles, responsibilities, and processes that undergird this construct. To fill this need, the researchers developed and refined a new instrument, the Parentification Inventory (PI; Hooper, 2009 ). A sample of 847 college students was split into two random, non-overlapping samples. For these initial survey development and cross-validation studies, the factor structure and psychometric properties of the PI were examined. To assess the PI's reliability, the researchers conducted an exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) using the first sub-sample of 431 students (mean age = 20.86, SD = 3.55). The researchers used the results to refine the PI and conducted a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2) using the second, non-overlapping sample of 416 students (mean age = 20.89, SD = 3.83). The best fitting and most parsimonious model resulted in 22 items that cohered into three unique, replicable factors that were found to be fairly stable and associated, although small in magnitude, with mental health constructs and psychopathology in theoretically expected directions. Implications and directions for future research on the measurement of parentification are considered.</description><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0192-6187</issn><issn>1521-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMXgykWnJpNMMnEjUl-Fgi6K25DJA1Omk5pMK_33ZhxFcOHqcg7fPdx7ADhHcIpgBa8g4gVFFZsWMFklRrQsDsAIlQXKIa7wIRj1SN4zx-AkxhWEiSTFCCyWbyZ7kcG0nbNOyc75Npu3u6R92F9nd2ZnGr9ZJz3JXmXj9BcyyWSrs1nwMea_7ik4srKJ5ux7jsHy4X45e8oXz4_z2e0iV5iyLrc1N8RozS0vkDWs0KamJcGIGcYVrDmjjFiqFFW8qpDmFEFds1IRSUhJ8RhcDrGb4N-3JnZi7aIyTSNb47dRoPQbxYQjlNCLP-jKb0ObjhMVJ4hXuCwTRAZI9f8EY8UmuLUM-5Qk-oLFT8GiL1gMBae1m2HNtdaHtfzwodGik_vGBxtkq1wU-N-ET9phgOY</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Hooper, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Doehler, Kirsten</creator><creator>Wallace, Scyatta A.</creator><creator>Hannah, Natalie J.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Brunner-Mazel Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>The Parentification Inventory: Development, Validation, and Cross-Validation</title><author>Hooper, Lisa M. ; Doehler, Kirsten ; Wallace, Scyatta A. ; Hannah, Natalie J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-fb9e4edd9f921fe72deb654317e79c0b97674f6cc6c9881d9610db75c4a44563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child abuse &amp; neglect</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doehler, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Scyatta A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Natalie J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American journal of family therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooper, Lisa M.</au><au>Doehler, Kirsten</au><au>Wallace, Scyatta A.</au><au>Hannah, Natalie J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Parentification Inventory: Development, Validation, and Cross-Validation</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of family therapy</jtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>226-241</pages><issn>0192-6187</issn><eissn>1521-0383</eissn><coden>AJFTDE</coden><abstract>Despite the ubiquitous nature of parentification, few instruments allow for the empirical study of the roles, responsibilities, and processes that undergird this construct. To fill this need, the researchers developed and refined a new instrument, the Parentification Inventory (PI; Hooper, 2009 ). A sample of 847 college students was split into two random, non-overlapping samples. For these initial survey development and cross-validation studies, the factor structure and psychometric properties of the PI were examined. To assess the PI's reliability, the researchers conducted an exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) using the first sub-sample of 431 students (mean age = 20.86, SD = 3.55). The researchers used the results to refine the PI and conducted a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2) using the second, non-overlapping sample of 416 students (mean age = 20.89, SD = 3.83). The best fitting and most parsimonious model resulted in 22 items that cohered into three unique, replicable factors that were found to be fairly stable and associated, although small in magnitude, with mental health constructs and psychopathology in theoretically expected directions. Implications and directions for future research on the measurement of parentification are considered.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01926187.2010.531652</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-6187
ispartof The American journal of family therapy, 2011-05, Vol.39 (3), p.226-241
issn 0192-6187
1521-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010634911
source Sociological Abstracts; Education Source
subjects Child abuse & neglect
College Students
Discriminant analysis
Mental Health
Psychopathology
Roles
Validation studies
title The Parentification Inventory: Development, Validation, and Cross-Validation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Parentification%20Inventory:%20Development,%20Validation,%20and%20Cross-Validation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20family%20therapy&rft.au=Hooper,%20Lisa%20M.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=226-241&rft.issn=0192-6187&rft.eissn=1521-0383&rft.coden=AJFTDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01926187.2010.531652&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2469319781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=894198355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true