Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis
In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Societ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2012-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1504-1508 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1508 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1504 |
| container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD Veith, Frank J., MD |
| description | In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society of Cardiology, the Australasian, and the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. As the recommendations of these five guideline committees were based on the same published literature, it would be expected that they are similar, at least to a large extent. Surprisingly, there were considerable differences between the five guidelines regarding the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid patients. The differences in the recommendations between the five Guideline Committees are analyzed and discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010495785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521412004314</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010495785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-118360d18243d61c910bde1650a2b94f96ab6ff50f849af6ebff057a60a803d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGr1DAUhYMovnlPf4Ab6UZw03pvm6QtgvAY9CkMuFDXIU1vNLVtxqQdeP_e1BkVXLjKIt85Cd9h7BlCgYDy1VAMp1iUgGUBWEDDH7AdQlvnsoH2IdtBzTEXJfIrdh3jAIAomvoxuypLwcuK1zt22PvpqIOLfs68zZZvlFl3oiyVYvZ1dT2NbqaYWR9-XS6B9DLRvGy00cEvrs_iQrOPLj5hj6weIz29nDfsy7u3n_fv88PHuw_720NuBK-XHLGpJPTYlLzqJZoWoesJpQBddi23rdSdtFaAbXirraTOWhC1lqAbqPq2umEvz73H4H-sFBc1uWhoHPVMfo0qyQHeiroRCcUzaoKPMZBVx-AmHe4TtHFSDSpJVJtEBaiSxJR5fqlfu4n6P4nf1hLw4gLoaPRog56Ni3850QhIWOJenzlKMk6OgorG0Wyod4HMonrv_vuNN_-kTdrCpQe_0z3Fwa9hTpYVqpgy6tO29jY2lgC8Ql79BBVdonQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010495785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD ; Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD ; Veith, Frank J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD ; Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD ; Veith, Frank J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society of Cardiology, the Australasian, and the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. As the recommendations of these five guideline committees were based on the same published literature, it would be expected that they are similar, at least to a large extent. Surprisingly, there were considerable differences between the five guidelines regarding the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid patients. The differences in the recommendations between the five Guideline Committees are analyzed and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22542347</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JVSUES</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty - adverse effects ; Angioplasty - instrumentation ; Angioplasty - standards ; Asymptomatic Diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carotid Stenosis - complications ; Carotid Stenosis - surgery ; Carotid Stenosis - therapy ; Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects ; Endarterectomy, Carotid - standards ; Evidence-Based Medicine - standards ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Neurology ; Patient Selection ; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards ; Risk Assessment ; Societies, Medical - standards ; Stents - standards ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2012-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1504-1508</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-118360d18243d61c910bde1650a2b94f96ab6ff50f849af6ebff057a60a803d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-118360d18243d61c910bde1650a2b94f96ab6ff50f849af6ebff057a60a803d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25850473$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veith, Frank J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society of Cardiology, the Australasian, and the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. As the recommendations of these five guideline committees were based on the same published literature, it would be expected that they are similar, at least to a large extent. Surprisingly, there were considerable differences between the five guidelines regarding the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid patients. The differences in the recommendations between the five Guideline Committees are analyzed and discussed.</description><subject>Angioplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Angioplasty - standards</subject><subject>Asymptomatic Diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid - standards</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Stents - standards</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGr1DAUhYMovnlPf4Ab6UZw03pvm6QtgvAY9CkMuFDXIU1vNLVtxqQdeP_e1BkVXLjKIt85Cd9h7BlCgYDy1VAMp1iUgGUBWEDDH7AdQlvnsoH2IdtBzTEXJfIrdh3jAIAomvoxuypLwcuK1zt22PvpqIOLfs68zZZvlFl3oiyVYvZ1dT2NbqaYWR9-XS6B9DLRvGy00cEvrs_iQrOPLj5hj6weIz29nDfsy7u3n_fv88PHuw_720NuBK-XHLGpJPTYlLzqJZoWoesJpQBddi23rdSdtFaAbXirraTOWhC1lqAbqPq2umEvz73H4H-sFBc1uWhoHPVMfo0qyQHeiroRCcUzaoKPMZBVx-AmHe4TtHFSDSpJVJtEBaiSxJR5fqlfu4n6P4nf1hLw4gLoaPRog56Ni3850QhIWOJenzlKMk6OgorG0Wyod4HMonrv_vuNN_-kTdrCpQe_0z3Fwa9hTpYVqpgy6tO29jY2lgC8Ql79BBVdonQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD</creator><creator>Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD</creator><creator>Veith, Frank J., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis</title><author>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD ; Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD ; Veith, Frank J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-118360d18243d61c910bde1650a2b94f96ab6ff50f849af6ebff057a60a803d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Angioplasty - standards</topic><topic>Asymptomatic Diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid - standards</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Stents - standards</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veith, Frank J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paraskevas, Kosmas I., MD</au><au>Mikhailidis, Dimitri P., MD</au><au>Veith, Frank J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1504</spage><epage>1508</epage><pages>1504-1508</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><coden>JVSUES</coden><abstract>In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society of Cardiology, the Australasian, and the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. As the recommendations of these five guideline committees were based on the same published literature, it would be expected that they are similar, at least to a large extent. Surprisingly, there were considerable differences between the five guidelines regarding the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid patients. The differences in the recommendations between the five Guideline Committees are analyzed and discussed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22542347</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
| ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2012-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1504-1508 |
| issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010495785 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Angioplasty - adverse effects Angioplasty - instrumentation Angioplasty - standards Asymptomatic Diseases Biological and medical sciences Carotid Stenosis - complications Carotid Stenosis - surgery Carotid Stenosis - therapy Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects Endarterectomy, Carotid - standards Evidence-Based Medicine - standards Humans Medical sciences Neurology Patient Selection Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Risk Assessment Societies, Medical - standards Stents - standards Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Treatment Outcome Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels |
| title | Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T21%3A03%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20five%202011%20guidelines%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20carotid%20stenosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Paraskevas,%20Kosmas%20I.,%20MD&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1504&rft.epage=1508&rft.pages=1504-1508&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft.coden=JVSUES&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010495785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010495785&rft_id=info:pmid/22542347&rft_els_id=S0741521412004314&rfr_iscdi=true |