Complete sequence analysis of 18S rDNA based on genomic DNA extraction from individual Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae)

[Display omitted] ► Improving Demodex mite gDNA extraction and PCR examination technique. ► gDNA of single Demodex mite has been extracted successfully for the first time. ► It could satisfy the demands of Demodex 18S rDNA study at gene level. ► 18S rDNA is unsuitable for molecular identification at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental parasitology 2012-05, Vol.131 (1), p.45-51
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Ya-E., Xu, Ji-Ru, Hu, Li, Wu, Li-Ping, Wang, Zheng-Hang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] ► Improving Demodex mite gDNA extraction and PCR examination technique. ► gDNA of single Demodex mite has been extracted successfully for the first time. ► It could satisfy the demands of Demodex 18S rDNA study at gene level. ► 18S rDNA is unsuitable for molecular identification at Demodex genus or below. ► 18S rDNA molecular data is suitable for family taxomomy in Cheyletoidea. The study for the first time attempted to accomplish 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) complete sequence amplification and analysis for three Demodex species (Demodex folliculorum, Demodex brevis and Demodex canis) based on gDNA extraction from individual mites. The mites were treated by DNA Release Additive and Hot Start II DNA Polymerase so as to promote mite disruption and increase PCR specificity. Determination of D. folliculorum gDNA showed that the gDNA yield reached the highest at 1 mite, tending to descend with the increase of mite number. The individual mite gDNA was successfully used for 18S rDNA fragment (about 900bp) amplification examination. The alignments of 18S rDNA complete sequences of individual mite samples and those of pooled mite samples (⩾1000mites/sample) showed over 97% identities for each species, indicating that the gDNA extracted from a single individual mite was as satisfactory as that from pooled mites for PCR amplification. Further pairwise sequence analyses showed that average divergence, genetic distance, transition/transversion or phylogenetic tree could not effectively identify the three Demodex species, largely due to the differentiation in the D. canis isolates. It can be concluded that the individual Demodex mite gDNA can satisfy the molecular study of Demodex. 18S rDNA complete sequence is suitable for interfamily identification in Cheyletoidea, but whether it is suitable for intrafamily identification cannot be confirmed until the ascertainment of the types of Demodex mites parasitizing in dogs.
ISSN:0014-4894
1090-2449
DOI:10.1016/j.exppara.2012.02.025