Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) slings in breast reconstruction are increasingly used but are not yet validated. This study compares immediate, expander-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of inferolateral ADM slings. There were 63 patients (106 breasts) in the ADM group and 42 patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2012-05, Vol.68 (5), p.425-428
Hauptverfasser: Collis, George N, TerKonda, Sarvam P, Waldorf, James C, Perdikis, Galen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 428
container_issue 5
container_start_page 425
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 68
creator Collis, George N
TerKonda, Sarvam P
Waldorf, James C
Perdikis, Galen
description Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) slings in breast reconstruction are increasingly used but are not yet validated. This study compares immediate, expander-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of inferolateral ADM slings. There were 63 patients (106 breasts) in the ADM group and 42 patients (68 breasts) in the control group. Initial intraoperative fill volumes were significantly greater in the ADM group, median 69% full (250 mL) versus 50% full (180 mL; P < 0.001). However, the number of days to complete expansion between the 2 groups was similar. One less office visit was required to complete the fills in the ADM group (P < 0.01). Drains were removed 3 days later in the ADM group (P < 0.01). Overall complication rate was greater in the ADM group (18.9% vs. 7.4%, P < 0.05), with a slightly higher percentage of expanders requiring removal due to infection in the ADM group (5.7% vs. 4.4%, P = NS). This study suggests inferolateral ADM slings in expander-based breast reconstruction allow for significantly increased initial fill volumes and may offer an aesthetic advantage; however, its use is costly and increases complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318225833f
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010234745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1010234745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-386bf2b93727733a65cec661f03f2bd56cc467bba1ac55be6f7081c85dc605a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMotlb_A5Ecvawmm01214uU4hcUFOx9SbKzNrIfNZOF-t-b0urBywwMv_eG9wi55OyGszK_fZ-_3TDDuADBizSVhRDNEZlyKVQiclYckynjWZHkLBMTcob4yRhPi0ydkkkaFbJU5ZSs5xbadmy1pzX4Tre008G7LcXW9R9IXU-DQxyBwnaj-8hQ40FjoB7s0GPwow1u6O-o9kDDGuLE0WDQfXDRzUAPjQt4f05OGt0iXBz2jKweH1aL52T5-vSymC8Tm0oVElEo06SmFHma50JoJS1YpXjDRDzXUlmbqdwYzbWV0oBqYlRuC1lbxaQWM3K9t9344WsEDFXncBdR9zCMWHHGWSqyPJMRzfao9QOih6baeNdp_x2haldxFSuu_lccZVeHD6PpoP4T_XYqfgAFDno7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010234745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Collis, George N ; TerKonda, Sarvam P ; Waldorf, James C ; Perdikis, Galen</creator><creatorcontrib>Collis, George N ; TerKonda, Sarvam P ; Waldorf, James C ; Perdikis, Galen</creatorcontrib><description>Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) slings in breast reconstruction are increasingly used but are not yet validated. This study compares immediate, expander-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of inferolateral ADM slings. There were 63 patients (106 breasts) in the ADM group and 42 patients (68 breasts) in the control group. Initial intraoperative fill volumes were significantly greater in the ADM group, median 69% full (250 mL) versus 50% full (180 mL; P &lt; 0.001). However, the number of days to complete expansion between the 2 groups was similar. One less office visit was required to complete the fills in the ADM group (P &lt; 0.01). Drains were removed 3 days later in the ADM group (P &lt; 0.01). Overall complication rate was greater in the ADM group (18.9% vs. 7.4%, P &lt; 0.05), with a slightly higher percentage of expanders requiring removal due to infection in the ADM group (5.7% vs. 4.4%, P = NS). This study suggests inferolateral ADM slings in expander-based breast reconstruction allow for significantly increased initial fill volumes and may offer an aesthetic advantage; however, its use is costly and increases complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318225833f</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21825969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials - administration &amp; dosage ; Breast Implantation ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Collagen - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - instrumentation ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tissue Expansion Devices ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2012-05, Vol.68 (5), p.425-428</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-386bf2b93727733a65cec661f03f2bd56cc467bba1ac55be6f7081c85dc605a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21825969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collis, George N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TerKonda, Sarvam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldorf, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdikis, Galen</creatorcontrib><title>Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) slings in breast reconstruction are increasingly used but are not yet validated. This study compares immediate, expander-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of inferolateral ADM slings. There were 63 patients (106 breasts) in the ADM group and 42 patients (68 breasts) in the control group. Initial intraoperative fill volumes were significantly greater in the ADM group, median 69% full (250 mL) versus 50% full (180 mL; P &lt; 0.001). However, the number of days to complete expansion between the 2 groups was similar. One less office visit was required to complete the fills in the ADM group (P &lt; 0.01). Drains were removed 3 days later in the ADM group (P &lt; 0.01). Overall complication rate was greater in the ADM group (18.9% vs. 7.4%, P &lt; 0.05), with a slightly higher percentage of expanders requiring removal due to infection in the ADM group (5.7% vs. 4.4%, P = NS). This study suggests inferolateral ADM slings in expander-based breast reconstruction allow for significantly increased initial fill volumes and may offer an aesthetic advantage; however, its use is costly and increases complications.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Breast Implantation</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Collagen - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion Devices</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMotlb_A5Ecvawmm01214uU4hcUFOx9SbKzNrIfNZOF-t-b0urBywwMv_eG9wi55OyGszK_fZ-_3TDDuADBizSVhRDNEZlyKVQiclYckynjWZHkLBMTcob4yRhPi0ydkkkaFbJU5ZSs5xbadmy1pzX4Tre008G7LcXW9R9IXU-DQxyBwnaj-8hQ40FjoB7s0GPwow1u6O-o9kDDGuLE0WDQfXDRzUAPjQt4f05OGt0iXBz2jKweH1aL52T5-vSymC8Tm0oVElEo06SmFHma50JoJS1YpXjDRDzXUlmbqdwYzbWV0oBqYlRuC1lbxaQWM3K9t9344WsEDFXncBdR9zCMWHHGWSqyPJMRzfao9QOih6baeNdp_x2haldxFSuu_lccZVeHD6PpoP4T_XYqfgAFDno7</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Collis, George N</creator><creator>TerKonda, Sarvam P</creator><creator>Waldorf, James C</creator><creator>Perdikis, Galen</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?</title><author>Collis, George N ; TerKonda, Sarvam P ; Waldorf, James C ; Perdikis, Galen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-386bf2b93727733a65cec661f03f2bd56cc467bba1ac55be6f7081c85dc605a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Breast Implantation</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Collagen - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion Devices</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collis, George N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TerKonda, Sarvam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldorf, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perdikis, Galen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collis, George N</au><au>TerKonda, Sarvam P</au><au>Waldorf, James C</au><au>Perdikis, Galen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>425-428</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) slings in breast reconstruction are increasingly used but are not yet validated. This study compares immediate, expander-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of inferolateral ADM slings. There were 63 patients (106 breasts) in the ADM group and 42 patients (68 breasts) in the control group. Initial intraoperative fill volumes were significantly greater in the ADM group, median 69% full (250 mL) versus 50% full (180 mL; P &lt; 0.001). However, the number of days to complete expansion between the 2 groups was similar. One less office visit was required to complete the fills in the ADM group (P &lt; 0.01). Drains were removed 3 days later in the ADM group (P &lt; 0.01). Overall complication rate was greater in the ADM group (18.9% vs. 7.4%, P &lt; 0.05), with a slightly higher percentage of expanders requiring removal due to infection in the ADM group (5.7% vs. 4.4%, P = NS). This study suggests inferolateral ADM slings in expander-based breast reconstruction allow for significantly increased initial fill volumes and may offer an aesthetic advantage; however, its use is costly and increases complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21825969</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0b013e318225833f</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2012-05, Vol.68 (5), p.425-428
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1010234745
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Biocompatible Materials - administration & dosage
Breast Implantation
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Collagen - administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - instrumentation
Mammaplasty - methods
Mastectomy
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Tissue Expansion Devices
Treatment Outcome
title Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: are there substantial benefits?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A36%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acellular%20dermal%20matrix%20slings%20in%20tissue%20expander%20breast%20reconstruction:%20are%20there%20substantial%20benefits?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Collis,%20George%20N&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=425-428&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318225833f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010234745%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010234745&rft_id=info:pmid/21825969&rfr_iscdi=true