Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of electrosurgical pulpotomy of human primary molars with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) cements. In this randomized clinical trial study, 120 primary second molar teeth were treated by electros...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry 2011-01, Vol.36 (2), p.133-138 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 138 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 133 |
| container_title | The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Nematollahi, H Sahebnasagh, M Parisay, I |
| description | The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of electrosurgical pulpotomy of human primary molars with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) cements.
In this randomized clinical trial study, 120 primary second molar teeth were treated by electrosurgical pulpotomy. Teeth were randomly assigned to two groups according to whether ZOE or ZPC cement was used as a sub-base. Teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 3, 6, and 12 months by two independent examiners. Clinical treatment outcomes and radiographic findings were statistically analyzed using Fishers' exact test with statistically significant differences defined for P < 0.05.
At 12 months, the clinical and radiographic success rates in the ZOE group were 98.2% and 84.2% and in the ZPC group were 96.2% and 75%, respectively (P > 0.05 for all).
The outcomes of this study suggested that either ZPC or ZOE sub-base have similar clinical and radiographic success in electrosurgical pulpotomy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.17796/jcpd.36.2.3527457504x6k880 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1009525872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1009525872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-6cb46f0be73c2969ab01f4298de026e240e5af7f78138c8f162d67104fc90e043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtu3DAMRYWiQfP8hUJAN914QuttdFUM8gICZJOsDVmmZpzKlivZ6Ey-Pm4m7SIrEsS95OUh5FsJq1LrSl0-u7FdcbViKy6ZFlJLEDv1yxj4RE5KKXUhmTKflx4kL4Ri5pic5vwMAEYZ-EKOGZNMgOYnZLuO_WhTl-NAo6cY0E0p5jltOmcDHecwxin2e_qnm7b0pRscjbuuRYrzBocYaEyH6RjD3tnUxN0-2Ampwx6HKdM8N0VjM56TI29Dxov3ekaerq8e17fF_cPN3frnfeG4FlOhXCOUhwY1d6xSlW2g9IJVpkVgCpfUKK3XXpuSG2d8qVirdAnCuwoQBD8j3w97xxR_z5inuu-ywxDsgHHOdQlQSSaNZov0x0Hqlo9zQl-Pqett2i-i-g11_Rd1zVXN6o-oF_fX90Nz02P73_uPLX8FaKx-jg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009525872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nematollahi, H ; Sahebnasagh, M ; Parisay, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Nematollahi, H ; Sahebnasagh, M ; Parisay, I</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of electrosurgical pulpotomy of human primary molars with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) cements.
In this randomized clinical trial study, 120 primary second molar teeth were treated by electrosurgical pulpotomy. Teeth were randomly assigned to two groups according to whether ZOE or ZPC cement was used as a sub-base. Teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 3, 6, and 12 months by two independent examiners. Clinical treatment outcomes and radiographic findings were statistically analyzed using Fishers' exact test with statistically significant differences defined for P < 0.05.
At 12 months, the clinical and radiographic success rates in the ZOE group were 98.2% and 84.2% and in the ZPC group were 96.2% and 75%, respectively (P > 0.05 for all).
The outcomes of this study suggested that either ZPC or ZOE sub-base have similar clinical and radiographic success in electrosurgical pulpotomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-4628</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-5268</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.36.2.3527457504x6k880</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22524073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Dentistry ; Electrosurgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Molar ; Polycarboxylate Cement - therapeutic use ; Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents - therapeutic use ; Pulpotomy - methods ; Tooth, Deciduous ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2011-01, Vol.36 (2), p.133-138</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-6cb46f0be73c2969ab01f4298de026e240e5af7f78138c8f162d67104fc90e043</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22524073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nematollahi, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahebnasagh, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisay, I</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base</title><title>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>J Clin Pediatr Dent</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of electrosurgical pulpotomy of human primary molars with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) cements.
In this randomized clinical trial study, 120 primary second molar teeth were treated by electrosurgical pulpotomy. Teeth were randomly assigned to two groups according to whether ZOE or ZPC cement was used as a sub-base. Teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 3, 6, and 12 months by two independent examiners. Clinical treatment outcomes and radiographic findings were statistically analyzed using Fishers' exact test with statistically significant differences defined for P < 0.05.
At 12 months, the clinical and radiographic success rates in the ZOE group were 98.2% and 84.2% and in the ZPC group were 96.2% and 75%, respectively (P > 0.05 for all).
The outcomes of this study suggested that either ZPC or ZOE sub-base have similar clinical and radiographic success in electrosurgical pulpotomy.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electrosurgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Polycarboxylate Cement - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pulpotomy - methods</subject><subject>Tooth, Deciduous</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1053-4628</issn><issn>1557-5268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtu3DAMRYWiQfP8hUJAN914QuttdFUM8gICZJOsDVmmZpzKlivZ6Ey-Pm4m7SIrEsS95OUh5FsJq1LrSl0-u7FdcbViKy6ZFlJLEDv1yxj4RE5KKXUhmTKflx4kL4Ri5pic5vwMAEYZ-EKOGZNMgOYnZLuO_WhTl-NAo6cY0E0p5jltOmcDHecwxin2e_qnm7b0pRscjbuuRYrzBocYaEyH6RjD3tnUxN0-2Ampwx6HKdM8N0VjM56TI29Dxov3ekaerq8e17fF_cPN3frnfeG4FlOhXCOUhwY1d6xSlW2g9IJVpkVgCpfUKK3XXpuSG2d8qVirdAnCuwoQBD8j3w97xxR_z5inuu-ywxDsgHHOdQlQSSaNZov0x0Hqlo9zQl-Pqett2i-i-g11_Rd1zVXN6o-oF_fX90Nz02P73_uPLX8FaKx-jg</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Nematollahi, H</creator><creator>Sahebnasagh, M</creator><creator>Parisay, I</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base</title><author>Nematollahi, H ; Sahebnasagh, M ; Parisay, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-6cb46f0be73c2969ab01f4298de026e240e5af7f78138c8f162d67104fc90e043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electrosurgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Polycarboxylate Cement - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pulpotomy - methods</topic><topic>Tooth, Deciduous</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nematollahi, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahebnasagh, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisay, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nematollahi, H</au><au>Sahebnasagh, M</au><au>Parisay, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>133-138</pages><issn>1053-4628</issn><eissn>1557-5268</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of electrosurgical pulpotomy of human primary molars with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) cements.
In this randomized clinical trial study, 120 primary second molar teeth were treated by electrosurgical pulpotomy. Teeth were randomly assigned to two groups according to whether ZOE or ZPC cement was used as a sub-base. Teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 3, 6, and 12 months by two independent examiners. Clinical treatment outcomes and radiographic findings were statistically analyzed using Fishers' exact test with statistically significant differences defined for P < 0.05.
At 12 months, the clinical and radiographic success rates in the ZOE group were 98.2% and 84.2% and in the ZPC group were 96.2% and 75%, respectively (P > 0.05 for all).
The outcomes of this study suggested that either ZPC or ZOE sub-base have similar clinical and radiographic success in electrosurgical pulpotomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22524073</pmid><doi>10.17796/jcpd.36.2.3527457504x6k880</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1053-4628 |
| ispartof | The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2011-01, Vol.36 (2), p.133-138 |
| issn | 1053-4628 1557-5268 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1009525872 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Child, Preschool Dentistry Electrosurgery Female Humans Male Molar Polycarboxylate Cement - therapeutic use Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents - therapeutic use Pulpotomy - methods Tooth, Deciduous Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - therapeutic use |
| title | Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A43%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20electrosurgical%20pulpotomy%20with%20zinc%20oxide%20eugenol%20or%20zinc%20polycarboxylate%20cements%20sub-base&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20clinical%20pediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Nematollahi,%20H&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=133-138&rft.issn=1053-4628&rft.eissn=1557-5268&rft_id=info:doi/10.17796/jcpd.36.2.3527457504x6k880&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1009525872%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009525872&rft_id=info:pmid/22524073&rfr_iscdi=true |