Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction
Abstract Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of sports medicine 2011-05, Vol.32 (5), p.386-392 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 392 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 386 |
container_title | International journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Shidahara, H. Deie, M. Niimoto, T. Shimada, N. Toriyama, M. Adachi, N. Hirata, K. Urabe, Y. Ochi, M. |
description | Abstract
Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0031-1271675 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1008847337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008847337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-569f4e1d95620a4ebf38294b8c7bc2519bbe408e8630be4eecce4c4eb44041ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKtb17MR3KTeJHceWZbiCwuKj3XIpDd0SjtTkxmh_96UFneu7l1853DOYexawERAnt9FDqAEF7IURZmfsJFApbnSBZ6yEYhSciykPGcXMa4ABGqhRky_hS5uyfXND2Uf_bDYZZ3PXpqWYr-k2Nhs6nsK2XQ2z97JdW3sw5Dorr1kZ96uI10d75h9Pdx_zp74_PXxeTadc4dQ9DwvtEcSC50XEixS7VUlNdaVK2snc6HrmhAqqgoF6SNyjtAlDhFQkFdjdnvw3Ybue0ixzKaJjtZr21I3RCMAqgpLpcqETg6oS6ViIG-2odnYsEuQ2W9kotlvZI4bJcHN0dtGZ9c-2NY18U8lUciUFRLHD1y_bGhDZtUNoU2l__P9BeQRc8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008847337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</title><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Shidahara, H. ; Deie, M. ; Niimoto, T. ; Shimada, N. ; Toriyama, M. ; Adachi, N. ; Hirata, K. ; Urabe, Y. ; Ochi, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shidahara, H. ; Deie, M. ; Niimoto, T. ; Shimada, N. ; Toriyama, M. ; Adachi, N. ; Hirata, K. ; Urabe, Y. ; Ochi, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271675</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJSMDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Thieme</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Orthopedics & Biomechanics ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports medicine, 2011-05, Vol.32 (5), p.386-392</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-569f4e1d95620a4ebf38294b8c7bc2519bbe408e8630be4eecce4c4eb44041ef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0031-1271675.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0031-1271675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3004,3005,27905,27906,54540,54541</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24122940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shidahara, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niimoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toriyama, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urabe, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochi, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</title><title>International journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Orthopedics & Biomechanics</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0172-4622</issn><issn>1439-3964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKtb17MR3KTeJHceWZbiCwuKj3XIpDd0SjtTkxmh_96UFneu7l1853DOYexawERAnt9FDqAEF7IURZmfsJFApbnSBZ6yEYhSciykPGcXMa4ABGqhRky_hS5uyfXND2Uf_bDYZZ3PXpqWYr-k2Nhs6nsK2XQ2z97JdW3sw5Dorr1kZ96uI10d75h9Pdx_zp74_PXxeTadc4dQ9DwvtEcSC50XEixS7VUlNdaVK2snc6HrmhAqqgoF6SNyjtAlDhFQkFdjdnvw3Ybue0ixzKaJjtZr21I3RCMAqgpLpcqETg6oS6ViIG-2odnYsEuQ2W9kotlvZI4bJcHN0dtGZ9c-2NY18U8lUciUFRLHD1y_bGhDZtUNoU2l__P9BeQRc8w</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Shidahara, H.</creator><creator>Deie, M.</creator><creator>Niimoto, T.</creator><creator>Shimada, N.</creator><creator>Toriyama, M.</creator><creator>Adachi, N.</creator><creator>Hirata, K.</creator><creator>Urabe, Y.</creator><creator>Ochi, M.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</title><author>Shidahara, H. ; Deie, M. ; Niimoto, T. ; Shimada, N. ; Toriyama, M. ; Adachi, N. ; Hirata, K. ; Urabe, Y. ; Ochi, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-569f4e1d95620a4ebf38294b8c7bc2519bbe408e8630be4eecce4c4eb44041ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Orthopedics & Biomechanics</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shidahara, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niimoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toriyama, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urabe, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochi, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shidahara, H.</au><au>Deie, M.</au><au>Niimoto, T.</au><au>Shimada, N.</au><au>Toriyama, M.</au><au>Adachi, N.</au><au>Hirata, K.</au><au>Urabe, Y.</au><au>Ochi, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>386</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>386-392</pages><issn>0172-4622</issn><eissn>1439-3964</eissn><coden>IJSMDA</coden><abstract>Abstract
Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><doi>10.1055/s-0031-1271675</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0172-4622 |
ispartof | International journal of sports medicine, 2011-05, Vol.32 (5), p.386-392 |
issn | 0172-4622 1439-3964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1008847337 |
source | Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Orthopedics & Biomechanics Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports |
title | Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Study%20of%20Kinesthesia%20After%20ACL%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Shidahara,%20H.&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=386&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=386-392&rft.issn=0172-4622&rft.eissn=1439-3964&rft.coden=IJSMDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0031-1271675&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008847337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008847337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |