Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction

Abstract Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of sports medicine 2011-05, Vol.32 (5), p.386-392
Hauptverfasser: Shidahara, H., Deie, M., Niimoto, T., Shimada, N., Toriyama, M., Adachi, N., Hirata, K., Urabe, Y., Ochi, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 5
container_start_page 386
container_title International journal of sports medicine
container_volume 32
creator Shidahara, H.
Deie, M.
Niimoto, T.
Shimada, N.
Toriyama, M.
Adachi, N.
Hirata, K.
Urabe, Y.
Ochi, M.
description Abstract Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0031-1271675
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1008847337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008847337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-569f4e1d95620a4ebf38294b8c7bc2519bbe408e8630be4eecce4c4eb44041ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKtb17MR3KTeJHceWZbiCwuKj3XIpDd0SjtTkxmh_96UFneu7l1853DOYexawERAnt9FDqAEF7IURZmfsJFApbnSBZ6yEYhSciykPGcXMa4ABGqhRky_hS5uyfXND2Uf_bDYZZ3PXpqWYr-k2Nhs6nsK2XQ2z97JdW3sw5Dorr1kZ96uI10d75h9Pdx_zp74_PXxeTadc4dQ9DwvtEcSC50XEixS7VUlNdaVK2snc6HrmhAqqgoF6SNyjtAlDhFQkFdjdnvw3Ybue0ixzKaJjtZr21I3RCMAqgpLpcqETg6oS6ViIG-2odnYsEuQ2W9kotlvZI4bJcHN0dtGZ9c-2NY18U8lUciUFRLHD1y_bGhDZtUNoU2l__P9BeQRc8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008847337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</title><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Shidahara, H. ; Deie, M. ; Niimoto, T. ; Shimada, N. ; Toriyama, M. ; Adachi, N. ; Hirata, K. ; Urabe, Y. ; Ochi, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shidahara, H. ; Deie, M. ; Niimoto, T. ; Shimada, N. ; Toriyama, M. ; Adachi, N. ; Hirata, K. ; Urabe, Y. ; Ochi, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271675</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJSMDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Thieme</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Orthopedics &amp; Biomechanics ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports medicine, 2011-05, Vol.32 (5), p.386-392</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-569f4e1d95620a4ebf38294b8c7bc2519bbe408e8630be4eecce4c4eb44041ef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0031-1271675.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0031-1271675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3004,3005,27905,27906,54540,54541</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24122940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shidahara, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niimoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toriyama, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urabe, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochi, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</title><title>International journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Orthopedics &amp; Biomechanics</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0172-4622</issn><issn>1439-3964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKtb17MR3KTeJHceWZbiCwuKj3XIpDd0SjtTkxmh_96UFneu7l1853DOYexawERAnt9FDqAEF7IURZmfsJFApbnSBZ6yEYhSciykPGcXMa4ABGqhRky_hS5uyfXND2Uf_bDYZZ3PXpqWYr-k2Nhs6nsK2XQ2z97JdW3sw5Dorr1kZ96uI10d75h9Pdx_zp74_PXxeTadc4dQ9DwvtEcSC50XEixS7VUlNdaVK2snc6HrmhAqqgoF6SNyjtAlDhFQkFdjdnvw3Ybue0ixzKaJjtZr21I3RCMAqgpLpcqETg6oS6ViIG-2odnYsEuQ2W9kotlvZI4bJcHN0dtGZ9c-2NY18U8lUciUFRLHD1y_bGhDZtUNoU2l__P9BeQRc8w</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Shidahara, H.</creator><creator>Deie, M.</creator><creator>Niimoto, T.</creator><creator>Shimada, N.</creator><creator>Toriyama, M.</creator><creator>Adachi, N.</creator><creator>Hirata, K.</creator><creator>Urabe, Y.</creator><creator>Ochi, M.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</title><author>Shidahara, H. ; Deie, M. ; Niimoto, T. ; Shimada, N. ; Toriyama, M. ; Adachi, N. ; Hirata, K. ; Urabe, Y. ; Ochi, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-569f4e1d95620a4ebf38294b8c7bc2519bbe408e8630be4eecce4c4eb44041ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Orthopedics &amp; Biomechanics</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shidahara, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deie, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niimoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toriyama, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urabe, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochi, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shidahara, H.</au><au>Deie, M.</au><au>Niimoto, T.</au><au>Shimada, N.</au><au>Toriyama, M.</au><au>Adachi, N.</au><au>Hirata, K.</au><au>Urabe, Y.</au><au>Ochi, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>386</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>386-392</pages><issn>0172-4622</issn><eissn>1439-3964</eissn><coden>IJSMDA</coden><abstract>Abstract Previous studies used a variety of methods to assess kinesthesia, thus no consensus exists regarding kinesthetic adaptation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study prospectively examined whether kinesthesia is adapted after ACL reconstruction, and then discussed the actual angular velocity required to properly assess kinesthesia in ACL-reconstructed patients. 31 patients were evaluated using the threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) test, which was applied preoperatively, and at 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. TTDPMs were measured at 15° or 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion with angular velocities of 0.1°/s or 0.2°/s. ACL-reconstructed knees showed significantly impaired TTDPMs compared to healthy knees before the operation at 15° of knee flexion toward extension and at 45° of knee flexion toward both extension and flexion at 0.2°/s (15° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.036; 45° of knee flexion toward extension, P=0.015; 45° of knee flexion toward flexion, P=0.030). However, there were no significant differences after 3 months of follow-up. On the basis of these results, applying 0.2°/s seems appropriate to assess TTDPM for patients with an ACL reconstruction, and kinesthesia is adapted within 12 months after the operation. Sensory function and biomechanical stability are also adapted following ACL reconstruction.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><doi>10.1055/s-0031-1271675</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0172-4622
ispartof International journal of sports medicine, 2011-05, Vol.32 (5), p.386-392
issn 0172-4622
1439-3964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1008847337
source Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
title Prospective Study of Kinesthesia After ACL Reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Study%20of%20Kinesthesia%20After%20ACL%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Shidahara,%20H.&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=386&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=386-392&rft.issn=0172-4622&rft.eissn=1439-3964&rft.coden=IJSMDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0031-1271675&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008847337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008847337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true