Borylene Complexes (BH)L2 and Nitrogen Cation Complexes (N+)L2: Isoelectronic Homologues of Carbones CL2

Quantum chemical calculations using DFT (BP86, M05‐2X) and ab initio methods (CCSD(T), SCS‐MP2) have been carried out on the borylene complexes (BH)L2 and nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 with the ligands L=CO, N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC, and CAACmodel. The results are compared with those obtained for th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry : a European journal 2012-04, Vol.18 (18), p.5676-5692
Hauptverfasser: Celik, Mehmet Ali, Sure, Rebecca, Klein, Susanne, Kinjo, Rei, Bertrand, Guy, Frenking, Gernot
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5692
container_issue 18
container_start_page 5676
container_title Chemistry : a European journal
container_volume 18
creator Celik, Mehmet Ali
Sure, Rebecca
Klein, Susanne
Kinjo, Rei
Bertrand, Guy
Frenking, Gernot
description Quantum chemical calculations using DFT (BP86, M05‐2X) and ab initio methods (CCSD(T), SCS‐MP2) have been carried out on the borylene complexes (BH)L2 and nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 with the ligands L=CO, N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC, and CAACmodel. The results are compared with those obtained for the isoelectronic carbones CL2. The geometries and bond dissociation energies of the ligands, the proton affinities, and adducts with the Lewis acids BH3 and AuCl were calculated. The nature of the bonding has been analyzed with charge and energy partitioning methods. The calculated borylene complexes (BH)L2 have trigonal planar coordinated boron atoms which possess rather short BL bonds. The calculated bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the ligands for complexes where L is a carbene (NHC or CAAC) are very large (De=141.6–177.3 kcal mol−1) which suggest that such species might become isolated in a condensed phase. The borylene complexes (BH)(PPh3)2 and (BH)(CO)2 have intermediate bond strengths (De=90.1 and 92.6 kcal mol−1). Substituted homologues with bulky groups at boron which protect the boron atom from electrophilic attack might also be stable enough to become isolated. The BDE of (BH)(N2)2 is much smaller (De=31.9 kcal mol−1), but could become observable in a low‐temperature matrix. The proton affinities of the borylene complexes are very large, particularly for the bulky adducts with L=PPh3, NHCMe, CAACmodel and CAAC and thus, they are superbases. All (BH)L2 molecules bind strongly AuCl either η1 (L=N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC) or η2 (L=CO, CAACmodel). The BDEs of H3B(BH)L2 adducts which possess a hitherto unknown boron→boron donor–acceptor bond are smaller than for the AuCl complexes. The strongest bonded BH3 adduct that might be isolable is (BH)(PPh3)2BH3 (De=36.2 kcal mol−1). The analysis of the bonding situation reveals that (BH)L2 bonding comes mainly from the orbital interactions which has three major contributions, that is, the donation from the symmetric (σ) and antisymmetric (π||) combination of the ligand lone‐pair orbitals into the vacant MOs of BH L→(BH)←L and the L←(BH)→L π backdonation from the boron lone‐pair orbital. The nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 have strongly bent LNL geometries, in which the calculated bending angle varies between 113.9° (L=N2) and 146.9° (L=CAAC). The BDEs for (N+)L2 are much larger than those of the borylene complexes. The carbene ligands NHC and CAAC but also the phosphane ligands PPh3 bind very strongly betwee
doi_str_mv 10.1002/chem.201103965
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1008825505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3957832741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3235-3be36d2d00a1e73100f7629313c9f02deac6a09b95cef35706cb37e50915bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0UFP2zAUB3ALDUFhXHecIu0CQmHPfrWNdxsBGqaum8SkHS3HeYGwJC5JK-i3x1WhQjvZln9_-9mPsU8czjiA-OrvqT0TwDmgUXKHjbgUPEWt5Ac2AjPWqZJo9tnBMDwAgFGIe2xfiDGOFZgRu78I_aqhjpIstPOGnmlIji_yk6lIXFcms3rRhzvqkswt6tC9R7PTiL4lN0OghnxkXe2TPLShCXfLCEIVQ30RujjPpuIj261cM9DR63jIbq-v_mR5Ov01ucm-T9MaBcoUC0JVihLAcdIY31hpJQxy9KYCUZLzyoEpjPRUodSgfIGaJBguC4-H7Hhz6rwPj7GKhW3rwVPTuI7CcrDxvPNzISXISL_8Rx_Csu9ibZZrpZQ0Gtfq86taFi2Vdt7XretX9u0HIzAb8FQ3tNruc1jfJey6P3bbH5vlVz-3q5hNN9l6WNDzNuv6f1Zp1NL-nU1s_mNyfZn9RjvGF1zmj8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766659735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Borylene Complexes (BH)L2 and Nitrogen Cation Complexes (N+)L2: Isoelectronic Homologues of Carbones CL2</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Celik, Mehmet Ali ; Sure, Rebecca ; Klein, Susanne ; Kinjo, Rei ; Bertrand, Guy ; Frenking, Gernot</creator><creatorcontrib>Celik, Mehmet Ali ; Sure, Rebecca ; Klein, Susanne ; Kinjo, Rei ; Bertrand, Guy ; Frenking, Gernot</creatorcontrib><description>Quantum chemical calculations using DFT (BP86, M05‐2X) and ab initio methods (CCSD(T), SCS‐MP2) have been carried out on the borylene complexes (BH)L2 and nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 with the ligands L=CO, N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC, and CAACmodel. The results are compared with those obtained for the isoelectronic carbones CL2. The geometries and bond dissociation energies of the ligands, the proton affinities, and adducts with the Lewis acids BH3 and AuCl were calculated. The nature of the bonding has been analyzed with charge and energy partitioning methods. The calculated borylene complexes (BH)L2 have trigonal planar coordinated boron atoms which possess rather short BL bonds. The calculated bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the ligands for complexes where L is a carbene (NHC or CAAC) are very large (De=141.6–177.3 kcal mol−1) which suggest that such species might become isolated in a condensed phase. The borylene complexes (BH)(PPh3)2 and (BH)(CO)2 have intermediate bond strengths (De=90.1 and 92.6 kcal mol−1). Substituted homologues with bulky groups at boron which protect the boron atom from electrophilic attack might also be stable enough to become isolated. The BDE of (BH)(N2)2 is much smaller (De=31.9 kcal mol−1), but could become observable in a low‐temperature matrix. The proton affinities of the borylene complexes are very large, particularly for the bulky adducts with L=PPh3, NHCMe, CAACmodel and CAAC and thus, they are superbases. All (BH)L2 molecules bind strongly AuCl either η1 (L=N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC) or η2 (L=CO, CAACmodel). The BDEs of H3B(BH)L2 adducts which possess a hitherto unknown boron→boron donor–acceptor bond are smaller than for the AuCl complexes. The strongest bonded BH3 adduct that might be isolable is (BH)(PPh3)2BH3 (De=36.2 kcal mol−1). The analysis of the bonding situation reveals that (BH)L2 bonding comes mainly from the orbital interactions which has three major contributions, that is, the donation from the symmetric (σ) and antisymmetric (π||) combination of the ligand lone‐pair orbitals into the vacant MOs of BH L→(BH)←L and the L←(BH)→L π backdonation from the boron lone‐pair orbital. The nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 have strongly bent LNL geometries, in which the calculated bending angle varies between 113.9° (L=N2) and 146.9° (L=CAAC). The BDEs for (N+)L2 are much larger than those of the borylene complexes. The carbene ligands NHC and CAAC but also the phosphane ligands PPh3 bind very strongly between De=358.4 kcal mol−1 (L=PPh3) and De=412.5 kcal mol−1 (L=CAACmodel). The proton affinities (PA) of (N+)L2 are much smaller and they bind AuCl and BH3 less strongly compared with (BH)L2. However, the PAs (N+)L2 for complexes with bulky ligands L are still between 139.9 kcal mol−1 (L=CAACmodel) and 168.5 kcal mol−1 (L=CAAC). The analysis of the (N+)L2 bonding situation reveals that the binding interactions come mainly from the L→(N+)←L donation while L←(N+)→L π backdonation is rather weak. Quantum chemical calculations suggest that the bonding model for carbones CL2 in terms of donor–acceptor interactions L→C←L is also valid for the isoelectronic systems (BH)L2 and (N+)L2. The nature of the donor–acceptor bonds and the theoretically predicted equilibrium geometries and bond dissociation energies of (BH)L2, (N+)L2 and CL2 with L=CO, N2, PPh3 and the carbene ligands NHCMe, CAACmodel, and CAAC are discussed (see figure). NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene; CAAC=cyclic alkyl amino carbene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0947-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/chem.201103965</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22434609</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEUJED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>bonding analysis ; Boron ; carbones ; Chemistry ; donor-acceptor systems ; Ligands ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen cation complexes ; quantum chemistry</subject><ispartof>Chemistry : a European journal, 2012-04, Vol.18 (18), p.5676-5692</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fchem.201103965$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fchem.201103965$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22434609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celik, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sure, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinjo, Rei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenking, Gernot</creatorcontrib><title>Borylene Complexes (BH)L2 and Nitrogen Cation Complexes (N+)L2: Isoelectronic Homologues of Carbones CL2</title><title>Chemistry : a European journal</title><addtitle>Chem. Eur. J</addtitle><description>Quantum chemical calculations using DFT (BP86, M05‐2X) and ab initio methods (CCSD(T), SCS‐MP2) have been carried out on the borylene complexes (BH)L2 and nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 with the ligands L=CO, N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC, and CAACmodel. The results are compared with those obtained for the isoelectronic carbones CL2. The geometries and bond dissociation energies of the ligands, the proton affinities, and adducts with the Lewis acids BH3 and AuCl were calculated. The nature of the bonding has been analyzed with charge and energy partitioning methods. The calculated borylene complexes (BH)L2 have trigonal planar coordinated boron atoms which possess rather short BL bonds. The calculated bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the ligands for complexes where L is a carbene (NHC or CAAC) are very large (De=141.6–177.3 kcal mol−1) which suggest that such species might become isolated in a condensed phase. The borylene complexes (BH)(PPh3)2 and (BH)(CO)2 have intermediate bond strengths (De=90.1 and 92.6 kcal mol−1). Substituted homologues with bulky groups at boron which protect the boron atom from electrophilic attack might also be stable enough to become isolated. The BDE of (BH)(N2)2 is much smaller (De=31.9 kcal mol−1), but could become observable in a low‐temperature matrix. The proton affinities of the borylene complexes are very large, particularly for the bulky adducts with L=PPh3, NHCMe, CAACmodel and CAAC and thus, they are superbases. All (BH)L2 molecules bind strongly AuCl either η1 (L=N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC) or η2 (L=CO, CAACmodel). The BDEs of H3B(BH)L2 adducts which possess a hitherto unknown boron→boron donor–acceptor bond are smaller than for the AuCl complexes. The strongest bonded BH3 adduct that might be isolable is (BH)(PPh3)2BH3 (De=36.2 kcal mol−1). The analysis of the bonding situation reveals that (BH)L2 bonding comes mainly from the orbital interactions which has three major contributions, that is, the donation from the symmetric (σ) and antisymmetric (π||) combination of the ligand lone‐pair orbitals into the vacant MOs of BH L→(BH)←L and the L←(BH)→L π backdonation from the boron lone‐pair orbital. The nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 have strongly bent LNL geometries, in which the calculated bending angle varies between 113.9° (L=N2) and 146.9° (L=CAAC). The BDEs for (N+)L2 are much larger than those of the borylene complexes. The carbene ligands NHC and CAAC but also the phosphane ligands PPh3 bind very strongly between De=358.4 kcal mol−1 (L=PPh3) and De=412.5 kcal mol−1 (L=CAACmodel). The proton affinities (PA) of (N+)L2 are much smaller and they bind AuCl and BH3 less strongly compared with (BH)L2. However, the PAs (N+)L2 for complexes with bulky ligands L are still between 139.9 kcal mol−1 (L=CAACmodel) and 168.5 kcal mol−1 (L=CAAC). The analysis of the (N+)L2 bonding situation reveals that the binding interactions come mainly from the L→(N+)←L donation while L←(N+)→L π backdonation is rather weak. Quantum chemical calculations suggest that the bonding model for carbones CL2 in terms of donor–acceptor interactions L→C←L is also valid for the isoelectronic systems (BH)L2 and (N+)L2. The nature of the donor–acceptor bonds and the theoretically predicted equilibrium geometries and bond dissociation energies of (BH)L2, (N+)L2 and CL2 with L=CO, N2, PPh3 and the carbene ligands NHCMe, CAACmodel, and CAAC are discussed (see figure). NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene; CAAC=cyclic alkyl amino carbene.</description><subject>bonding analysis</subject><subject>Boron</subject><subject>carbones</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>donor-acceptor systems</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen cation complexes</subject><subject>quantum chemistry</subject><issn>0947-6539</issn><issn>1521-3765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0UFP2zAUB3ALDUFhXHecIu0CQmHPfrWNdxsBGqaum8SkHS3HeYGwJC5JK-i3x1WhQjvZln9_-9mPsU8czjiA-OrvqT0TwDmgUXKHjbgUPEWt5Ac2AjPWqZJo9tnBMDwAgFGIe2xfiDGOFZgRu78I_aqhjpIstPOGnmlIji_yk6lIXFcms3rRhzvqkswt6tC9R7PTiL4lN0OghnxkXe2TPLShCXfLCEIVQ30RujjPpuIj261cM9DR63jIbq-v_mR5Ov01ucm-T9MaBcoUC0JVihLAcdIY31hpJQxy9KYCUZLzyoEpjPRUodSgfIGaJBguC4-H7Hhz6rwPj7GKhW3rwVPTuI7CcrDxvPNzISXISL_8Rx_Csu9ibZZrpZQ0Gtfq86taFi2Vdt7XretX9u0HIzAb8FQ3tNruc1jfJey6P3bbH5vlVz-3q5hNN9l6WNDzNuv6f1Zp1NL-nU1s_mNyfZn9RjvGF1zmj8U</recordid><startdate>20120427</startdate><enddate>20120427</enddate><creator>Celik, Mehmet Ali</creator><creator>Sure, Rebecca</creator><creator>Klein, Susanne</creator><creator>Kinjo, Rei</creator><creator>Bertrand, Guy</creator><creator>Frenking, Gernot</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120427</creationdate><title>Borylene Complexes (BH)L2 and Nitrogen Cation Complexes (N+)L2: Isoelectronic Homologues of Carbones CL2</title><author>Celik, Mehmet Ali ; Sure, Rebecca ; Klein, Susanne ; Kinjo, Rei ; Bertrand, Guy ; Frenking, Gernot</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3235-3be36d2d00a1e73100f7629313c9f02deac6a09b95cef35706cb37e50915bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>bonding analysis</topic><topic>Boron</topic><topic>carbones</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>donor-acceptor systems</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen cation complexes</topic><topic>quantum chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celik, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sure, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinjo, Rei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenking, Gernot</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celik, Mehmet Ali</au><au>Sure, Rebecca</au><au>Klein, Susanne</au><au>Kinjo, Rei</au><au>Bertrand, Guy</au><au>Frenking, Gernot</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Borylene Complexes (BH)L2 and Nitrogen Cation Complexes (N+)L2: Isoelectronic Homologues of Carbones CL2</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle><addtitle>Chem. Eur. J</addtitle><date>2012-04-27</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>5676</spage><epage>5692</epage><pages>5676-5692</pages><issn>0947-6539</issn><eissn>1521-3765</eissn><coden>CEUJED</coden><abstract>Quantum chemical calculations using DFT (BP86, M05‐2X) and ab initio methods (CCSD(T), SCS‐MP2) have been carried out on the borylene complexes (BH)L2 and nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 with the ligands L=CO, N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC, and CAACmodel. The results are compared with those obtained for the isoelectronic carbones CL2. The geometries and bond dissociation energies of the ligands, the proton affinities, and adducts with the Lewis acids BH3 and AuCl were calculated. The nature of the bonding has been analyzed with charge and energy partitioning methods. The calculated borylene complexes (BH)L2 have trigonal planar coordinated boron atoms which possess rather short BL bonds. The calculated bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the ligands for complexes where L is a carbene (NHC or CAAC) are very large (De=141.6–177.3 kcal mol−1) which suggest that such species might become isolated in a condensed phase. The borylene complexes (BH)(PPh3)2 and (BH)(CO)2 have intermediate bond strengths (De=90.1 and 92.6 kcal mol−1). Substituted homologues with bulky groups at boron which protect the boron atom from electrophilic attack might also be stable enough to become isolated. The BDE of (BH)(N2)2 is much smaller (De=31.9 kcal mol−1), but could become observable in a low‐temperature matrix. The proton affinities of the borylene complexes are very large, particularly for the bulky adducts with L=PPh3, NHCMe, CAACmodel and CAAC and thus, they are superbases. All (BH)L2 molecules bind strongly AuCl either η1 (L=N2, PPh3, NHCMe, CAAC) or η2 (L=CO, CAACmodel). The BDEs of H3B(BH)L2 adducts which possess a hitherto unknown boron→boron donor–acceptor bond are smaller than for the AuCl complexes. The strongest bonded BH3 adduct that might be isolable is (BH)(PPh3)2BH3 (De=36.2 kcal mol−1). The analysis of the bonding situation reveals that (BH)L2 bonding comes mainly from the orbital interactions which has three major contributions, that is, the donation from the symmetric (σ) and antisymmetric (π||) combination of the ligand lone‐pair orbitals into the vacant MOs of BH L→(BH)←L and the L←(BH)→L π backdonation from the boron lone‐pair orbital. The nitrogen cation complexes (N+)L2 have strongly bent LNL geometries, in which the calculated bending angle varies between 113.9° (L=N2) and 146.9° (L=CAAC). The BDEs for (N+)L2 are much larger than those of the borylene complexes. The carbene ligands NHC and CAAC but also the phosphane ligands PPh3 bind very strongly between De=358.4 kcal mol−1 (L=PPh3) and De=412.5 kcal mol−1 (L=CAACmodel). The proton affinities (PA) of (N+)L2 are much smaller and they bind AuCl and BH3 less strongly compared with (BH)L2. However, the PAs (N+)L2 for complexes with bulky ligands L are still between 139.9 kcal mol−1 (L=CAACmodel) and 168.5 kcal mol−1 (L=CAAC). The analysis of the (N+)L2 bonding situation reveals that the binding interactions come mainly from the L→(N+)←L donation while L←(N+)→L π backdonation is rather weak. Quantum chemical calculations suggest that the bonding model for carbones CL2 in terms of donor–acceptor interactions L→C←L is also valid for the isoelectronic systems (BH)L2 and (N+)L2. The nature of the donor–acceptor bonds and the theoretically predicted equilibrium geometries and bond dissociation energies of (BH)L2, (N+)L2 and CL2 with L=CO, N2, PPh3 and the carbene ligands NHCMe, CAACmodel, and CAAC are discussed (see figure). NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene; CAAC=cyclic alkyl amino carbene.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>22434609</pmid><doi>10.1002/chem.201103965</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0947-6539
ispartof Chemistry : a European journal, 2012-04, Vol.18 (18), p.5676-5692
issn 0947-6539
1521-3765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1008825505
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects bonding analysis
Boron
carbones
Chemistry
donor-acceptor systems
Ligands
Nitrogen
nitrogen cation complexes
quantum chemistry
title Borylene Complexes (BH)L2 and Nitrogen Cation Complexes (N+)L2: Isoelectronic Homologues of Carbones CL2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A09%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Borylene%20Complexes%20(BH)L2%20and%20Nitrogen%20Cation%20Complexes%20(N+)L2:%20Isoelectronic%20Homologues%20of%20Carbones%20CL2&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20:%20a%20European%20journal&rft.au=Celik,%20Mehmet%20Ali&rft.date=2012-04-27&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=5676&rft.epage=5692&rft.pages=5676-5692&rft.issn=0947-6539&rft.eissn=1521-3765&rft.coden=CEUJED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/chem.201103965&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3957832741%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766659735&rft_id=info:pmid/22434609&rfr_iscdi=true