Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison
Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2012-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4515-4522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 4515 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Schubert, Carsten J Diem, Torsten Eugster, Werner |
description | Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es203465x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1002511867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1002511867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u1DAURi0EotPCghdA3iCB1IB_kwy7IZ0BpKlYFAS76Ma-0aQ49mAnqPM0vCquOhQhsbry1dF35fMR8oyz15wJ_gaTYFKV-uYBWXAtWKFrzR-SBWNcFktZfjshpyldM8aEZPVjciKEkiVnakF-XeK0A490PQ4pDcEn2scwUqBXIzhHvw7e0qvdgM6ipVv4jvQCJ4zj4PO7O9C1tQfahJ8QB_AGz-nGzTe02cHYYUzndOXNLsTMbmbv0eUN5MR3YfYW4oFeBouONuDM7GC6vf-WrnLeuM-BKfgn5FEPLuHT4zwjXzbrz82HYvvp_cdmtS1AcT4VwmhcwlIrLowsO1sxq5e2k5Xpei6XXGFfaVFhD1Yyq2pllWISSyMAelaBPCMv73L3MfyYMU1t9mHQuewmzKnl2Z3mvC6rjL66Q00MKUXs230cxvyZDLW3fbT3fWT2-TF27ka09-SfAjLw4ghAMuD6mCUO6S-nay7-4cCk9jrM0Wcb_zn4G1Chn0U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1002511867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Schubert, Carsten J ; Diem, Torsten ; Eugster, Werner</creator><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Carsten J ; Diem, Torsten ; Eugster, Werner</creatorcontrib><description>Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es203465x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22436104</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Lakes - chemistry ; Meteorology ; Methane - analysis ; Methane - metabolism ; Methylococcaceae - metabolism ; Models, Theoretical ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Switzerland ; Water Microbiology ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants - analysis ; Water Pollutants - metabolism ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2012-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4515-4522</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es203465x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es203465x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25812104$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Carsten J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diem, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Werner</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Lakes - chemistry</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Methane - metabolism</subject><subject>Methylococcaceae - metabolism</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - metabolism</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1u1DAURi0EotPCghdA3iCB1IB_kwy7IZ0BpKlYFAS76Ma-0aQ49mAnqPM0vCquOhQhsbry1dF35fMR8oyz15wJ_gaTYFKV-uYBWXAtWKFrzR-SBWNcFktZfjshpyldM8aEZPVjciKEkiVnakF-XeK0A490PQ4pDcEn2scwUqBXIzhHvw7e0qvdgM6ipVv4jvQCJ4zj4PO7O9C1tQfahJ8QB_AGz-nGzTe02cHYYUzndOXNLsTMbmbv0eUN5MR3YfYW4oFeBouONuDM7GC6vf-WrnLeuM-BKfgn5FEPLuHT4zwjXzbrz82HYvvp_cdmtS1AcT4VwmhcwlIrLowsO1sxq5e2k5Xpei6XXGFfaVFhD1Yyq2pllWISSyMAelaBPCMv73L3MfyYMU1t9mHQuewmzKnl2Z3mvC6rjL66Q00MKUXs230cxvyZDLW3fbT3fWT2-TF27ka09-SfAjLw4ghAMuD6mCUO6S-nay7-4cCk9jrM0Wcb_zn4G1Chn0U</recordid><startdate>20120417</startdate><enddate>20120417</enddate><creator>Schubert, Carsten J</creator><creator>Diem, Torsten</creator><creator>Eugster, Werner</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120417</creationdate><title>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</title><author>Schubert, Carsten J ; Diem, Torsten ; Eugster, Werner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Lakes - chemistry</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Methane - metabolism</topic><topic>Methylococcaceae - metabolism</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - metabolism</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Carsten J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diem, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Werner</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schubert, Carsten J</au><au>Diem, Torsten</au><au>Eugster, Werner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2012-04-17</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4515</spage><epage>4522</epage><pages>4515-4522</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>22436104</pmid><doi>10.1021/es203465x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2012-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4515-4522 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1002511867 |
source | MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals |
subjects | Air Pollutants - analysis Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change Earth, ocean, space Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Lakes - chemistry Meteorology Methane - analysis Methane - metabolism Methylococcaceae - metabolism Models, Theoretical Oxidation-Reduction Switzerland Water Microbiology Water Movements Water Pollutants - analysis Water Pollutants - metabolism Wind |
title | Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Emissions%20from%20a%20Small%20Wind%20Shielded%20Lake%20Determined%20by%20Eddy%20Covariance,%20Flux%20Chambers,%20Anchored%20Funnels,%20and%20Boundary%20Model%20Calculations:%20A%20Comparison&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Schubert,%20Carsten%20J&rft.date=2012-04-17&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4515&rft.epage=4522&rft.pages=4515-4522&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es203465x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1002511867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1002511867&rft_id=info:pmid/22436104&rfr_iscdi=true |