Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison

Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2012-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4515-4522
Hauptverfasser: Schubert, Carsten J, Diem, Torsten, Eugster, Werner
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4522
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4515
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 46
creator Schubert, Carsten J
Diem, Torsten
Eugster, Werner
description Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es203465x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1002511867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1002511867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u1DAURi0EotPCghdA3iCB1IB_kwy7IZ0BpKlYFAS76Ma-0aQ49mAnqPM0vCquOhQhsbry1dF35fMR8oyz15wJ_gaTYFKV-uYBWXAtWKFrzR-SBWNcFktZfjshpyldM8aEZPVjciKEkiVnakF-XeK0A490PQ4pDcEn2scwUqBXIzhHvw7e0qvdgM6ipVv4jvQCJ4zj4PO7O9C1tQfahJ8QB_AGz-nGzTe02cHYYUzndOXNLsTMbmbv0eUN5MR3YfYW4oFeBouONuDM7GC6vf-WrnLeuM-BKfgn5FEPLuHT4zwjXzbrz82HYvvp_cdmtS1AcT4VwmhcwlIrLowsO1sxq5e2k5Xpei6XXGFfaVFhD1Yyq2pllWISSyMAelaBPCMv73L3MfyYMU1t9mHQuewmzKnl2Z3mvC6rjL66Q00MKUXs230cxvyZDLW3fbT3fWT2-TF27ka09-SfAjLw4ghAMuD6mCUO6S-nay7-4cCk9jrM0Wcb_zn4G1Chn0U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1002511867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Schubert, Carsten J ; Diem, Torsten ; Eugster, Werner</creator><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Carsten J ; Diem, Torsten ; Eugster, Werner</creatorcontrib><description>Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es203465x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22436104</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Lakes - chemistry ; Meteorology ; Methane - analysis ; Methane - metabolism ; Methylococcaceae - metabolism ; Models, Theoretical ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Switzerland ; Water Microbiology ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants - analysis ; Water Pollutants - metabolism ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2012-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4515-4522</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es203465x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es203465x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25812104$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Carsten J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diem, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Werner</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Lakes - chemistry</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Methane - metabolism</subject><subject>Methylococcaceae - metabolism</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - metabolism</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1u1DAURi0EotPCghdA3iCB1IB_kwy7IZ0BpKlYFAS76Ma-0aQ49mAnqPM0vCquOhQhsbry1dF35fMR8oyz15wJ_gaTYFKV-uYBWXAtWKFrzR-SBWNcFktZfjshpyldM8aEZPVjciKEkiVnakF-XeK0A490PQ4pDcEn2scwUqBXIzhHvw7e0qvdgM6ipVv4jvQCJ4zj4PO7O9C1tQfahJ8QB_AGz-nGzTe02cHYYUzndOXNLsTMbmbv0eUN5MR3YfYW4oFeBouONuDM7GC6vf-WrnLeuM-BKfgn5FEPLuHT4zwjXzbrz82HYvvp_cdmtS1AcT4VwmhcwlIrLowsO1sxq5e2k5Xpei6XXGFfaVFhD1Yyq2pllWISSyMAelaBPCMv73L3MfyYMU1t9mHQuewmzKnl2Z3mvC6rjL66Q00MKUXs230cxvyZDLW3fbT3fWT2-TF27ka09-SfAjLw4ghAMuD6mCUO6S-nay7-4cCk9jrM0Wcb_zn4G1Chn0U</recordid><startdate>20120417</startdate><enddate>20120417</enddate><creator>Schubert, Carsten J</creator><creator>Diem, Torsten</creator><creator>Eugster, Werner</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120417</creationdate><title>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</title><author>Schubert, Carsten J ; Diem, Torsten ; Eugster, Werner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-2c5e9a95412c36bd70d59db37cbf13914ef7527efad30d484d4403e6c2aaf07a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Lakes - chemistry</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Methane - metabolism</topic><topic>Methylococcaceae - metabolism</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - metabolism</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Carsten J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diem, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Werner</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schubert, Carsten J</au><au>Diem, Torsten</au><au>Eugster, Werner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2012-04-17</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4515</spage><epage>4522</epage><pages>4515-4522</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Lakes are large sources of methane, held to be responsible for 18% of the radiative forcing, to the atmosphere. Periods of lake overturn (during fall/winter) are short and therefore difficult to capture with field campaigns but potentially one of the most important periods for methane emissions. We studied methane emissions using four different methods, including eddy covariance measurements, floating chambers, anchored funnels, and boundary model calculations. Whereas the first three methods agreed rather well, boundary model estimates were 5–30 times lower leading to a strong underestimation of methane fluxes from aquatic systems. These results show the importance of ebullition as the most important flux pathway and the need for continuous measurements with a large footprint covering also shallow parts of lakes. Although fluxes were high, on average 4 mmol m–2 d–1 during the overturn period, water column microbial methane oxidation removed 75% of the methane and only 25% of potential emissions were released to the atmosphere. Hence, this study illustrates second the importance of considering methane oxidation when estimating the flux of methane from lakes during overturn periods.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>22436104</pmid><doi>10.1021/es203465x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2012-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4515-4522
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1002511867
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Air Pollutants - analysis
Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change
Earth, ocean, space
Environmental Monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Lakes - chemistry
Meteorology
Methane - analysis
Methane - metabolism
Methylococcaceae - metabolism
Models, Theoretical
Oxidation-Reduction
Switzerland
Water Microbiology
Water Movements
Water Pollutants - analysis
Water Pollutants - metabolism
Wind
title Methane Emissions from a Small Wind Shielded Lake Determined by Eddy Covariance, Flux Chambers, Anchored Funnels, and Boundary Model Calculations: A Comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Emissions%20from%20a%20Small%20Wind%20Shielded%20Lake%20Determined%20by%20Eddy%20Covariance,%20Flux%20Chambers,%20Anchored%20Funnels,%20and%20Boundary%20Model%20Calculations:%20A%20Comparison&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Schubert,%20Carsten%20J&rft.date=2012-04-17&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4515&rft.epage=4522&rft.pages=4515-4522&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es203465x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1002511867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1002511867&rft_id=info:pmid/22436104&rfr_iscdi=true